Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modelling Dominance Hierarchies Under Winner and Loser Effects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Animals that live in groups commonly form themselves into dominance hierarchies which are used to allocate important resources such as access to mating opportunities and food. In this paper, we develop a model of dominance hierarchy formation based upon the concept of winner and loser effects using a simulation-based model and consider the linearity of our hierarchy using existing and new statistical measures. Two models are analysed: when each individual in a group does not know the real ability of their opponents to win a fight and when they can estimate their opponents’ ability every time they fight. This estimation may be accurate or fall within an error bound. For both models, we investigate if we can achieve hierarchy linearity, and if so, when it is established. We are particularly interested in the question of how many fights are necessary to establish a dominance hierarchy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addison WE, Simmel EC (1980) The relationship between dominance and leadership in a flock of ewes. Bull Psychonom Soc 15(5):303–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcock J (1993) Animal behavior: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Allee WC (1951) Cooperation among animals, with human implications: a revised and amplified edition of the social life of animals. Henry Schuman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleby MC (1983) The probability of linearity in hierarchies. Anim Behav 31(2):600–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker TH, Bruijn E, Sevenster P (1989) Asymmetrical effects of prior winning and losing on dominance in sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Ethology 82(3):224–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan R, Ranganathan K (2012) A textbook of graph theory. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Beacham JL (1988) The relative importance of body size and aggressive experience as determinants of dominance in pumpkinseed sunfish, lepomis gibbosus. Anim Behav 36(2):621–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beacham JL (2003) Models of dominance hierarchy formation: effects of prior experience and intrinsic traits. Behaviour 140(10):1275–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman DA, Kozlowski CP, McIntyre JC, Huber R, Daws AG (2003) Temporal dynamics and communication of winner-effects in the crayfish, orconectes rusticus. Behaviour 140:805–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg JL (1999) Dominance orders in animal societies: the self-organization hypothesis revisited. Bull Math Biol 61(4):727–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom M (2002) A unified model of dominance hierarchy formation and maintenance. J Theor Biol 219(1):63–72

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Broom M, Cannings C (2002) Modelling dominance hierarchy formation as a multi-player game. J Theor Biol 219(3):397–413

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JL, Brown ER, Sedransk J, Ritter SH (1997) Dominance, age, and reproductive success in a complex society: a long-term study of the mexican jay. Auk 114:279–286

  • de Villiers MS, Richardson PRK, van Jaarsveld AS (2003) Patterns of coalition formation and spatial association in a social carnivore, the african wild dog (Lycaon pictus). J Zool 260(04):377–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries H (1995) An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relationships. Anim Behav 50(5):1375–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin LA (1995) Formalizing allee’s ideas on dominance hierarchies: an intrademic selection model. Am Nat 146:154–160

  • Dugatkin LA (1997) Winner and loser effects and the structure of dominance hierarchies. Behav Ecol 8(6):583–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin LA, Dugatkin AD (2007) Extrinsic effects, estimating opponents’ RHP, and the structure of dominance hierarchies. Biol Lett 3(6):614–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Early R, Dugatkin LA (2010) Behavior in groups. In: Westneat D, Fox C (eds) Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology. Oxford University Press, pp 285–307

  • Fero K, Simon JL, Jourdie V, Moore PA (2007) Consequences of social dominance on crayfish resource use. Behaviour 144:61–82

  • Frank LG (1986) Social organization of the spotted hyaena crocuta crocuta. II. Dominance and reproduction. Anim Behav 34(5):1510–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goessmann C, Hemelrijk C, Huber R (2000) The formation and maintenance of crayfish hierarchies: behavioral and self-structuring properties. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48(6):418–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand JL (1986) Resolution of social conflicts: dominance, egalitarianism, spheres of dominance, and game theory. Q Rev Biol 61:201–220

  • Hemelrijk CK (2000) Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure. Anim Behav 59(5):1035–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoglund J, Alatalo RV (1995) Leks. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu Y, Earley RL, Wolf LL (2006) Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biol Rev 81(1):33–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu Y, Lee IH, Lu CK (2009) Prior contest information: mechanisms underlying winner and loser effects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63(9):1247–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MG (1962) Rank correlation methods. Griffin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer PH (1973) Behavioral aspects of ecology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Lindström J, Alatalo RV, Rintamäki PT (1998) Queuing for territory positions in the lekking black grouse (Tetrao tetrix). Behav Ecol 9(4):376–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau HG (1951a) On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: I. effect of inherent characteristics. Bull Math Biophys 13(1):1–19

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Landau HG (1951b) On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: II. Some effects of possible social factors. Bull Math Biophys 13(4):245–262

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist WB, Chase ID (2009) Data-based analysis of winner-loser models of hierarchy formation in animals. Bull Math Biol 71(3):556–584

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden HM (1968) Agonistic behaviour of young rhesus monkeys after changes induced in social rank of their mothers. Anim Behav 16(1):38–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald DB, Shizuka D (2013) Comparative transitive and temporal orderliness in dominance networks. Behav Ecol 24:511–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesterton-Gibbons M, Dugatkin LA (1995) Toward a theory of dominance hierarchies: effects of assessment, group size, and variation in fighting ability. Behav Ecol 6(4):416–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molet M, Van Baalen M, Monnin T (2005) Dominance hierarchies reduce the number of hopeful reproductives in polygynous queenless ants. Insectes Soc 52(3):247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monnin T, Peeters C (1999) Dominance hierarchy and reproductive conflicts among subordinates in a monogynous queenless ant. Behav Ecol 10(3):323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J Theor Biol 47(1):223–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutte C, Taborsky M, Brinkhof MWG (2006) What sets the odds of winning and losing? Trends Ecol Evol 21(1):16–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schjelderup-Ebbe T (1922) Beiträge zur sozialpsychologie des haushuhns. Z Psychol

  • Schmid F, Schmidt A (2006) Nonparametric estimation of the coefficient of overlapping-theory and empirical application. Comput Stat Data Anal 50(6):1583–1596

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schuett GW (1997) Body size and agonistic experience affect dominance and mating success in male copperheads. Anim Behav 54(1):213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimoji H, Abe MS, Tsuji K, Masuda N (2014) Global network structure of dominance hierarchy of ant workers. J R Soc Interface 11(99):20140599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shizuka D, McDonald DB (2012) A social network perspective on measurements of dominance hierarchies. Anim Behav 83(4):925–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silk JB, Alberts SC, Altmann J (2004) Patterns of coalition formation by adult female baboons in Amboseli, Kenya. Anim Behav 67(3):573–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, City University London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK

    Klodeta Kura, Mark Broom & Anne Kandler

Authors
  1. Klodeta Kura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark Broom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anne Kandler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klodeta Kura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kura, K., Broom, M. & Kandler, A. Modelling Dominance Hierarchies Under Winner and Loser Effects. Bull Math Biol 77, 927–952 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-015-0070-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-015-0070-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation