Skip to main content
Log in

Detectability of the choroid plexus of the third ventricle with magnetic resonance ventriculography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Purpose

To clarify the detectability of the choroid plexus of the third ventricle (ChPl3V) with magnetic resonance ventriculography (MRVn) employing a steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequence in comparison to surgical endoscopic movies as a golden standard, as we encountered some clinical cases of total agenesis of corpus callosum (ACC) where we could not recognize the choroid plexus of the third ventricle and found no previous article addressing this problem.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included consecutive patients from 2010 to 2016 for whom endoscopic evaluation of the third ventricle was conducted. The anterior portion of the right and left streaks of ChPl3V was evaluated in 8 patients on 16 sites, while the posterior portion of both streaks of ChPl3V was evaluated in 13 patients on 26 sites. Sensitivity of MRVn to visualize ChPl3V with endoscopic movies as the golden standard was calculated.

Results

Sensitivity of MRVn in visualizing the anterior portion of ChPl3V was 0.813, and that for the posterior portion 0.692. The anterior portion of ChPl3V was visualized in all cases where no tumor contacted the foramen of Monro.

Conclusion

MRVn visualizes the anterior portion of ChPl3V with significant sensitivity and the posterior portion with lower one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Loeser JD, Alvord EC Jr. Agenesis of the corpus callosum. Brain. 1968;91(3):553–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Netsky MG, Shuangshoti S. I origin of choroid plexus and ependyma. In: Netsky MG, Shuangshoti S, editors. The choroid plexus in health and disease. John Wright and Sons Ltd: Bristol; 1975. p. 3–18.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bayer SA, Altman J. The human brain during the early first trimester. 1st ed., Atlas of Human Central Nervous System DevelopmentBoca Raton: CRC Press; 2008. p. 432–4. ISBN 978-08-4931-424-7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rakic P, Yakovlev PI. Development of the corpus callosum and cavum septi in man. J Comp Neurol. 1968;132(1):45–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Madhukar M, Choudhary AK, Boal DK, Dias MS, Iantosca MR. Choroid plexus: normal size criteria on neuroimaging. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012;34:887–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Casselman JW, Kuhweide R, Deimling M, Ampe W, Dehaene I, Meeus L. Constructive interference in steady state-3DFT MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1993;14:47–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aleman J, Jokura H, Higano S, Akabane A, Shirane R, Yoshimoto T. Value of constructive interference in steady-state three-dimensional, Fourier transformation magnetic resonance imaging for the neuroendoscopic treatment of hydrocephalus and intracranial cysts. Neurosurgery. 2001;48(6):1291–5 (discussion 1295–6).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Seitz J, Held P, Strotzer M, Volk M, Nitz WR, Dorenbeck U, et al. MR imaging of cranial nerve lesions using six different high-resolution T1- and T2(*)-weighted 3D and 2D sequences. Acta Radiol. 2002;43(4):349–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kocaoglu M, Bulakbasi N, Ucoz T, Ustunsoz B, Pabuscu Y, Tayfun C, et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and 3D constructive interference in steady state images for predicting outcome after hearing-preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma. Neuroradiology. 2003;45:476–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hatipoğlu HG, Durakoğlugil T, Ciliz D, Yüksel E. Comparison of FSE T2W and 3D FIESTA sequences in the evaluation of posterior fossa cranial nerves with MR cisternography. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2007;13(2):56–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Awaji M, Okamoto K, Nishiyama K. Magnetic resonance cisternography for preoperative evaluation of arachnoid cysts. Neuroradiology. 2007;49:721–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Linn J, Moriggl B, Schwarz F, Naidich TP, Schmid UD, Wiesmann M, et al. Cisternal segments of the glossopharyngeal, vagus, and accessory nerves: detailed magnetic resonance imaging-demonstrated anatomy and neurovascular relationships. J Nerosurg. 2009;110:1026–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rhoton AL Jr. The lateral and third ventricles. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(4 Suppl):S207–71 (see Figure 5.12).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oresković D, Klarica M. The formation of cerebrospinal fluid: nearly a hundred years of interpretations and misinterpretations. Brain Res Rev. 2010;64(2):241–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.04.00.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Orešković D, Radoš M, Klarica M. Role of choroid plexus in cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. Neuroscience. 2017;23(354):69–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.04.025.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Spector R, Snodgrass SR, Johanson CE. A balanced view of the cerebrospinal fluid composition and functions: focus on adult humans. Exp Neurol. 2015;273:57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.07.027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken Sato.

Ethics declarations

Ethical statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sato, K., Awaji, M., Inagawa, S. et al. Detectability of the choroid plexus of the third ventricle with magnetic resonance ventriculography. Jpn J Radiol 37, 449–457 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-019-00834-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-019-00834-2

Keywords

Navigation