Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting Individual Survival After Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Novel Nomogram from the “HCC East & West Study Group”

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Introductions

Different staging systems have been devised for patients undergoing resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with disparate results. The aim of this study was to create a new nomogram to predict individual survival after hepatectomy for HCC.

Methods

Based on the “Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Eastern & Western Experiences Network,” data from 2046 patients who underwent HCC resections at ten centers were reviewed. Patient survival was analyzed with Cox-regression analysis to construct a unique nomogram and contour plots to predict survival.

Results

The nomograms built on the multivariate analyses, which showed that the independent predictors were tumor size, tumor number, vascular invasion, cirrhosis, preoperative bilirubin value, and esophageal varices, showed good calibration and discriminatory abilities with C-index value of 0.62 (95 % CI, 0.59–0.69) and 0.61 (95 % CI, 0.56–0.64) for overall and disease-free survival, respectively. The 5-year survival contour plots showed that the presence of vascular invasion was associated with decreased survival, regardless of the tumor number or size. Cirrhosis and varices were equally associated with decreased survival, according to the tumor number or size.

Conclusions

These nomograms accurately predict individual prognosis after HCC resection and support an expansion of the selection criteria for resection. They offer useful guidance to clinicians for individual survival prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caldwell S, Park SH. The epidemiology of hepatocellular cancer: from the perspectives of public health problem to tumor biology. J Gastroenterol 2009;44(S19):96–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Venook AP, Papandreou C, Furuse J, et al. The incidence and epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: a global and regional perspective. Oncologist 2010;15(S4):5–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mazzaferro V, Llovet JM, Miceli R, et al. Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a retrospective, exploratory analysis. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:35–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:693–699.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Torzilli G, Belghiti J, Kokudo N, et al. A snapshot of the effective indications and results of surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma in tertiary referral centers: is it adherent to the EASL/AASLD recommendations?: an observational study of the HCC East-West study group. Ann Surg 2013;257:929–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 2011;53:1020–1022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, et al. Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol 2001;35:421–430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Llovet JM, Bru C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis 1999;19:329–338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Terminology Committee of the IHPBA (authors). Terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB Surg 200;2:333–339.

  10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–213.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Groenwold RH, Hak E, Hoes AW. Quantitative assessment of unobserved confounding is mandatory in nonrandomized intervention studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:22–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harrell Jr. FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996;15:361–387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bruix J, Fuster J. A snapshot of the effective indications and results of surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma in tertiary referral centers: is it adherent to the EASL/AASLD recommendations? An observational study of the HCC east-west study group. Ann Surg 2015;262:e30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mazzaferro V, Roayaie S, Poon R, et al. Dissecting EASL/AASLD recommendations with a more careful knife: a comment on “surgical misinterpretation” of the BCLC staging system. Ann Surg 2015;262:e17-18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bruix J, Castells A, Bosch J, et al. Surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: prognostic value of preoperative portal pressure. Gastroenterology 1996; 111:1018–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Llovet JM, Bustamante J, Castells A, et al. Natural history of untreated nonsurgical hepatocellular carcinoma: rationale for the design and evaluation of therapeutic trials. Hepatology 1999;29:62–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:378–390.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Torzilli G, Belghiti J, Kokudo N, et al. Reply to the Letter to the Editor titled “Dissecting EASL/AASLD Recommendations With a More Careful Knife: A Comment on ‘Surgical Misinterpretation’ of the BCLC Staging System”: Real Misinterpretation or Lack of Clarity within the BCLC? Ann Surg 2015;262:e18-19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Torzilli G, Belghiti J, Kokudo N, et al. Reply to the letter to the editor entitled “A snapshot of the effective indications and results of surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma in tertiary referral centers: is it adherent to the EASL/AASLD recommendations? An observational study of the HCC east-west study group”: when the study setting “ignores” the patients. Ann Surg 2015;262:e30-31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mariani L, Miceli R, Kattan MW, et al. Validation and adaptation of a nomogram for predicting the survival of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma using a three-grade system. Cancer 2005; 03:402–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sternberg CN. Are nomograms better than currently available stage groupings for bladder cancer? J Clin Oncol 2006;24:3819–3820.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang HI, Sherman M, Su J, et al. Nomograms for risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:2437–2444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cho CS, Gonen M, Shia J, et al. A novel prognostic nomogram is more accurate than conventional staging systems for predicting survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2008;206:281–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shim JH, Jun MJ, Han S, et al. Prognostic Nomograms for Prediction of Recurrence and Survival After Curative Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Ann Surg 2014;261:939–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Edge SB (2009) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (ed 7) Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan, Okamoto E (1997) Classification of Primary Liver Cancer.

  27. Capussotti L, Ferrero A, Vigano L, et al. Portal hypertension: contraindication to liver surgery? World J Surg 2006;30:992–999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cucchetti A, Ercolani G, Vivarelli M, et al. Is portal hypertension a contraindication to hepatic resection? Ann Surg 2009; 250:922–928.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Torzilli G, Donadon M, Marconi M, et al. Hepatectomy for stage B and stage C hepatocellular carcinoma in the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification: results of a prospective analysis. Arch Surg 2008;143:1082–1090.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hoshida Y, Villanueva A, Kobayashi M, et al. Gene expression in fixed tissues and outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1995–2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee SC, Tan HT, Chung MC. Prognostic biomarkers for prediction of recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status and future prospects. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:3112–3124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Zender L, Villanueva A, Tovar V, et al. Cancer gene discovery in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2010;52:921–929.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Claudio Iannacone and his team for the support with the statistical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido Torzilli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torzilli, G., Donadon, M., Belghiti, J. et al. Predicting Individual Survival After Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Novel Nomogram from the “HCC East & West Study Group”. J Gastrointest Surg 20, 1154–1162 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3132-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3132-0

Keywords

Navigation