Abstract
Almost 30 years after Anderson and Gatignon systematically conceptualized various entry modes, the scholarly research on their performance effects has accumulated a large amount of empirical evidence. However, research has progressed in a somewhat fragmented manner where the cumulative impact of entry modes is difficult to discern and the entry-performance relationship still remains a conundrum in IB research. This study consolidates and meta-analyzes the empirical findings reported from 44 independent studies. While the results show an overall significant effect of entry modes on performance, more fine-tuned meta-analyses unravel that the effects of entry modes vary with the performance types and a number of plausible contingencies. Findings are discussed in terms of implications for future research and limitations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
21 December 2017
Almost 30 years after Anderson and Gatignon systematically conceptualized various entry modes, the scholarly research on their performance effects has accumulated a large amount of empirical evidence. However, research has progressed in a somewhat fragmented manner where the cumulative impact of entry modes is difficult to discern and the entry-performance relationship still remains a conundrum in IB research.
Notes
For the studies that included more than one type of entry mode, our calculation is based on the direct and paired correlation between a specific entry mode and performance as listed in the correlation table.
According to Hult et al. (2008) classification, financial performance includes: overall profitability (indicated by ratios such as return on investment, return on sales, return on assets, and return on equity), profit margin, earnings per share, stock price, sales growth, growth of foreign sales, and Tobin’s Q. Operating performance includes product–market outcomes (market share, efficiency, new product introduction and innovation, and product/service quality) and internal process outcomes (productivity, employee retention and satisfaction, and cycle time). Overall effectiveness includes: reputation, survival, perceived overall performance, achievement of goals, and perceived overall performance relative to competitors. We treat survival as a separate category as Ren et al. (2009) suggested that venture termination is not the same as other performance measures.
References
Anand, J., & Delios, A. (1997). Location specificity and the transferability of downstream assets to foreign subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(3), 579–603.
Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1–26.
Ariño, A. (2003). Measures of strategic alliance performance: An analysis of construct validity. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), 66–79.
Barkema, H. G., & Vermeulen, F. (1997). What differences in the cultural backgrounds of partners are detrimental for international joint ventures? Journal of International Business Studies, 28(4), 845–864.
Bausch, A., & Krist, M. (2007). The effect of context-related moderators on the internationalization-performance relationship: Evidence from meta-analysis. Management International Review, 47(3), 319–347.
Belderbos, R., Tong, T. W., & Wu, S. (2014). Multinationality and downside risk: The roles of option portfolio and organization. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 88–106.
Blesa, A., & Ripollés, M. (2008). The influence of marketing capabilities on economic international performance. International Marketing Review, 25(6), 651–673.
Boyd, B., Dyhr Ulrich, A. M., & Hollensen, S. (2012). Financial performance of entry mode decisions: Effects of control in an internationalization context. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(24), 12–28.
Brouthers, K. D. (2013). A retrospective on: Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(1), 14–22.
Brouthers, K. D., & Hennart, J.-F. (2007). Boundaries of the firm: Insights from international entry mode research. Journal of Management, 33(3), 395–425.
Brouthers, L. E., & Xu, K. (2002). Product stereotypes, strategy and performance satisfaction: The case of Chinese exporters. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(4), 657–677.
Brouthers, L. E., Brouthers, K. D., & Werner, S. (1999). Is Dunning’s eclectic framework descriptive or normative? Journal of International Business Studies, 30(4), 831–844.
Brouthers, K. D., Brouthers, L. E., & Werner, S. (2003). Transaction cost‐enhanced entry mode choices and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24(12), 1239-1248.
Brouthers, K. D., Brouthers, L. E., & Werner, S. (2008). Resource-based advantages in an international context. Journal of Management, 34(2), 189-217.
Chandy, P., & Williams, T. G. (1994). The impact of journals and authors on international business research: A citational analysis of JIBS articles. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(4), 715–728.
Chang, S. J., Chung, J., & Moon, J. J. (2013). When do wholly owned subsidiaries perform better than joint ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 317–337.
Chang, S. J., & Xu, D. (2008). Spillovers and competition among foreign and local firms in China. Strategic Management Journal, 29(5), 495–518.
Chen, H. (1999). International performance of multinationals: A hybrid model. Journal of World Business, 34(2), 157–170.
Chung, C. C., & Beamish, P. W. (2010). The trap of continual ownership change in international equity joint ventures. Organization Science, 21(5), 995–1015.
Combs, J. G., Michael, S. C., & Castrogiovanni, G. J. (2004). Franchising: A review and avenues to greater theoretical diversity. Journal of Management, 30(6), 907–931.
Cullen, J. B., Johnson, J. L., & Sakano, T. (1995). Japanese and local partners commitment to IJVs: Psychological consequences of outcomes and investments in the IJV relationships. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(1), 91–115.
Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). Survival and profitability: The roles of experience and intangible assets in foreign subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1028–1038.
Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. (2004). Joint venture performance revisited: Japanese foreign subsidiaries worldwide. Management International Review, 44(1), 69–91.
Demirbag, M., Tatoglu, E., & Glaister, K. W. (2007). Factors influencing perceptions of performance: The case of western FDI in an emerging market. International Business Review, 16(3), 310–336.
Deng, P. (2001). WFOEs: The most popular entry mode into China. Business Horizons, 44(4), 63–72.
Dikova, D. (2009). Performance of foreign subsidiaries: Does psychic distance matter? International Business Review, 18(1), 38–49.
DuBois, F. L., & Reeb, D. (2000). Ranking the international business journals. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 689–704.
Ganotakis, P., & Love, J. H. (2012). Export propensity, export intensity and firm performance: The role of the entrepreneurial founding team. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(8), 693–718.
Gaur, A. S., & Lu, J. W. (2007). Ownership strategies and survival of foreign subsidiaries: Impacts of institutional distance and experience. Journal of Management, 33(1), 84–110.
Geyskens, I., Krishnan, R., Steenkamp, J.-B. E., & Cunha, P. V. (2009). A review and evaluation of meta-analysis practices in management research. Journal of Management, 35(2), 393–419.
Griffith, D. A., Cavusgil, S. T., & Xu, S. (2008). Emerging themes in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(7), 1220–1235.
Grinstein, A. (2008). The effect of market orientation and its components on innovation consequences: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(2), 166–173.
Hennart, J.-F., Kim, D.-J., & Zeng, M. (1998). The impact of joint venture status on the longevity of Japanese stakes in US manufacturing affiliates. Organization Science, 9(3), 382–395.
Hennart, J.-F., & Slangen, A. H. (2015). Yes, we really do need more entry mode studies! A commentary on Shaver. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1), 114–122.
Hill, C. W., Hwang, P., & Kim, W. C. (1990). An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 117–128.
Hsieh, L. H., Rodrigues, S. B., & Child, J. (2010). Risk perception and post-formation governance in international joint ventures in Taiwan: The perspective of the foreign partner. Journal of International Management, 16(3), 288–303.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Dichotomization of continuous variables: The implications for meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(3), 334–349.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen Jr, D. J., Griffith, D. A., Chabowski, B. R., Hamman, M. K., Dykes, B. J., Pollitte, W. A. & Cavusgil, S. T. (2008). An assessment of the measurement of performance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 1064–1080.
Isobe, T., Makino, S., & Montgomery, D. B. (2000). Resource commitment, entry timing, and market performance of foreign direct investments in emerging economies: The case of Japanese international joint ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 468–484.
Johnson, J., & Tellis, G. J. (2008). Drivers of success for market entry into China and India. Journal of Marketing, 72(3), 1–13.
Kallunki, J.-P., Larimo, J., & Pynnönen, S. (2001). Value creation in foreign direct investments. Management International Review, 41(4), 357–376.
Kim, K., & Park, J. H. (2002). The determinants of value creation for partner firms in the global alliance context. Management International Review, 42(4), 361–384.
Kim, Y., & Gray, S. J. (2008). The impact of entry mode choice on foreign affiliate performance: The case of foreign MNEs in South Korea. Management International Review, 48(2), 165–188.
Kirca, A. H., Hult, G. T. M., Roth, K., Cavusgil, S. T., Perryy, M. Z., Akdeniz, M. B., Deligonul, S. Z., Mena, J. A., Pollitte, W. A., Hoppner, J. J., Miller, J. C., White, R. C. (2011). Firm-specific assets, multinationality, and financial performance: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 47–72.
Lane, P. J., Salk, J. E., & Lyles, M. A. (2001). Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1139–1161.
Lee, C., & Beamish, P. W. (1995). The characteristics and performance of Korean joint ventures in LDCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3), 637–654.
Li, J. (1995). Foreign entry and survival: Effects of strategic choices on performance in international markets. Strategic Management Journal, 16(5), 333–351.
Li, J., Zhou, C., & Zajac, E. J. (2009). Control, collaboration, and productivity in international joint ventures: Theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8), 865–884.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis (Vol. 49). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Liu, L. A., Adair, W. L., & Bello, D. C. (2015). Fit, misfit, and beyond fit: Relational metaphors and semantic fit in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(7), 830–849.
Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2006). Partnering strategies and performance of SMEs’ international joint ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 461–486.
Lu, J. W., & Xu, D. (2006). Growth and survival of international joint ventures: An external-internal legitimacy perspective. Journal of Management, 32(3), 426–448.
Luo, Y. (1997). Guanxi and performance of foreign-invested enterprises in China: An empirical inquiry. Management International Review, 37(1), 51–70.
Luo, Y. (2001). Antecedents and consequences of personal attachment in cross-cultural cooperative ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 177–201.
Luo, Y. (2003). Market-seeking MNEs in an emerging market: How parent–subsidiary links shape overseas success. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(3), 290–309.
Luo, Y., & Zhao, H. (2004). Corporate link and competitive strategy in multinational enterprises: A perspective from subsidiaries seeking host market penetration. Journal of International Management, 10(1), 77–105.
Luo, Y., & Han, B. (2009). Graft and business in emerging economies: An ecological perspective. Journal of World Business, 44(3), 225–237.
Ma, X., & Delios, A. (2007). A new tale of two cities: Japanese FDIs in Shanghai and Beijing, 1979–2003. International Business Review, 16(2), 207–228.
Magnusson, P., Westjohn, S. A., & Boggs, D. J. (2009). Order-of-entry effects for service firms in developing markets: An examination of multinational advertising agencies. Journal of International Marketing, 17(2), 23–41.
Makino, S., Chan, C. M., Isobe, T., & Beamish, P. W. (2007). Intended and unintended termination of international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 28(11), 1113–1132.
Markides, C. C., & Ittner, C. D. (1994). Shareholder benefits from corporate international diversification: Evidence from US international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 343–366.
Martin, X. (2013). Solving theoretical and empirical conundrums in international strategy research: Linking foreign entry mode choices and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(1), 28–41.
Merchant, H. (2002). Shareholder value creation via international joint ventures: Some additional explanations. Management International Review, 42(1), 49–69.
Merchant, H. (2005). The structure-performance relationship in international joint ventures: a comparative analysis. Journal of World Business, 40(1), 41–56.
Miller, C. C., & Cardinal, L. B. (1994). Strategic planning and firm performance: A synthesis of more than two decades of research. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1649–1665.
Morschett, D., Schramm-Klein, H., & Swoboda, B. (2010). Decades of research on market entry modes: what do we really know about external antecedents of entry mode choice? Journal of International Management, 16(1), 60–77.
Murray, J. Y., Ju, M., & Gao, G. Y. (2012). Foreign market entry timing revisited: Trade-off between market share performance and firm survival. Journal of International Marketing, 20(3), 50–64.
Pan, Y., Li, S., & Tse, D. K. (1999). The impact of order and mode of market entry on profitability and market share. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1), 81–103.
Pangarkar, N., & Klein, S. (2004). The impact of control on international joint venture performance: A contingency approach. Journal of International Marketing, 12(3), 86–107.
Pangarkar, N., & Lim, H. (2003). Performance of foreign direct investment from Singapore. International Business Review, 12(5), 601–624.
Park, S. H., & Kim, D. (1997). Market valuation of joint ventures: Joint venture characteristics and wealth gains. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(2), 83–108.
Quer, D., & Claver, E. (2008). Foreign direct investment in China: Beyond the representative office. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 2(2), 23–31.
Ramaswamy, K., Gomes, L., & Veliyath, R. (1998). The performance correlates of ownership control: A study of US and European MNE joint ventures in India. International Business Review, 7(4), 423–441.
Ren, H., Gray, B., & Kim, K. (2009). Performance of international joint ventures: What factors really make a difference and how? Journal of Management, 35(3), 805–832.
Reuer, J. J., & Miller, K. D. (1997). Agency costs and the performance implications of international joint venture internalization. Strategic Management Journal, 18(6), 425–438.
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641.
Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2005). Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organization Science, 16(5), 491–508.
Shaver, J. M. (1998). Do foreign-owned and US-owned establishments exhibit the same location pattern in US manufacturing industries? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), 469–492.
Shaver, J. M. (2013). Do we really need more entry mode studies? Journal of International Business Studies, 44(1), 23–27.
Steensma, H. K., & Lyles, M. A. (2000). Explaining IJV survival in a transitional economy through social exchange and knowledge-based perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), 831–851.
Steensma, H. K., Tihanyi, L., Lyles, M. A., & Dhanaraj, C. (2005). The evolving value of foreign partnerships in transitioning economies. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 213–235.
Tang, J., & Rowe, W. G. (2012). The liability of closeness: Business relatedness and foreign subsidiary performance. Journal of World Business, 47(2), 288–296.
Yu, T., Subramaniam, M., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Rivalry deterrence in international markets: Contingencies governing the mutual forbearance hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 127–147.
Tihanyi, L., Griffith, D. A., & Russell, C. J. (2005). The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3), 270–283.
Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801–814.
Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269–296.
Woodcock, C. P., Beamish, P. W., & Makino, S. (1994). Ownership-based entry mode strategies and international performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 253–273.
Zhang, Y., Li, H., Hitt, M. A., & Cui, G. (2007). R&D intensity and international joint venture performance in an emerging market: Moderating effects of market focus and ownership structure. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(6), 944–960.
Zhao, H., & Luo, Y. (2002). Product diversification, ownership structure, and subsidiary performance in China’s dynamic market. Management International Review, 42(1), 27–48.
Zhao, H., Luo, Y., & Suh, T. (2004). Transaction cost determinants and ownership-based entry mode choice: A meta-analytical review. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6), 524–544.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research is partially funded by the Summer Research Grant of John Cook School of Business, Saint Louis University.
An erratum to this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-017-0328-9.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, H., Ma, J. & Yang, J. 30 Years of Research on Entry Mode and Performance Relationship: A Meta-Analytical Review. Manag Int Rev 57, 653–682 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-017-0314-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-017-0314-2