Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Role of CT colonography in differentiating sigmoid cancer from chronic diverticular disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the accuracy of computed tomography colonography (CTC) in differentiating chronic diverticular disease from colorectal cancer (CRC), using morphological and textural parameters.

Materials and methods

We included 95 consecutive patients with histologically proven chronic diverticular disease (n = 53) or CRC (n = 42) who underwent CTC. One radiologist, unaware of histological findings, evaluated CTC studies for the presence of potential discriminators including: maximum thickness, involved segment length, shouldering phenomenon, growth pattern, diverticula, fascia thickening, fat tissue edema, loco-regional lymph nodes, mucosal pattern. Another radiologist performed volumetric texture analysis on the involved segment.

Results

Several qualitative imaging parameters resulted to significantly correlated with colorectal cancer, including absence of diverticula in the affected segment, straightened growth pattern and shouldering phenomenon. A maximum wall thickness/involved segment length ratio < 0.1 had 98% specificity and 47% sensitivity in identifying diverticular disease. Regarding first-order texture analysis parameters, kurtosis resulted to be significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions

Absence of diverticula, straightened growth pattern and shouldering phenomenon are significantly associated with CRC (71–91% sensitivity; 82–91%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CTC:

Computed tomography colonography

CRC:

Colorectal cancer

References

  1. Bray F, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold M, et al. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017;66(4):683–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(2):104–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Everhart JE, Ruhl CE. Burden of digestive diseases in the United States Part III: Liver, biliary tract, and pancreas. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(4):1134–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Christl SU. Diverticular disease of the colon. Med Monatsschr Pharm. 2008;31(6):209–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee SJ, et al. Association between colorectal cancer and colonic diverticulosis: case-control study based on computed tomographic colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2012;37(1):70–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Morini S, et al. Diverticular disease as a risk factor for sigmoid colon adenomas. Dig Liver Dis. 2002;34(9):635–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sonnenberg A, Delco F, Bauerfeind P. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer? Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(8):2268–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pickhardt PJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions. Cancer. 2007;109(11):2213–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de Haan MC, et al. Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(8):1747–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Simons PC, et al. Miss rate of colorectal cancer at CT colonography in average-risk symptomatic patients. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(4):908–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pickhardt PJ, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(23):2191–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pickhardt PJ, et al. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection–systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2011;259(2):393–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Burling D, et al. Polyp measurement using CT colonography: agreement with colonoscopy and effect of viewing conditions on interobserver and intraobserver agreement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(6):1597–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH. CT colonography: pitfalls in interpretation. Radiol Clin North Am. 2013;51(1):69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chintapalli KN, et al. Diverticulitis versus colon cancer: differentiation with helical CT findings. Radiology. 1999;210(2):429–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Goh V, Padhani AR, Rasheed S. Functional imaging of colorectal cancer angiogenesis. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(3):245–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gryspeerdt S, Lefere P. Chronic diverticulitis vs. colorectal cancer findings: on CT colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2012;37(6):1101–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lips LM, et al. Sigmoid cancer versus chronic diverticular disease: differentiating features at CT colonography. Radiology. 2015;275(1):127–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Faccioli N, et al. A simplified approach to virtual colonoscopy using different intestinal preparations: preliminary experience with regard to quality, accuracy and patient acceptability. Radiol Med. 2011;116(5):749–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lubner MG, et al. CT texture analysis: definitions, applications, biologic correlates, and challenges. Radiographics. 2017;37(5):1483–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu Y, et al. Texture feature extraction and analysis for polyp differentiation via computed tomography colonography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016;35(6):1522–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Song B, et al. Volumetric texture features from higher-order images for diagnosis of colon lesions via CT colonography. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014;9(6):1021–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nioche C, et al. LIFEx: a freeware for radiomic feature calculation in multimodality imaging to accelerate advances in the characterization of tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Res. 2018;78(16):4786–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Padidar AM, et al. Differentiating sigmoid diverticulitis from carcinoma on CT scans: mesenteric inflammation suggests diverticulitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163(1):81–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Buch K, et al. Using texture analysis to determine human papillomavirus status of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas on CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(7):1343–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kawashima Y, et al. Using texture analysis of head CT images to differentiate osteoporosis from normal bone density. Eur J Radiol. 2019;116:212–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ng F, et al. Assessment of primary colorectal cancer heterogeneity by using whole-tumor texture analysis: contrast-enhanced CT texture as a biomarker of 5-year survival. Radiology. 2013;266(1):177–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Valletta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (include name of committee + reference number) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Retrospective study, need for informed consent was waived by the institutional review board.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valletta, R., Faccioli, N., Bonatti, M. et al. Role of CT colonography in differentiating sigmoid cancer from chronic diverticular disease. Jpn J Radiol 40, 48–55 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01176-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01176-8

Keywords

Navigation