Skip to main content
Log in

Superiority of laparoscopy in the peritoneal dialysis catheter reset surgery

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Peritoneal dialysis catheter surgery has been used in clinical treatment for nearly 40 years, and open surgery under local anesthesia is the conventional method. However, catheter displacement after open surgery is still the thorny issue during our clinical practice. Then the reset surgery is often required to be taken again. Nowadays, laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter draws our attention due to its advantages of accurate positioning, smaller incision, and less pain, and its clinical application has been limited. While laparoscopic surgery is recognized, there are few relevant studies on whether there is difference during the catheter reset process between the two surgical approaches. In this study, we mainly discussed the rate of secondary catheter migration, the incidence of complications after catheter reset for two surgical approaches and the hospital stay as well as the total clinical cost for the two surgical approaches. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 25 cases of end-stage renal disease, who received catheterization for peritoneal dialysis and regular peritoneal dialysis in our hospital from March 2010 to December 2013, and had a medical history of catheter migration. We collected the relevant clinical data for all patients. Fifteen patients selected laparoscopic catheter reset, and 10 patients selected the traditional surgical method for catheter reset by themselves. For all patients enrolled, we analyzed the incidence of secondary catheter migration and postoperative complications, hospitalization time, and total cost for different methods of reset. Through the studies above, we found that laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter surgery offered accurate catheter location and a small incision that was easy to heal. Besides, the incidence of postoperative complications for the laparoscopic surgery was lower than that for traditional surgical approach for catheter reset. The average hospitalization time for laparoscopic surgery was shorter than that for the traditional surgical approach. The total cost of laparoscopic surgery was more than that of the traditional surgery. Therefore, the rational application of a laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter and reset surgery can increase the success rate of peritoneal dialysis, reduce the complications, shorten hospitalization time of patients, and thus enhance patient’s confidence to stick it out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nolph KD, Popovich RP, Moncrief JW. Theoretical and practical implications of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Nephron, 1978, 21(3):117–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Park YS, Min SI, Kim DK, et al. The outcomes of percutaneous versus open placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters. World J Surg, 2014, 38(5):1058–1064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. García-López E, Lindholm B, Davies S. An update on peritoneal dialysis solutions. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2012, 8(4): 224–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maio R, Figueiredo N, Costa P. Laparoscopic placement of Tenckhoff catheters for peritoneal dialysis: a safe, effective, and reproducible procedure. Perit Dial Int, 2008, 28(2): 170–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bagul A, Thiyagarajan UM, Mamode N. Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) insertion: does it really make a difference? J Nephrol, 2014, 27(2):127–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lessin MS, Luks FI, Brem AS, et al. Primary laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters in children and young adults. Surg Endosc, 1999, 13(11):1165–1167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gultekin FA, Cakmak GK, Karakaya K, et al. Our long-term results of Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheters placement via laparoscopic preperitoneal tunneling technique. Semin Dial, 2013, 26(3):349–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lu CT, Watson DI, Ellias TJ, et al. Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: 7 years experience. ANZ J Surg, 2003, 73(30):109–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Haggerty SP, Jorge JM. Laparoscopy to evaluate scrotal edema during peritoneal dialysis. JSLS, 2013, 17(3):429–432

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Xie H, Zhang W, Cheng J, et al. Laparoscopic versus open catheter placement in peritoneal dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol 2012, 13:69

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Numanoglu A, Rasche L, Roth MA, et al. Laparoscopic insertion with tip suturing, omentectomy, and ovariopexy improves lifespan of peritoneal dialysis catheters in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2008, 18(2):320–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogunc G, Tuncer M, Ogunc D, et al. Laparoscopic omental fixation technique versus open surgical placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters. Surg Endosc, 2003, 17(11):1749–1755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Crabtree JH, Fishman A. Selective performance of prophylactic omentopexy during laparoscopic implantation of peritoneal dialysis catheters. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2003, 13(3):180–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Crabtree JH. Selected best demonstrated practices in peritoneal dialysis acces. Kidney Int, 2006(103):S27–S37

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harissis HV, Katsios CS, Koliousi EL, et al. A new simplified one port laparoscopic technique of peritoneal dialysis catheter placement with intra-abdominal fixation. Am J Surg, 2006, 192(1):125–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hagen SM, van Alphen AM, Ijzermans JN, et al. Laparoscopic versus open peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion, the LOCI-trial: a study protocol. BMC Surg, 2011, 11:35

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sainaresh VV, Jain SH, Engineer DP, et al. Laproscopic salvage of omental wrapping of the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheter. Indian J Nephrol, 2012, 22(1): 68–69

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guo-hua Ding  (丁国华).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Wl., Ding, Gh., Zheng, Z. et al. Superiority of laparoscopy in the peritoneal dialysis catheter reset surgery. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.] 35, 71–75 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-015-1391-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-015-1391-8

Key words

Navigation