Abstract
Both picture exchange, a low-tech picturebased communication system, and technologybased interventions, such as the iPad™ with communication application, are emerging treatments for students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), according to the National Autism Center (2009). Recently, investigations regarding the use of the Apple iPad™ to communicate have been conducted with mixed results. The authors used a single-subject alternating treatment design during an extended school year (ESY) program for students with disabilities to compare the independent use and effectiveness of the two approaches (low-tech picture-based versus iPad™ equivalent) for three pre-school and two elementary students with ASD and developmental delay (DD). The authors concluded that teaching low-tech picture exchange prior to introducing the iPad™ may be effective progression in teaching communication reciprocity skills for some students with ASD/DD. Limitations and strengths of both technologies are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alabama Administrative Code. (2009). Rules of the Alabama state board of education, state department of education, chapter 290-8-9, special education services. Retrieved from https://docs.alsde.edu/documents/65/1-AAC%20290-8- 9%20%205-19-2011.pdf
American Academy of Neurology (2012). Evaluation of a child with global developmental delay. Retrieved from http://www.aan.com/globals/axon/assets/2603.pdf
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-text revision (4th ed.). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Apple (2011). iPad Technical Specifications. Retrieved from http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs
Assistiveware (2011). Proloquo2go. Retrieved from http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/proloquo2go/id308368164?mt=8#
Barlow, D., Nock, M., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Bondy, A. S., & Frost, L.. A. (1994). The Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS). Focus on Autistic Behavior, 9, 1-19.
Boutot, E. A., & Myles, B. S. (2011). Autism spectrum disorder: Foundations, characteristics, and effective strategies. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Centers for Disease Control (2012). Types of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/facts.html.
Cooper, J., Heron, T., & Heward, W. (2007). Applied behavior analysis, 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Frost, L., & Bondy, A. (2002). The picture exchange communication system training Manual. Newark, DE: Pyramid Educational Products.
Ganz, J., Parker, R., & Benson, J. (2009). Impact of the picture exchange communication system: Effects on communication and collateral effects on maladaptive behaviors. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25(4), 25-261.
Grandin, T. (2011). The way I see it: A personal look at autism and Asperger’s. Arlington, TX: Future Horizons.
Hammill, D. D., & Newcomer, P. L. (2008a). Test of language development-primary, 4th edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
Hammill, D. D., & Newcomer, P. L. (2008b). Test of language development-intermediate, 4th edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
National Autism Center (2009). Evidence-based practice and autism in the schools: A guide to providing appropriate interventions to students with autism spectrum disorder. Randolph, MA: National Autism Center.
Roid, G. H., & Miller, L. J. (2002). Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised. Wood-Dale, IL: Stoelting Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hill, D.A., Flores, M.M. Comparing the Picture Exchange Communication System and the iPad™ for Communication of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Developmental Delay. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 58, 45–53 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0751-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0751-8