Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Food, Big Data, and Decision-making: a Scoping Review—the 3-D Commission

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Food is an important determinant of health, featuring prominently in the Sustainable Development Goals. The term “big data” is seldom used in relation to food, partly because food data are scattered across different sectors. The increasing availability of food-related data presents an opportunity to glean new insights on food and food systems. These insights may enhance the quality of products and services and improve decision-making on optimizing food availability, all to the end of producing better health. Yet, knowledge gaps remain about the unique opportunities and challenges linked to big data on food and their use in decision-making. This scoping review explored the available literature linking food with big data and decision-making, using the following research question: What is the current literature on data about food, and how are these data used in decision-making? We searched PubMed until 29 February 2020 and Embase, Web of Sciences, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews until 8 March 2020. We included studies written in English and conducted narrative analyses to identify relevant themes from included studies. Sixteen studies fulfilled our eligibility criteria, including big data analyses, modelling studies, and reviews. These studies described the added value of using big data and how evidence from big data had or can be used for decision-making, as well as challenges and opportunities for such use. The majority of the included studies examined the link between food and big data, while hypothesizing of how these insights could inform decision-making, including policies, interventions, programs, and financing. There were only two examples wherein big data on food informed decision-making directly. The review highlights several false dichotomies in how the subject is approached in the literature and the importance of context, both between and within countries, in shaping the availability and types of data that can be used as meaningful evidence to inform decision-making. This review shows the paucity of research around the intersection of food, big data, and decision-making, as well as the potential in using big data on food systems to the end of informing decisions to improve the health of populations. Future research and decision-making around health systems can benefit from examining the full spectrum of perspectives on the subject. Future research and decision-making around health systems can also employ the steadfast embrace of technology, which will potentially reduce disparities in big data availability, to the end of improving the health of populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dubé L, Labban A, Moubarac J-C, Heslop G, Ma Y, Paquet C. A nutrition/health mindset on commercial Big Data and drivers of food demand in modern and traditional systems: roadmap paper on metrics and analytics. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014;1331(1):278–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gómez MI, Ricketts KD. Food value chain transformations in developing countries: selected hypotheses on nutritional implications. Food Policy. 2013;42:139–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.06.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubé L, Pingali P, Webb P. Paths of convergence for agriculture, health, and wealth. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(31):12294–301. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912951109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sjauw-Koen-Fa A. Framework for an Inclusive Food Strategy. Utrecht (In The Netherlands): Rabobank; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kraak VI, Story M. A public health perspective on healthy lifestyles and public–private partnerships for global childhood obesity prevention. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110(2):192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Slining M, Yoon E, Davis J, Hollingsworth B, Miles D, Ng S. Complexities of Monitoring Food and Nutrition from Factory to Fork: the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Crosswalk Approach. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas B, Gostin LO. Tackling the global NCD crisis: innovations in law and governance. J Law Med Ethics. 2013;41(1):16–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. 2019;393(10170):447–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. United Nations (UN). Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations. Accessed Dec 7, 2020. https://sdgs.un.org/goals

  10. Acemoglu D, Robinson JA. Why Nations Fail: the Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. 1. ed. New York, NY: Crown Business; 2012.

  11. Moodie R, Stuckler D, Monteiro C, Sheron N, Neal B, Thamarangsi T, et al. Profits and pandemics: prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries. Lancet. 2013;381(9867):670–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62089-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Swinburn BA, Sacks G, Hall KD, McPherson K, Finegood DT, Moodie ML, et al. The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):804–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60813-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Population Reference Bureau. 2013 World Population Data Sheet. Population Reference Bureau. Published 2013. Accessed December 8, 2020. https://www.prb.org/2013-world-population-data-sheet/

  14. Gartner Information technology glossary. Big Data. Gartner. Accessed Dec 7, 2020. https://www.gartner.com/en/information-technology/glossary/big-data

  15. Marvin HJP, Janssen EM, Bouzembrak Y, Hendriksen PJM, Staats M. Big data in food safety: an overview. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017;57(11):2286–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2016.1257481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bakhtin P, Khabirova E, Kuzminov I, Thurner T. The future of food production – a text-mining approach. Tech Anal Strat Manag. Published online. 2019;32:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1674802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bogaardt M-J, Geelen A, Zimmermann K, Finglas P, Raats MM, Mikkelsen BE, et al. Designing a research infrastructure on dietary intake and its determinants. Nutr Bull. 2018;43(3):301–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Coble KH, Mishra AK, Ferrell S, Griffin T. Big data in agriculture: a challenge for the future. Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2018;40(1):79–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppx056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Drewnowski A, Kawachi I. Diets and health: how food decisions are shaped by biology, economics, geography, and social interactions. Big Data. 2015;3(3):193–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2015.0014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Dwivedi P, Huang D, Yu W, Nguyen Q. Predicting geographical variation in health-related quality of life. Prev Med. 2019;126:105742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.05.030.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Frelat R, Lopez-Ridaura S, Giller KE, Herrero M, Douxchamps S, Djurfeldt AA, et al. Drivers of household food availability in sub-Saharan Africa based on big data from small farms. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113(2):458–63. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518384112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Global Burden of Disease (GBD). 2015 Eastern Mediterranean Region Collaborators. Danger ahead: the burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, 1990–2015. Int J Public Health. 2018;63(S1):11–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-017-1017-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Grummon AH, Taillie LS. Nutritional profile of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program household food and beverage purchases. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;105(6):1433–42. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.116.147173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Jo HS, Jung SM. Evaluation of food labeling policy in Korea: analyzing the Community Health Survey 2014–2017. J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34(32):e211. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e211.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson MO, Cozart T, Isokpehi RD. Harnessing knowledge for improving access to fruits and vegetables at farmers markets: interactive data visualization to inform food security programs and policy. Health Promot Pract. 2019;21:152483991987717–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839919877172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Källestål C, Blandón EZ, Peña R, Peréz W, Contreras M, Persson LÅ, et al. Assessing the multiple dimensions of poverty. Data mining approaches to the 2004–14 Health and Demographic Surveillance System in Cuatro Santos, Nicaragua. Front. Public Health. 2020;7:409. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ng SW, Slining MM, Popkin BM. The Healthy Weight Commitment Foundation pledge: calories sold from U.S. consumer packaged goods, 2007-2012. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(4):508–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.05.029.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Pokhriyal N, Jacques DC. Combining disparate data sources for improved poverty prediction and mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114(46):E9783–92. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700319114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Protopop I, Shanoyan A. Big data and smallholder farmers: big data applications in the agri-food supply chain in developing countries. Int Food Agribus Manag Rev. 2016;19:173–90. https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.240705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. World Bank Group. Agriculture and Climate Risk Enterprise – Kilimo Salama – Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania. World Bank Group; 2016. Accessed December 6, 2020. http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/858031490693709582/pdf/113740-BRI-PartnerProfiles-ACRE-PUBLIC.pdf

  34. van Rijmenam M. How big data can help the developing world beat poverty. DATAFLOQ. Published 2013. Accessed December 7, 2020. https://datafloq.com/read/big-data-developing-world-beat-poverty/168

  35. The Global Information Technology Report 2015: ICTs for Inclusive Growth. World Economic Forum/INSEAD; 2015. Accessed Dec 8, 2020. https://reports.weforum.org/global-information-technology-report-2015/

  36. Tortora B. Africa continues going mobile. Gallup. Published 2014. Accessed Dec 8, 2020. https://news.gallup.com/poll/168797/africa-continues-going-mobile.aspx

  37. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Information Economy Report: the Cloud Economy and Developing Countries. United Nations; 2013. Accessed Dec 8, 2020. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ier2013_en.pdf

  38. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Measuring the Information Society Report 2018.; 2018. Accessed Dec 7, 2020. https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/ind/D-IND-ICTOI-2018-SUM-PDF-E.pdf

  39. Naef E, Muelbert P, Raza S, Frederick R, Kendall J, Gupta N. Using Mobile Data for Development. Cartesian, Inc./ Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; 2014. Accessed Dec 8, 2020. https://docs.gatesfoundation.org/Documents/Using%20Mobile%20Data%20for%20Development.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Leona Ofei for her support in formatting this paper. The Rockefeller Foundation–Boston University 3‐D Commission (Grant number: 2019 HTH 024).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden

    Olivia Biermann

  2. Rockefeller Foundation-Boston University 3-D Commission on Determinants, Data, and Decision-making, Boston, USA

    Olivia Biermann, Shaffi Fazaludeen Koya, Claire Corkish, Salma M Abdalla & Sandro Galea

  3. Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, USA

    Shaffi Fazaludeen Koya, Claire Corkish, Salma M Abdalla & Sandro Galea

Authors
  1. Olivia Biermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shaffi Fazaludeen Koya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Claire Corkish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Salma M Abdalla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sandro Galea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salma M Abdalla.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Biermann, O., Koya, S.F., Corkish, C. et al. Food, Big Data, and Decision-making: a Scoping Review—the 3-D Commission. J Urban Health 98 (Suppl 1), 69–78 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-021-00562-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-021-00562-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation