Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Sitting or Walking? Analyzing the Neural Emotional Indicators of Urban Green Space Behavior with Mobile EEG

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a close relationship between urban green space and the physical and mental health of individuals. Most previous studies have discussed the impact of the structure of green space and its elements. This study focused on the emotional changes caused by common behaviors in urban green space (walking and sitting). We recruited 40 college students and randomly assigned them to walking and sitting groups (20 students per group). The two groups performed the same 8-min high-pressure learning task indoors and then performed 8-min recovery activities in a simulated urban green space (a bamboo-lawn space). We used the Emotiv EPOC+ EEG headset to dynamically measure six neural emotional parameters: “engagement,” “valence,” “meditation,” “frustration,” “focus,” and “excitement.” We conducted a pretest and posttest and used analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to analyze the posttest data (with the pretest data as covariates). The results of the comparison of the two behaviors showed that the “valence” and “meditation” values of the walking group were higher than those of the sitting group, which suggests that walking in urban green space is more favorable for stress reduction. The sitting group had a higher “focus” value than did the walking group, which suggests that sitting in urban green space is better for attention restoration. The results of this study can provide guidance for urban green space planning and design as well as health guidance for urban residents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Beatley T. Green urbanism: learning from European cities. Washington: Island Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stigsdotter UK, Ekholm O, Schipperijn J, Toftager M, Kamper-Jorgensen F, Randrup TB. Health promoting outdoor environments--associations between green space, and health, health-related quality of life and stress based on a Danish national representative survey. Scand J Public Health. 2010;38(4):411–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wallner P, Kundi M, Arnberger A, et al. Reloading pupils’ batteries: impact of green spaces on cognition and wellbeing. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(6)

  4. Hartig T, Mang M, Evans GW. Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior. 2016;23(1):3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hartig T, Evans GW, Jamner LD, Davis DS, Gärling T. Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2003;23(2):109–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lanki T, Siponen T, Ojala A, et al. Acute effects of visits to urban green environments on cardiovascular physiology in women: a field experiment. Environ Res. 2017;159:176–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ulmer JM, Wolf KL, Backman DR, Tretheway RL, Blain CJ, O'Neil-Dunne JP, et al. Multiple health benefits of urban tree canopy: the mounting evidence for a green prescription. Health Place. 2016;42:54–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Johansson M, Gyllin M, Witzell J, Küller M. Does biological quality matter? Direct and reflected appraisal of biodiversity in temperate deciduous broad-leaf forest. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2014;13(1):28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Astell-Burt T, Feng X, Mavoa S, Badland HM, Giles-Corti B. Do low-income neighbourhoods have the least green space? A cross-sectional study of Australia’s most populous cities. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:292.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Qin J, Zhou X, Sun C, Leng H, Lian Z. Influence of green spaces on environmental satisfaction and physiological status of urban residents. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2013;12(4):490–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jang HS, Kim J, Kim KS, Pak CH. Human brain activity and emotional responses to plant color stimuli. Color Res Appl. 2014;39(3):307–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aspinall P, Mavros P, Coyne R, Roe J. The urban brain: analysing outdoor physical activity with mobile EEG. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015;49(4):272–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Igarashi M, Aga M, Ikei H, Namekawa T, Miyazaki Y. Physiological and psychological effects on high school students of viewing real and artificial pansies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(3):2521–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kacha L, Matsumoto N, Mansouri A. Electrophysiological evaluation of perceived complexity in streetscapes. J Asian Architect Build Eng. 2015;14:585–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maskeliunas R, Damasevicius R, Martisius I, Vasiljevas M. Consumer-grade EEG devices: are they usable for control tasks? PeerJ. 2016;4:e1746.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Picavet HSJ, Milder I, Kruize H, de Vries S, Hermans T, Wendel-Vos W. Greener living environment healthier people?: exploring green space, physical activity and health in the Doetinchem Cohort Study. Prev Med. 2016;89:7–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Flouri E, Midouhas E, Joshi H. The role of urban neighbourhood green space in children’s emotional and behavioural resilience. J Environ Psychol. 2014;40:179–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Feda DM, Seelbinder A, Baek S, Raja S, Yin L, Roemmich JN. Neighbourhood parks and reduction in stress among adolescents: results from Buffalo, New York. Indoor and Built Environment. 2014;24(5):631–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vujcic M, Tomicevic-Dubljevic J. Urban forest benefits to the younger population: the case study of the city of Belgrade, Serbia. Forest Policy Econ. 2018;96:54–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gehl J. Life between buildings: VAN Nosrand Reinhold; 2003.

  21. Song C, Ikei H, Igarashi M, Takagaki M, Miyazaki Y. Physiological and psychological effects of a walk in urban parks in fall. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(11):14216–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Goto S, Park B-J, Tsunetsugu Y, Herrup K, Miyazaki Y. The effect of garden designs on mood and heart output in older adults residing in an assisted living facility. Herd: Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 2013;6:27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaplan S. The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol. 1995;15:169–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaplan R, Kaplan S, Ryan RL. With people in mind. Washington: Island Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kaplan R. The nature of the view from home: psychological benefits. Environ Behav. 2016;33(4):507–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol. 1991;11:201–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chang C-Y, Hammitt WE, Chen P-K, Machnik L, Su W-C. Psychophysiological responses and restorative values of natural environments in Taiwan. Landsc Urban Plann. 2008;85(2):79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li D, Sullivan WC. Impact of views to school landscapes on recovery from stress and mental fatigue. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2016;148:149–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. San Juan C, Subiza-Perez M, Vozmediano L. Restoration and the city: the role of public urban squares. Front Psychol. 2017;8:2093.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor AF, Kuo FE. Children with attention deficits concentrate better after walk in the park. J Atten Disord. 2009;12(5):402–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hartig T, Mitchell R, de Vries S, Frumkin H. Nature and health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:207–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee J, Tsunetsugu Y, Takayama N, et al. Influence of forest therapy on cardiovascular relaxation in young adults. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:834360.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Chiang Y-C, Li D, Jane H-A. Wild or tended nature? The effects of landscape location and vegetation density on physiological and psychological responses. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2017;167:72–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Choi JY, Park SA, Jung SJ, et al. Physiological and psychological responses of humans to the index of greenness of an interior space. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2016;28:37–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Song C, Joung D, Ikei H, et al. Physiological and psychological effects of walking on young males in urban parks in winter. Journal of Physiological Anthropology. 2013;32:18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Marselle MR, Irvine KN, Lorenzo-Arribas A, Warber SL. Moving beyond green: exploring the relationship of environment type and indicators of perceived environmental quality on emotional well-being following group walks. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;12(1):106–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Mennis J, Mason M, Ambrus A. Urban greenspace is associated with reduced psychological stress among adolescents: a Geographic Ecological Momentary Assessment (GEMA) analysis of activity space. Landsc Urban Plan. 2018;174:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Tilley S, Neale C, Patuano A, Cinderby S. Older people’s experiences of mobility and mood in an urban environment: a mixed methods approach using electroencephalography (EEG) and interviews. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(2)

  39. Neale C, Aspinall P, Roe J, et al. The aging urban brain: analyzing outdoor physical activity using the Emotiv Affectiv suite in older people. J Urban Health. 2017;94(6):869–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Debener S, Minow F, Emkes R, Gandras K, de Vos M. How about taking a low-cost, small, and wireless EEG for a walk? Psychophysiology. 2012;49(11):1617–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Barham MP, Clark GM, Hayden MJ, Enticott PG, Conduit R, Lum JAG. Acquiring research-grade ERPs on a shoestring budget: a comparison of a modified Emotiv and commercial SynAmps EEG system. Psychophysiology. 2017;54(9):1393–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rodríguez A, Rey B, Alcañiz M. Evaluating virtual reality mood induction procedures with portable EEG devices. Studies in Health Technology & Informatics. 2013;191:131.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pietto ML, Gatti M, Raimondo F, Lipina SJ, Kamienkowski JE. Electrophysiological approaches in the study of cognitive development outside the lab. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0206983.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Gunes H, Pantic M. Automatic, dimensional and continuous emotion recognition. International Journal of Synthetic Emotions. 2010;1(1):68–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mehrabian A. Pleasure-arousal-dominance: a general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in temperament. Current Psychology. 1996;14:261–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cowie R, Douglas-Cowie E, Tsapatsoulis N, et al. Emotion recognition in human-computer interaction. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. 2001;18:32–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Russell JA. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1980;39:1161–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lewis PA, Critchley HD, Rotshtein P, Dolan RJ. Neural correlates of processing valence and arousal in affective words. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17(3):742–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Anders S, Lotze M, Erb M, Grodd W, Birbaumer N. Brain activity underlying emotional valence and arousal: a response-related fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2004;23(4):200–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Ramirez R, Palencia-Lefler M, Giraldo S, Vamvakousis Z. Musical neurofeedback for treating depression in elderly people. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:354.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Davidson RJ. Emotion and affective style: hemispheric substrates. Psychological Science. 1992;3(1):39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Henriques JB, Davidson RJ. Left frontal hypoactivation in depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1991;100(4):535–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ramirez R, Vamvakousis Z. Detecting emotion from EEG signals using the Emotive Epoc device. In: Proceedings of the 2012 international conference on Brain Informatics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lawson BR. The language of space. Nature. 2007;252:93.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Cahn DA, Salmon DP, Butters N, et al. Detection of dementia of the Alzheimer type in a population-based sample: Neuropsychological test performance. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1995;1:252–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Gotts ZM, Ellis JG, Deary V, Barclay N, Newton JL. The association between daytime napping and cognitive functioning in chronic fatigue syndrome. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0117136.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Arnett JA, Labovitz SS. Effect of physical layout in performance of the Trail Making Test. Psychological Assessment. 1995;7:220–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Tombaugh TN. Trail Making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004;19:203–14.

  59. Kennedy S, Glaser R, Kiecolt-Glaser J. Psychoneuroimmunology. In: Principles of psychophysiology: physical, social, and inferential elements. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990. p. 177–90.

  60. Yang F, Bao ZY, Zhu ZJ. An assessment of psychological noise reduction by landscape plants. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(4):1032–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Hallgrimsdottir B, Svensson H, Ståhl A. Long term effects of an intervention in the outdoor environment-a comparison of older people’s perception in two residential areas, in one of which accessibility improvements were introduced. J Transport Geogr. 2015;42:90–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Hall ET. The silent language. Anchor Books. 1980;38:87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Jiang B, Chang C-Y, Sullivan WC. A dose of nature: tree cover, stress reduction, and gender differences. Landsc Urban Plann. 2014;132:26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant number 2018YFD0600105). This study was conducted after approval from the Sichuan Agricultural University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, China (FJY-B20170703-2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China

    Wei Lin, Qibing Chen, Mingyan Jiang, Jinying Tao, Zongfang Liu, Xiaoxia Zhang, Linjia Wu, Shan Xu, Yushan Kang & Qiuyuan Zeng

Authors
  1. Wei Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qibing Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mingyan Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jinying Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zongfang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaoxia Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Linjia Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Shan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yushan Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Qiuyuan Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qibing Chen.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, W., Chen, Q., Jiang, M. et al. Sitting or Walking? Analyzing the Neural Emotional Indicators of Urban Green Space Behavior with Mobile EEG. J Urban Health 97, 191–203 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-019-00407-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-019-00407-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation