Skip to main content
Log in

Recommendations in pre-procedural imaging assessment for TAVI intervention: SIC-SIRM position paper part 2 (CT and MR angiography, standard medical reporting, future perspectives)

  • Cardiac radiology
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-invasive cardiovascular imaging owns a pivotal role in the preoperative assessment of patient candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), providing a wide range of crucial information to select the patients who will benefit the most and have the procedure done safely. This document has been developed by a joined group of experts of the Italian Society of Cardiology and the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology and aims to produce an updated consensus statement about the pre-procedural imaging assessment in candidate patients for TAVI intervention. The writing committee consisted of members and experts of both societies who worked jointly to develop a more integrated approach in the field of cardiac and vascular radiology. Part 2 of the document will cover CT and MR angiography, standard medical reporting, and future perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

2D/3D:

Bi-three dimensional

AKI:

Acute kidney injury

ATTR-CA:

Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis

BAV:

Bicuspid aortic valve

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

CABG:

Coronary artery bypass graft

CM:

Contrast material

CMR:

Cardiac magnetic resonance

CT:

Computed tomography

CTA:

Computed tomography angiography

CCTA:

Coronary computed tomography angiography

ECV:

Extracellular volume

HR:

Heart rate

ICA:

Invasive coronary angiography

LGE:

Late gadolinium enhancement

MR:

Magnetic resonance

LVOT:

Left ventricle outflow tract

SIC:

Italian Society of Cardiology

SIRM:

Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology

SSFP:

Steady-state-free-precession

TAVI:

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation

VIV:

Valve-in-valve

VTC:

Virtual transcatheter aortic valve to coronary distance

VTSTJ:

Valve-to-sinotubular junction distance

References

  1. Ferro CJ, Chue CD, de Belder MA, Moat N, Wendler O, Trivedi U, Ludman P, Townend JN (2015) Impact of renal function on survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): an analysis of the UK TAVI registry. Heart 101:546–552. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2014-307041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Edvardsen T, Goldstein S, Lancellotti P, LeFevre M, Miller F Jr, Otto CM (2017) Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 30:372–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2017.02.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bang CN, Greve AM, Rossebo AB, Ray S, Egstrup K, Boman K, Nienaber C, Okin PM, Devereux RB, Wachtell K (2017) Antihypertensive treatment with ß-blockade in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis and Association with Cardiovascular Events. J Am Heart Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006709

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Rovere G, Meduri A, Savino G, Flammia FC, Lo Piccolo F, Carafa MRP, Larici AR, Natale L, Merlino B, Marano R (2021) Practical instructions for using drugs in CT and MR cardiac imaging. Radiol Med (Torino) 126:356–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01261-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kasel AM, Cassese S, Bleiziffer S, Amaki M, Hahn RT, Kastrati A, Sengupta PP (2013) Standardized imaging for aortic annular sizing: implications for transcatheter valve selection. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:249–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.12.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aschoff AJ, Catalano C, Kirchin MA, Krix M, Albrecht T (2017) Low radiation dose in computed tomography: the role of iodine. Br J Radiol 90(1076):20170079. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170079

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hecht H, Blaha MJ, Berman DS, Nasir K, Budoff M, Leipsic J, Blankstein R, Narula J, Rumberger J, Shaw LJ (2017) Clinical indications for coronary artery calcium scoring in asymptomatic patients: expert consensus statement from the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 11:157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2017.02.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blanke P, Weir-McCall JR, Achenbach S, Delgado V, Hausleiter J, Jilaihawi H, Marwan M, Norgaard BL, Piazza N, Schoenhagen P, Leipsic JA (2019) Computed tomography imaging in the context of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): an expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 12:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.12.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Onoda H, Ueno H, Hashimoto M, Kuwahara H, Sobajima M, Kinugawa K (2019) Clinical advantages of using low tube voltage in third-generation 192-slice dual-source computed tomographic angiography before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int Heart J 60:1091–1097. https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.18-693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Elhmidi Y, Bleiziffer S, Deutsch MA, Krane M, Mazzitelli D, Lange R, Piazza N (2014) Acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: incidence, predictors and impact on mortality. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 107:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2014.01.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alassar A, Roy D, Abdulkareem N, Valencia O, Brecker S, Jahangiri M (2012) Acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: incidence, risk factors, and prognostic effects. Innovations (Phila) 7:389–393. https://doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0b013e3182814e43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McCullough PA, Wolyn R, Rocher LL, Levin RN, O’Neill WW (1997) Acute renal failure after coronary intervention: incidence, risk factors, and relationship to mortality. Am J Med 103:368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00150-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carrabba N, Valenti R, Migliorini A, Vergara R, Parodi G, Antoniucci D (2013) Prognostic value of myocardial injury following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 111:1475–1481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.01.301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Elhmidi Y, Bleiziffer S, Piazza N, Hutter A, Opitz A, Hettich I, Kornek M, Ruge H, Brockmann G, Mazzitelli D, Lange R (2011) Incidence and predictors of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am Heart J 161:735–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2011.01.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barbash IM, Ben-Dor I, Dvir D, Maluenda G, Xue Z, Torguson R, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Waksman R (2012) Incidence and predictors of acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am Heart J 163:1031–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2012.01.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wijesinghe N, Ye J, Rodes-Cabau J, Cheung A, Velianou JL, Natarajan MK, Dumont E, Nietlispach F, Gurvitch R, Wood DA, Tay E, Webb JG (2010) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:1122–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2010.08.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jilaihawi H, Chen M, Webb J, Himbert D, Ruiz CE, Rodes-Cabau J et al (2016) A bicuspid aortic valve imaging classification for the TAVR era. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9:1145–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.12.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoon S-H, Kim W-K, Dhoble A, Milhorini Pio S, Babaliaros V, Jilaihawi H et al (2020) Bicuspid aortic valve morphology and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC 76:1018–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sucha D, Tuncay V, Prakken NH, Leiner T, van Ooijen PM, Oudkerk M, Budde RP (2015) Does the aortic annulus undergo conformational change throughout the cardiac cycle? A systematic review. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:1307–1317. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Clavel MA, Pibarot P, Messika-Zeitoun D, Capoulade R, Malouf J, Aggarval S, Araoz PA, Michelena HI, Cueff C, Larose E, Miller JD, Vahanian A, Enriquez-Sarano M (2014) Impact of aortic valve calcification, as measured by MDCT, on survival in patients with aortic stenosis: results of an international registry study. JACC 64:1202–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK, Gardin JM, Gottdiener JS, Smith VE, Kitzman DW, Otto CM (1997) Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovasc Health Study JACC 29:630–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00563-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Achenbach S, Delgado V, Hausleiter J, Schoenhagen P, Min JK, Leipsic JA (2012) SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6:366–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2012.11.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Edvardsen T, Goldstein S, Lancellotti P, LeFevre M, Miller F Jr, Otto CM (2017) Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18:254–275. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aggarwal SR, Clavel M-A, Messika-Zeitoun D, Cueff C, Malouf J, Araoz PA, Mankad R, Michelena H, Vahanian A, Enriquez-Sarano M (2013) Sex differences in aortic valve calcification measured by multidetector computed tomography in aortic stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6:40–47. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.980052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Buellesfeld L, Stortecky S, Heg D, Gloekler S, Meier B, Wenaweser P, Windecker S (2014) Extent and distribution of calcification of both the aortic annulus and the left ventricular outflow tract predict aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. EuroIntervention 10:732–738. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV10I6A126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. John D, Buellesfeld L, Yuecel S, Mueller R, Latsios G, Beucher H, Gerckens U, Grube E (2010) Correlation of Device landing zone calcification and acute procedural success in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantations with the self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:233–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2009.11.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Leber AW, Kasel M, Ischinger T, Ebersberger UH, Antoni D, Schmidt M, Riess G, Renz V, Huber A, Helmberger T, Hoffmann E (2013) Aortic valve calcium score as a predictor for outcome after TAVI using the CoreValve revalving system. Int J Cardiol 166:652–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Masson JB, Kovac J, Schuler G, Ye J, Cheung A, Kapadia S, Tuzcu ME, Kodali S, Leon MB, Webb JG (2009) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: review of the nature, management, and avoidance of procedural complications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:811–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2009.07.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ribeiro HB, Nombela-Franco L, Urena M, Mok M, Pasian S, Doyle D, DeLarochelliere R, Cote M, Laflamme L, DeLarochelliere H, Allende R, Dumont E, Rodes-Cabau J (2013) Coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6:452–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.11.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Huczek Z, Zbronski K, Grodecki K, Scislo P, Rymuza B, Kochman J et al (2018) Concomitant coronary artery disease and its management in patients referred to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from the POL-TAVI Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 91:115–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Annoni AD, Andreini D, Pontone G, Mancini ME, Formenti A, Mushtaq S, Baggiano A, Conte E, Guglielmo M, Muscogiuri G, Muratori M, Fusini L, Trabattoni D, Teruzzi G, Coutinho Santos AI, Agrifoglio M, Pepi M (2018) CT angiography prior to TAVI procedure using third-generation scanner with wide volume coverage: feasibility, renal safety and diagnostic accuracy for coronary tree. Br J Radiol 91(1090):20180196. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180196

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Mushtaq S, Conte E, Pontone G, Pompilio G, Guglielmo M, Annoni A, Baggiano A, Formenti A, Mancini ME, Muscogiuri G, Nicoli F, Giannitto C, Magatelli M, Tanzilli A, Consiglio E, Fiorentini C, Bartorelli AL, Pirillo SP, Pepi M, Andreini D (2020) Interpretability of coronary CT angiography performed with a novel whole-heart coverage high-definition CT scanner in 300 consecutive patients with coronary artery bypass grafts. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 14:137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2019.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Salgado RA, Leipsic JA, Shivalkar B, Ardies L, Van Herck PL, Op de Beeck BJ, Vrints C, Rodrigus I, Parizel PM, Bosmans J (2014) Preprocedural CT evaluation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics 34:1491–1514. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.346125076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hanneman K, Newman B, Chan F (2017) Congenital variants and anomalies of the aortic arch. Radiographics 37:32–51. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Blanke P, Schoepf UJ, Leipsic JA (2013) CT in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Radiology 269:650–669. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13120696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Leipsic J, Hague CJ, Gurvitch R, Ajlan AM, Labounty TM, Min JK (2012) MDCT to guide transcatheter aortic valve replacement and mitral valve repair. Cardiol Clin 30:147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccl.2011.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chiocchi M, Ricci F, Pasqualetto M, D’Errico F, Benelli L, Pugliese L, Cavallo AU, Forcina M, Presicce M, De Stasio V, Di Donna C, Di Tosto F, Spiritigliozzi L, Floris R, Romeo F (2020) Role of computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and valve-in-valve implantation: complete review of preprocedural and postprocedural imaging. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 21:182–191. https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000000899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lederman RJ, Babaliaros VC, Rogers T, Khan JM, Kamioka N, Dvir D, Greenbaum AB (2019) Preventing coronary obstruction during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: from computed tomography to BASILICA. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 12:1197–1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.052

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Paelinck BP, Van Herck PL, Rodrigus I, Claeys MJ, Laborde JC, Parizel PM, Vrints CJ, Bosmans JM (2011) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging of aortic valve stenosis and aortic root to multimodality imaging for selection of transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates. Am J Cardiol 108:92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.02.348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gopal A, Grayburn PA, Mack M, Chacon I, Kim R, Montenegro D, Phan T, Rudolph J, Filardo G, Mack MJ, Gopalakrishnan D (2015) Noncontrast 3D CMR imaging for aortic valve annulus sizing in TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 8:375–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.11.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. La Manna A, Sanfilippo A, Capodanno D, Salemi A, Polizzi G, Deste W, Cincotta G, Cadoni A, Marchese A, Figuera M, Ussia GP, Pittala R, Privitera C, Tamburino C (2011) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the assessment of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a pilot study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:82. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-82

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Francone M, Budde RPJ, Bremerich J, Dacher JN, Loewe C, Wolf F, Natale L, Pontone G, Redheuil A, Vliegenthart R, Nikolaou K, Gutberlet M, Salgado R (2020) CT and MR imaging prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: standardisation of scanning protocols, measurements and reporting-a consensus document by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR). Eur Radiol 30:2627–2650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06357-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR, Schoenhagen P (2010) Multimodality quantitative imaging of aortic root for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: more complex than it appears. JACC 55:195–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL, Bertella E, Mushtaq S, Gripari P, Loguercio M, Cortinovis S, Baggiano A, Conte E, Beltrama V, Annoni A, Formenti A, Tamborini G, Muratori M, Guaricci A, Alamanni F, Ballerini G, Pepi M (2013) Comparison of accuracy of aortic root annulus assessment with cardiac magnetic resonance versus echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 112:1790–1799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.07.050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rogers T, Waksman R (2016) Role of CMR in TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9:593–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.01.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Freixa X, Chan J, Bonan R, Ibrahim R, Lamarche Y, Demers P, Basmadjian A, Cartier R, Asgar AW (2015) Impact of coronary artery disease on left ventricular ejection fraction recovery following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 85:450–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Weidemann F, Herrmann S, Stork S, Niemann M, Frantz S, Lange V, Beer M, Gattenlohner S, Voelker W, Ertl G, Strotmann JM (2009) Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 120:577–584. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.847772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Jabbour A, Ismail TF, Moat N, Gulati A, Roussin I, Alpendurada F, Park B, Okoroafor F, Asgar A, Barker S, Davies S, Prasad SK, Rubens M, Mohiaddin RH (2011) Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography. JACC 58:2165–2173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Binder RK, Webb JG, Willson AB, Urena M, Hansson NC, Norgaard BL et al (2013) The impact of integration of a multidetector computed tomography annulus area sizing algorithm on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective, multicenter, controlled trial. JACC 62:431–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. von Aspern K, Foldyna B, Etz CD, Hoyer A, Girrbach F, Holzhey D, Lucke C, Grothoff M, Linke A, Mohr FW, Gutberlet M, Lehmkuhl L (2015) Effective diameter of the aortic annulus prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: influence of area-based versus perimeter-based calculation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31:163–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0527-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Gurvitch R, Webb JG, Yuan R, Johnson M, Hague C, Willson AB, Toggweiler S, Wood DA, Ye J, Moss R, Thompson CR, Achenbach S, Min JK, Labounty TM, Cury R, Leipsic J (2011) Aortic annulus diameter determination by multidetector computed tomography: reproducibility, applicability, and implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4:1235–1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ng AC, Delgado V, van der Kley F, Shanks M, van de Veire NR, Bertini M, Nucifora G, van Bommel RJ, Tops LF, de Weger A, Tavilla G, de Roos A, Kroft LJ, Leung DY, Schuijf J, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ (2010) Comparison of aortic root dimensions and geometries before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by 2- and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.885152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Mitsouras D, Liacouras P, Imanzadeh A, Giannopoulos AA, Cai T, Kumamaru KK, George E, Wake N, Caterson EJ, Pomahac B, Ho VB, Grant GT, Rybicki FJ (2015) Medical 3D printing for the radiologist. Radiographics 35:1965–1988. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015140320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ripley B, Kelil T, Cheezum MK, Goncalves A, Di Carli MF, Rybicki FJ, Steigner M, Mitsouras D, Blankstein R (2016) 3D printing based on cardiac CT assists anatomic visualization prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2015.12.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. George E, Liacouras P, Rybicki FJ, Mitsouras D (2017) Measuring and establishing the accuracy and reproducibility of 3D printed medical models. Radiographics 37:1424–1450. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Faletti R, Gatti M, Cosentino A, Bergamasco L, Cura Stura E, Garabello D, Pennisi G, Salizzoni S, Veglia S, Ottavio D, Rinaldi M, Fonio P (2018) 3D printing of the aortic annulus based on cardiovascular computed tomography: preliminary experience in pre-procedural planning for aortic valve sizing. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 12:391–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2018.05.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Maragiannis D, Jackson MS, Igo SR, Schutt RC, Connell P, Grande-Allen J, Barker CM, Chang SM, Reardon MJ, Zoghbi WA, Little SH (2015) Replicating patient-specific severe aortic valve stenosis with functional 3D modeling. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 8:e003626. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.003626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kristen AV, Schnabel PA, Winter B, Helmke BM, Longerich T, Hardt S, Koch A, Sack FU, Katus HA, Linke RP, Dengler TJ (2010) High prevalence of amyloid in 150 surgically removed heart valves—a comparison of histological and clinical data reveals a correlation to atheroinflammatory conditions. Cardiovasc Pathol 19:228–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpath.2009.04.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Castano A, Narotsky DL, Hamid N, Khalique OK, Morgenstern R, DeLuca A, Rubin J, Chiuzan C, Nazif T, Vahl T, George I, Kodali S, Leon MB, Hahn R, Bokhari S, Maurer MS (2017) Unveiling transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis and its predictors among elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Eur Heart J 38:2879–2887. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx350

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Sperry BW, Jones BM, Vranian MN, Hanna M, Jaber WA (2016) Recognizing transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis in patients with aortic stenosis: impact on prognosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9:904–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.10.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Maceira AM, Joshi J, Prasad SK, Moon JC, Perugini E, Harding I, Sheppard MN, Poole-Wilson PA, Hawkins PN, Pennell DJ (2005) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac amyloidosis. Circulation 111:186–193. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000152819.97857.9D

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Treibel TA, Fontana M, Gilbertson JA, Castelletti S, White SK, Scully PR, Roberts N, Hutt DF, Rowczenio DM, Whelan CJ, Ashworth MA, Gillmore JD, Hawkins PN, Moon JC (2016) Occult transthyretin cardiac amyloid in severe calcific aortic stenosis: prevalence and prognosis in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 9(8):e005066. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Scully PR, Patel KP, Saberwal B, Klotz E, Augusto JB, Thornton GD et al (2020) Identifying cardiac amyloid in aortic stenosis: ECV quantification by CT in TAVR patients. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 13:2177–2189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.05.029

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RM and MC contributed equally to the writing and editing of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Marano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This article contains data extracted from published papers. All procedures were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

Ethical standards

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

This article contains data extracted from published papers; informed consent was obtained from authors of included papers.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marano, R., Pontone, G., Agricola, E. et al. Recommendations in pre-procedural imaging assessment for TAVI intervention: SIC-SIRM position paper part 2 (CT and MR angiography, standard medical reporting, future perspectives). Radiol med 127, 277–293 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01434-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01434-9

Keywords

Navigation