Skip to main content
Log in

Site condition investigation using horizontal to vertical spectral ratios of Iran strong motion data

  • Research Article - Solid Earth Sciences
  • Published:
Acta Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, horizontal to vertical spectral ratios (HVSR) have been calculated for strong ground motion data recorded by the Iran Strong Motion Network (ISMN). Then, a uniform and specific procedure is applied for selecting the peak amplitude (Apeak) and peak frequency (fpeak) of the average HVSR for each station in the database. Based on this procedure, Apeak and fpeak values were estimated at 502 stations of ISMN. Also, the relationships between HVSR parameters and time-averaged shear wave velocity in the upper 30 m (VS30) have been investigated and these relationships are presented for Iran. The results and uncertainties of these models are compared with other related studies conducted in Japan, North and Central America, as well as previous studies for Iran. Compared to other datasets, the VS30 model presented for Iran shows the highest VS30 values among all models. The equation developed in this study can be used to estimate VS30 at ISMN stations where there is no other site characteristics available. Therefore, the soil type can be classified according to the Standard No. 2800, which is useful in seismic design codes and other related studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson N, Atkinson GM, Boore DM, Bozorgnia Y, Campbell KW, Chiou B et al (2008) Comparisons of the NGA ground-motion relations. Earthq Spectra 24:45–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn JK, Kwak DY, Kim HS (2021) Estimating VS30 at Korean Peninsular seismic observatory stations using HVSR of event records. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 146:106650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkar S, Sandikkaya MA, Bommer J (2013) Empirical ground-motion models for point-and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East. Bull Earthq Eng 12:359–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen T, Wald DJ (2009) On the use of high-resolution topographic data as a proxy for seismic site conditions (VS30). Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:935–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JG, Bodin P, Brune JN, Prince J, Singh SK, Quaas R, Onate M (1986) Strong ground motion from the Michoacan Mexico, Earthquake. Science 233:1043–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bard PY (1995) Effects of surface geology on ground motion: recent results and remaining issues. In: 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Duma (Editor), Balkema, Rotterdam, 305–323

  • Bonilla LF, Steidl JH, Lindley GT, Tumarkin AG, Archuleta RJ (1997) Site amplification in the San Fernando Valley, California: variability of site-effect estimation using the S-wave, coda, and H/V methods. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87:710–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Joyner WB (1997) Site amplifications for generic rock sites. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87:327–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcherdt RD (1970) Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay. Bull Seismol Soc Am 60:29–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Building Seismic Safety Council (2009) NEHRP recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures, FEMA P-750. The National Institute of Building Sciences, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, DC

  • Cadet H, Bard P-Y, Duval A-M, Bertrand E (2012) Site effect assessment using KiK-net data: part 2-site amplification prediction equation based on f0 and Vsz. Bull Earthq Eng 10:451–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campillo M, Gariel JC, Aki K, Sanchez-Sesma FJ (1989) Destructive strong ground motion in Mexico City: source, path, and site effects during great 1985 michoacan earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79:1718–1735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darzi A, Pilz M, Zolfaghari MR, Fa¨h D (2019) An automatic procedure to determine the fundamental site resonance: application to the iranian strong motion network. Pure Appl Geophys 176:3509–3531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02153-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Committee for Standardization (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance – part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Bruxelles

  • Farzanegan A, Mirzaei Alavijeh H, Sinaian F, (2006–2010) Research report of the “Geotechnical studies using seismic refraction method in Iran strong motion stations”. Publications of the Road, Housing & Urban Development Research Center (in Persian)

  • Field EH, Jacob KH (1995) A comparison and test of various site-response estimation techniques, including three that are not reference site dependent. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:1127–1143

    Google Scholar 

  • Geotechnical Engineering Department, BHRC. https://www.bhrc.ac.ir/en-bsri/Research-Departments/Geotechnical-Engineering-Department

  • Ghasemi H, Zare M, Fukushima Y, Sinaeian F (2009) Applying empirical methods in site classification, using response spectral ratio (H/V): a case study on Iranian strong motion network (ISMN). Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghofrani H, Atkinson GM, Goda K (2013) Implications of the 2011 M9.0 Tohoku Japan earthquake for the treatment of site effects in large earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng 11:171–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghofrani H, Atkinson G (2014) Site condition evaluation using horizontal-to-vertical response spectralratios of earthquakes in the NGA-West 2 and Japanese databases. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 67:30–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregor N, Abrahamson NA, Atkinson GM, Boore DM, Bozorgnia Y, Campbell KW (2014) Comparison of NGA-West2 GMPEs. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1179. https://doi.org/10.1193/070113EQS186M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassani B, Atkinson G (2016) Applicability of the site fundamental frequency as a VS30 proxy for central and Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 106:653–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter JA, Crow HL (2012) Shear wave velocity measurement guidelines for Canadian seismic site characterization in soil and rock. (Open File 7078). Geol Surv Canada 2012:227. https://doi.org/10.4095/291753.

  • Konno K, Ohmachi T (1998) Ground motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:228–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer SL Geotechnical earthquake engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, p 653

  • Kwak DY, Seyhan E (2018) Development of peak frequency-site condition correlation models using H/V spectral ratio. In: Proceedings of the geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics V, Austin, TX, 10–13 June, Reston, VA: ASCE. 2018:340–7. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481462.033

  • Lermo J, Chavez-Garcia FJ (1993) Site effect evaluation using spectral ratio with only one station. Bull Seismol Soc Am 83:1574–1594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lermo J, Chavez-Garcıa FJ (1994) Are microtremors useful in site response evaluation? Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(5):1350–1364

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura YA (1989) Method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Q Rep Railw Tech Res Inst (RTRI) 30:1

    Google Scholar 

  • NEHRP (National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program) (2000) Recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, Part 1, Provisions, FEMA 368. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency

  • Nogoshi M, Igarashi T (1970) On the propagation characteristics of microtremors. J Seism Soc Japan 23:264–280 ((in Japanese with English abstract))

    Google Scholar 

  • Parolai S, Richwalski S, Milkereit C, Fa¨h D (2006) S-wave velocity profiles for earthquake engineering purposes for the Cologne area (Germany). Bull Earthq Eng 4:65–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parolai S (2012) Investigation of site response in urban areas by using earthquake data and seismic noise, https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_43227

  • Shahvar M, Farzanegan E, Eshaghi A, Mirzaei H (2021) i1-net: the Iran strong motion network. Seismo Res Lett 92(4):2100–2108. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer PM, Orcutt JA (1987) Surface and near-surface effects on seismic waves—theory and borehole seismometer results. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:1168–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinaiean F, Mirzaei H, Farzanegan F, Salamat A (2011) Research report of “design and implementation of the down hole strong motion arrays”. No. R-609, Publications of the Road, Housing & Urban Development Research Center (in Persian)

  • Sinaiean F (2006) Study on Iran strong motion records. Ph.D. thesis, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Tehran, Iran

  • Standard No 2800 (2015) Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings, vol 4. Iran: Building & Housing Research Center

  • Wair RB, DeJong JT, Shantz T (2012) Guidelines for estimation of shear wave velocity profiles. PEER Report 2012/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA

  • Williams RR, King KW, Tinsley JC (1993) Site response estimates in salt lake Valley Utah, from borehole seismic velocities. Bull Seismol Soc Am 83:862–889

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaghmaei-Sabegh S, Hassani B (2020) Investigation of the relation between Vs30 and site characteristics of Iran based on horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 128:105899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong A, Hough SE, Iwahashi J, Braverman A (2012) Terrain-based site conditions map of California with implications for the contiguous United States. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:114–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zare M, Bard PY, Ghafory-Ashtiany M (1999) Site characterizations for the Iranian strong motion network. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 18:101–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao JX, Xu H (2013) A comparison of VS30 and site period as site-effect parameters in response spectral ground-motion prediction equations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu C, Cotton F, Pilz M (2020) Detecting site resonant frequency using HVSR: fourier versus response spectrum and the first versus the highest peak frequency. Bull Seismol Soc Am 110(2):427–440. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120190186

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Attieh Eshaghi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Edited by Dr. Aybige Akinci (ASSOCIATE EDITOR) / Prof. Ramón Zuńiga (CO-EDITOR-IN-CHIEF).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eshaghi, A., Hassani, B., Pourmohammad Shahvar, M. et al. Site condition investigation using horizontal to vertical spectral ratios of Iran strong motion data. Acta Geophys. 71, 2049–2064 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01091-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01091-8

Keywords

Navigation