Abstract
While the video discussion tool Flipgrid has increasingly become popular among educators, limited research has been conducted with Flipgrid as the subject. The research on Flipgrid has focused, to date, primarily on single-case uses. These studies have been beneficial in examining how Flipgrid is being used in isolated contexts. The goal in conducting this study was to add to the research base by exploring on a macro level how educators are using Flipgrid and how they perceive the use of Flipgrid enhancing student learning. To meet this goal, we conducted an online survey to gather data on educators’ (n = 230) uses of Flipgrid and their perceptions about Fligrid use on student learning. The data show that primary uses of Flipgrid are promoting creativity and formative evaluation of student learning. Data analysis suggested that teachers perceived Flipgrid to be a valuable teaching tool and a valuable student learning tool. We discuss these findings and implications for Flipgrid users and those who provide support for and training on Flipgrid.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamy, P., & Boulmetis, J. (2006). The impact of modeling technology integration on pre-service teachers’ technology confidence. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 17(2), 100–120.
Agan, T., Anderson, D., Atwood, A., Casarez, L., Heron, A., & Self, R. (2020). FlipGrid to enhance communication in distance education. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 85(4), 35–37.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Angelone, L., & Gerstner, J. (2020, April). Imagineering collaboration: Preservice teachers and gifted students using Flipgrid to support the design process. In Society for Information Technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 1569-1572). Association for the Advancement of computing in education (AACE).
Arnold, A. (personal communication, February 11, 2021).
Bartlett, M. (2018). Using Flipgrid to increase students' connectedness in an online class. eLearn, 2018(12).
Brown, A., & Green, T. D. (2008). Issues and trends in instructional technology: Making the most of mobility and ubiquity. Educational media and technology yearbook, 33, 4–16.
Carpenter, J. P., Trust, T., & Green, T. D. (2020). Transformative instruction or old wine in new skins? Exploring how and why educators use HyperDocs. Computers & Education, 157, 103979.
Darling-Hammond, L., Meyerson, D., LaPointe, M., & Orr, M. T. (2009). Preparing principals for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass.
Delmas, P., & Moore, P. (2019). Student perceptions of video-based discussions in online and blended learning. In E-learn: World conference on E-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (pp. 1280-1286). Association for the Advancement of computing in education (AACE).
Donovan, L., Green, T. D., & Mason, C. (2014). Examining the 21st Century classroom: Developing an Innovation Configuration Map. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.50.2.a.
Education Week. (2017). Technology counts 2017 – Classroom technology: Where schools stand. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/toc/2017/06/14/index.html
Education Week. (2019). Technology counts 2019: Ed tech & innovation – educators tear through the hype. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/technology/technology-counts-2019
Evans, J. (2019). Digital learning: Peril or promise for our K-12 students. Retrieved from https://tomorrow.org/Speakup/downloads/2018_19-Speak-Up-National-Congressional-Briefing-Paper.pdf
Fahey, S., Moura, K., & Saarinen, J. (2019). The educator’s guide to Flipgrid. Retrieved from https://static.flipgrid.com/docs/Flipgrid_eBook_ 2nd_edition.Pdf.
Flipgrid. (2021). Empower every voice. Retrieved February 26, 2021 from http://info.flipgrid.com/
Fram, S. M. (2013). The constant comparative analysis method outside of grounded theory. Qualitative Report, 18, 1–25.
Freeman, A., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., & Hall Giesinger, C. (2017). NMC/CoSN horizon report: 2017 K–12 edition. The New Media Consortium.
Garrison, D. R. (2003). Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: The role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and metacognition. Elements of quality online education: Practice and direction, 4, 47–58.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine De Gruyter.
Green, T. D., Donovan, L. C., & Green, J. P. (2020). Making Technology Work in Schools: How PK-12 Educators Can Foster Digitalage Learning. Routledge.
Green, T., & Green, J. (2018). Flipgrid: Adding voice and video to online discussions. TechTrends, 62(1), 128–130.
Gronseth, S., & Bauder, D. K. (2018, June). Learning together: Strategies for supporting collaborative learning in online courses from a universal Design for Learning perspective. In EdMedia+ innovate learning (pp. 1068-1081). Association for the Advancement of computing in education (AACE).
Johnson, L., Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Hall, C. (2016). NMC horizon report: 2016 higher education edition (pp. 1-50). The new media consortium.
Keiper, M. C., White, A., Carlson, C. D., & Lupinek, J. M. (2020). Student perceptions on the benefits of Flipgrid in a HyFlex learning environment. Journal of education for business, 1-9.
Kiles, T. M., Vishenchuk, J., & Hohmeier, K. (2020). Implementation of Flipgrid as a Self-reflection tool for student engagement–a pilot study. Innovations in pharmacy, 11(4), 15–15.
Lambert, J., Gong, Y., & Cuper, P. (2008). Technology, transfer and teaching: The impact of a single technology course on preservice teachers’ computer attitudes and ability. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4), 385–410.
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557–584.
Lowenthal, P., Borup, J., West, R., & Archambault, L. (2020). Thinking beyond zoom: Using asynchronous video to maintain connection and engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 383–391.
Lowenthal, P. R., & Moore, R. L. (2020). Exploring student perceptions of Flipgrid in online courses. Online Learning, 24(4).
Mango, O. (2019). Students’ Perceptions and Attitudes toward the use of Flipgrid in the Language Classroom. In K. Graziano (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1970-1973). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 10, 2021 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/207916/.
McIntyre, C. J., Lindt, S., & Miller, S. (2020). Using Flipgrid to increase college students’ depth of knowledge. In Society for Information Technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 1798-1803). Association for the Advancement of computing in education (AACE).
Miles, H., Huberman, A., & Saldana, M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
Miller, S. C., McIntyre, C. J., & Lindt, S. F. (2020). Engaging Technology in Elementary School: Flipgrid’s potential. Childhood Education, 96(3), 62–69.
Mills, M. (2014). Effect of faculty member’s use of twitter as informal professional development during a preservice teacher internship. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher.
Miskam, N. N., & Saidalvi, A. (2019). The use of Flipgrid for teaching oral presentation skills to engineering students. International journal of recent technology and engineering ISSN, 2277-3878. Education, 14(4), 451-467.
Musgrove, A., Powers, J., Gonzalez-DeHass, A., & Willems, P. (2019). Developing and modeling pedagogy with interactive video. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 28(1), 57–73.
Ostashewski, N. (2020). Building a Community of Inquiry in an online graduate course: Does Flipgrid help?. In innovate learning summit 2020 (pp. 390-393). Association for the Advancement of computing in education (AACE).
Petersen, J. B., Townsend, S. D., & Onak, N. (2020). Utilizing Flipgrid application on student smartphones in a small-scale ESL study. English Language Teaching, 13(5), 164–176.
Rao, K., Ok, M. W., & Bryant, B. R. (2014). A review of research on universal design educational models. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513518980.
Resier, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2018). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Pearson.
Robinson, L. K., Brown, A., & Green, T. (2007). The threat of security: Hindering technology integration in the classroom. Learning & Leading with Technology, 35(2), 18–23.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.
Saldaña, M. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative research. Sage.
Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
Sebach, A. M. (2020). Using Flipgrid as an alternative to journals during DNP practicum experiences. Nurse Educator, 45(5), 256. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000812.
Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73.
Taylor, C., & Hinchman, T. (2020). Strategies for using Flipgrid in the kinesiology classroom. US-China Education Review, 10(1), 26–31.
University of Minnesota. (2021). Canvas Flipgrid overview. https://it.umn.edu/services-technologies/how-tos/canvas-flipgrid-overview
Welch, E. (2019). Leveraging Flipgrid to Transform Student Engagement & Promote Active Learning in blended environments. eLearn, 2018(12).
Weller, M. (2020). 25 years of ed tech. Retrieved from https://www.aupress.ca/books/120290-25-years-of-ed-tech/
Further Reading
Donovan, L., Green, T. & Hartley, K. (2010). An examination of one-to-one computing in the middle school: Does increased access bring about increased student engagement? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(4), 423–441.
Green, T., & Green, J. (2018). Flipgrid: Adding voice and video to online discussions. TechTrends, 62(1), 128-130.
Johnson, M. & Skarphol, M. (2018). The effects of digital portfolios and Flipgrid on student engagement and communication in a connected learning secondary visual arts classroom. Retrieved from Sophia, the St. Catherine University repository website: https://sophia.stkate.edu/maed/270
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
There are no conflicts of interest associated with this study. Research involving human participants was carried out through IRB approval HSR-19-19-282 granted by the authors’ University.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Green, T.D., Besser, E.D. & Donovan, L.C. More than Amplifying Voice and Providing Choice: Educator Perceptions of Flipgrid Use in the Classroom. TechTrends 65, 785–795 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00635-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00635-3