Abstract
Traditional paper science notebooks have served the purpose of engaging learners in the scientific practices, however, as with many things, paper is being replaced by digital. This study examined the digital notebook entries of students to consider the affordances and limitations of digital science notebooks versus traditional paper science notebooks. Affordances were related to the use of audio, ability to copy and paste, take photographs, and include material from the internet. Limitations included the time it took students to write and/or draw tables, and the potential learning opportunities lost from close observation through drawing to photographs. This study highlights how a digital science notebook can also integrate technology in a manner that promotes active learning and critical thinking. Based on the notebook entries examined, we suggest that the affordances outweigh the limitations and encourage further research on digital science notebooks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aladé, F., Lauricella, A. R., Beaudoin-Ryan, L., & Wartella, E. (2016). Measuring with Murray: Touchscreen technology and preschoolers' STEM learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.080.
Apple (2017). iPad in Education. Apple. https://images.apple.com/education/docs/ipad-in-education-results.pdf
Arcon, N., Klein, P. D., & Dombroski, J. D. (2017). Effects of dictation, speech to text, and handwriting on the written composition of elementary school English language learners. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(6), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1253513.
Aschbacher, P., & Alonzo, A. (2006). Examining the utility of elementary science notebooks for formative assessment purposes. Educational Assessment, 11(3 and 4), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2006.9652989.
Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Allyn & Bacon.
Bird, C. L., Willoughby, C., & Frey, J. G. (2013). Laboratory notebooks in the digital era: The role of ELNs in record keeping for chemistry and other sciences. Chemical Society Reviews, 42(20), 8157–8175. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CS60122F.
Brown, M. E., & Hocutt, D. L. (2015). Learning to use, useful for learning: A usability study of Google apps for education. Journal of Usability Studies, 10(4), 160–181.
Butler, M. B., & Nesbit, C. (2008). Using science notebooks to improve writing skills and conceptual understanding. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 44(4), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.3200/SATS.44.4.137-146.
Cavanagh, S. (2015). Tablet, smartphone use in K-12 rises, and learning apps have big presence. Digital Education. http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/DigitalEducation/2015/09/tablet_smartphone_use_in_k-12_.html
Chauhan, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students. Computers & Education, 105, 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.005.
Chmiliar, L. (2017). Improving learning outcomes: The iPad and preschool children with disabilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 660. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00660.
Clark, W., & Luckin, R. (2013). What the research says: iPads in the classroom. https://digitalteachingandlearning.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/ipads-in-the-classroom-report-lkl.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd Ed.). Sage Publications.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold & underused: Computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press.
Dias, L., & Victor, A. (2017). Teaching and learning with mobile devices in the 21st century digital world: Benefits and challenges. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(1), 339–344. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v5i1.p339-344.
Ditzler, C., Hong, E., & Strudler, N. (2016). How tablets are utilized in the classroom. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1172444.
Dündar, H., & Akçayır, M. (2017). Tablet vs. paper: The effect on learners' reading performance. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(3), 441–450.
Fabos, B. (2004). Wrong turn on the information superhighway: Education and the commercialization of the internet, Columbia University Teachers College Press.
Fabos, B. (2008). The Price of information: Critical literacy, education and today‘s internet. In D.J. Leu, J. Coiro, M. Knobel & C. Lankshear (Eds.). Handbook of research on new literacies. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1077058.pdf
Finegan, C., & Austin, N. J. (2002). Developmentally appropriate technology for young children. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 87-102.
Flewitt, R., Messer, D., & Kucirkova, N. (2015). New directions for early literacy in a digital age: The iPad. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15(3), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798414533560.
Fulton, L. A. (2012). Writing in science: Influences of professional development on a teachers’ beliefs, practices, and student performance (publication no. 3523673) [doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Fulton, L. (2017). Science notebooks as learning tools. Science and Children, 54(6), 80–85.
Fulton, L., & Campbell B. (2014). Science notebooks: Writing about inquiry (2nd ed.). Heinemann.
Fulton, L., & Poeltler, E. (2013). Developing a scientific argument. Science and Children, 50(9), 30–35.
Fulton, L., Paek, S., & Taoka, M. (2017). Science notebooks for the 21st century. Science & Children, 54(5), 54–59.
Fulwiler, B. R. (2007). Writing in science: How to scaffold instruction to support learning. Heinemann.
Geist, E. (2011). The game changer: Using iPads in college teacher education classes. College Student Journal, 45(4), 758–768.
Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2008). Learning with laptops: A multi-method case study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(3), 305–332. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.38.3.d.
Hargrove, T. Y., & Nesbit, C. (2003). Science notebooks: Tools for increasing achievement across the curriculum. ERIC Clearinghouse.
Haug, K. N., & Klein, P. D. (2018). The effect of speech-to-text technology on learning a writing strategy. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2017.1326014.
Hill, S. (2012). How tablets are invading the classroom. Digital Trends. http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/tablets-invading-the-classroom/#!7VxyI
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting education in “educational” apps: Lessons from the science of learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615569721.
Holloway, D., Green, L., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Zero to eight: Young children and their internet use. Research Online @ ECU. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks2013/929
Hsu, H.-Y., Wang, S.-K., & Runco, L. (2013). Middle school science teachers’ confidence and pedagogical practice of new literacies. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 314–324.
Hutchison, A., Beschorner, B., & Schmidt-Crawford, D. (2012). Exploring the use of the iPad for literacy learning. The Reading Teacher, 66(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01090.
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2007). ISTE national educational technology standards (NETS). International Society for Technology in Education.
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2016). ISTE national educational technology standards (NETS). International Society for Technology in Education.
Keengwe, J., Schnellert, G., & Mills, C. (2012). Laptop initiative: Impact on instructional technology integration and student learning. Education and Information Technologies, 17(2), 137–146.
Kennewell, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2003). The influence of a technology-rich classroom environment on elementary teachers' pedagogy and children's learning. In Proceedings of the international federation for information processing working group 3.5 open conference on Young children and learning technologies, 34 (pp. 71-76). Australian computer society.
Lauricella, A. R., Barr, R., & Calvert, S. L. (2014). Parent–child interactions during traditional and computer storybook reading for children’s comprehension: Implications for electronic storybook design. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.07.001.
Leonard, D. (2013). The iPad goes to school. Bloomberg Business Week. http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-10-24/the-ipad-goes-to-school-the-rise-of-educational-tablets
Lovato, S. B., & Waxman, S. R. (2016). Young children learning from touch screens: Taking a wider view. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1078 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01078/full.
Merrill, M. D., Barclay, M., & van Schaak, A. (2008). Prescriptive principles for instructional design. In M. Spector, D. Merrill, J. V. Merriënboer, M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 173–184). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Merrill, M. D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., Pratt, J., & ID2 Research Group. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design. Educational Technology, 5–7.
Miller, B. T., Krockover, G. H., & Doughty, T. (2013). Using iPads to teach inquiry science to students with a moderate to severe intellectual disability: A pilot study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(8), 887–911. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21091.
Miller, B., & Martin, C. (2016). Digital notebooks for digital natives. Science and Children, 53(5), 84–89.
National Research Council (NRC). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11625.
National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Nature Education (n.d.). Science photography. Scitable https://www.nature.com/scitable/spotlight/science-photography-10285104/
Neumann, M. M. (2018). Parent scaffolding of young children’s use of touch screen tablets. Early Child Development and Care, 188(12), 1654–1664. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1278215.
Neumann, M. M., & Neumann, D. L. (2017). The use of touch-screen tablets at home and pre-school to foster emergent literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798415619773.
Peluso, D. C. (2012). The fast-paced iPad revolution: Can educators stay up to date and relevant about these ubiquitous devices? British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 125–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01310.x.
Quillen, I. (2011). Educators evaluate learning benefits of iPad. Education Week. http://www.edweek.org/dd/articles/2011/06/15/03mobile.h04.html
Rappolt-Schlichtmann, G., Daley, S. G., Lim, S., Lapinski, S., Robinson, K. H., & Johnson, M. (2013). Universal design for learning and elementary school science: Exploring the efficacy, use, and perceptions of a web-based science notebook. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1210–1225.
Riconscente, M. M. (2013). Results from a controlled study of the iPad fractions game motion math. Games Cult, 8, 186–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412013496894.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Ayala, C., & Shavelson, R. (2004). Evaluating students’ science notebooks as an assessment tool. International Journal of Science Education, 26(12), 1477–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000177299.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Tsai, S. P., & Schneider, J. (2010). Testing one premise of scientific inquiry in science classrooms: Examining students’ scientific explanations and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 583–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20356.
Schacter, J., Shih, J., Allen, C. M., DeVaul, L., Adkins, A. B., Ito, T., & Jo, B. (2016). Math shelf: A randomized trial of a prekindergarten tablet number sense curriculum. Early Education and Development, 27(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2015.1057462.
Schnackenberg, H. L. (2013). Tablet technologies and education. International Journal of Education and Practice, 1(4), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61/2013.1.4/61.4.44.50.
Schroeder, E. L., & Kirkorian, H. L. (2016). When seeing is better than doing: Preschoolers' transfer of STEM skills using touchscreen games. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1377. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01377.
Setzer, V. W., & Monke, L. (2001). Challenging the applications: An alternative view on why, when and how computers should be used in education. In R. Muffoletto. (Ed.), Education and technology: Critical and reflective practices (pp. 141–172). Hampton Press.
Shade, D. D., & Watson, J. A. (1990). Computers in early education: Issues put to rest, theoretical links to sound practice, and the potential contribution of microworlds. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6(4), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.2190/3RW1-W5QF-DH25-6EGP.
Shepardson, D. P., & Birtsch, S. J. (2001). The role of children’s journals in elementary school science activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200101)38:1<43::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-I.
Shin, N., Sutherland, L. M., Norris, C. A., & Soloway, E. (2012). Effects of game technology on elementary student learning in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 540–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01197.x.
Siegle, D. (2013). iPads: Intuitive technology for 21st-century students. Gifted Child Today, 36(2), 146–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217512474983.
Tahnk, J. L., & Bean, S. (2011). Digital milestones: Raising a tech-savvy kid. Parenting Early Years, 25(10), 78–84.
Wartella, E., & Jennings, N. (2000). Children and computers: New technology old concerns. The Future of Children, 10(2), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602688.
Wiebe, E., Shelton, A., Patterson, L., Hardy, M., Carter, M., Sheffield, W. (2013). Elementary students use of argumentation and evidentiary support in science notebooks [paper presentation]. NARST Annual Meeting, Rio Del Mar, PR.
Wood, E., Petkovski, M., De Pasquale, D., Gottardo, A., Evans, M. A., & Savage, R. S. (2016). Parent scaffolding of young children when engaged with mobile technology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 690. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00690.
Xie, H., Peng, J., Qin, M., Huang, X., Tian, F., & Zhou, Z. (2018). Can touchscreen devices be used to facilitate young children's learning? A meta-analysis of touchscreen learning effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2580. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02580.
Yore, L. D., Florence, M. K., Pearson, T. W., & Weaver, A. J. (2006). Written discourse in scientific communities: A conversation with two scientists about their views of science, use of language, role or writing in doing science, and compatibility between their epistemic views and language. International Journal of Science Education, 23(2–3), 109–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336601.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paek, S., Fulton, L. Digital Science Notebooks: A Tool for Supporting Scientific Literacy at the Elementary Level. TechTrends 65, 359–370 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00579-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00579-0