Abstract
This paper provides an overview of a needs assessment study conducted in higher education to address the impact of generative AI, specifically ChatGPT, on faculty development and instructional strategies. The study acknowledges the disruptive effect of AI on academia and the varying responses from faculty members. It emphasizes the importance of equipping educators with the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively integrate generative AI into their teaching practices. The results of the needs assessment reveal various factors contributing to performance gaps, including policy and budget, knowledge, skills, competencies, information, and technological tools. The study suggests that faculty members need support in understanding the scope and implications of AI and AI-driven content creation, assessment, and personalized learning.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11528-024-00964-z/MediaObjects/11528_2024_964_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11528-024-00964-z/MediaObjects/11528_2024_964_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11528-024-00964-z/MediaObjects/11528_2024_964_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11528-024-00964-z/MediaObjects/11528_2024_964_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11528-024-00964-z/MediaObjects/11528_2024_964_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11528-024-00964-z/MediaObjects/11528_2024_964_Fig6_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdullah, Z., & Zaid, N. (2023). Perception of generative artificial intelligence in higher education research. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal, 7(2), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.11113/itlj.v7.137
Alasadi, E., & Baiz, C. (2023). Generative AI in education and research: Opportunities, concerns, and solutions. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(8), 2965–2971. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00323
Alexander, S., Cunningham, W. J., Lanier, J., Smolin, L., Stanojevic, S., Toomey, M. W., & Wecker, D. (2021). The Autodidactic Universe. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.03902
Amani, S., White, L., Balart, T., Arora, L., Shryock, D. K. J., Brumbelow, D. K., & Watson, D. K. L. (2023). Generative AI perceptions: A survey to measure the perceptions of faculty, staff, and students on generative AI tools in academia. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.14415
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
Bender, E., & Koller, A., (2020). Climbing towards NLU: On Meaning, Form, and Understanding in the Age of Data. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 5185–5198. https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.463
Berendt, B., Littlejohn, A., & Blakemore, M. (2020). AI in education: Learner choice and fundamental rights. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1786399
Bessette, L. S. (2023). This isn’t another piece on ChatGPT. National Teaching & Learning Forum, 32(2), 11–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ntlf.30359
Browning, J. & LeCun, Y. (2022). AI and the limits of language. Noema. The Berggruen Institute. https://www.noemamag.com/ai-and-the-limits-of-language/
Burns, J. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
Chalmers, D. J. (2022). Reality+: virtual worlds and the problems of philosophy. W. W. Norton & Company.
Chignell, M., Wang, L., Zare, A., & Li, J. (2023). The evolution of HCI and human factors: Integrating human and artificial intelligence. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 30(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3557891
COMEST (2019) World Commission on Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology. Preliminary study on the ethics of artificial intelligence. Paris, France.
Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
Corn, J. O. (2010). Investigating the quality of the school technology needs assessment (STNA) 3.0: A validity and reliability study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9140-y
Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2022). Scale development : Theory and applications (5th ed.). Sage.
Duha, M. S. U. (2023). ChatGPT in education: An opportunity or a challenge for the future? TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 67(3), 402–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00844-y
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., … & Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
Faster, better, more productive. (2023 September 16). Economist.
Frith, K. H. (2023). ChatGPT: Disruptive educational technology. Nursing Education Perspectives, 44(3), 198–199. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001129
Ganesan, K. (2022). The business case for AI: A leader’s guide to AI strategies, best practices & real-world applications. Opinosis Analytics.
General Services Administration. (n.d.). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. (GSA).
George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership : Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value. Jossey-Bass.
Goertzel, T. (2014). The path to more general artificial intelligence. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 26(3), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2014.895106
Goertzel, B. (2023). Generative AI vs. AGI: The cognitive strengths and weaknesses of modern LLMs. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.10371
Government Accountability Office. (GAO). (2023) Science & Tech Spotlight: Generative AI. GAO-23–106782. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-106782
Harris, T. & Raskin, A. (2023). The AI dilemma. Centre for Humane Technology. https://www.humanetech.com/podcast/the-ai-dilemma
Heifetz, R. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674038479
Hodges, C. B., & Kirschner, P. A. (2024). Innovation of instructional design and assessment in the age of generative artificial intelligence. TechTrends, 68(1), 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00926-x
Holmes, W., Fadel, C., & Bialik, M. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. The Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Hsu, Y. C., & Ching, Y. H. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence in education, part one: The dynamic frontier. TechTrends, 67(4), 603–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00863-9
International Society for Technology in Education. (n.d.). International society for technology in education standards: For educators. https://iste.org/standards/educators
Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Grotewold, K., Hartwick, P., & Papin, K. (2023). Generative AI and teachers’ perspectives on its implementation in education. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 34(2), 313–338.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Kuchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Gunnemann, S., Hullermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences., 103(April), 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kelly, K. (2016). The Inevitable. Penguin.
Khemani, D. (2013). A first course in artificial intelligence. McGraw-Hill Education.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521, 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
Li, T., Vorvoreanu, M., Debellis, D., & Amershi, S. (2023). Assessing human-AI interaction early through factorial surveys: A study on the guidelines for human-AI Interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 30(5), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/3511605
Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
Marshall, R., Pardo, A., Smith, D., & Watson, T. (2022). Implementing next generation privacy and ethics research in education technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 737–755. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13224
McCarthy, J. (1987). Generality in artificial intelligence. Communications of the ACM, 30(12), 1030–1035. https://doi.org/10.1145/33447.33448
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Education. Guidance for Policy-makers. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative ai for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856.
Minsky, M. (2006). The emotion machine: Commonsense thinking, artificial intelligence, and the future of the human mind. Simon & Schuster.
Monett, D., & Lewis, C. W. P. (2018). Getting clarity by defining artificial intelligence - a survey. In V. C. Muller (Ed.), Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 212–214). Springer.
National AI Advisory Committee (NAIAC) (2023.). Committee member perspectives. In National AI Advisory Committee Report. https://ai.gov/naiac/#MEMBERS
Nazaretsky, T., Ariely, M., Cukurova, M., & Alexandron, G. (2022). Teachers’ trust in AI-powered educational technology and a professional development program to improve it. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 914–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13232
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1976). Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search. Communications of the ACM, 19(3), 113–126.
OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 Technical Report. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.08774
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2019). OECD AI Principles Overview. https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013). Leadership for 21st Century Learning, Educational Research and Innovation. (OECD).https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264205406-en
Papenmeier, A., Kern, D., Englebienne, G., & Seifert, C. (2022). It’s complicated: The relationship between user trust, model accuracy and explanations in ai. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 29(4), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3495013
Petricini, T., Wu, C., & Zipf, S. T. (2023). Perceptions about generative AI and ChatGPT use by faculty and college students. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/jyma4
Pham, S. T. H., & Sampson, P. M. (2022). The development of artificial intelligence in education: A review in context. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1408–1421. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12687
Qadir, J. (2023). Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125121
Rad, D., & Rad, G. (2023). Exploring the psychological implications of ChatGPT: A qualitative study. Journal Plus Education / Educatia Plus, 32(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.24250/jpe/vol.321/2023/dr/gr
Resendez, A. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions and practices on using educational technology as an instructional tool in the classroom. [Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley]. https://scholarworks.utrgv.edu/etd/570
Ruiz-Rojas, L. I., Acosta-Vargas, P., De-Moreta-Llovet, J., & Gonzalez-Rodriguez, M. (2023). Empowering education with generative artificial intelligence tools: Approach with an instructional design matrix. Sustainability, 15(15), 11524. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511524
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
Sawyer, L. M. (2018). Perceptions and practice: The relationship between teacher perceptions of technology use and level of classroom technology integration. [Doctoral Dissertation, Southeastern University].
Schiaffino, S., Garcia, P., & Amandi, A. (2008). eTeacher: Providing personalized assistance to e-learning students. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1744–1754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.008
Schiff, D. (2022). Education for AI, not AI for education: The role of education and ethics in national AI policy strategies. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 527–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00270-2
Smolansky, A., Cram, A., Raduescu, C., Zeivots, S., Huber, E., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2023). Educator and student perspectives on the impact of generative AI on assessments in higher education. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, pp. 378–382.
Sogaard, A. (2023). Grounding the vector space of an octopus: Word meaning from raw text. Minds and Machines, 33, 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-023-09622-4
Stivers, J. L., & Cramer, S. F. (Eds.). (2009). A teachers guide to change: Understanding, navigating, and leading the process. Corwin Press.
Strzelecki, A. (2023). To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881
Susnjak, T. (2022). ChatGPT: The end of online exam integrity? arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09292
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D., Huang, R., Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(15). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
United Nations International Centre for Technical and Vocational Education and Training. (UNEVOC). (2021). Understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on skills development. UNESCO. Paris, France.
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. Kaiser, L., Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762.
Wang, P. (2019). On Defining Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 10(2), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00020
Wang, P., Li, X., & Hammer, P. (2018). Self in NARS, an AGI System. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00020
White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). (n.d.). Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights. https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/
Williamson, B. (2019). New power networks in educational technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(4), 395–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1672724
Witkin, B. R., & Altschuld, J. W. (1995). Planning and conducting needs assessments: A practical guide. Sage.
Wong, K. (2023). Cybernetical intelligence: Engineering cybernetics with machine intelligence. Wiley.
World Commission on Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology. (2019). Preliminary study on the ethics of artificial intelligence. COMEST.
Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 13943–13967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The authors received IRB approval prior to collecting data for this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix A
Appendix A
Interview Questions
-
1.
What strategies have you used to incorporate AI technologies in your classes?
-
2.
What concerns do you have regarding the use of AI technologies in coursework?
-
3.
What additional resources would you like to have to learn more about how to incorporate AI technologies specifically, ChatGPT, in your classes?
-
4.
What strategies are students using to learn about AI technologies?
-
5.
What types of faculty development and/or support would you like to help learn more about AI technologies as they relate to instruction?
-
6.
What ethical and moral challenges have presented during interactions with ChatGPT?
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mathew, R., Stefaniak, J.E. A Needs Assessment to Support Faculty Members’ Awareness of Generative AI Technologies to Support Instruction. TechTrends (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00964-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00964-z