Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiation of pediatric posterior fossa tumors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the contribution of preoperative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the differential diagnosis of pediatric posterior fossa tumors.

Methods

Forty-two pediatric patients (mean age 7.76 ± 4.58 years) with intra-axial tumors in the infra-tentorial region underwent magnetic resonance imaging. ADC measurement was performed using regions of interest, obtained from the solid component of the mass lesions. ADC ratios were calculated by dividing the ADC values from the mass lesions by the ADC values from normal cerebellar parenchyma. Lesions were categorized as juvenile pilocytic astrocytoma (JPA), ependymoma and medulloblastoma based on histopathological diagnosis. ADC values of the lesions and histopathological diagnoses were statistically correlated.

Results

Histopathological diagnosis showed that 14 lesions were JPA, 10 were ependymoma; 18 were medulloblastoma. Both ADC values and ADC ratios were significantly correlated with tumor types (p <0.05). Astrocytoma was distinguished from ependymoma with sensitivity 85.7% and specificity 90% using an ADC ratio ≥1.7 and medulloblastoma was distinguished from ependymoma with sensitivity 100% and specificity 88.89% using an ADC ratio ≤1.18.

Conclusion

Preoperative ADC values could differentiate the main histological subtypes of pediatric posterior fossa tumors with high sensitivity and specificity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walker PA, Perilongo G, Punt JAG, Taylor RE. Brain and spinal tumors of childhood. London: Arnold; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Legler JM, Gloeckler Ries LA, Smith MA, Warren JL, Heineman EF, Kaplan RS, et al. Brain and other central nervous system cancers: recent trends in incidence and mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:1382–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gold E. Epidemiology of brain tumors. Rev Cancer Epidemiol. 1982;1:245.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Panigrahy A, Bluml S. Neuroimaging of pediatric brain tumors: from basic to advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). J Child Neurol. 2009;24(11):1343–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gimi B, Cederberg K, Derinkuyu B, Gargan L, Koral KM, Bowers DC, Koral K. Utility of apparent diffusion coefficient ratios in distinguishing common pediatric cerebellar tumors. Acad Radiol. 2012;19(7):794–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jaremko JL, Jans LB, Coleman LT, Ditchfield MR. Value and limitations of diffusion-weighted imaging in grading and diagnosis of pediatric posterior fossa tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(9):1613–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rumboldt Z, Camacho DL, Lake D, Welsh CT, Castillo M. Apparent diffusion coefficients for differentiation of cerebellar tumors in children. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(6):1362–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koral K, Alford R, Choudhury N, Mossa-Basha M, Gargan L. Applicability of apparent diffusion coefficient ratios in preoperative diagnosis of common pediatric cerebellar tumors across two institutions. Neuroradiology. 2014;56(9):781–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maier SE, Sun Y, Mulkern RV. Diffusion imaging of brain tumors. NMR Biomed. 2010;23(7):849–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kono K, Inoue Y, Nakayama K, Shakudo M, Morino M, Ohata K, Yamada R. The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22(6):1081–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Graham DI, Lantos PL. Greenfield’s neuropathology. 7th ed. London: Hodder Arnold; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Giangaspero F, Eberhart CG, Haapasalo H, Pietsch T, Wiestler OD, Ellison DW. Medulloblastoma. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, editors. WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. 4th ed. Lyon: IACR; 2007. p. 132–40.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scheithauer BW, Hawkins C, Tihan T, VandenBerg SR, Burger PC. Pilocytic astrocytoma. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, editors. WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Lyon: IACR; 2007. p. 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koral K, Mathis D, Gimi B, Gargan L, Weprin B, Bowers DC, Margraf L. Common pediatric cerebellar tumors: correlation between cell densities and apparent diffusion coefficient metrics. Radiology. 2013;268(2):532–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McLendon RE, Wiestler OD, Kros JM, Korshunov A, Ng H-K. Ependymoma. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, editors. WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. 4th ed. Lyon: IACR; 2007. p. 74–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yamasaki F, Kurisu K, Satoh K, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient of human brain tumors at MR imaging. Radiology. 2005;235:985–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gauvain KM, McKinstry RC, Mukherjee P, et al. Evaluating pediatric brain tumor cellularity with diffusion-tensor imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:449–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sibel Saracoglu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

This work was approved by the local institutional review board.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zitouni, S., Koc, G., Doganay, S. et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiation of pediatric posterior fossa tumors. Jpn J Radiol 35, 448–453 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-017-0652-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-017-0652-9

Keywords

Navigation