Abstract
A systematic literature review to validate the conclusions with regard to stranded seeds versus loose seeds. Published data for this review were identified by searching the PubMed databases. PD90, PV100, PV150, UD30, and RV100 acquired during the perioperative period and the postoperative period were analyzed by meta-analysis. Based on these studies, in addition to the reduction of migration and displacement, stranded seeds had some dosimetric advantages, especially in dose homogeneity and coverage of target area due to its connection characteristics. We also noticed implanted seeds usually excessive both in stranded seeds group and loose seed group. Intraoperatively built custom links will prolong operation time, with the proficiency of technology, the prolonged time gradually decreases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cooperberg MR, Lubeck DP, Mehta SS, Carroll PR. Time trends in clinical risk stratification for prostate cancer: implications for outcomes (data from CaPSURE). J Urol. 2003;170(6):S21–7.
Sylvester JE, Grimm PD, Blasko JC, Millar J, Skoglund S, Galbreath RW, et al. 15 year biochemical relapse free survival in clinical Stage T1 T3 prostate cancer following combined external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy Seattle experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.07.1382.
Potters L, Morgenstern C, Calugaru E, Fearn P, Jassal A, Presser J, et al. 12 year outcomes following permanent prostate brachytherapy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2008;179(5):S20–4.
Stock RG, Cahlon O, Cesaretti JA, Kollmeier MA, Stone NN. Combined modality treatment in the management of high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59(5):1352–9.
Stock RG, Cesaretti JA, Stone NN. Disease-specific survival following the brachytherapy management of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;64(3):810–6.
Merrick GS, Butler WM, Wallner KE, Blasko JC, Michalski J, Aronowitz J, et al. Variability of prostate brachytherapy preimplant dosimetry: a multi-institutional analysis. Brachytherapy. 2005;4(4):241–51.
Marshall DT. Options and recent advances in permanent brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Can J Urol. 2007;14(Suppl 1):28–31.
Stock RG, Stone NN, Wesson MF, DeWyngaert JK. A modified technique allowing interactive ultrasound-guided three-dimensional transperineal prostate implantation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;32:219–25.
Reed DR, Wallner KE, Merrick GS, Arthurs S, Mueller A, Cavanagh W, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of stranded vs loose 125I seeds for prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2007;6(2):129–34.
Ishiyama H, Satoh T, Yorozu A, Saito S, Kataoka M, Hashine K, et al. Multi-institutional retrospective analysis of learning curves on dosimetry and operation time before and after introduction of intraoperatively built custom-linked seeds in prostate brachytherapy. J Radiat Res. 2016;57(1):68–74.
Tanaka N, Asakawa I, Nakai Y, Miyake M, Anai S, Yamaki K, et al. Coverage of the external prostatic region by the hybrid method compared with the conventional method of prostate low-dose-rate brachytherapy: a randomized controlled study. Int J Urol Off J Japan Urol Assoc. 2020;27(11):1013–7.
Okazaki E, Kuratsukuri K, Nishikawa T, Tanaka T, Shibuya K. Comparison of post-implant dosimetrics between intraoperatively built custom-linked seeds and loose seeds by sector analysis at 24 hours and 1 month for localized prostate cancer. Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy. 2020;12(4):317–26.
Zauls AJ, Ashenafi MS, Onicescu G, Clarke HS, Marshall DT. Comparison of intraoperatively built custom linked seeds versus loose seed gun applicator technique using real-time intraoperative planning for permanent prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81(4):1010–6.
Ishiyama H, Satoh T, Kawakami S, Komori S, Tabata K, Tsumura H, et al. A prospective quasi-randomized comparison of intraoperatively built custom linked seeds versus loose seeds for prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.009.
Masahiro I, Masaki Y, Takafumi M, Kiyoshi N, Yasumasa N. Dosimetry advantages of intraoperatively built custom-linked seeds compared with loose seeds in permanent prostate brachytherapy. J Contemp Brachyther. 2017;5:410–7.
Hirose K, Aoki M, Sato M, Akimoto H, Hashimoto Y, Imai A, et al. Analysis of the relationship between prescribed dose and dosimetric advantage of real-time intraoperatively built custom-linked seeds in iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2017;12(1):192.
Katayama N, Takemoto M, Takamoto A, Ihara H, Katsui K, Ebara S, et al. Comparison of implant quality between intraoperatively built custom-linked seeds and loose seeds in permanent prostate brachytherapy using sector analysis. J Radiat Res. 2016;57(4):393–9.
Tomoya K, Toshio O, Masanori S, Shinya S, Shoji Y, Tetsuo M, et al. Plan reproducibility of intraoperatively custom-built linked seeds compared to loose seeds for prostate brachytherapy. J Contemp Brachyther. 2018. https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2018.77948.
Saibishkumar EP, Borg J, Yeung I, Cummins-Holder C, Landon A, Crook J. Sequential comparison of seed loss and prostate dosimetry of stranded seeds with loose seeds in 125i permanent implant for low-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73(1):61–8.
Laimonas J, Arturas I, Elona J, Kestutis V, Antanas V, Migle S. Comparison of implant quality between loose and intra-operatively linked iodine-125 seeds in prostate cancer brachytherapy. J Radiat Res. 2012;53(3):439–46.
Lee WR, deGuzman AF, Tomlinson SK, McCullough DL. Radioactive sources embedded in suture are associated with improved postimplant dosimetry in men treated with prostate brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2002;65(2):123–7.
Herbert C, Morris WJ, Hamm J, Lapointe V, McKenzie M, Pickles T, et al. The effect of loose versus stranded seeds on biochemical no evidence of disease in patients with carcinoma of the prostate treated with iodine-125 brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2011;10(6):442–8.
Major T, Agoston P, Fröhlich G, Baricza K, Szabo Z, Jorgo K, et al. Loose versus stranded seeds in permanent prostate brachytherapy: dosimetric comparison of intraoperative plans. Physica Med. 2014;30(8):909–13.
Hoaglin DC. Misunderstandings about Q and ‘Cochran’s Q test’ in meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2016;35(4):485–95.
Kudchadker RJ, Swanson DA, Kuban DA, Lee AK, Bruno TL, Frank SJ. Is a loose-seed nomogram still valid for prostate brachytherapy in a stranded-seed era? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72(2):623–7.
Ki D, Mp M, Marshal L, Bria S, Solomon B, J HE. . A comparison of the precision of seeds deposited as loose seeds versus suture embedded seeds: a randomized trial. Brachytherapy. 2004;3(1):7–9.
Saibishkumar EP, Borg J, Yeung I, Cummins-Holder C, Landon A, Crook JM. Loose seeds vs stranded seeds: a comparison of critical organ dosimetry and acute toxicity in 125I permanent implant for low risk prostate cancer. Brachytherapy. 2008;7(2):200–5.
Pinkawa M, Asadpour B, Gagel B, Piroth MD, Borchers H, Jakse G, et al. Evaluation of source displacement and dose–volume changes after permanent prostate brachytherapy with stranded seeds. Radiother Oncol. 2007;84(2):190–6.
Mclaughlin P, Narayana V, Pan C, Berri S, Troyer S, Herman J, et al. Comparison of day 0 and day 14 dosimetry for permanent prostate implants using stranded seeds. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64(1):144–50.
Hinnen KA, Moerland MA, Battermann JJ, Roermund JGH, Monninkhof EM, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, et al. Loose seeds versus stranded seeds in I-125 prostate brachytherapy: differences in clinical outcome. Radiother Oncol. 2010;96(1):30–3.
Merrell KW, Davis BJ, Goulet CC, Furutani KM, Mynderse LA, Harmsen WS, et al. Reducing seed migration to near zero with stranded-seed implants: comparison of seed migration rates to the chest in 1000 permanent prostate brachytherapy patients undergoing implants with loose or stranded seeds. Brachytherapy. 2019;18:306–12.
Birckhead BJ, Fossum CC, Deufel CL, Furutani KM, Merrell KW, Schueler BA, et al. Stranded seed displacement, migration, and loss after permanent prostate brachytherapy as estimated by day 0 fluoroscopy and 4 month postimplant pelvic X-ray. Brachytherapy. 2016;15:714–21.
Al-Qaisieh B, Carey B, Dan A, Bottomley D. The use of linked seeds eliminates lung embolization following permanent seed implantation for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59(2):397–9.
Vassiliev ON, Kudchadker RJ, Swanson DA, Bruno TL, van Vulpen M, Frank SJ. Displacement of periurethral stranded seeds and its dosimetric consequences in prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2011;10(5):401–8.
Miura N, Kusuhara Y, Numata K, Shirato A, Hashine K, Sumiyoshi Y, et al. Radiation pneumonitis caused by a migrated brachytherapy seed lodged in the lung. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38(9):623–5.
Zhu AX, Wallner KE, Frivold GP, Ferry D, Jutzy KR, Foster GP. Prostate brachytherapy seed migration to the right coronary artery associated with an acute myocardial infarction. Brachytherapy. 2006;5(4):262–5.
Chen WC, Katcher J, Nunez C, Tirgan AM, Ellis RJ. Radioactive seed migration after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy and associated development of small-cell lung cancer. Brachytherapy. 2012;11(5):354–8.
Keyes M, Miller S, Moravan V, Pickles T, McKenzie M, Pai H, et al. Predictive factors for acute and late urinary toxicity after permanent prostate brachytherapy: long-term outcome in 712 consecutive patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73(4):1023–32.
Merrick GS, Butler WM. Modified uniform seed loading for prostate brachytherapy: rationale, design, and evaluation. Tech Urol. 2000;6(2):78–84.
Butler WM, Merrick GS, Lief JH, Dorsey AT. Comparison of seed loading approaches in prostate brachytherapy. Med Phys. 2000;27(2):381–92.
Reed DR, Wallner K, Ford E, Mueller A, Merrick G, Maki J, et al. Effect of post-implant edema on prostate brachytherapy treatment margins. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63(5):1469–73.
Pinkawa M, Asadpour B, Piroth MD, Gagel B, Klotz J, Fischedick K, et al. Rectal dosimetry following prostate brachytherapy with stranded seeds comparison of transrectal ultrasound intra-operative planning (day 0) and computed tomography-postplanning (day 1 vs day 30) with special focus on sources placed close to the rectal. Radiother Oncol. 2009;91(2):207–12.
Funding
No funding supported this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, G., Jiang, P., Li, C. et al. A review on permanent implants for prostate brachytherapy with comparison between stranded and loose seeds. Jpn J Radiol 40, 135–146 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01189-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01189-3