Skip to main content
Log in

Interpretive Frames as the Organization’s “Mirror”: From Espoused Values to Social Integration in MNEs

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Management International Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many multinational enterprises (MNEs) seek to strengthen their competitive positions through internal integration. Socialization is a key integration mechanism to leverage advantages across MNEs’ geographically dispersed organizational units. Parent organizations often communicate a set of values intended to guide action throughout the MNE, referred to as espoused values, to initiate a socialization process. However, we have limited insights into how espoused values are endorsed and subsequently contribute to MNE integration. Through a case study, we analyze how espoused values are interpreted by the foreign subsidiaries and influence subsequent subsidiary behavior. Our findings suggest that the socialization process is complex, where the local context and perceptions of headquarter nationality provide the frames for interpretation. We identify that even though the espoused values may differ in their operationalization in local contexts, they can still contribute to MNE integration. This study contributes to existing MNE literature by conceptualizing the role of interpretive frames and the endorsement of values in achieving integration through espoused values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashforth, B. K., & Saks, A. M. (1996). Socialization tactics: longitudinal effects on newcomer adjustment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 149–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Corley, K. (2012). Publishing in AMJ—part 7: what’s different about qualitative research? Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 509–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Bresman, H., & Håkanson, L. (2000). Managing the post-acquisition integration process: how the human integration and task integration processes interact to foster value creation. Journal of Management Studies, 37(3), 395–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. (1998). Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 773–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., & Morrison, A. J. (1995). Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4), 729–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkman, I., Barner-Rasmussen, W., & Li, L. (2004). Managing knowledge transfer in MNCs: the impact of headquarters control mechanisms. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 443–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkman, I., Stahl, G. K., & Vaara, E. (2007). Cultural differences and capability transfer in cross-border acquisitions: the mediating roles of capability complementarity, absorptive capacity, and social integration. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 658–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicekli, E. (2011). Antecedents of normative integration in multinational companies: a conceptual model. International Journal of Management, 28(4), 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E., & Geppert, M. (2011). Subsidiary integration as identity construction and institution building: a political sensemaking approach. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 395–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colman, H. L., Stensaker, I. G., & Tharaldesen, J. E. (2011). A merger of equals?. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J. B., Parboteeah, K. P., & Hoegl, M. (2004). Cross-national differences in managers’ willingness to justify ethically suspect behaviors: a test of institutional anomie theory. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 411–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Iribarne, P. (1997). The usefulness of an ethnographic approach to the international comparison of organizations. International Studies of Management and Organization, 26(4), 30–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Iribarne, P. (2012a). Cultural translation of corporate values. In M. C. Gertsen, A.-M. Søderberg, & M. Zølner (Eds.), Global collaboration: Intercultural experiences and learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Iribarne, P. (2012b). Managing corporate values in diverse national cultures: The challenge of differences (Vol. 19). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enright, M. J., & Subramanian, V. (2007). An organizing framework for MNC subsidiary typologies. Management International Review, 47(6), 895–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evan, W. M. (1963). Peer-group interaction and organizational socialization: a study of employee turnover. American Sociological Review, 28(3), 436–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., & Nohria, N. (1989). Internal differentiation within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 10(4), 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., & Nohria, N. (1993). Horses for courses: organizational forms for multinational corporations. Sloan Management Review, 34(2), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbert, M., & Ruigrok, W. (2010). The “what” and “how” of case study rigor: three strategies based on published work. Organizational Research Methods, 13(4), 710–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., & Thomas, J. B. (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 370–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grøgaard, B. (2012). Alignment of strategy and structure in international firms: an empirical examination. International Business Review, 21(3), 397–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegl, M., Parboteeah, K. P., & Muethel, M. (2012). Cross-national differences in managers’ creativity promoting values. Management International Review, 52(4), 565–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, A., Kirk-Brown, A., & Cooper, B. (2012). Does congruence between espoused and enacted organizational values predict affective commitment in Australian organizations? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(4), 731–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., De Luque, M. S., & House, R. J. (2006). In the eye of the beholder: cross cultural lessons in leadership from project GLOBE. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), 67–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabanoff, B., & Daly, J. (2002). Espoused values of organisations. Australian Journal of Management, 27(Special Issue), 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keupp, M. M., Beckenbauer, A., & Gassmann, O. (2010). Enforcing intellectual property rights in weak appropriability regimes. Management International Review, 50(1), 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keupp, M. M., Palmié, M., & Gassmann, O. (2011). Achieving subsidiary integration in international innovation by managerial ‘tools’. Management International Review, 51(2), 213–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal, K. A., & Mohendra, N. (2010). Espoused organizational values, vision, and corporate social responsibility: does it matter to organizational members? The Journal for Decision Makers, 35(3), 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K., Park, J. H., & Prescott, J. E. (2003). The global integration of business functions: a study of multinational businesses in integrated global industries. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(4), 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, P. H., & Zeitlin, J. (2005). Local players in global games. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, O., Beechler, S., Taylor, S., & Boyacigiller, N. A. (2007). What we talk about when we talk about ‘global mindset’: managerial cognition in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(2), 231–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S., & Hsieh, A. (2010). International strategy implementation: roles of subsidiaries, operational capabilities, and procedural justice. Journal of Business Research, 63(1), 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitlis, S. (2005). The social process of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, J. I., & Jarillo, J. C. (1989). The evolution of research on coordination mechanisms in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 20(3), 489–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, J. I., & Jarillo, J. C. (1991). Coordination demands of international strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(3), 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. (2011). Multinational enterprises and local contexts: the opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michailova, S., & Minbaeva, D. B. (2012). Organizational values and knowledge sharing in multinational corporations: the Danisco case. International Business Review, 21(1), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muratbekova-Touron, M. (2008). From an ethnocentric to a geocentric approach to IHRM. Cross Cultural Management, 15(4), 335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N., & Ghoshal, S. (1994). Differentiated fit and shared values: alternatives for managing headquarters-subsidiary relations. Strategic Management Journal, 15(6), 491–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noorderhaven, N., & Harzing, A. W. (2009). Knowledge-sharing and social interaction within MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(5), 719–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, S. W. (2000). Managing foreign subsidiaries: agents of headquarters, or an interdependent network? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 525–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, H. V. (1969). The tortuous evolution of the multinational corporation. Colombia Journal of World Business, 4(1), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, M. (2006). The impact of operational structure, lateral integrative mechanisms and control mechanisms on intra-MNE knowledge transfer. International Business Review, 15(5), 547–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, B. (2010). Another look at the impact of personal and organizational values congruency. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(4), 535–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K., Schweiger, D. M., & Morrison, A. J. (1991). Global strategy implementation at the business unit level: operational capabilities and administrative mechanisms. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(3), 369–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M., Verbeke, A., & Nguyen, Q. T. K. (2011). Fifty years of international business theory and beyond. Management International Review, 51(6), 755–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, S., & Kotulla, T. (2011). 50 years of research on international standardization and adaptation: from a systematic literature analysis to a theoretical framework. International Business Review, 20(5), 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinkovics, R. R., Penz, E., & Ghauri, P. N. (2008). Enhancing the trustworthiness of qualitative research in international business. Management International Review, 48(6), 689–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teerikangas, S., & Very, P. (2006). The culture–performance relationship in M&A: from yes/no to how. British Journal of Management, 17(S1), S31–S48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1979). The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 539–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A. (2009). International business strategy: Rethinking the foundations of global corporate success. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, C., & Piekkari, R. (2006). Crossing language boundaries: qualitative interviewing in international business. Management International Review, 46(4), 417–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zbaracki, M. J. (1998). The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3), 602–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Alain Verbeke, Øystein Fjeldstad, the anonymous reviewers, and the participants in the MIR special issue pre-publication workshop in November 2012 for their valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birgitte Grøgaard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grøgaard, B., Colman, H.L. Interpretive Frames as the Organization’s “Mirror”: From Espoused Values to Social Integration in MNEs. Manag Int Rev 56, 171–194 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-015-0273-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-015-0273-4

Keywords

Navigation