Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Electromagnetic (EM) catheter path tracking in ultrasound-guided brachytherapy of the breast

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate a novel navigation system for breast brachytherapy, based on ultrasound (US)-guided catheter needle implantations followed by electromagnetic (EM) tracking of catheter paths.

Methods

Breast phantoms were produced, containing US–visible tumors. Ultrasound was used to localize the tumor pose and volume within the phantom, followed by planning an optimal catheter pattern through the tumor using navigation software. An electromagnetic (EM)-tracked catheter needle was used to insert the catheters in the desired pattern. The inserted catheters were visualized on a post-implant CT, serving as ground truth. Electromagnetic (EM) tracking and reconstruction of the inserted catheter paths were performed by pulling a flexible EM guidewire through each catheter, performed in two clinical brachytherapy suites. The accuracy of EM catheter tracking was evaluated by calculating the Hausdorff distance between the EM-tracked and CT-based catheter paths. The accuracy and clinical feasibility of EM catheter tracking were also evaluated in three breast cancer patients, performed in a separate experiment room.

Results

A total of 71 catheter needles were implanted into 12 phantoms using US guidance and EM navigation, in an average ± SD time of 8.1 ± 2.9 min. The accuracy of EM catheter tracking was dependent on the brachytherapy suite: 2.0 ± 1.2 mm in suite 1 and 0.6 ± 0.2 mm in suite 2. EM catheter tracking was successfully performed in three breast brachytherapy patients. Catheter tracking typically took less than 5 min and had an average accuracy of 1.7 ± 0.3 mm.

Conclusion

Our preliminary results show a potential role for US guidance and EM needle navigation for implantation of catheters for breast brachytherapy. EM catheter tracking can accurately assess the implant geometry in breast brachytherapy patients. This methodology has the potential to evaluate catheter positions directly after the implantation and during the several fractions of the treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Canadian Cancer Statistics Advisory Committee (2019) Canadian cancer statistics 2019. Canadian Cancer Society, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  2. Khan AJ, Kirk MC, Mehta PS, Seif NS, Griem KL, Bernard DA, Chu JCH, Dickler A (2006) A dosimetric comparison of three-dimensional conformal, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, and MammoSite partial-breast irradiation. Brachytherapy 5:183–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2006.06.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weed DW, Edmundson GK, Vicini FA, Chen PY, Martinez AA (2005) Accelerated partial breast irradiation: a dosimetric comparison of three different techniques. Brachytherapy 4:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2004.12.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel RR, Becker SJ, Das RK, Mackie TR (2007) A dosimetric comparison of accelerated partial breast irradiation techniques: multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, and supine versus prone helical tomotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:935–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.03.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsalpatouros A, Baltas D, Kolotas C, van der Laarse R, Koutsouris D, Uzunoglu NK, Zamboglou N (1997) CT-based software for 3-D localization and reconstruction in stepping source brachytherapy. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 1:229–242. https://doi.org/10.1109/4233.681165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou J, Sebastian E, Mangona V, Yan D (2013) Real-time catheter tracking for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy using an electromagnetic 3D-guidance device: a preliminary performance study. Med Phys. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4788641

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bharat S, Kung C, Dehghan E, Ravi A, Venugopal N, Bonillas A, Stanton D, Kruecker J (2014) Electromagnetic tracking for catheter reconstruction in ultrasound-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy of the prostate. Brachytherapy 13:640–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2014.05.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bax J, Smith D, Bartha L, Montreuil J, Sherebrin S, Gardi L, Edirisinghe C, Fenster A (2018) A compact mechatronic system for 3D ultrasound guided prostate interventions. Med Phys 38:1055–1069. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3531540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ungi T, Gauvin G, Lasso A, Yeo CT, Pezeshki P, Vaughan T, Carter K, Rudan J, Engel CJ, Fichtinger G (2016) Navigated breast tumor excision using electromagnetically tracked ultrasound and surgical instruments. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 63:600–606. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2015.2466591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tokuda J, Fischer GS, Papademetris X, Yaniv Z, Ibanez L, Cheng P, Liu H, Blevins J, Arata J, Golby AJ, Kapur T, Pieper S, Burdette EC, Fichtinger G, Tempany CM, Hata N (2009) OpenIGTLink: an open network protocol for image-guided therapy environment. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 5:423–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lasso A, Heffter T, Rankin A, Pinter C, Ungi T, Fichtinger G (2014) PLUS: open-source toolkit for ultrasound-guided intervention systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 61:2527–2537. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2014.2322864

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin J-C, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R (2012) 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 30:1323–1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Marinello G (2009) Paris system for interstitial brachytherapy. In: Lemoigne Y, Caner A (eds) Radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 219–225

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Vaughan T, Brastianos H, Ungi T, Lasso A, Falkson C, Fichtinger G (2019) Needle navigation and catheter reconstruction for breast brachytherapy using open source software. Acta Polytech Hungarica 16:99–118

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith BD, Arthur DW, Buchholz TA, Haffty BG, Hahn CA, Hardenbergh PH, Julian TB, Marks LB, Todor DA, Vicini FA, Whelan TJ, White J, Wo JY, Harris JR (2009) Accelerated partial breast irradiation consensus statement from the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:987–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Correa C, Harris EE, Leonardi MC, Smith BD, Taghian AG, Thompson AM, White J, Harris JR (2017) Accelerated partial breast irradiation: executive summary for the update of an ASTRO evidence-based consensus statement. Pract Radiat Oncol 7:73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2016.09.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kåsine T, Romundstad L, Rosseland LA, Ullensvang K, Fagerland MW, Hol PK, Kessler P, Sauter AR (2019) Needle tip tracking for ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block procedures—an observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 63:1055–1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13379

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kellermeier M, Herbolzheimer J, Kreppner S, Lotter M, Strnad V, Bert C (2017) Electromagnetic tracking (EMT) technology for improved treatment quality assurance in interstitial brachytherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 18:211–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12021

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kellermeier M, Fietkau R, Strnad V, Bert C (2018) Assessment of the implant geometry in fractionated interstitial HDR breast brachytherapy using an electromagnetic tracking system. Brachytherapy 17:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2017.10.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Gabor Fichtinger is supported as a Canada Research Chair in Computer-Integrated Surgery. This work was funded, in part, by NIH/NIBIB and NIH/NIGMS (via Grant 1R01EB021396-01A1-Slicer + PLUS: Point-of-Care Ultrasound) and by CANARIE’s Research Software Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natasja N. Y. Janssen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Janssen, N.N.Y., Brastianos, H., Akingbade, A. et al. Electromagnetic (EM) catheter path tracking in ultrasound-guided brachytherapy of the breast. Int J CARS 15, 1645–1652 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02233-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02233-9

Keywords

Navigation