Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Intravenous Versus Epidural Lidocaine Infusion on Pain Intensity and Bowel Function After Major Large Bowel Surgery: a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

We compared the effects of intravenous lidocaine (IVL) with lumbar epidural lidocaine analgesia (LEA) on pain and ileus after open colonic surgery.

Methods

Between December 2011 and February 2013, 60 patients were randomly allocated to IVL, LEA, or control group. The IVL group received intraoperatively lidocaine 2 % intravenously (1.5 mg/kg bolus, 2 mg/kg/h infusion) and normal saline (NS) epidurally. The LEA group received lidocaine epidurally (1.5 mg/kg bolus, 2 mg/kg/h infusion) and NS intravenously. The control group received NS both intravenously and epidurally, as bolus and infusion. All NS volumes were calculated as if containing lidocaine 2 % at the aforementioned doses. We assessed pain intensity at rest/cough at 1, 2, 4, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively (numerical rating scale 0–10), 48-h analgesic consumption, and time to first flatus passage.

Results

Data from 60 patients (20 per group) were analyzed. The IVL group had significantly lower pain scores at rest and cough compared to LEA or control group only at 1, 2, and 4 h postoperatively (P < 0.005 for all comparisons). The 48-h analgesic requirements and time to first flatus passage did not differ significantly between IVL group and LEA or control group (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with LEA-lidocaine or placebo, intravenous lidocaine offered no clinically significant benefit in terms of analgesia and bowel function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Artinyan A, Nunoo-Mensah JW, Balasubramaniam S, Gauderman J, Essani R, Gonzalez-Ruiz C, Kaiser AM, Beart RW Jr. Prolonged postoperative ileus—definition, risk factors, and predictors after surgery. World J Surg 2008;32:1495–1500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu S, Carpenter RL, Neal JM. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia. Their role in postoperative outcome. Anesthesiology 1995;82:1474-1506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carpenter RL. Gastrointestinal benefits of regional anesthesia/analgesia. Reg Anesth 1996; 21:13-17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rimback G, Cassuto J, Tollesson PO. Treatment of postoperative paralytic ileus by intravenous lidocaine infusion. Anesth Analg 1990;70:414–419.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vigneault L, Turgeon AF, Côté D, Lauzier F, Zarychanski R, Moore L, McIntyre LA, Nicole PC, Fergusson DA. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain control: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Can J Anaesth 2011;58:22–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Holte K, Kehlet H. Prevention of postoperative ileus. Minerva Anestesiol 2002;68:152–156.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Groudine SB, Fisher HA, Kaufman RP, Patel MK, Wilkins LJ, Mehta SA, Lumb PD. Intravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg 1998;86:235–239.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koppert W, Weigand M, Neumann F, Sittl R, Schuettler J, Schmelz M, Hering W. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine has preventive effects on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 2004;98:1050–1055.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuo CP, Jao SW, Chen KM, Wong CS, Yeh CC, Sheen MJ, Wu CT. Comparison of the effects of thoracic epidural analgesia and i.v. infusion with lidocaine on cytokine response, postoperative pain and bowel function in patients undergoing colonic surgery. Br J Anaesth 2006;97:640–646.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Swenson BR, Gottschalk A, Wells LT, Rowlingson JC, Thompson PW, Barclay M, Sawyer RG, Friel CM, Foley E, Durieux ME. Intravenous lidocaine is as effective as epidural bupivacaine in reducing ileus duration, hospital stay, and pain after open colon resection: a randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2010;35:370–376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hollmann MW, Durieux ME. Local anesthetics and the inflammatory response: a new therapeutic indication? Anesthesiology 2000;93:858–375.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Challapalli V, Tremont-Lukats IW, McNicol ED, Lau J, Carr DB. Systemic administration of local anesthetic agents to relieve neuropathic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2005: CD003345.

  13. McKay A, Gottschalk A, Ploppa A, Durieux ME, Groves DS. Systemic lidocaine decreased the perioperative opioid analgesic requirements but failed to reduce discharge time after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 2009;109:1805–1808.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferrante FM, Paggioli J, Cherukuri S, Arthur GR. The analgesic response to intravenous lidocaine in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Anesth Analg 1996;82:91–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawamata M, Sugino S, Narimatsu E, Yamauchi M, Kiya T, Furuse S, Namiki A. Effects of systemic administration of lidocaine and QX-314 on hyperexcitability of spinal dorsal horn neurons after incision in the rat. Pain 2006;122:68–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wongyingsinn M, Baldini G, Charlebois P, Liberman S, Stein B, Carli F. Intravenous lidocaine versus thoracic epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery using an enhanced recovery program. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011;36:241–248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Doherty TJ. Postoperative ileus: pathogenesisand treatment. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2009;25:351–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Biber B, Fara J. Intestinal motility increased by tetrodotoxin, lidocaine, and procaine. Experientia 1973;29:551–552.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nadrowski L. Paralytic ileus: recent advances in pathophysiology and treatment. Curr Surg 1983;40:260–273.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wallin G, Cassuto J, Högström S, Lindén I, Faxén A, Rimbäck G, Hedner T. Effects of lidocaine infusion on the sympathetic response to abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 1987;66:1008–1013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Harvey KP, Adair JD, Isho M, Robinson R. Can intravenous lidocaine decrease postsurgical ileus and shorten hospital stay in elective bowel surgery? A pilot study and literature review. Am J Surg 2009;198:231–236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lauwick S, Kim do J, Michelagnoli G, Mistraletti G, Feldman L, Fried G, Carli F. Intraoperative infusion of lidocaine reduces postoperative fentanyl requirements in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anaesth 2008;55:754–760.

Download references

Ethical Approval

NAC 5/30-11-2011, Chairman Dr. A. Melidonis, IRB of Tzaneion General Hospital of Piraeus.

Conflict of Interest

None declared

Financial Support

Departmental only

Previous Presentations

None

Permissions for Tables/Figures from Other Sources

Not applicable (no tables/figures from other sources have been used in this manuscript)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. First Department of Anesthesiology, Aretaieion Hospital, University of Athens School of Medicine, 76 Vass. Sophias Av., 11528, Athens, Greece

    Chryssoula Staikou & Eriphili Argyra

  2. Department of Anesthesiology, Tzaneion General Hospital, Zanni & 1 Afentouli Strs, 18536, Piraeus, Greece

    Alexandra Avramidou

  3. Second Department of Surgery, Tzaneion General Hospital, Zanni & 1 Afentouli Strs, 18536, Piraeus, Greece

    Georgios D. Ayiomamitis

  4. Tzaneion General Hospital, Zanni & 1 Afentouli Strs, 18536, Piraeus, Greece

    Spyros Vrakas

Authors
  1. Chryssoula Staikou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexandra Avramidou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Georgios D. Ayiomamitis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Spyros Vrakas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Eriphili Argyra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chryssoula Staikou.

Additional information

Authors’ Contributions

Study conception and design: A. Avramidou, G. Ayiomamitis, E. Argyra

Acquisition of data: A. Avramidou, G. Ayiomamitis, S. Vrakas

Analysis and interpretation of data: S. Vrakas, C. Staikou

Drafting of manuscript: A. Avramidou, C. Staikou

Critical revision of manuscript: C. Staikou, E. Argyra

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Staikou, C., Avramidou, A., Ayiomamitis, G.D. et al. Effects of Intravenous Versus Epidural Lidocaine Infusion on Pain Intensity and Bowel Function After Major Large Bowel Surgery: a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gastrointest Surg 18, 2155–2162 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2659-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2659-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation