Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the accuracy of computed tomography colonography (CTC) in differentiating chronic diverticular disease from colorectal cancer (CRC), using morphological and textural parameters.
Materials and methods
We included 95 consecutive patients with histologically proven chronic diverticular disease (n = 53) or CRC (n = 42) who underwent CTC. One radiologist, unaware of histological findings, evaluated CTC studies for the presence of potential discriminators including: maximum thickness, involved segment length, shouldering phenomenon, growth pattern, diverticula, fascia thickening, fat tissue edema, loco-regional lymph nodes, mucosal pattern. Another radiologist performed volumetric texture analysis on the involved segment.
Results
Several qualitative imaging parameters resulted to significantly correlated with colorectal cancer, including absence of diverticula in the affected segment, straightened growth pattern and shouldering phenomenon. A maximum wall thickness/involved segment length ratio < 0.1 had 98% specificity and 47% sensitivity in identifying diverticular disease. Regarding first-order texture analysis parameters, kurtosis resulted to be significantly different between the two groups.
Conclusions
Absence of diverticula, straightened growth pattern and shouldering phenomenon are significantly associated with CRC (71–91% sensitivity; 82–91%).
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CTC:
-
Computed tomography colonography
- CRC:
-
Colorectal cancer
References
Bray F, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.
Arnold M, et al. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017;66(4):683–91.
Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(2):104–17.
Everhart JE, Ruhl CE. Burden of digestive diseases in the United States Part III: Liver, biliary tract, and pancreas. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(4):1134–44.
Christl SU. Diverticular disease of the colon. Med Monatsschr Pharm. 2008;31(6):209–13.
Lee SJ, et al. Association between colorectal cancer and colonic diverticulosis: case-control study based on computed tomographic colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2012;37(1):70–3.
Morini S, et al. Diverticular disease as a risk factor for sigmoid colon adenomas. Dig Liver Dis. 2002;34(9):635–9.
Sonnenberg A, Delco F, Bauerfeind P. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer? Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(8):2268–74.
Pickhardt PJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions. Cancer. 2007;109(11):2213–21.
de Haan MC, et al. Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(8):1747–63.
Simons PC, et al. Miss rate of colorectal cancer at CT colonography in average-risk symptomatic patients. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(4):908–13.
Pickhardt PJ, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(23):2191–200.
Pickhardt PJ, et al. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection–systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2011;259(2):393–405.
Burling D, et al. Polyp measurement using CT colonography: agreement with colonoscopy and effect of viewing conditions on interobserver and intraobserver agreement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(6):1597–604.
Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH. CT colonography: pitfalls in interpretation. Radiol Clin North Am. 2013;51(1):69–88.
Chintapalli KN, et al. Diverticulitis versus colon cancer: differentiation with helical CT findings. Radiology. 1999;210(2):429–35.
Goh V, Padhani AR, Rasheed S. Functional imaging of colorectal cancer angiogenesis. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(3):245–55.
Gryspeerdt S, Lefere P. Chronic diverticulitis vs. colorectal cancer findings: on CT colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2012;37(6):1101–9.
Lips LM, et al. Sigmoid cancer versus chronic diverticular disease: differentiating features at CT colonography. Radiology. 2015;275(1):127–35.
Faccioli N, et al. A simplified approach to virtual colonoscopy using different intestinal preparations: preliminary experience with regard to quality, accuracy and patient acceptability. Radiol Med. 2011;116(5):749–58.
Lubner MG, et al. CT texture analysis: definitions, applications, biologic correlates, and challenges. Radiographics. 2017;37(5):1483–503.
Hu Y, et al. Texture feature extraction and analysis for polyp differentiation via computed tomography colonography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016;35(6):1522–31.
Song B, et al. Volumetric texture features from higher-order images for diagnosis of colon lesions via CT colonography. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014;9(6):1021–31.
Nioche C, et al. LIFEx: a freeware for radiomic feature calculation in multimodality imaging to accelerate advances in the characterization of tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Res. 2018;78(16):4786–9.
Padidar AM, et al. Differentiating sigmoid diverticulitis from carcinoma on CT scans: mesenteric inflammation suggests diverticulitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163(1):81–3.
Buch K, et al. Using texture analysis to determine human papillomavirus status of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas on CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(7):1343–8.
Kawashima Y, et al. Using texture analysis of head CT images to differentiate osteoporosis from normal bone density. Eur J Radiol. 2019;116:212–8.
Ng F, et al. Assessment of primary colorectal cancer heterogeneity by using whole-tumor texture analysis: contrast-enhanced CT texture as a biomarker of 5-year survival. Radiology. 2013;266(1):177–84.
Funding
There is no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (include name of committee + reference number) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Retrospective study, need for informed consent was waived by the institutional review board.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Valletta, R., Faccioli, N., Bonatti, M. et al. Role of CT colonography in differentiating sigmoid cancer from chronic diverticular disease. Jpn J Radiol 40, 48–55 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01176-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01176-8