Skip to main content
Log in

New qualification conditions for convex optimization without convex representation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a convex optimization problem with the feasible set is convex and the constraint functions are differentiable, but they are not necessarily convex. We study several known constraint qualifications under which the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions are necessary and sufficient for the optimality. We also establish new connections among various known constraint qualifications that guarantee necessary the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions. Moreover, by using the concept of dual cones, we introduce a new constraint qualification that is the weakest qualification for the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions to be necessary for the optimality. Finally, as an application, we characterize the best approximation to any \(x \in \mathbb {R}^{n}\) from a convex set in the face of non-convex inequality constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bauschke, H.H., Combettes, P.L.: Convex Analysis and Monotone Operator Theory in Hilbert Spaces. Springer, New York (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Berteskas, D., Nedić, A., Ozdaglar, A.E.: Convex Analysis and Optimization. Athena. Scientific, Belmont (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonnans, J.F., Shapiro, A.: Perturbation Analysis of Optimization Problems. Springer, New York (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L.: Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Chieu, N.H., Jeyakumar, V., Li, G., Mohebi, H.: Constraint qualifications for convex optimization without convexity of constraints: new connections and applications to best approximation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 265, 19–25 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Deutsch, F.: Best Approximation in Inner Product Spaces. Springer, New York (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Deutsch, F.: The role of conical hull intersection property in convex optimization and approximation. In: Chui, C.K., Schumaker, L.L. (eds.) Approximation Theory IX. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deutsch, F., Li, W., Swetits, J.: Fenchel duality and the strong conical hull intersection property. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 102, 681–695 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Dutta, J., Lalitha, C.S.: Optimality conditions in convex optimization revisited. Optim. Lett. 7, 221–229 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Goberna, M.A., Guerra-Vazquez, F., Todorov, M.I.: Constraint qualifications in convex vector semi-infinite optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 249, 32–40 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hiriart-Urruty, J.B., Lemarechal, C.: Convex Analysis and Minimization Algorithms I. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer, Berlin (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeyakumar, V.: The strong conical hull intersection property for convex programming. Math. Program. 106, 81–92 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeyakumar, V., Mohebi, H.: A global approach to nonlinearly constrained best approximation. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 26(2), 205–227 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Jeyakumar, V., Mohebi, H.: Characterizing best approximation from a convex set without convex representation. J. Approx. Theory 239, 113–127 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Jeyakumar, V., Wolkowicz, H.: Generalizations Slater’s constraint qualifications for infinite convex programs. Math. Program. 57, 85–101 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Lasserre, J.B.: On representations of the feasible set in convex optimization. Optim. Lett. 4, 1–5 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Lasserre, J.B.: On convex optimization without convex representation. Optim. Lett. 5, 549–556 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Mordukhovich, B.S.: Variational Analysis and Generalized Differentiation, I: Basic Theory. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Rockafellar, R.T.: Convex Anal. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1970)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Tiel, J.: Convex Analysis An Introductory Text. Wiley, New York (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to the anonymous referee for his/her helpful comments and valuable suggestions which have contributed to the final preparation of the paper. The second author was partially supported by Mahani Mathematical Research Center.

Funding

Funding was provided by Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman (Grant No. 97/3267).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Mohebi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bazargan, F., Mohebi, H. New qualification conditions for convex optimization without convex representation. Optim Lett 15, 953–977 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-019-01441-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-019-01441-w

Keywords

Navigation