Skip to main content
Log in

Risk factors of complications after CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of lumps near pulmonary hilum

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The factors influencing the incidence of common complications (pneumothorax and pulmonary hemorrhage) of CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of lumps near pulmonary hilum were investigated. CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of lumps near pulmonary hilum was performed on 48 patients. The complications of pneumothorax and pneumorrhagia as well as the contributing factors were analyzed statistically. The major complications associated with CT-guided needle biopsy included pneumothorax (13 cases, 27.1%) and pulmonary hemorrhage (14 cases, 20.24%). χ2 test revealed that pneumothorax was associated with the lesion size and depth of needle penetration, and pulmonary hemorrhage with the depth of needle penetration and needle retention time with a significant P value. Pneumothorax was observed in 7 cases (17.5%) out of 40 cases with diameter of mass greater than 3 cm, and in 6 cases (60%) out of 10 cases with depth of needle penetration greater than 4 cm. Additionally, pulmonary hemorrhage was identified in 12 cases (41.4%) out of 29 cases with needle retention time longer than 15 min, and pulmonary hemorrhage in 7 cases (70%) out of 10 cases with depth of needle penetration greater than 4 cm. CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of lumps near pulmonary hilum is safe and effective. The key factors to prevent the complications include correct evaluation of lesion size, depth of needle penetration and the needle retention time before the operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011,61(2):69–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Westcott JL. Percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy. Radiology, 1988,169(3):593–601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Paez JG, Jänne PA, Lee JC, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to geitinib therapy. Science, 2004,304(5676):1497–1500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen CM, Chang JW, Cheung YC, et al. Computed tomography- guided core-needle biopsy specimens show epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Acta Radiol, 2008,49(9):991–994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bunyaviroch T, Coleman RE. PET evaluation of lung cancer. J Nucl Med, 2006,47(3):451–469

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Charig MJ, Phillips AJ. CT-guided cutting needle biopsy of lung lesions: safety and efficacy of an outpatient service. Clin Radiol, 2000,55(12):964–969

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Steil S, Zerwas S, Moos G, et al. CT-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy in oncology outpatients: sensitivity, specificity, complications. Onkologie, 2009,32(5):254–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Klein JS, Salomon G, Stewart EA. Transthoracic needle biopsy with a coaxially placed 20-gauge automated cutting needle: results in 122 patients. Radiology, 1996,198(3): 715–720

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yeow KM, Su IH, Pan KT, et al. Risk factors of pneumothorax and bleeding: multivariate analysis of 660 CT-guided coaxial cutting needle lung biopsies. Chest, 2004,126(3):748–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Covey AM, Gandhi R, Brody LA, et al. Factors associated with pneumothorax and pneumothorax requiring treatment after percutaneous lung biopsy in 443 consecutive patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2004,15(5):479–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saji H, Nakamura H, Tsuchida T, et al. The incidence and the risk of pneumothorax and chesttube placement after percutaneous CT-guided lung biopsy: the angle of the needle trajectory is a novel predictor. Chest, 2002,121(5):1521–1526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yeow KM, Tsay PK, Cheung YC, et al. Factors affecting diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided coaxial cutting needle lung biopsy: retrospective analysis of 631 procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2003,14(5):581–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kazerooni EA, Lim FT, Mikhail A, et al. Risk of pneumothorax in CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of the lung. Radiology, 1996,198(2):371–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cox JE, Chiles C, McManus CM, et al. Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy: variables that affect risk of pneumothorax. Radiology, 1999,212(1):165–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Laurent F, Michel P, Latrabe V, et al. Pneumothorax and chest tube placement after CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy using a coaxial technique: incidence and risk factors. Am J Roentgenol, 1999,172(4):1049–1053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kazerooni EA, Hartker FW, Whyte RI, et al. Transthoracic needle aspiration in patients with severe emphysema: a study of lung transplant candidates. Chest, 1996,109(3): 616–620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vallop L, Chalida A, Kobkul S. Adequacy and complications of CT-guided percutaneous biopsy: a study of 334 cases in Srinagarind hospital. J Med Assoc Thai, 2009,92(7):939–946

    Google Scholar 

  18. Biswajit Ch, John E. E, Rakesh P, et al. Risk assessment of pneumothorax and pulmonary haemorrhage complicating percutaneous co-axial cutting needle lung biopsy. Respir Med, 2009,103(3):449–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Richardson CM, Pointon KS, Manhire AR, et al. Percutaneous lung biopsies: a survey of UK practice based on 5444 biopsies. Br J Radiol, 2002,75(897):731–735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Manhire A, Charig M, Clelland C, et al. Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy. Thorax, 2003,58(11):920–936

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Choo JY, Park CM, Lee NK, et al. Percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of small (≤ 1 cm) lung nodules under C-arm cone-beam CT virtual navigation guidance. Eur Radiol, 2013,23(3):712–719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee SM, Park CM, Lee KH, et al. C-arm cone-beam CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of lung nodules: clinical experience in 1108 patients. Radiology, 2014,271(1):291–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yankelevitz DF, Vazquez M, Henschke CI. Special techniques in transthoracic needle biopsy of pulmonary nodules. Radiol Clin North Am, 2000,38(2):267–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gang Wu  (伍 钢).

Additional information

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81102074).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, Zy., Lin, Zy., Wang, Y. et al. Risk factors of complications after CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of lumps near pulmonary hilum. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.] 35, 278–282 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-015-1424-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-015-1424-3

Key words

Navigation