Skip to main content
Log in

Racial-Ethnic Variation in Park Use and Physical Activity in the City of Los Angeles

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Racial-ethnic disparities in physical activity present important challenges to population health. Public parks provide access to free or low-cost physical activity opportunities, but it is unclear to what extent parks are utilized by various race-ethnic groups in diverse urban settings. Here, we examine racial ethnic differences in park use and physical activity among adult residents (n = 7506) living within 1 mi of 50 parks in the city of Los Angeles. In multivariate analyses, we find few differences among race-ethnic groups in terms of their frequency of having visited the park in the past 7 days; however, we find numerous differences in how the groups used the park and in their levels of physical activity: Blacks and English-speaking Latinos were less likely than whites to report being physically active, exercising in the park, and exercising outside the park; Spanish-speaking Latinos were equally likely as whites to report exercising in park but less likely to report exercising outside the park and more likely to report using the parks for social interactions; Asians/Pacific Islanders (PI)/others were more likely than whites to report visiting the park in the past 7 days and using the parks for social interactions. Urban parks appear to be an important resource for physical activity and socialization, in particular among Spanish-speaking Latino and Asians/PI groups. Additional efforts may be needed for other racial-ethnic minorities to experience the same benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40(1): 181–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vasquez E, Shaw BA, Gensburg L, Okorodudu D, Corsino L. Racial and ethnic differences in physical activity and bone density: National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007–2008. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013; 10, E216.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Godbey GC, Graefe A, James SW. The benefits of local recreation and park services: a nationwide study of the perceptions of the American public. Ashburn, VA: National Recreation and Park Association;1992

  4. Godbey GC, Caldwell LL, Floyd M, Payne LL. Contributions of leisure studies and recreation and park management research to the active living agenda. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28(2): 150–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tinsley HEA, Tinsley DJ, Croskeys CE. Park usage, social milieu, and psychosocial benefits of park use reported by older urban park users from four ethnic groups. Leisure Sci. 2002; 24(2): 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reed JA, Price AE, Grost L, Mantinan K. Demographic characteristics and physical activity behaviors in sixteen Michigan parks. J Community Health. 2012; 37(2): 507–512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stodolska M, Shinew KJ, Acevedo JC, Izenstark D. Perceptions of urban parks as havens and contested terrains by Mexican-Americans in Chicago neighborhoods. Leisure Sci. 2011; 33(2): 103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaczynski AT, Besenyi GM, Stanis SA, et al. Are park proximity and park features related to park use and park-based physical activity among adults? Variations by multiple socio-demographic characteristics. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014; 11: 146.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carlson SA, Brooks JD, Brown DR, Buchner DM. Racial/ethnic differences in perceived access, environmental barriers to use, and use of community parks. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010; 7(3): A49.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Paxton RJ, Sharpe PA, Granner ML, Hutto B. Associations of sociodemographic and community environmental variables to use of public parks and trails for physical activity. Intl J Health Promot Educ. 2005; 43(4): 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Floyd MF, Spengler JO, Maddock JE, Gobster PH, Suau LJ. Park-based physical activity in diverse communities of two U.S. Cities. An observational study. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 34(4): 299–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Floyd MF, Taylor WC, Whitt-Glover M. Measurement of park and recreation environments that support physical activity in low-income communities of color: highlights of challenges and recommendations. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36(4 Suppl): S156–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cronan MK, Shinew KJ, Schneider I, Stanis SA, Chavez D. Physical activity patterns and preferences among Latinos in different types of public parks. J Phys Act Health. 2008; 5(6): 894–908.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006; 27: 297–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Derose KP, Marsh T, Mariscal M, Pina-Cortez S, Cohen DA. Involving community stakeholders to increase park use and physical activity. Prev Med. 2014; 64: 14–19.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen DA, Han B, Derose KP, Williamson S, Marsh T, McKenzie TL. Physical activity in parks: a randomized controlled trial using community engagement. Am J Prev Med. 2013; 45(5): 590–597.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McKenzie TL, Cohen DA, Sehgal A, Williamson S, Golinelli D. System for observing play and recreation in communities (SOPARC): reliability and feasibility measures. J Phys Act Health. 2006; 3(Suppl 1): S208–S222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Evenson KR, Wen F, Golinelli D, Rodríguez DA, Cohen DA. Measurement properties of a park use questionnaire. Environ Behav. 2013; 45(4): 526–547.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007; 116(9): 1081–1093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Coleman KJ, Ngor E, Reynolds K, et al. Initial validation of an exercise “vital sign” in electronic medical records. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 44(11): 2071–2076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cohen DA, Han B, Derose KP, et al. Neighborhood poverty, park use, and park-based physical activity in a Southern California city. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 75(12): 2317–2325.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Osypuk TL, Diez Roux AV, Hadley C, Kandula NR. Are immigrant enclaves healthy places to live? The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 69(1): 110–120.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. White MJ. Segregation and diversity measures in population distribution. Popul Index. 1986; 52(2): 198–221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lopez RP, Hynes HP. Obesity, physical activity, and the urban environment: public health research needs. Environ Health. 2006; 5: 25.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Denton EG, Green P, Newman J, Siqin Y, Davidson KW, Schwartz J. The benefits of neighborhood racial diversity: neighborhood factors and its association with increased physical activity in ACS patients. Int J Cardiol. 2014; 173(3): 517–518.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sasidharan V, And FW, Godbey G. Cultural differences in urban recreation patterns: an examination of park usage and activity participation across six population subgroups. Manag Leis. 2005; 10(1): 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gobster PH, Delgado A. Ethnicity and recreation use in Chicago Lincoln-Park: In-park user survey findings. In: Gobster P, ed. Managing Urban and High-Use Recreation Settings. 1993;163:75–81. United States Department of Agriculture, St. Paul, Minnesota. Available at: http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_nc163.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2015.

  28. Casper JM, Harrolle MG, Kelley K. Gender differences in self-report physical activity and park and recreation facility use among Latinos in Wake County, North Carolina. Ann Behav Med. 2013; 45(Suppl 1): S49–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cohen DA, Sehgal A, Williamson S, Sturm R, McKenzie TL, Lara R, Lurie N. Park use and physical activity in a sample of public parks in the city of Los Angeles. Santa Monica, California: RAND; 2006.

  30. Cohen DA, Han B, Isacoff J, Shulaker B, Williamson S, Marsh T, McKenzie TL, Weir M, Bathia R. Impact of park renovations on park use and park-based physical activity. J Phys Act Health. 2015; 12(2): 289–295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838): 219–229.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cohen DA, Marsh T, Williamson S, et al. Parks and physical activity: why are some parks used more than others? Prev Med. 2010; 50(S1): S9–S12.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. The Trust for Public Land. Available at: http://parkscore.tpl.org/Methodology/TPL_10MinWalk.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2015.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by Grant No. R01HL083869 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Manuscript contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NHLBI. We thank collaborators at the Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks and in particular Mark Mariscal, Sophia Pina-Cortez, and Kevin Regan. We also acknowledge the important role played by the promotoras (bilingual community health promoters) from AltaMed Health Services in helping to collect the data and Terry Marsh of RAND in managing fieldwork.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn Pitkin Derose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Derose, K.P., Han, B., Williamson, S. et al. Racial-Ethnic Variation in Park Use and Physical Activity in the City of Los Angeles. J Urban Health 92, 1011–1023 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-015-9994-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-015-9994-8

Keywords

Navigation