Skip to main content
Log in

Introduction: Studying Islam from below and interrogating divisions in contemporary Russia

  • Published:
Contemporary Islam Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The four contributions to this special section aim to study Islam in Russia from below, by examining how Muslims in Russia live and experience their vision of the Islamic religion in conformity and/or dissonance with official categories of Islam, or by simply moving beyond them. The contributions in this collection start from the idea that the study of Islam in Russia is inevitably confronted with normative discourses about acceptable and undesirable forms of Islam. These normative discourses are represented in the categories of “traditional” and “non-traditional Islam” that contributors to the section examine and interrogate through the perceptions and experiences of their Muslim informants. A number of questions arise when we examine the relationship between lived, grassroots Muslim experiences – Islam perceived from below – and top-down normative discourses. First, we can ask whether official categories reflect emic self-definitions, ways in which Muslims in Russia define themselves, taking into account that these emic terms are in flux. We can also ask about the nature of grassroots Muslim experiences: do they inevitably emerge outside of official Muslim institutions, or do we find a variety of grassroots Muslims, not all clearly identifiable on a religious level? Second, we can consider what increased religiosity, taking different forms, might mean for the perception of official dichotomies, along with the role of the Muftiates at the intersection between state discourses and grassroots Muslims. Does increased religiosity dissolve, alter or consolidate divisions drawn on an official level? The ethnographies in this section reveal that the exploration of Islam tends to produce unique trajectories among Muslims in Russia that cannot always be clearly located on a theological spectrum. The religious trajectories carved out by Muslims in Russia are constantly evolving and responding to a changing socio-political environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Conversation with Sufi murids in Ufa, June 2019.

  2. The debates on the Grozny fatwa, which was adopted in 2016 during an international theological conference, show that the question of Sufism also relates to power considerations among diverse Muslim representative bodies in Russia. The initiative was supported by the Muftiate of Tatarstan but not by the Moscow-based Russian Council of Muftis.

References

  • Akhmetkarimov, B. (2019). Common sense is not so common: Integration and perceptions of ‘traditional Islam’ in Russia’s Volga-Ural region. Contemporary Islam, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-019-00439-6.

  • Benussi, M. (2018). “Sovereign” Islam and Tatar “Aqīdah”: Normative religious narratives and grassroots criticism amongst Tatarstan’s Muslims. Contemporary Islam, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-018-0428-8.

  • Di Puppo, L. (2019). The paradoxes of a localised Islamic orthodoxy: Rethinking Tatar traditional Islam in Russia. Ethnicities, 19(2), 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Puppo, L., & Schmoller, J. (2019). Here or elsewhere: Sufism and traditional Islam in Russia’s Volga-Ural region. Contemporary Islam, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-018-00434-3.

  • Eickelman, D. F. (2007). The study of Islam in local contexts. In: Rippin, A. (Ed.), Defining Islam: A Reader (pp. 58–73). London: Equinox.

  • el-Zein, A. H. (1977). Beyond ideology and theology: The search for the anthropology of Islam. Annual Review of Anthropology 6, 227–254.

  • Fadil, N., & Fernando, M. (2015). Rediscovering the “everyday” Muslim. Notes on an anthropological divide. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 5(2), 59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. J. (2001). Muslim religious institutions in Imperial Russia: The Islamic world of Novouzensk District and the Kazakh inner horde, 1780–1910. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzelbaeva, G. (2013). Религиозные идентичности и практики православных и мусульман. In S. A. Ahmetova, M. I. Gilyazova, & D. R. Gimadeeva (Eds.), Этничность, религиозность и миграции в современном Татарстане (pp. 55–74). Кazan: Kazan Federal University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K. (2013). And then we work for God: Rural Sunni Islam in Western Turkey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Kaliszewska, I. (2019). What good are all these divisions in Islam? Everyday Islam and normative discourses in Daghestan. Contemporary Islam, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-019-00436-9.

  • Kefeli, A. (2015). Becoming Muslim in Imperial Russia: Conversion, apostasy, and literacy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukens-Bull, R. (1999). Between text and practice: Considerations in the anthropological study of Islam. Marburg Journal of Religion 4(2), 10–20.

  • Marsden, M. (2005). Living Islam: Muslim religious experience in Pakistan’s North-West Frontier. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Osella, F., & Soares, B. (2010). Islam, politics, anthropology. In F. Osella & B. Soares (Eds.), Islam, politics, anthropology (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schielke, S. (2010). Second thoughts about the anthropology of Islam, or how to make sense of grand schemes in everyday life. ZMO working papers, 2.

  • Schielke, S. (2012). Being a nonbeliever in a time of Islamic revival: Trajectories of doubt and certainty in contemporary Egypt. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 44(2), 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varisco, D. M. (2005). Islam obscured: The rhetoric of anthropological representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Yurchak, A. (2006). Everything was forever until it was no more: The last Soviet generation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lili Di Puppo.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di Puppo, L., Schmoller, J. Introduction: Studying Islam from below and interrogating divisions in contemporary Russia. Cont Islam 14, 99–110 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-019-00447-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-019-00447-6

Keywords

Navigation