Abstract
Hypophysitis is an inflammatory disease affecting the pituitary gland. Hypophysitis can be classified into multiple types depending on the mechanisms (primary or secondary), histology (lymphocytic, granulomatous, xanthomatous, plasmacytic/IgG4 related, necrotizing, or mixed), and anatomy (adenohypophysitis, infundibulo-neurohypophysitis, or panhypophysitis). An appropriate diagnosis is vital for managing these potentially life-threatening conditions. However, physiological morphological alterations, remnants, and neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions may masquerade as hypophysitis, both clinically and radiologically. Neuroimaging, as well as imaging findings of other sites of the body, plays a pivotal role in diagnosis. In this article, we will review the types of hypophysitis and summarize clinical and imaging features of both hypophysitis and its mimickers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Hypophysitis is a potentially life-threatening inflammatory disease of the pituitary gland accounting for 0.24–0.88% of all intra- and suprasellar lesions [1]. Hypophysitis can be classified into categories depending on the mechanisms (primary or secondary), histology (lymphocytic, granulomatous, xanthomatous, plasmacytic/IgG4 related, necrotizing, or mixed), and anatomy (adenohypophysitis, infundibulo-neurohypophysitis, or panhypophysitis). Secondary causes of hypophysitis include systemic granulomatous diseases, infection, sellar tumors or cysts, and drugs [2]. Clinically, patients with hypophysitis present with inflammatory symptoms such as headaches and vomiting, and varying degrees of hypopituitarism. Although the diagnosis of hypophysitis ultimately requires a biopsy, the presumptive diagnosis based on clinical manifestation in conjunction with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and laboratory findings is typically made in clinical settings [2]. Early assessment of treatment response of hypophysitis on pituitary MRI with serial imaging until clear stability has been recommended [1]. Furthermore, the exclusion of other potential mimickers is necessary for appropriate management. In this article, we review the clinical and imaging features of primary and secondary hypophysitis, as well as various types of mimickers.
Etiology and imaging features of hypophysitis
Lymphocytic hypophysitis
Lymphocytic hypophysitis is the most common type of primary hypophysitis, accounting for 76–86% of cases [3]. Lymphocytic hypophysitis is histopathologically characterized by lymph follicles of T and B lymphocytes forming lymph follicles and fibrosis [3, 4]. It is thought to be due to autoimmune mechanisms and is more frequent during pregnancy and in the early postpartum period [5]. Development in association with other autoimmune diseases such as Graves’ disease, Hashimoto’s disease, and Addison’s disease has been reported [5]. Clinically, central diabetes insipidus/arginine vasopressin deficiency (48–72%), hypogonadism (60–80%), adrenal dysfunction (71%), and hypothyroidism (81%) are frequently observed [6,7,8]. High-dose corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment, but spontaneous regression is also frequent [4]. Surgical procedure is occasionally indicated in refractory cases, in those with enlarged gland exhibiting mass effect on adjacent critical structures, and in those with visual field defects. Other than pituitary gland enlargement, Nakata et al. [9] reported loss of posterior pituitary T1-weighted bright spot (17/20, 85%), enlarged pituitary stalk (17/20, 85%), and homogeneous contrast enhancement (13/19, 68%) were typical MR imaging findings of lymphocytic hypophysitis. The parasellar T2 dark sign was noted in 35% of cases, which the authors reported was helpful in differentiating lymphocytic hypophysitis and pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) (Figs. 1, 2). It should be noted, however, that the parasellar T2 dark sign can also be observed in other chronic inflammatory diseases besides lymphocytic hypophysitis (Fig. 3). Sato et al. reported that abnormal enhancement of the pituitary gland in lymphocytic hypophysitis was delayed to over 90 s, even though a conventional MRI showed a normal pituitary, highlighting the usefulness of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [10].
Granulomatous hypophysitis
A review article showed that granulomatous hypophysitis accounts for 20% of all primary hypophysitis [3]. It can also occur secondary to systemic granulomatous diseases. Granulomatous hypophysitis is histopathologically characterized by large numbers of multinucleated giant cells and histiocytes aggregated as granulomas. The primary form mainly affects women, and the average age at onset is 43 years [3]. Endocrine dysfunctions involve the growth hormone (21/30, 70%), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)/cortisol (38/52, 73%), gonadotropins (35/53, 66%), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)/T4 (35/54, 65%), and prolactin (35/54, 65%) [11]. Diabetes insipidus/arginine vasopressin deficiency (22/82, 27%) is also an important correlate [11]. Cranial nerve symptoms involving the optic nerve (12/82, 15%), oculomotor nerve (12/82, 15%), abducens nerve (6/82, 7%), and facial nerve (2/82, 2%) were also observed [11]. Granulomatous hypophysitis is considered less responsive to corticosteroid therapy compared with lymphocytic hypophysitis, and surgery and long-term hormone replacement are frequently required [3, 6, 11]. Secondary causes of granulomatous hypophysitis include multiple types of diseases, including infection (tuberculosis, syphilis, and fungus), autoimmune diseases (sarcoidosis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), Takayasu arteritis, Cogan’s syndrome, and Crohn’s disease), histiocytosis (Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) and Erdheim–Chester disease), and specific sellar and suprasellar lesions (Rathke’s cleft cyst, PitNET, germinoma, and craniopharyngioma) [3]. MR imaging findings are not significantly different from those of lymphocytic hypophysitis (Figs. 3, 4) [6]; however, loss of T1-weighted bright spot in the posterior pituitary lobe is less frequent (10/51, 20%), and the contrast enhancement tends to be more heterogeneous [6, 11]. The preoperative edema and contrast enhancement of the infrasellar basisphenoid bone marrow have been reported as differentiating MRI findings of granulomatous hypophysitis from PitNET [12], although further accumulation of cases are needed to determine whether these MRI findings are also found in other types of hypophysitis.
Plasmacytic/IgG4-related hypophysitis
Plasmacytic/IgG4-related hypophysitis accounts for up to 30% of all primary hypophysitis [3, 13]. Histopathologically, plasmacytic/IgG4-related hypophysitis is characterized by lymphocyte and plasma cell-rich mononuclear infiltration of the pituitary gland, with storiform fibrosis and > 10 IgG4-positive cells/high-power field [3]. Pituitary involvement is found in 1.7–8% of patients with IgG4-related disease, although plasmacytic/IgG4-related hypophysitis can occur without the involvement of other sites [14]. When the pituitary gland is the only involved site, the diagnosis of IgG4-related disease cannot be made, according to the 2019 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria [15, 16]. Frequently encountered symptoms include anterior hypopituitarism (86/102, 84%), diabetes insipidus/arginine vasopressin deficiency (71/89, 80%), and bitemporal hemianopia (19/31, 61%) [14]. While the response to corticosteroid therapy is good, recovery of endocrine dysfunction is considered rare [6]. Besides the nonspecific MRI findings of hypophysitis, such as pituitary enlargement, abnormal enhancement, and loss of T1-weighted bright spot in the posterior pituitary lobe (Figs. 5, 6), associated heterogeneous T2-weighted signal intensity and enhancement may be observed. The involvement of IgG4-related diseases in the salivary glands, lacrimal glands, meninges, and cranial nerves can be diagnostic indicators if present. There have been reports of empty sella after plasmacytic/IgG4-related hypophysitis [17]. The pattern of uptake and multi-organ involvement on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) can be diagnostic clues of plasmacytic/IgG4-related hypophysitis when other typical metabolic lesions are demonstrated [1].
Xanthomatous hypophysitis
Xanthomatous hypophysitis is the second rarest type of hypophysitis, accounting for 3% of all primary hypophysitis [3]. Histopathologically, xanthomatous hypophysitis is characterized by the infiltration of foamy histiocytes without granuloma formation, with fibrosis in the chronic phase [3]. Researchers suggested that at least some cases of xanthomatous hypophysitis develop giant cell reaction (xanthogranulomatous hypophysitis) in association with Rathke’s cleft cyst leakage/rupture/hemorrhage [18]. The average age at onset is 34 years, with 19:7 female-to-male predominance [18]. Clinically, symptoms resemble those of mild lymphocytic hypophysitis, and optic tract-related symptoms have been infrequently reported [6]. Xanthomatous hypophysitis is thought to be less responsive to corticosteroid therapy, and endocrine dysfunctions tend to be difficult to ameliorate. On MRI, xanthomatous hypophysitis tends to have cystic components, and peripheral contrast enhancement is observed (Fig. 7) [19]. The cystic components on MRI correspond to a dark orange fluid-filled cyst with suspended crystals seen macroscopically [6].
Necrotizing hypophysitis
Necrotizing hypophysitis is the rarest type of primary hypophysis, accounting for less than 1% of all primary hypophysitis [3]. Histopathologically, necrotizing hypophysitis is characterized by diffuse non-hemorrhagic necrosis with surrounding lymphocytes, plasma cells, and eosinophils [3]. Patients present with acute onset headaches with anterior or panhypopituitarism, and hormone replacement is generally required. On MRI, necrotizing hypophysitis usually appears as a diffusely enlarged pituitary gland and infundibulum, with a typical loss of central contrast enhancement (Fig. 8) [20, 21].
Hypophysitis as immune-related adverse events (irAE)
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) activate host immunity against tumors by inhibiting immune checkpoints that suppress T-cell activity. The activated T cells by ICIs, however, occasionally infiltrate into various organs and cause excessive immune responses, irAEs. There have been two distinct forms of irAEs involving the pituitary gland (Fig. 9) [22]: ICI-related isolated adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency (ICI-IAD) and ICI-related hypophysitis (ICI-H). ICI-IAD is mainly caused by the cytotoxic effect of activated T cells due to PD-1 inhibitors and is characterized by isolated ACTH deficiency [22]. Serum anti-pituitary antibodies have been shown to be positive before the initiation of ICI treatment in the majority of cases (11/17, 65%), and the positive rate increased after symptom onset (15/17, 88%) [22]. MRI is normal in most cases of ICI-IAD [23]. On the other hand, ICI-H is typically caused by anti-CTLA4 treatment with or without combined anti-PD1 treatment, and can cause variable endocrine dysfunctions including ACTH deficiency [22]. The serum anti-pituitary antibodies were negative before ICI treatment (0/5, 0%), whereas they were frequently positive after the onset of ICI-H (4/5, 80%) [22]. On MRI, ICI-H is characterized by enlargement of the pituitary gland and stalk. Heterogeneous hypointensity on T2-weighted imaging with nodular or geographic weak and gradual enhancement on dynamic post-contrast T1-weighted imaging may be characteristic of ICI-H [24]. Patients of pituitary irAE are recommended to be managed with discontinuation of ICI until the conditions stabilize with appropriate hormone replacement and corticosteroid administration [25]. While pituitary irAE can be clinically severe, there have been reports of better survival prognosis in patients with pituitary irAE than in those without, if properly managed [26].
Anti-pituitary-specific transcription factor 1 (PIT-1) antibody-related hypophysitis
PIT-1 is a transcription factor in the pituitary gland that plays a crucial role in the regulation of somatotroph, lactotroph, and thyrotroph differentiation during organogenesis [27]. Anti-PIT-1 antibody-related hypophysitis is an autoimmune hypophysitis associated with tumors such as thymoma, resulting in acquired selective deficiencies of growth hormone, prolactin, and TSH [28]. Pituitary MRI is usually normal, but mild pituitary atrophy was present in a few cases [28, 29].
Differential diagnosis of hypophysitis
Imaging mimics of hypophysitis include various types of conditions including physiological change, remnant, neoplasm, and non-neoplastic lesions (Table 1).
Pituitary hyperplasia
Normal pituitary size is influenced by age and sex. The upper limit of normal pituitary height is as follows: 6 mm for infants and children; 8 mm for males and postmenopausal women; 10 mm for young females; and 12 mm for pregnant or lactating women [30]. Pituitary hyperplasia is an absolute increase in the number caused by physiological, pathological, or iatrogenic conditions. Physiological pituitary hyperplasia occurs in young females and pregnant/lactating women as mentioned above. Pathological pituitary hyperplasia is associated with endocrine disorders not attributed to the pituitary gland, for example, hypothyroidism (causing thyrotroph hyperplasia), hypogonadism (causing gonadotroph hyperplasia), and excess growth hormone-releasing hormone or corticotrophin-releasing hormone (causing somatotroph or corticotroph hyperplasia, respectively) [31]. Iatrogenic hyperplasia is caused by several conditions including estrogen and antipsychotic use, both causing lactotroph hyperplasia, and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogs, causing gonadotroph hyperplasia [31]. On MRI, diffuse and symmetrical pituitary enlargement with homogeneous contrast enhancement is observed (Fig. 10).
Rathke’s cleft cyst
Rathke’s cleft cysts are benign sellar or suprasellar lesions originating from the remnants of Rathke’s pouch, which usually disappear during the embryonic period. The incidence of Rathke’s cleft cysts in reported 12–33% in autopsy series [32]. They are often classified as incidentalomas, found on routine MR evaluations of the brain. Cysts are typically small and are intraglandular, whereas larger, suprasellar cysts are frequently symptomatic. The incidence of symptomatic cases varies depending on the studies [32,33,34]. Symptoms usually result from compression of the optic pathway, hypothalamus, or pituitary gland, and may require surgical decompression. Rathke’s cleft cyst is not only a differential diagnosis of hypophysitis, but can also cause secondary hypophysitis [35,36,37]. Rathke’s cleft cysts occasionally present with hemorrhage, potentially mimicking hypophysitis and pituitary apoplexy [38]. On MRI, Rathke’s cleft cysts typically arise between the anterior and intermediate lobes of the pituitary gland. The cystic components show hyper- or hypointensity on T1-weighted imaging and hyper- or iso-to hypointensity on T2-weighted imaging without contrast enhancement of the wall (Fig. 11) [39]. The intracystic nodules (“waxy nodule”) can be found in the majority of cases, which appear as hyperintensity on T1-weighted imaging and hypointensity on T2-weighted imaging [34]. Shaggy wall enhancement with a consistent clinical course may indicate secondary hypophysitis [36].
Neoplastic lesion
PitNET/pituitary adenoma
PitNETs are clonal neoplastic proliferations of anterior pituitary hormone-producing cells [40, 41]. PitNET is found in approximately 1 case per 1000 general population [42], and approximately 5% of cases are diagnosed before 20 years of age [40]. The term PitNET has been added to the commonly used term “pituitary adenoma” in both the WHO 2021 classification of CNS tumors and the WHO classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors to reflect the neuroendocrine basis of these lesions [40, 43]. Further classifications based on size (microadenoma and macroadenoma) and function (secretory and non-secretory) are commonly employed. Large PitNETs may cause compressive symptoms and various types of hypopituitarism, mimicking hypophysitis. Gutenberg et al. [44] reported that younger age ≤ 30 years, pregnancy, medium or high gadolinium contrast enhancement, loss of posterior pituitary T1-weighted bright spot (indicating loss of accumulation of neurosecretory granules including vasopressin [45]), and enlarged pituitary stalk were more suggestive of hypophysitis than PitNET. Although hypophysitis secondary to PitNET is unusual [46], PitNET occasionally causes acute hemorrhagic necrosis, resulting in pituitary apoplexy, mimicking hypophysitis (Fig. 12).
Adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma and papillary craniopharyngioma
Craniopharyngiomas are CNS WHO grade 1 tumors originating from the embryonic remnants of Rathke’s pouch epithelium. There are two distinct craniopharyngiomas: adamantinomatous and papillary craniopharyngioma, both of which are regarded as CNS WHO grade 1 in 2021 WHO classification [40]. Although these craniopharyngiomas have been regarded as subtypes in the previous WHO classifications, they are now recognized as distinct tumor types based on the distinct histologies and driver mutations [40, 47, 48]. Adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma is a mixed solid and cystic squamous epithelial tumor with stellate reticulum and wet keratin, characterized by activating CTNNB1 mutations [40]. They mainly affect children with an incidence peak in 5–15 years, accounting for nearly all craniopharyngiomas in children, while another incidence peak in 45–60 years is known [40]. Papillary craniopharyngioma is typically a solid, non-keratinizing squamous epithelial tumor, characterized by BRAF p.V600E mutations, and most often occurs in adults with exceptional pediatric cases [40]. Clinically, craniopharyngiomas mimic hypophysitis with frequent intracranial pressure (e.g., headaches and nausea), visual impairment, and endocrine dysfunction [49]. On neuroimaging, the adamantinomatous type typically shows a cauliflower-like shape, a solid and cystic appearance with cholesterol-rich oily fluid, vivid enhancement, and frequent calcification (Fig. 13) [49]. On the other hand, the papillary type usually develops in the suprasellar region and is vividly enhanced as mostly solid mass without calcifications [40, 49]. These imaging features may help distinguish craniopharyngiomas from hypophysitis. It should be noted, however, that craniopharyngiomas, seemingly almost always the adamantinomatous type, may cause secondary hypophysitis [50, 51].
Pituitary metastasis
Pituitary metastasis from other malignancies accounts for 1.0–3.6% of surgically treated pituitary lesions and as high as 28% of autopsy cases [52]. The prognosis is unfavorable with a median survival time of approximately 6 months [52]. The most common primary sites include breast, lung, kidney, and prostate [52]. Diabetes insipidus/arginine vasopressin deficiency is a frequent symptom owing to the posterior lobe receiving direct systemic blood flow. Approximately, half of the cases arise in the posterior lobe, one-third involve both the anterior and posterior lobes, and only 15% involve the anterior lobe alone [53]. On neuroimaging, rapid enlargement, multiple lesions, and adjacent bone destruction are indicative of pituitary metastasis (Fig. 14). Bone destruction with a normal sellar size indicates the rapid growth of the tumor, in contrast to slow-growing PitNET. Contrast enhancement tends to be avid, and flow voids can be observed within the lesion [52]. However, it is often challenging to diagnose a pituitary metastasis without other metastatic lesions or bone destruction on the first surveillance MRI of the brain [54].
Germ cell tumor
Germ cell tumors mainly occur in pediatric and young adult patients, and sellar/suprasellar involvement accounts for 32–42% of intracranial germ cell tumors [55, 56]. The most common presenting symptom is diabetes insipidus/arginine vasopressin deficiency, accounting for more than 90% of sellar/suprasellar germ cell tumors and 75% of bifocal (i.e., sellar/suprasellar and pineal regions) germ cell tumors [55]. Germ cell tumors, especially neurohypophyseal germinoma, could be infiltrated by abundant lymphocytes or plasma cells, mimicking hypophysitis [57, 58]. Elevated serum or CSF biomarkers including alpha-fetoprotein, beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, and placental alkaline phosphatase are suggestive of germ cell tumors, but the biomarker that tends to be elevated differs depending on the included tumor subtypes [59]—elevated alpha-fetoprotein: immature teratoma, embryonal carcinoma, and yolk sac tumor; elevated beta-human chorionic gonadotropin: choriocarcinoma and some germinoma and embryonal carcinoma cases; elevated placental alkaline phosphatase: germinoma. Neuroimaging findings vary depending on the subtypes and percentage of subtypes included. The tumors show laminar, nodular, or lobular morphology, presenting as a suprasellar mass with or without extending into the sella turcica and the floor of the third ventricle (Fig. 15) [55]. Germinoma typically shows hyperdensity on CT and restricted diffusion on MRI [48, 60]. Contrast enhancement tends to be heterogeneous in mixed germ cell tumors.
Other neoplastic lesions
Other neoplastic lesions located in the sellar/suprasellar may masquerade as hypophysitis, both clinically and radiologically. These include meningioma, lymphoma, pituicytoma, granular cell tumor of the sellar region, and spindle cell oncocytoma, and histiocytosis (Fig. 16). Meningioma is a well-defined, extra-axial mass, and dural-tail sign and hyperostosis of adjacent bone are characteristic when present [61, 62]. Sellar/suprasellar lymphoma tends to be misdiagnosed as PitNET, lymphocytic hypophysitis, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, and metastases before pathological diagnosis [63]. On MRI, tumors show hypo- to isointensity on T1- and T2-weighted images with low apparent diffusion coefficient, located in the sellar or suprasellar regions with or without the involvement of the cavernous sinus and the sphenoid sinus [63, 64]. Pituicytoma, granular cell tumor of the sellar region, and spindle cell oncocytoma have been considered to represent a spectrum of a single nosological entity, all showing TTF1 expression [40]. These tumors usually arise along the posterior pituitary and infundibulum, and MRI typically shows a well-defined, T2-weighted heterogeneous and hypo- to isointense mass with vivid contrast enhancement. Sellar/suprasellar histiocytosis may be observed as a meningioma-like or an infiltrative mass with elevated inflammatory markers [65, 66].
Non-neoplastic lesion
Sarcoidosis
Hypothalamo-pituitary sarcoidosis accounts for less than 1% of all intrasellar lesions [67]. Most patients present with hypopituitarism, and other clinical manifestations may be found depending on the sites involved [67]. On MRI, sellar/suprasellar/hypothalamus plaque-like or nodular lesions showing T2-weighted hyperintensity with intense contrast enhancement is observed in the active lesions, while hypointensity on T2-weighed imaging with weak contrast enhancement is observed in the chronic fibrous lesions (Fig. 17) [68]. Other lesions of neurosarcoidosis were associated in more than half of the cases: brain parenchymal, meningeal, or spinal lesions [67]. Hydrocephalus may be found in 5–12% of patients [68]. Mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy are frequent and may help with diagnosis. Both clinical and imaging findings can improve or disappear with corticosteroid treatment [67].
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA)
The pituitary gland is involved in up to 1.3% of patients with GPA [69, 70]. The pituitary lesion may be a distant granuloma or direct spread from nasal, paranasal, or orbital disease [70]. The vasculitic components of the disease are infrequently observed, compared with granulomatous components [70]. Although pituitary involvement can be the initial presentation, it usually occurs during the course of other GPA lesions within an interval from months to years after diagnosis [69]. Like other mimickers of hypophysitis, GPA may cause compressive symptoms (e.g., headaches, nausea, visual impairment) and endocrine dysfunction [69, 70]. On MRI, the pituitary lesion typically shows hypointensity on T2-weighted imaging with heterogeneous contrast enhancement (Fig. 18). Other findings, such as nasal, paranasal, orbital, mastoid, meningeal, and pulmonary involvements may be diagnostic indicators. Both clinical and imaging findings can improve or disappear with corticosteroid and/or immunosuppressive agents, although hypopituitarism tends to be persistent, and long hormonal replacement is usually required [69].
Sheehan’s syndrome
Sheehan’s syndrome is hypopituitarism due to postpartum pituitary necrosis after massive postpartum hemorrhage and severe hypotension. Hyperplasia of lactotrophs and other anterior pituitary gland cells during pregnancy causes the increased size of the anterior pituitary lobe, which is susceptible to ischemia [71]. Therefore, massive bleeding and associated hypotension tend to trigger pituitary necrosis. Patients with Sheehan’s syndrome show anterior or panhypopituitarism in either acute or chronic phases. A detailed perinatal medical history is necessary to differentiate Sheehan’s syndrome from differential diagnoses such as lymphocytic hypophysitis and pituitary apoplexy due to other causes. On MRI, weak or absence of contrast enhancement is observed (Fig. 19) [72]. Follow-up MRI may demonstrate empty sella [72].
Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH)
SIH is caused by CSF volume depletion, which typically results from CSF leakage at the lower cervical and upper thoracic spine [73]. A female predominance with a peak incidence around the fourth decade has been known [73]. SIH is clinically characterized by orthostatic headache, nausea/vomiting, neck rigidity, and cranial nerve palsies [74]. On MRI, an enlarged pituitary gland is observed (Fig. 20) [75]. Other MRI features, including pachymeningeal thickening and enhancement, brain sagging, and bilateral subdural effusion, may help in accurate diagnosis.
Conclusion
Herein, we have reviewed the clinical and imaging features of primary and secondary hypophysitis and their various mimickers. The recognition of both clinical and imaging findings, including those at other sites in the body, may provide diagnostic indicators and facilitate appropriate management.
References
Joshi MN, Whitelaw BC, Carroll PV. Mechanisms in endocrinology: hypophysitis: diagnosis and treatment. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;179:R151–63.
Langlois F, Varlamov EV, Fleseriu M. Hypophysitis, the growing spectrum of a rare pituitary disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107:10–28.
Angelousi A, Alexandraki K, Tsoli M, Kaltsas G, Kassi E. Hypophysitis (including IgG4 and immunotherapy). Neuroendocrinology. 2020;110:822–35.
Imura H, Nakao K, Shimatsu A, Ogawa Y, Sando T, Fujisawa I, et al. Lymphocytic infundibuloneurohypophysitis as a cause of central diabetes insipidus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:683–9.
Bellastella A, Bizzarro A, Coronella C, Bellastella G, Sinisi AA, De Bellis A. Lymphocytic hypophysitis: a rare or underestimated disease? Eur J Endocrinol. 2003;149:363–76.
Caranci F, Leone G, Ponsiglione A, Muto M, Tortora F, Muto M, et al. Imaging findings in hypophysitis: a review. Radiol Med. 2020;125:319–28.
Gutenberg A, Hans V, Puchner MJA, Kreutzer J, Brück W, Caturegli P, et al. Primary hypophysitis: clinical-pathological correlations. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;155:101–7.
Arima H, Cheetham T, Christ-Crain M, Cooper D, Drummond J, Gurnell M, et al. Changing the name of diabetes insipidus: a position statement of the working group for renaming diabetes insipidus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;108:1–3.
Nakata Y, Sato N, Masumoto T, Mori H, Akai H, Nobusawa H, et al. Parasellar T2 dark sign on MR imaging in patients with lymphocytic hypophysitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:1944–50.
Sato N, Sze G, Endo K. Hypophysitis: endocrinologic and dynamic MR findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:439–44.
Hunn BHM, Martin WG, Simpson S Jr, Mclean CA. Idiopathic granulomatous hypophysitis: a systematic review of 82 cases in the literature. Pituitary. 2014;17:357–65.
Mark IT, Glastonbury CM. Diffuse basisphenoid enhancement: possible differentiating feature for granulomatous hypophysitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022;43:1341–5.
Shikuma J, Kan K, Ito R, Hara K, Sakai H, Miwa T, et al. Critical review of IgG4-related hypophysitis. Pituitary. 2017;20:282–91.
Amirbaigloo A, Esfahanian F, Mouodi M, Rakhshani N, Zeinalizadeh M. IgG4-related hypophysitis. Endocrine. 2021;73:270–91.
Wallace ZS, Naden RP, Chari S, Choi HK, Della-Torre E, Dicaire J-F, et al. The 2019 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for IgG4-related disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:77–87.
Ren H, Mori N, Sato S, Mugikura S, Masamune A, Takase K. American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for IgG4-related disease: an update for radiologists. Jpn J Radiol. 2022;40:876–93.
Kanie K, Bando H, Iguchi G, Shiomi H, Masuda A, Fukuoka H, et al. IgG4-related hypophysitis in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis. Pituitary. 2019;22:54–61.
Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Lillehei KO, Hankinson TC. Review of xanthomatous lesions of the sella. Brain Pathol. 2017;27:377–95.
Aste L, Bellinzona M, Meleddu V, Farci G, Manieli C, Godano U. Xanthomatous hypophysitis mimicking a pituitary adenoma: case report and review of the literature. J Oncol. 2010;2010: 195323.
Ćaćić M, Marinković J, Kruljac I, Perić B, Čerina V, Stipić D, et al. Ischemic pituitary apoplexy, hypopituitarism and diabetes insipidus: a triad unique to necrotizing hypophysitis. Acta Clin Croat. 2018;57:768–71.
Gutenberg A, Caturegli P, Metz I, Martinez R, Mohr A, Brück W, et al. Necrotizing infundibulo-hypophysitis: an entity too rare to be true? Pituitary. 2012;15:202–8.
Kobayashi T, Iwama S, Sugiyama D, Yasuda Y, Okuji T, Ito M, et al. Anti-pituitary antibodies and susceptible human leukocyte antigen alleles as predictive biomarkers for pituitary dysfunction induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9: e002493.
Iglesias P, Sánchez JC, Díez JJ. Isolated ACTH deficiency induced by cancer immunotherapy: a systematic review. Pituitary. 2021;24:630–43.
Kurokawa R, Ota Y, Gonoi W, Hagiwara A, Kurokawa M, Mori H, et al. MRI findings of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced hypophysitis: possible association with fibrosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41:1683–9.
Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Thompson JA. Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline summary. J Oncol Pract. 2018;14:247–9.
Kobayashi T, Iwama S, Yasuda Y, Okada N, Okuji T, Ito M, et al. Pituitary dysfunction induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors is associated with better overall survival in both malignant melanoma and non-small cell lung carcinoma: a prospective study. J Immunother Cancer. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-000779.
Tatsumi K, Amino N. The pituitary specific transcription factor Pit-1/GHF-1 and PIT1 abnormality. Rinsho Byori. 1997;45:656–9.
Yamamoto M, Iguchi G, Takeno R, Okimura Y, Sano T, Takahashi M, et al. Adult combined GH, prolactin, and TSH deficiency associated with circulating PIT-1 antibody in humans. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:113–9.
Yamamoto M, Iguchi G, Bando H, Kanie K, Hidaka-Takeno R, Fukuoka H, et al. Autoimmune pituitary disease: new concepts with clinical implications. Endocr Rev. 2020;41:261–72.
Osborn FK, Salzman B, et al. Diagnostic imaging: brain 2nd edition. Neuroradiology. 2012;54:269–269.
De Sousa SMC, Earls P, McCormack AI. Pituitary hyperplasia: case series and literature review of an under-recognised and heterogeneous condition. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2015;2015: 150017.
Jung JE, Jin J, Jung MK, Kwon A, Chae HW, Kim DH, et al. Clinical manifestations of Rathke’s cleft cysts and their natural progression during 2 years in children and adolescents. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2017;22:164–9.
Kuan EC, Yoo F, Chyu J, Bergsneider M, Wang MB. Treatment outcomes of Rathke’s cleft cysts managed with marsupialization. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2017;78:112–5.
Byun WM, Kim OL, Kim D. MR imaging findings of Rathke’s cleft cysts: significance of intracystic nodules. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:485–8.
Roncaroli F, Bacci A, Frank G, Calbucci F. Granulomatous hypophysitis caused by a ruptured intrasellar Rathke’s cleft cyst: report of a case and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 1998;43:146–9.
Daikokuya H, Inoue Y, Nemoto Y, Tashiro T, Shakudo M, Ohata K. Rathke’s cleft cyst associated with hypophysitis: MRI. Neuroradiology. 2000;42:532–4.
Hojo M, Ishibashi R, Arai H, Miyamoto S. Granulomatous hypophysitis caused by Rathke’s cleft cyst mimicking a growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma. Asian J Neurosurg. 2017;12:283–6.
Schooner L, Wedemeyer MA, Bonney PA, Lin M, Hurth K, Mathew A, et al. Hemorrhagic presentation of Rathke cleft cysts: a surgical case series. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020;18:470–9.
Azuma M, Khant ZA, Kadota Y, Takeishi G, Watanabe T, Yokogami K, et al. Added value of contrast-enhanced 3D-FLAIR MR imaging for differentiating cystic pituitary adenoma from Rathke’s cleft cyst. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2021;20:404–9.
Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat DJ, Cree IA, Figarella-Branger D, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23:1231–51.
Tsukamoto T, Miki Y. Imaging of pituitary tumors: an update with the 5th WHO Classifications-part 1. Pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET)/pituitary adenoma. Jpn J Radiol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-023-01400-7.
Daly AF, Beckers A. The epidemiology of pituitary adenomas. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2020;49:347–55.
WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Endocrine and neuroendocrine tumours. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2023.
Gutenberg A, Larsen J, Lupi I, Rohde V, Caturegli P. A radiologic score to distinguish autoimmune hypophysitis from nonsecreting pituitary adenoma preoperatively. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1766–72.
Azuma M, Kadota Y, Matsuyama M, Moritake H, Hirai T. 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted volume isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition (VISTA) imaging for the evaluation of the ectopic posterior pituitary gland. Jpn J Radiol. 2021;39:564–70.
Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Lopes MBS. Update on hypophysitis and TTF-1 expressing sellar region masses. Brain Pathol. 2013;23:495–514.
Rindi G, Klimstra DS, Abedi-Ardekani B, Asa SL, Bosman FT, Brambilla E, et al. A common classification framework for neuroendocrine neoplasms: an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization (WHO) expert consensus proposal. Mod Pathol. 2018;31:1770–86.
Tsukamoto T, Miki Y. Imaging of pituitary tumors: an update with the 5th WHO Classifications-part 2. Neoplasms other than PitNET and tumor-mimicking lesions. Jpn J Radiol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-023-01407-0.
Müller HL, Merchant TE, Warmuth-Metz M, Martinez-Barbera J-P, Puget S. Craniopharyngioma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5:75.
Tena-Suck ML, Palacios-Ortiz IJ, Martinez E, Salina-Lara C, Sánchez-Garibay C. Xanthogranulomatous hypophysitis due to craniopharyngioma rupture: a case report. Case Rep Clin Pathol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.5430/crcp.v2n4p30.
Puchner MJ, Lüdecke DK, Saeger W. The anterior pituitary lobe in patients with cystic craniopharyngiomas: three cases of associated lymphocytic hypophysitis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1994;126:38–43.
Kameda-Smith MM, Zhang E, Lannon M, Algird A, Reddy K, Lu J-Q. Pituitary metastasis: from pathology to clinical and radiological considerations. J Clin Neurosci. 2021;93:231–40.
Chiang MF, Brock M, Patt S. Pituitary metastases. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg). 1990;33:127–31.
Sakai M, Kashiwagi N, Nakanishi K, Maeda N, Nakaya Y, Tanaka J, et al. Nonbrain metastases seen on magnetic resonance imaging during metastatic brain tumor screening. Jpn J Radiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-022-01362-2.
Esfahani DR, Alden T, DiPatri A, Xi G, Goldman S, Tomita T. Pediatric suprasellar germ cell tumors: a clinical and radiographic review of solitary vs. Bifocal tumors and its therapeutic implications. Cancers (Basel). 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092621.
Chen B, Chen C, Zhang Y, Huang Z, Wang H, Li R, et al. Differentiation between germinoma and craniopharyngioma using radiomics-based machine learning. J Pers Med. 2022;12:45.
Chen K, Yao Y, Mao X, You H, Wang L, Duan L, et al. Sellar germinoma mimicking IgG4-related hypophysitis: a case report. BMC Endocr Disord. 2022;22:23.
Fujisawa I, Asato R, Okumura R, Nakano Y, Shibata T, Hamanaka D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of neurohypophyseal germinomas. Cancer. 1991;68:1009–14.
Carr C, O’Neill BE, Hochhalter CB, Strong MJ, Ware ML. Biomarkers of pineal region tumors: a review. Ochsner J. 2019;19:26–31.
Kanagaki M, Miki Y, Takahashi JA, Shibamoto Y, Takahashi T, Ueba T, et al. MRI and CT findings of neurohypophyseal germinoma. Eur J Radiol. 2004;49:204–11.
Kwancharoen R, Blitz AM, Tavares F, Caturegli P, Gallia GL, Salvatori R. Clinical features of sellar and suprasellar meningiomas. Pituitary. 2014;17:342–8.
Lyndon D, Lansley JA, Evanson J, Krishnan AS. Dural masses: meningiomas and their mimics. Insights Imaging. 2019;10:11.
Duan L, Liu J, Zhang Y, Cui L, Zhai X, Pan B, et al. Primary pituitary lymphoma in immunocompetent patients: a report on two case studies and the review of literature. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11: 562850.
Kaufmann TJ, Lopes MBS, Laws ER Jr, Lipper MH. Primary sellar lymphoma: radiologic and pathologic findings in two patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:364–7.
Tan H, Yu K, Yu Y, An Z, Li J. Isolated hypothalamic-pituitary langerhans’ cell histiocytosis in female adult: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98: e13853.
Zhang Y, Liu J, Zhu J, Zhou X, Zhang K, Wang S, et al. Case report: Rosai-Dorfman disease involving sellar region in a pediatric patient: a case report and systematic review of literature. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7: 613756.
Langrand C, Bihan H, Raverot G, Varron L, Androdias G, Borson-Chazot F, et al. Hypothalamo-pituitary sarcoidosis: a multicenter study of 24 patients. QJM. 2012;105:981–95.
Ganeshan D, Menias CO, Lubner MG, Pickhardt PJ, Sandrasegaran K, Bhalla S. Sarcoidosis from head to toe: What the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics. 2018;38:1180–200.
De Parisot A, Puéchal X, Langrand C, Raverot G, Gil H, Perard L, et al. Pituitary involvement in granulomatosis with polyangiitis: report of 9 patients and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94: e748.
Guzman-Soto MI, Kimura Y, Romero-Sanchez G, Cienfuegos-Alvear JA, Candanedo-Gonzalez F, Kimura-Sandoval Y, et al. From head to toe: granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Radiographics. 2021;41:1973–91.
Schury MP, Adigun R. Sheehan syndrome. StatPearls [Internet]; 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459166/. Accessed 22 Mar 2023.
Kaplun J, Fratila C, Ferenczi A, Yang WC, Lantos G, Fleckman AM, et al. Sequential pituitary MR imaging in Sheehan syndrome: report of 2 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:941–3.
Leung GKK, Ho J, Pu JKS. Pituitary enlargement in spontaneous intracranial hypotension–a diagnostic pitfall. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011;153:2445–6.
Ferrante E, Savino A, Sances G, Nappi G. Spontaneous intracranial hypotension syndrome: report of twelve cases. Headache. 2004;44:615–22.
Alvarez-Linera J, Escribano J, Benito-León J, Porta-Etessam J, Rovira A. Pituitary enlargement in patients with intracranial hypotension syndrome. Neurology. 2000;55:1895–7.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study's conception. RK wrote the original manuscript. MK, AB, MN, SK, JB, YN, YO, AS, OA, and TM edited the manuscript. RK, MK, and TM conceptualized this study. RK, MN, SK, YN, and TM collected the data. OA and TM supervised the study. TM validated this study. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Kurokawa, R., Kurokawa, M., Baba, A. et al. Neuroimaging of hypophysitis: etiologies and imaging mimics. Jpn J Radiol 41, 911–927 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-023-01417-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-023-01417-y