Abstract
Background
It remains controversial whether anatomical resection (AR) improves the prognosis for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or not. To our knowledge, there have been a few well-matched studies about this issue. The aim of the present study was to compare the recurrence-free survival of AR versus nonanatomical resection (NAR) for a solitary HCC using propensity score matching.
Methods
The present study included 236 patients who had a solitary HCC without macroscopic vessel thrombosis. Those patients were divided into AR (n = 139) and NAR (n = 97) groups. A propensity score matching was performed to minimize the effect of potential confounders.
Results
Sixty-four patients from each group were matched. Preoperative confounding factors were balanced between the two groups. The median recurrence-free survival times in the AR and NAR groups were 33.8 and 30.8 months, respectively (P = 0.520). There were no significant differences in the intrahepatic recurrence pattern (P = 0.097). Operative procedure was not a significant risk factor for recurrence in both uni- and multivariate analyses.
Conclusions
This case-matching study using a propensity score shows that there is no superiority of AR to NAR relevant to the recurrence-free survival in patients with a single HCC.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Primary liver cancer in Japan. Clinicopathologic features and results of surgical treatment. Ann Surg. 1990; 211: 277–287
Lai EC, Fan ST, Lo CM, Chu KM, Liu CL, Wong J. Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. An audit of 343 patients. Ann Surg. 1995; 221: 291–298.
Fan ST, Ng IO, Poon RT, Lo CM, Liu CL, Wong J. Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: the surgeon’s role in long-term survival. Arch Surg. 1999; 134: 1124–1130.
Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Miyagawa Y, Ishida K, Shimada R, Miyagawa S, Makuuchi M, Kawasaki S. Prognostic significance of anatomical resection and des-r-carboxy prothombin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1999; 86: 1032–1038.
Nakashima T, Kojiro M. Pathologic characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 1986; 6: 259–266.
Makuuchi M, Kosuge T, Takayama T, Yamazaki S, Kakazu T, Miyagawa S, Kawasaki S. Surgery for small liver cancers. Semin Surg Oncol. 1993; 9: 298–304.
Kasahara A, Hayashi N, Mochizuki K, Takayanagi M, Yoshioka K, Kakumu S, Iijima A, Urushihara A, Kiyosawa K, Okuda M, Hino K, Okita K. Risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma and its incidence after interferon treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Osaka Liver Disease Study Group. Hepatology. 1998; 27: 1394–1402.
Ikeda K, Saitoh S, Suzuki Y, Kobayashi M, Tsubota A, Fukuda M, Koida I, Arase Y, Chayama K, Murashima N, Kumada H. Interferon decreases hepatocellular carcinogenesis in patients with cirrhosis caused by the hepatitis B virus: a pilot study. Cancer. 1998; 82: 827–835.
Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Aoki T, Minagawa M, Sano K, Sugawara Y, Takayama T, Makuuchi M. Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2005; 242: 252–259.
Shirabe K, Kanematsu T, Matsumata T, Adachi E, Akazawa K, Sugimachi K. Factors linked to early recurrence of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a univariate and multivariate analyses. Hepatology. 1991; 14: 802–805.
Izumi R, Shimizu K, Ii T, Yagi M, Matsui O, Nonomura A, Miyazaki I. Prognostic factors of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients undergoing hepatic resection. Gastroenterology. 1994; 106: 720–727.
Vauthey JN, Klimstra D, Franceschi D, Tao Y, Fortner J, Blumgart L, Brennan M. Factors affecting long-term outcome after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1995; 169: 28–35.
Yamamoto J, Kosuge T, Takayama T, Shimada K, Yamasaki S, Ozaki H, Yamaguchi N, Makuuchi M. Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgery. Br J Surg. 1996; 83: 1219–1222.
Kishi Y, Saiura A, Yamamoto J, Koga R, Seki M, Morimura R, Yoshioka R, Kokudo N, Yamaguchi T. Significance of anatomic resection for early and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011; 397: 85–92.
Wakai T, Shirai Y, Sakata J, Kaneko K, Cruz PV, Akazawa K, Hatakeyama K. Anatomic resection independently improves long-term survival in patients with T1-T2 hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007; 14: 1356–1365.
Yamashita Y, Taketomi A, Itoh S, Kitagawa D, Kayashima H, Harimoto N, Tsujita E, Kuroda Y, Maehara Y. Longterm favorable results of limited hepatic resections for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: 20 years of experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 205: 19–26.
Kaibori M, Matsui Y, Hijikawa T, Uchida Y, Kwon AH, Kamiyama Y. Comparison of limited and anatomic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis C. Surgery. 2006; 139: 385–394.
Tanaka K, Shimada H, Matsumoto C, Matsuo K, Nagano Y, Endo I, Togo S. Anatomic versus limited nonanatomic resection for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery. 2008; 143: 607–615.
Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW Jr. A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemol. 1982; 226: 92–106
Hauck WW. Re: “a review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models”. Am Epidemol. 1982; 116: 732
Agostino RB Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998; 17: 2265–2281.
Cucchetti A, Qiao GL, Cescon M, Li J, Xia Y, Ercolani G, Shen F, Pinna AD. Anatomic versus nonanatomic resection in cirrhotic patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery 2014; 155: 512–521.
Ishii M, Mizuguchi T, Kawamoto M, Meguro M, Ota S, Nishidate T, Okita K, Kimura Y, Hui TT, Hirata K. Propensity score analysis demonstrated the prognostic advantage of anatomical liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 3335–3342.
Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the esophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg. 1973; 60: 646–649.
Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. The general rules for the clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer. 2nd ed. Tokyo, Japan: Kanehara; 2003.
Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind CH, eds. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 7th ed. New York: Wiley-Liss, 2009.
Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S. Ultrasonically guided subsegmentectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985; 161: 346–350.
Imamura H, Kokudo N, Sugawara Y, Sano K, Kaneko J, Takayama T, Makuuchi M. Pringle’s maneuver and selective inflow occlusion in living donor liver hepatectomy. Liver Transpl. 2004; 10: 771–778.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P. Classification of surgical complications of surgery with evaluation in a cohort of 6366 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240: 205–213.
Poon RT, Fan ST, Ng IO, Wong J. Significance of resection margin in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A critical reappraisal. Ann surg. 2000; 231: 544–551.
Kumada T, Nakano S, Takeda I, Sugiyama K, Osada T, Kiriyama S, Sone Y, Toyoda H, Shimada S, Takahashi M, Sassa T. Patterns of recurrence after initial treatment in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 1997; 25: 87–92.
Takenaka K, Adachi E, Nishizaki T, Hiroshige K, Ikeda T, Tsuneyoshi M, Sugimachi K. Possible multicentric occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinicopathological study. Hepatology. 1994; 19: 889–894.
Eguchi S, Kanematsu T, Arii S, Okazaki M, Okita K, Omata M, Ikai I, Kudo M, Kojiro M, Makuuchi M, Monden M, Matsuyama Y, Nakanuma Y, Takayasu K; Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Comparison of the outcomes between an anatomical subsegmentectomy and a non-anatomical minor hepatectomy for single hepatocellular carcinomas based on a Japanese nationwide survey. Surgery. 2008; 143: 469–475.
Sources of financial support
None
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Okamura, Y., Ito, T., Sugiura, T. et al. Anatomic Versus Nonanatomic Hepatectomy for a Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 18, 1994–2002 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2646-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2646-6