Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Meeting the Needs of A Changing Landscape: Advances and Challenges in Undergraduate Biology Education

  • Special Issue: Mathematical Biology Education
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last 25 years, reforms in undergraduate biology education have transformed the way biology is taught at many institutions of higher education. This has been fueled in part by a burgeoning discipline-based education research community, which has advocated for evidence-based instructional practices based on findings from research. This perspective will review some of the changes to undergraduate biology education that have gained or are currently gaining momentum, becoming increasingly common in undergraduate biology classrooms. However, there are still areas in need of improvement. Although more underrepresented minority students are enrolling in and graduating from biology programs than in the past, there is a need to understand the experiences and broaden participation of other underserved groups in biology and ensure biology classroom learning environments are inclusive. Additionally, although understanding biology relies on understanding concepts from the physical sciences and mathematics, students still rarely connect the concepts they learn from other STEM disciplines to biology. Integrating concepts and practices across the STEM disciplines will be critical for biology graduates as they tackle the biological problems of the twenty-first century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler FR (2013) Teaching calculus, probability and statistics to undergraduate life science majors: a unified approach. In: Ledder G, Carpenter JP, Comar TD (eds) Undergraduate mathematics for the life sciences: models, processes, and directions. Mathematical Association of America, Washington DC, pp 33–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen DA, Tanner KT (2003) Approaches to cell biology teaching: learning content in context—problem-based learning. Cell Biol Educ 2:73–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen DA, Tanner KT (2005) Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: seven strategies, from the simple to complex. Cell Biol Educ 4:262–268

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1989) Science for all Americans. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2011) Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: a call to action. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson ARA, Quaranta V (2008) Integrative mathematical oncology. Nat Rev Cancer 8:227–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Armbruster P, Patel M, Johnson E, Weiss M (2009) Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology. CBE Life Sci Educ 8:203–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballen CJ, Salehi S, Cotner S (2017) Exams disadvantage women in introductory biology. PLoS ONE 12:e0186419

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangera G, Brownell SE (2014) Course-based undergraduate research experiences can make scientific research more inclusive. CBE Life Sci Educ 13:602–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierema AM-K, Schwarz CV, Stoltzfus JR (2017) Engaging undergraduate biology students in scientific modeling: analysis of group interactions, sense-making, and justification. CBE Life Sci Educ 16:68

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonwell CC, Eison JA (1991) Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom (1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports). ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray Speth E, Shaw N, Momsen J, Reinagel A, Le P, Taqieddin R, Long T (2014) Introductory biology students’ conceptual models and explanations of the origin of variation. CBE Life Sci Educ 13:529–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownell SE, Hekmat-Scafe DS, Singla V, Chandler Seawell P, Conklin Imam JF, Eddy SL, Stearns T, Cyert MS (2015) A high-enrollment course-based undergraduate research experience improves student conceptions of scientific thinking and ability to interpret data. CBE Life Sci Educ 14:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck LB, Lowery Bretz S, Towns MH (2008) Characterizing the level of inquiry in the undergraduate laboratory. J Coll Sci Teach 38:52–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruso JP, Israel N, Rowland K, Lovelace MJ, Saunders MJ (2016) Citizen science: the small world initiative improved lecture grades and California Critical Thinking Skills Test scores of nonscience major students at Florida Atlantic University. J Microbiol Biol Educ 17:156–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Cech EA (2015) LGBT professionals’ workplace experiences in STEM-related federal agencies. In: Paper presented at the 122nd ASEE annual conferences and exposition on June 14–17, 2015, Seattle, WA

  • Comar TD (2013) Biocalculus at Benedictine University. In: Ledder G, Carpenter JP, Comar TD (eds) Undergraduate mathematics for the life sciences: models, processes, and directions. Mathematical Association of America, Washington DC, pp 17–24

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper KM, Brownell SE (2016) Coming out in class: Challenges and benefits of active learning in a biology classroom for LGBTQIA students. CBE Life Sci Educ 15:37

    Google Scholar 

  • Corwin Auchincloss L, Laursen SL, Branchaw JL, Eagan K, Graham M, Hanauer DI, Lawrie G, McLinn CM, Pelaez N, Rowland S, Towns M, Trautmann NM, Varma-Nelson P, Weston TJ, Dolan EL (2014) Assessment of curse-based undergraduate research experiences: a meeting report. CBE Life Sci Educ 13:29–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford MB, Wilson-Kennedy ZS, Thomas GA, Gilman SD, Warner IM (2018) LA-STEM research scholars program: a model for broadening diversity in STEM education. Technol Innov 19:577–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch CH, Mazur E (2001) Peer instruction: ten years of experience and results. Am J Phys 69:970–977

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EA, Janssens IA (2006) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440:165–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis E, Sloan T, Aurelius K, Barbour A, Bodey E, Clark B, Dennis C, Drown R, Fleming M, Humbert A, Glasgo E, Kerns T, Lingro K, McMillin M, Meyer A, Pope B, Stalevicz A, Steffen B, Steindl A, Williams C, Wimberley C, Zenas R, Butela K, Wildschutte H (2017) Antibiotic discovery throughout the Small World Initiative: a molecular strategy to identify biosynthetic gene clsuters involved in antagonistic activity. Microbiol Open 6:e435

    Google Scholar 

  • Derting TL, Ebert-May D (2010) Learner-centered inquiry in undergraduate biology: Positive relationships with long-term student achievement. CBE Life Sci Educ 9:462–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury BM (2019) Deep teaching in a college STEM classroom. Cult Stud of Sci Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9891-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury B, Brame CJ (2019) Inclusive teaching. CBE Life. Sci Educ 18:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz Eaton C, Callender Highlander H (2017) The case for biocalculus: design, retention, and student performance. CBE Life Sci Educ 16:25

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan EL (2015) Biology education research 2.0. CBE Life Sci Educ 14:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffus D, Olifer A (2010) Introductory life science mathematics and quantitative neuroscience courses. CBE Life Sci Educ 9:370–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert-May D, Brewer C, Allred S (1997) Innovation in large lectures—teaching for active learning. Bioscience 47:601–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy SL, Hogan KA (2014) Getting under the hood: How and for whom does increasing course structure work? CBE Life Sci Educ 13:453–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy SL, Brownell SE, Wenderoth MP (2014) Gender gaps in achievement and participation in multiple introductory biology classrooms. CBE Life Sci Educ 13:478–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelstein-Keshet L (2005) Adapting mathematics to the new biology. In: Steen LA (ed) Math and Bio 2010: linking undergraduate disciplines. Mathematical Association of America, Washington DC, pp 63–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada M, Burnett M, Campbell AG, Campbell PB, Denetclaw WF, Gutiérrez CG, Hurtado S, John GH, Matsui J, McGee R, Moses Okpodu C, Robinson TJ, Summers MF, Werner-Washburne M, Zavala M (2016) Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM. CBE Life Sci Educ 15:5

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman S, O’Connor E, Parks JW, Cunningham M, Hurley D, Haak D, Dirks C, Wenderoth MP (2007) Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE Life Sci Educ 6:132–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt H, Wenderoth MP (2014) Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:8410–8415

    Google Scholar 

  • Full RJ, Dudley R, Koehl MAR, Libby T, Schwab C (2015) Interdisciplinary laboratory course facilitating knowledge integration, mutualistic teaming, and original discovery. Integr Comput Biol 55:912–925

    Google Scholar 

  • Galic N, Hindle AG, DeLong JP, Watanabe K, Forbes V, Buck CL (2019) Modeling genomes to phenomes to populations in a changing climate: the need for collaborative networks. Ecol Model 406:80–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller BD, Turpen C, Crouch CH (2018) Sources of student engagement in introductory physics or life sciences. Phys Rev Phys Educ Res 14:010118

    Google Scholar 

  • Gick ML, Holyoak KJ (1983) Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognit Psychol 15:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottesman AJ, Hoskins SG (2013) CREATE Cornerstone: Introduction to scientific thinking, a new course for STEM-interested frehsmen, demystifies scientific thinking through analysis of scientific literature. CBE Life Sci Educ 12:59–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene TG, Marti CN, McClenney K (2008) The effort-outcome gap: differences for African American and hispanic community college students in student engagement and academic achievement. J High Educ 79:513–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunspan DZ, Eddy SL, Brownell SE, Wiggins BL, Crowe AJ, Goodreau SM (2016) Males under-estimate academic performance of their female peers in undergraduate biology classrooms. PLoS ONE 11:e0148405

    Google Scholar 

  • Hake RR (1998) Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am J Phys 66:64–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall TE, Meyer A, Rose DH (2012) Universal design for learning in the classroom. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Handelsman J, Ebert-May D, Beichner R, Bruns P, Chang A, DeHaan R, Gentile J, Lauffer S, Stewart J, Tilghman SM, Wood WB (2004) Scientific teaching. Science 304:521–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Harackiewicz JM, Canning EA, Tibbetts Y, Giffen CJ, Blair SS, Rouse DI, Hyse JS (2014) Closing the social class achievement gap for first-generation students in undergraduate biology. J Educ Psychol 106:375–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez CM, Morales AR, Shroyer MG (2013) The development of a model of culturally responsive science and mathematics teaching. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 8:803–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Herreid CF, Schiller NA, Herreid KYF (2014) Science stories you can count on: 51 case studies with quantitative reasoning in biology. NSTA Press, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill ST (1997) Science and engineering Bachelor’s degrees awarded to women increase overall, but decline in several fields. National Science Foundation Data Brief NSF 97-326. National Science Foundation, Arlington VA

  • Hill ST (2001) Science and engineering degrees by race/ethnicity of recipients, 1990–1998. NSF 01-327. National Science Foundation, Arlington VA

  • Hoffman K, Leupen S, Dowell K, Kephart K, Leips J (2016) Development and assessment of modules to integrate quantitative skills in introductory biology courses. CBE Life Sci Educ 15:14

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins SG, Stevens LM, Nehm RH (2007) Selective use of the primary literature transforms the classroom into a virtual laboratory. Genetics 176:1381–1389

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins SG, Lopatto D, Stevens LM (2011) The C.R.E.A.T.E approach to primary literature shifts undergraduates’ self-assessed ability to read and analyze journal articles, attitudes about science, and epistemological beliefs. CBE Life Sci Educ 10:368–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan TC, Burnett SH, Carson S, Caruso SM, Clase K, DeJong RJ, Dennehy JJ, Denver DR, Dunbar D, Elgin SC, Findley AM, Hatfull GF (2014) A broadly implementable research course in phage discovery and genomics for first-year undergraduate students. mBio 5:e01051-13

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordt H, Eddy SL, Brazil R, Lau I, Mann C, Brownell SE, King K, Freeman S (2017) Values affirmation intervention reduces achievement gap between underrepresented minority and white students in introductory biology classes. CBE Life Sci Educ 16:41

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsai I, Knisley J, Knisley D, Yampolsky L, Godbole A (2011) Mentoring interdisciplinary undergraduate students via a team effort. CBE Life Sci Educ 10:250–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon KL, Onorato ME, Gottesman AJ, Hoque J, Hoskins SG (2016) Testing CREATE at community colleges: An examination of faculty perspectives and diverse student gains. CBE Life Sci Educ 15:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloser MJ, Brownell SE, Shavelson RJ, Fukami T (2013) Effects of a research-based ecology lab course: a study of nonvolunteer achievement, self-confidence, and perception of lab course purpose. J Coll Sci Teach 42:72–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight JK, Brame CJ (2018) Peer instruction. CBE Life Sci Educ 17:5

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight JK, Wood WB (2005) Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biol Educ 4:298–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman NG (2007) Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In: Abell SK, Lederman NG (eds) Handbook of research on science education. Taylor and Francis, New York, pp 831–880

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung W, Shaffer CD, Cordonnier T, Wong J, Itano MS, Tempel EE, Kellmann E, Desruisseau DM, Cain C, Carrasquillo R, Chusak TM (2010) Evolution of a distinct genomic domain in Drosophila: Comparative analysis of the dot chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis. Genetics 185:1519–1534

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopatto D, Alvarez C, Barnard D, Chandrasekaran C, Chung HM, Du C, Eckdahl T, Goodman AL, Hauser C, Jones CJ, Kopp OR (2008) Genomics education partnership. Science 322(5902):684–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton KI, Beason TS, Godsay S, Sto Domingo MR, Bailey TC, Sun S, Hrabowski FA III (2016) Outcomes and processes in the Meyerhoff Scholars Program: STEM Ph.D. completion, sense of community, perceived program benefit, science identity, and research self-efficacy. CBE Life Sci Educ 15:48

    Google Scholar 

  • Matz RL, Koester BP, Fiorini S, Grom G, Shepard L, Stangor CG, Weiner B, McKay TA (2017) Patterns of gendered performance differences in large introductory courses at five research universities. AERA Open 3:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur E (1997) Peer instruction: getting students to think in class. AIP Conf Proc 399:981–988

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen A, Klein WMP (2006) Experimental manipulations of self-affirmation: a systematic review. Self Identity 5:289–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith DC, Bolker JA (2012) Rounding off the cow: Challenges and successes in an interdisciplinary physics course for life science students. Am J Phys 80:913–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Michor F, Liphardt J, Ferrari M, Widom J (2011) What does physics have to do with cancer? Nat Rev Cancer 11:657–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog RS, Spencer JN (2008) POGIL: An overview. In: Moog RS, Spencer JN (eds) POGIL: process oriented guided inquiry learning. American Chemical Society, New York, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch TB, Detsky AS (2013) The inevitable application of big data to health care. JAMA 309:1351–1352

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2015) Integrating discovery-based research into the undergraduate curriculum: Report of a convocation. National Academies Press, Washington DC

  • National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council (2014) STEM Integration in K-12 Education: status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2003) Bio 2010: transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists. National Academies Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2009) A new biology for the 21st century: ensuring the United States leads the coming biology revolution. National Academies Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (NSF) (1996) Shaping the future: new expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. National Science Foundation, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (2019) Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. NSF 19-304. National Science Foundation, Alexandria VA, https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/data/

  • Nelson PH (2018) Biophysics and physiological modeling. http://circle4.com/biophysics/

  • Olimpo JT, Pevey RS, McCabe TM (2018) Incorporating an interactive statistics workshop into an introductory biology course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) enhances students’ statistical reasoning and quantitative literacy skills. J Microbiol Biol Educ 19:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathy R (2015) ‘The physics of life’, an undergraduate general education biophysics course. Phys Educ 50:358–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Piunno PAE, Boyd C, Barzda V, Gradinaru CC, Krull UJ, Stefanovic S, Stewart B (2014) The advanced interdisciplinary research laboratory: a student team approach to the fourth-year research thesis project experience. J Chem Educ 91:655–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope WH, Bowman CA, Russell DA, Jacobs-Sera D, Asai DJ, Cresawn SG, Jacobs WR, Hendrix RW, Lawrence JG, Hatfull GF, Science Education Alliance Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science, Phage Hunters Integrating Research and Eductaion, Mycobacterial Genetics Course (2015) Whole genome comparison of a large collection of mycobacteriophages reveals a continuum of phage genetic diversity. eLife 4:e06416

    Google Scholar 

  • Redish EF, Cooke TJ (2013) Learning each other’s ropes: negotiating interdisciplinary authenticity. CBE Life Sci Educ 12:175–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Redish EF, Bauer C, Carleton KL, Cooke TJ, Cooper M, Crouch CH, Dreyfus BW, Geller BD, Giannini J, Gouvea JS, Klymkowsky MW, Losert W, Moore K, Presson J, Sawtelle V, Thompson KV, Turpen C, Zia RKP (2014) NEXUS/Physics: an interdisciplinary repurposing of physics for biologists. Am J Phys 82:368–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodenbusch SE, Hernandez PR, Simmons SL, Dolan EL (2016) Early engagement in course-based research increases graduation rates and completion of science, engineering, and mathematics degrees. CBE Life Sci Educ 15:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinske JN, Perkins H, Snyder A, Wyer M (2017) Scientist Spotlight homework assignments shift students’ stereotypes of scientists and enhance science identity in a diverse introductory science class. CBE Life Sci Educ 15:47

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz PW, Hernandez PR, Woodcock A, Estrada M, Chance RC, Aguilar M, Serpe RT (2011) Patching the pipeline: Reducing educational disparities in the sciences through minority training programs. Educ Eval Policy Anal 33:95–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer CD, Alvarez C, Bailey C, Barnard D, Bhalla S, Chandrasekaran C, Chandrasekaran V, Chung HM, Dorer DR, Elgin SCR (2010) The Genomics Education Partnership: Successful integration of research into laboratory classes at a diverse group of undergraduate institutions. CBE Life Sci Educ 9:55–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro C, Moberg-Parker J, Toma S, Ayon C, Zimmerman H, Roth-Johnson EA, Hancock SP, Levis-Fitzgerald M, Sanders ER (2015) Comparing the impact of course-based and apprentice-based research experiences in a life science laboratory curriculum. J Microbiol Biol Educ 16:186–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Stains M, Harshman J, Barker MK, Chasteen SV, Cole R, DeChenne-Peters SE, Eagan MK, Esson JM, Knight JK, Laski FA, Levis-Fitzgerald M (2018) Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American Universities. Science 359(6383):1468–1470

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele CM (1997) A threat in the air: how stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. Am Psychol 52:613–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele CM, Aronson J (1995) Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J Personal Soc Psychol 69:797–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens LM, Hoskins SG (2014) The CREATE strategy for intensive analysis of primary literature can be used effectively by newly trained faculty to produce multiple gains in diverse students. CBE Life Sci Educ 13:224–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayhorn TL (2012) College students’ sense of belonging. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg MD, Armstrong JE (1993) The status of laboratory instruction for introductory biology in US universities. Am Biol Teach 55:144–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg MD, Armstrong JE, Wischusen EW (2005) A reappraisal of the status of introductory biology laboratory education in US colleges and universities. Am Biol Teach 67:525–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Svoboda Gouvea J, Sawtelle V, Geller BD, Turpen C (2013) A framework for analyzing interdisciplinary tasks: Implications for student learning and curricular design. CBE Life Sci Educ 12:187–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner KD (2011) Reconsidering “what works”. CBE Life Sci Educ 10:329–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner KD (2013) Structure matters: Twenty-one teaching strategies to promote student engagement and cultivate classroom equity. CBE Life Sci Educ 12:322–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner K, Allen D (2007) Cultural competence in the college biology classroom. CBE Life Sci Educ 6:251–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson KV, Nelson KC, Marbach-Ad G, Keller M, Fagan WF (2010) Online interactive teaching modules enhance quantitative proficiency of introductory biology students. CBE Life Sci Educ 9:277–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson KV, Cooke TJ, Fagan WF, Gulick D, Levy D, Nelson KC, Redish EF, Smith RF, Presson J (2013) Infusing quantitative approaches throughout the biological sciences curriculum. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol 44:817–833

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp B, Shortlidge EE (2019) A framework to guide undergraduate education in interdisciplinary science. CBE Life Sci Educ 18:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl JJ, Holdener J (2013) BioCalc at Illinois. In: Ledder G, Carpenter JP, Comar TD (eds) Undergraduate mathematics for the life sciences: models, processes, and directions. Mathematical Association of America, Washington DC, pp 5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • University Center for the Advancement of Teaching, The Ohio State University (2019) Inclusive teaching. https://uitl.osu.edu/instructor-support/inclusive-teaching

  • Vickrey T, Rosploch K, Rahmanian R, Pilarz M, Stains M (2015) Research-based implementation of peer instruction: A literature review. CBE Life Sci Educ 14:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker JD, Cotner SH, Baepler PM, Decker MD (2008) A delicate balance: Integrating active learning into a large lecture course. CBE Life Sci Educ 7:361–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins J, Coffey JE, Redish EF, Cooke TJ (2012) Disciplinary authenticity: Enrichnig the reforms of introductory physics courses for life-science students. Phys Rev Spec Top Phys Educ Res 9:010112

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D, Jones D, Bocell F, Crawford J, Kim MJ, Veilleux N, Floyd-Smith T, Bates R, Plett M (2015) Belonging and academic engagement among undergraduate STEM students: a multi-institutional study. Res High Educ 56:750–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson KJ, Brickman P, Brame CJ (2018) Group work. CBE Life. Sci Educ 17:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood WB (2009) Innovations in teaching undergraduate biology and why we need them. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 25:93–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock A, Hernandez PR, Schultz PW (2016) Diversifying science: intervention programs moderate the effect of stereotype threat on motivation and career choice. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 7:184–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodin T, Vasaly H, McBride D, White G (2013) Integration of physics and biology: synergistic undergraduate education for the 21st century. CBE Life Sci Educ 12:120–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright CD, Eddy SL, Wenderoth MP, Abshire E, Blankenbiller M, Brownell SE (2016) Cognitive difficulty and format of exams predicts gender and socioeconomic gaps in exam performance of students in introductory biology courses. CBE Life Sci Educ 15:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagallo P, Meddleton S, Bolger MS (2016) Teaching Real Data Interpretation with Models (TRIM): Analysis of student dialogue in a larger-enrollment cell and developmental biology course. CBE Life Sci Educ 15:1–18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Sarah Eddy and Dawn Meredith for their thoughtful comments on a draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA

    Melissa L. Aikens

Authors
  1. Melissa L. Aikens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa L. Aikens.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aikens, M.L. Meeting the Needs of A Changing Landscape: Advances and Challenges in Undergraduate Biology Education. Bull Math Biol 82, 60 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-020-00739-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-020-00739-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation