Skip to main content
Log in

The Prognostic Impact of KRAS Mutation in Patients Having Curative Resection of Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

m-KRAS has been recently reported to be a significant prognostic factor in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases. This is due to the lack of response to monoclonal epithelial growth factor receptor antibodies, and potentially as a result of a more aggressive tumor biology.

Methods

The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients with known KRAS status presenting with colorectal cancer and liver metastases who underwent resection of the primary tumor and metastatic disease between 2010 and 2015.

Results

A total of 2655 patients were identified of which 1116 (42%) had m-KRAS. Tumor size, lymph node involvement rates, and margin status of the primary tumor were similar between patients with m-KRAS and wild-type KRAS (wt-KRAS). In the multivariable analysis, African-American race and right-sided colon cancers were independently associated with m-KRAS (both p < 0.001). m-KRAS patients had a significantly lower overall survival (OS) than those with wt-KRAS, with a 3- and 5-year OS of 51 vs. 64% and 31 vs. 42%, respectively (p < 0.001). After adjustment for available prognostic confounders, factors independently associated with worse OS were increasing age, receipt of monoagent chemotherapy, tumor size, positive lymph node, and resection margin status of the primary tumor, right-sided cancers, and m-KRAS.

Conclusions

m-KRAS is associated with worse OS in patients presenting with colorectal cancer and liver metastases undergoing resection of the primary tumor and metastatic disease. Right-sided lesions and African-American race were associated with m-KRAS. However, while right-sided remained an independent prognostic factor for OS, race did not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tosi F, Magni E, Amatu A, Mauri G, Bencardino K, Truini M et al. Effect of KRAS and BRAF Mutations on Survival of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Liver Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clinical colorectal cancer. 2017;16(3):e153-e63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2017.01.004.

  2. Hayashi M, Inoue Y, Komeda K, Shimizu T, Asakuma M, Hirokawa F et al. Clinicopathological analysis of recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis. BMC surgery. 2010;10:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-10-27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan DLH, Segelov E, Wong RS, Smith A, Herbertson RA, Li BT et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors for metastatic colorectal cancer. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017;6:Cd007047. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007047.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Hitre E, Zaluski J, Chang Chien CR, Makhson A et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. The New England journal of medicine. 2009;360(14):1408–17. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0805019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Lang I, Folprecht G, Nowacki MP, Cascinu S et al. Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2011;29(15):2011–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2010.33.5091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brudvik KW, Kopetz SE, Li L, Conrad C, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN. Meta-analysis of KRAS mutations and survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. The British journal of surgery. 2015;102(10):1175–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9870.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vauthey JN, Zimmitti G, Kopetz SE, Shindoh J, Chen SS, Andreou A et al. RAS mutation status predicts survival and patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Annals of surgery. 2013;258(4):619–26; discussion 26–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a5025a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brudvik KW, Vauthey JN. Surgery: KRAS mutations and hepatic recurrence after treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Nature reviews Gastroenterology & hepatology. 2017;14(11):638–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2017.129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brudvik KW, Mise Y, Chung MH, Chun YS, Kopetz SE, Passot G et al. RAS Mutation Predicts Positive Resection Margins and Narrower Resection Margins in Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases. Annals of surgical oncology. 2016;23(8):2635–43. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5187-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamashita S, Chun YS, Kopetz SE, Vauthey JN. Biomarkers in colorectal liver metastases. The British journal of surgery. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10834.

  11. National Cancer Database ncdbpuf.facs.org. 2018. Accessed March 2018.

  12. C Percy, A Fritz, A Jack, K Shanmugarathnam, L Sobin, DM Parkin, S Whelan. International Classification of Disease for Oncology. Third ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, Sobrero A, Van Krieken JH, Aderka D et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. 2016;27(8):1386–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2017. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp#site. Accessed May 2017.

  15. Charlton ME, Kahl AR, Greenbaum AA, Karlitz JJ, Lin C, Lynch CF et al. KRAS Testing, Tumor Location, and Survival in Patients With Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: SEER 2010-2013. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN. 2017;15(12):1484–93. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2017.7011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Staudacher JJ, Yazici C, Bul V, Zeidan J, Khalid A, Xia Y et al. Increased Frequency of KRAS Mutations in African Americans Compared with Caucasians in Sporadic Colorectal Cancer. Clinical and translational gastroenterology. 2017;8(10):e124. https://doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2017.48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gabriel E, Attwood K, Al-Sukhni E, Erwin D, Boland P, Nurkin S. Age-related rates of colorectal cancer and the factors associated with overall survival. Journal of gastrointestinal oncology. 2018;9(1):96–110. https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo.2017.11.13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Alexander DD, Waterbor J, Hughes T, Funkhouser E, Grizzle W, Manne U. African-American and Caucasian disparities in colorectal cancer mortality and survival by data source: an epidemiologic review. Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers. 2007;3(6):301–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Newman LA, Kaljee LM. Health Disparities and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in African American Women: A Review. JAMA surgery. 2017;152(5):485–93. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Petrelli F, Tomasello G, Borgonovo K, Ghidini M, Turati L, Dallera P et al. Prognostic Survival Associated With Left-Sided vs Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA oncology. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4227.

  21. Taieb J, Kourie HR, Emile JF, Le Malicot K, Balogoun R, Tabernero J et al. Association of Prognostic Value of Primary Tumor Location in Stage III Colon Cancer With RAS and BRAF Mutational Status. JAMA oncology. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3695.

  22. Winchester DP, Stewart AK, Phillips JL, Ward EE. The national cancer data base: past, present, and future. Annals of surgical oncology. 2010;17(1):4–7. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0771-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Annals of surgical oncology. 2008;15(3):683–90. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9747-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Each author provided substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafted/revised the work critically for important intellectual content; approved the version to be published; and agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Imran Hassan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The data used in the study are derived from a de-identified NCDB file. The American College of Surgeons and the Commission on Cancer have not verified and are not responsible for the analytic or statistical methodology employed, or the conclusions drawn from these data by the investigator.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goffredo, P., Utria, A.F., Beck, A.C. et al. The Prognostic Impact of KRAS Mutation in Patients Having Curative Resection of Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases. J Gastrointest Surg 23, 1957–1963 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3978-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3978-4

Keywords

Navigation