Abstract
Seismic data in desert area generally have low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) due to special surface conditions. Desert noise is characterized as low-frequency, non-Gaussian and non-stationary noise, which makes the noise suppression in desert area more challenging by conventional methods. Conventional methods are effective for the signal with high SNR, but in desert seismic signal, the SNR is low and the signal can easily be obliterated in desert noise. In this paper, we propose an approach that operates in synchrosqueezing transform (SST) domain and use classification techniques obtained from supervised machine learning to identify the coefficients associated with signal and noise. First of all, we transform the real desert seismic data into time–frequency domain by SST. Secondly, we select features by calculating the SST coefficients of signal and noise. And then, we train them in the Adaboost classifier. Finally, when the training is completed, we can obtain the final classifier that can effectively separate the signal from noise. We perform tests on synthetic and field records, and the results show great advantages in suppressing random noise as well as retaining effective signal amplitude.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anvari R, Siahsar MAN, Gholtashi S, Roshandel Kahoo A, Mohammadi M (2017) Seismic random noise attenuation using synchrosqueezed wavelet transform and low-rank signal matrix approximation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 55(11):6574–6581. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2730228
Bekara M, van der Baan M (2009) Random and coherent noise attenuation by empirical mode decomposition. Geophysics 74(5):V89–V98. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3157244
Chen Y (2017) Fast dictionary learning for noise attenuation of multidimensional seismic data. Geophys J Int 209(1):21–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw492
Chen Y (2018) Fast waveform detection for microseismic imaging using unsupervised machine learning. Geophys J Int 215(2):1185–1199. https://doi.org/10.1093/GJI/GGY348
Chen Y, Ma J (2014) Random noise attenuation by f-x empirical-mode decomposition predictive filtering. Geophysics 79(3):81–91. https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO2013-0080.1
Daubechies I, Maes S (1996) A nonlinear squeezing of the continuous wavelet transform based on auditory nerve models. Wavelets Med Biol. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203734032-20
Daubechies I, Lu J, Wu H (2011) Synchrosqueezed wavelet transforms: an empirical mode decomposition-like tool. Appl Comput Harmon Anal 30(2):243–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acha.2010.08.002
Deng X, Li Y, Yang B (2007) Ricker wavelet LS-SVM and its parameters setting for seismic prospecting signals denoising. In: Paper presented at the second international conference on space information technology 2007, vol 6795. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.773771
Freund Y, Schapire RE (1997) A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J Comput Syst Sci 55(1):119–139. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1997.1504
Kumar R, Sumathi P, Kumar A (2017) Synchrosqueezing transform-based frequency shifting detection for earthquake-damaged structures. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 14(8):1393–1397. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2017.2714428
Li G, Li Y, Yang B (2017) Seismic exploration random noise on land: modeling and application to noise suppression. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens PP(99):1–14
Liu Y (2013) Noise reduction by vector median filtering. Geophysics 78(3):V79–V86. https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO2012-0232.1
Liu Y, Liu C, Wang D (2009) A 1D time-varying median filter for seismic random, spike-like noise elimination. Geophysics 74(1):V17–V24. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3043446
Lv T, Yan J, Xu H (2017) An EEG emotion recognition method based on AdaBoost classifier. In: Paper presented at the 2017 Chinese automation congress (CAC), pp 6050–6054. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAC.2017.8243867
Singer SF (1981) Oil exploration. 213(4515):1448
Qin X, Song W (2016) Weak signal extraction method of microseismic data based on synchrosqueezing transform. Geophys Prospect Pet 55(1):60–66
Wang Y, Peng Z, He Y (2017) Time-frequency representation for seismic data using sparse S transform. In: 2nd IEEE international conference on computer and communications (ICCC). IEEE, Chengdu, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/CompComm.2016.7925036
Wang W, Jin Y, Wang B, Li W, Wang X (2018) Chaotic signal de-noising based on adaptive threshold synchrosqueezed wavelet transform. Tien Tzu Hsueh Pao/Acta Electron Sin 46(7):1652–1657. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0372-2112.2018.07.016
Yuan S, Liu J, Wang S, Wang T, Shi P (2018) Seismic waveform classification and first-break picking using convolution neural networks. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 15(2):272–276. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2017.2785834
Zhang C, Van Der Baan M (2018a) A denoising framework for microseismic and reflection seismic data based on block matching. Geophysics 83(5):V283–V292. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0782.1
Zhang C, van der Baan M (2018b) Multicomponent microseismic data denoising by 3D shearlet transform. Geophysics 83(3):A45–A51. https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO2017-0788.1
Zhao Y, Li Y, Dong X, Yang B (2019) Low-frequency noise suppression method based on improved DnCNN in desert seismic data. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 16(5):811–815. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2018.2882058
Zhong T, Li Y, Wu N, Nie P, Yang B (2015) A study on the stationarity and Gaussianity of the background noise in land-seismic prospecting. Geophysics 80(4):V67–V82. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0153.1
Zhou Q, Gao J, Wang Z, Li K (2016) Adaptive variable time fractional anisotropic diffusion filtering for seismic data noise attenuation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 54(4):1905–1917. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2015.2490158
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 41730422).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, X., Li, Y. Denoising of desert seismic signal based on synchrosqueezing transform and Adaboost algorithm. Acta Geophys. 68, 403–412 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-020-00408-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-020-00408-1