Skip to main content
Log in

Application of a deformable registration technique to investigate breath-hold reproducibility

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To develop an objective and less invasive method for evaluating breath-hold status, and to investigate breath-hold reproducibility during voluntary breath-holding irradiation.

Materials and methods

We enrolled 20 patients who were treated using a voluntary breath-holding technique. Four or five sessions of cone beam computed tomography (CT) were performed during the radiotherapy session. An image of the lung with respiratory tract was extracted from the CT findings. The rigid registration of subsequent CT findings was completed using the first fraction CT findings. Next, subsequent CT images already subjected to rigid registration were deformed using the first CT images. We compared the differences in the subsequent CT images before and after the deformable registration.

Results

We were able to complete the method to evaluate breath-hold status without having to consider set-up uncertainty, manual processes, visual estimates, or excessive patient cooperation. Tumor dislocation was almost within 3 mm in all directions and deformation was much smaller than 30 % period of free breathing.

Conclusion

This method we have developed may have great potential for the objective verification of breath-hold reproducibility in a less invasive manner. This method assumed that the voluntary breath-hold status was reproducible enough at a clinically satisfactory level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Onishi H, Kawakami H, Marino K, Komiyama T, Kuriyama K, Araya M, et al. A simple respiratory indicator for irradiation during voluntary breath holding: a one-touch device without electronic materials. Radiology. 2010;255:917–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tarohda TI, Ishiguro M, Hasegawa K, Kohda Y, Onishi H, Aoki T, et al. The management of tumor motions in the stereotactic irradiation to lung cancer under the use of Abches to control active breathing. Med Phys. 2011;38:4141–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weiss E, Robertson SP, Mukhopadhyay N, Hugo GD. Tumor, lymph node, and lymph node-to-tumor displacements over a radiotherapy series: analysis of interfraction and intrafraction variations using active breathing control (ABC) in lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:e639–45.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Panakis N, McNair HA, Christian JA, Mendes R, Symonds-Tayler JR, Knowles C, et al. Defining the margins in the radical radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with active breathing control (ABC) and the effect on physical lung parameters. Radiother Oncol. 2008;87:65–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheung PC, Sixel KE, Tirona R, Ung YC. Reproducibility of lung tumor position and reduction of lung mass within the planning target volume using active breathing control (ABC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:1437–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shen Y, Zhang H, Wang J, Zhong R, Jiang X, Xu Q, et al. Hypofractionated radiotherapy for lung tumors with online cone beam CT guidance and active breathing control. Radiat Oncol. 2010;5:19.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mah D, Hanley J, Rosenzweig KE, Yorke E, Braban L, Ling CC, et al. Technical aspects of the deep inspiration breath-hold technique in the treatment of thoracic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;48:1175–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarrut D, Boldea V, Ayadi M, Badel JN, Ginestet C, Clippe S, et al. Nonrigid registration method to assess reproducibility of breath-holding with ABC in lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61:594–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fukumitsu N, Hashimoto T, Okumura T, Mizumoto M, Tohno E, Fukuda K, et al. Investigation of the geometric accuracy of proton beam irradiation in the liver. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:826–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gierga DP, Turcotte JC, Tong LW, Chen YL, DeLaney TF. Analysis of setup uncertainties for extremity sarcoma patients using surface imaging. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014;4:261–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Uh J, Merchant TE, Li Y, Li X, Hua C. MRI-based treatment planning with pseudo CT generated through atlas registration. Med Phys. 2014;41:051711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdelnour AF, Nehmeh SA, Pan T, Humm JL, Vernon P, Schoder H, et al. Phase and amplitude binning for 4D-CT imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:3515–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kashani R, Hub M, Balter JM, Kessler ML, Dong L, Zhang L, et al. Objective assessment of deformable image registration in radiotherapy: a multi-institution study. Med Phys. 2008;35:5944–53.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nie K, Chuang C, Kirby N, Braunstein S, Pouliot J. Site-specific deformable imaging registration algorithm selection using patient-based simulated deformations. Med Phys. 2013;40:041911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirby N, Chuang C, Ueda U, Pouliot J. The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration. Med Phys. 2013;40:011702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pirozzi S, Piper J, Nelson A, Duchateau M, Verellen D, De Ridder M. A novel framework for user-intervened correction of deformable registration. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;87:S144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhong H, Kim J, Chetty IJ. Analysis of deformable image registration accuracy using computational modeling. Med Phys. 2010;37:970–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oborski MJ, Laymon CM, Qian Y, Lieberman FS, Nelson AD, Mountz JM. Challenges and approaches to quantitative therapy response assessment in glioblastoma multiforme using the novel apoptosis positron emission tomography tracer F-18 ML-10. Transl Oncol. 2014;7:111–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yakoumakis N, Winey B, Killoran J, Mayo C, Niedermayr T, Panayiotakis G, et al. Using four-dimensional computed tomography images to optimize the internal target volume when using volume-modulated arc therapy to treat moving targets. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012;13:3850.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobuyoshi Fukumitsu.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fukumitsu, N., Hayashi, Y. Application of a deformable registration technique to investigate breath-hold reproducibility. Jpn J Radiol 32, 700–707 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-014-0369-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-014-0369-y

Keywords

Navigation