Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Health in All Urban Policy: City Services through the Prism of Health

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In April, 2014, the City of Richmond, California, became one of the first and only municipalities in the USA to adopt a Health in All Policies (HiAP) ordinance and strategy. HiAP is increasingly recognized as an important method for ensuring policy making outside the health sector addresses the determinants of health and social equity. A central challenge facing HiAP is how to integrate community knowledge and health equity considerations into the agendas of policymakers who have not previously considered health as their responsibility or view the value of such an approach. In Richmond, the HiAP strategy has an explicit focus on equity and guides city services from budgeting to built and social environment programs. We describe the evolution of Richmond’s HiAP strategy and its content. We highlight how this urban HiAP was the result of the coproduction of science policy. Coproduction includes participatory processes where different public stakeholders, scientific experts, and government sector leaders come together to jointly generate policy goals, health equity metrics, and policy drafting and implementation strategies. We conclude with some insights for how city governments might consider HiAP as an approach to achieve “targeted universalism,” or the idea that general population health goals can be achieved by targeting actions and improvements for specific vulnerable groups and places.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIG. 1
FIG. 2
FIG. 3
FIG. 4
FIG. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ollila E. Health in All Policies: from rhetoric to action. Scand J Public Health. 2011; 39: 11. doi:10.1177/1403494810379895.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Declaration of Alma-Ata. Alma-Ata, USSR, 1978. Available at, http://www.who.int/publications/almaata_declaration_en.pdf. Accessed 11 Mar 2014.

  3. Kickbusch I, McCann W, Sherbon T. Adelaide revisited: from healthy public policy to health in all policies. Health Promot Int. 2008; 23: 1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kickbusch I. Health in All Policies: setting the scene. Public Health Bull S Australia. 2008; 5: 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Steenbakkersa M, Jansena M, Maarseb H, de Vriesc N. Challenging Health in All Policies, an action research study in Dutch municipalities. Health Policy. 2012; 105(2–3): 288–95. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.01.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Storm I, Harting J, Stronks K, Schuit AJ. Measuring stages of health in all policies on a local level: the applicability of a maturity model. Health Policy. 2014; 114(2–3): 183–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gase LN, Pennotti R, Smith KD. Health in All Policies: taking stock of emerging practices to incorporate health in decision making in the United States. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013; 19: 529–40. doi:10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182980c6e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. California Health in All Policies Task Force. Health in All Policies Task Force Implementation Plan: Health and Health Equity in State Guidance. 2012. Available at http://sgc.ca.gov/hiap/docs/publications/Endorsed__HiAP_Implementation_plan_Health_and_Health_Equity_in_State_Guidance.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2014.

  9. California Health And Safety Code Section 131000–131020. 2013. Available at, http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=hsc&group=130001131000&file=131000-131020. Accessed 17 Jan 2014.

  10. District of Columbia. Mayor Gray announces multiple initiatives to continue implementation of sustainable DC initiative. Available at http://mayor.dc.gov/release/mayor-gray-announces-multiple-initiatives-continue-implementation-sustainable-dc-initiative. Accessed 25 Mar 2014.

  11. Healthy Chicago, what we do. Available at http://www.cityofchicago.org/city/en/depts/cdph/provdrs/healthychicago.html. Accessed 20 Mar 2014.

  12. Whitehead M, Dahlgren G. Concepts and Principles for tackling social inequities in health: leveling up part 1. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. WHOLIS E89383. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/74737/E89383.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2013.

  13. CSDH. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. 2008. Available at www.who.int/social_determinants/thecommission/finalreport/en/index.Html. Accessed 1 Dec 2013.

  14. Shankardass K, Solar O, Murphy K, Freiler A, Bobbili S, Bayoumi A, et al. Getting started with Health in All Policies: a resource pack. Centre for Research on Inner City Health (CRICH), Ontario, Canada, 2011. Available at http://www.stmichaelshospital.com/crich/reports/hiap/. Accessed 11 Nov 2013.

  15. Shankardass K, Solar O, Murphy K, et al. A scoping review of intersectoral action for health equity involving governments. Int J Public Health. 2012; 57: 25–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. World Health Organization (WHO). Framework and statement: consultation on the drafts of the “Health in All Policies Framework for Country Action” for the Conference Statement of 8th Global Conference on Health Promotion. 2013. Available at http://www.healthpromotion2013.org/conference-programme/framework-and-statement. Accessed 10 Oct 2013.

  17. Rudolph L, Caplan J, Mitchell C, Ben-Moshe K, Dillon L. Health in All Policies: improving health through intersectoral collaboration. Discussion Paper. September 18, 2013. Institute of Medicine. Available at http://www.iom.edu/Home/Global/Perspectives/2013/HealthInAllPolicies.aspx. Accessed 1 Feb 2014.

  18. Freiler A, Muntaner C, Shankardass K, Mah CL, Molnar A, Renahy E, et al. Glossary for the implementation of Health in All Policies (HiAP). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013; 67: 1068–72. doi:10.1136/jech-2013-202731.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Burris S, Hancock T, Lin V, Herzog A. Emerging strategies for healthy urban governance. J Urban Health. 2007; 84: 154–63.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ostrom E. Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development. World Dev. 1996; 24(6): 1073–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Corburn J. Bringing local knowledge into environmental decision making: improving urban planning for communities at risk. J Plan Educ Res. 2003; 22: 420–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jasanoff S. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. London: Routledge. 2006. ISBN 978-0-415-40329-0.

  23. Chevron modernization project, draft environmental impact report. 2014. Available http://chevronmodernization.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/4.3_Air-Quality.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2014.

  24. US Census Summary File 3a. 2010. Summarized here, http://www.city-data.com/city/Richmond-California.html. Accessed 7 Sept 2013.

  25. Contra Costa Health Services (CCHS). Community health indicators for Contra Costa County. Available at http://cchealth.org/health-data/hospital-council/2010/pdf/2010_community_health_indicators_report_complete.pdf. 2010. Accessed 11 Jul 2013.

  26. Bohan S, Kleffman S. shortened lives: where you live matters. Contra Costa Times. 2010. Available at http://www.contracostatimes.com/life-expectancy. Accessed 12 Nov 2012.

  27. Connelly C. Bold Richmond plan aims at ‘Health and Wellness.’ Richmond confidential, June 7, 2011. Available at http://richmondconfidential.org/2011/06/07/richmond-plans-for-a-healthier-future/. Accessed 24 Feb 2014.

  28. Rodgers R. Richmond city leaders form partnership to improve health, reduce violence. Contra Costa Times, March 27, 2013. Available at http://www.contracostatimes.com/ci_22880066/richmond-city-leaders-form-partnership-improve-health-reduce. Accessed 23 Jan 2014.

  29. Weintraub D. Richmond’s new priority: taking health seriously, New York Times, April 3, 2010. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/04/us/04sfpolitics.html?_r=0. Accessed 7 Feb 2014.

  30. McEwen B. Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: central role of the brain. Physiol Rev. 2008; 87(3): 873–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. National Scientific Council (NSC) on the Developing Child. The developing child, excessive stress disrupts the architecture of the developing brain: Working Paper # 3. 2009. Available at http://developingchild.harvard.edu/resources/reports_and_working_papers/working_papers/wp3/. Accessed 3 Dec 2013.

  32. Powell J. Structural racism: building upon the insights of John Calmore. N C Law Rev. 2007; 86: 791–816.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Richmond City of. Health Initiatives. 2014. Available at http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?NID=2574. Accessed 29 Dec 2013.

  34. Said C. Richmond pushes forward with eminent domain plan. San Francisco Chronicle, 2013. Available at http://www.sfgate.com/realestate/article/Richmond-pushes-forward-with-eminent-domain-plan-5073950.php. Accessed 19 Dec 2013.

  35. Brown J. Contra Costa tables controversial jail expansion. Richmond Confidential, 2012. Available at http://richmondconfidential.org/2012/09/07/contra-costa-tables-controversial-jail-expansion/. Accessed 21 Oct 2013.

  36. Rodgers R. Contra Costa supervisors OK Chevron Richmond tax deal. Contra Costa Times, 2013. Available at http://www.contracostatimes.com/west-county-times/ci_24114907/contra-costa-supervisors-ok-chevron-richmond-tax-deal. Accessed 11 Nov 2013.

  37. Jones C. UC picks Richmond for Lawrence Berkeley Lab Campus. San Francisco Chronicle, 2013. Available at http://www.sfgate.com/education/article/UC-picks-Richmond-for-Lawrence-Berkeley-lab-campus-2675669.php. Accessed 15 Oct 2013.

  38. Geluardi J. The man behind Richmond’s renaissance. East Bay Express, 2011. Available at http://www.eastbayexpress.com/oakland/the-man-behind-richmonds-renaissance/Content?oid=2647128. Accessed 1 Aug 2013.

  39. Skocpol T. Targeting within universalism: politically viable policies to combat poverty in the United States. In: Jencks C, Peterson PE, eds. The Urban Underclass. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 1991: 411–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work described in the paper was funded by The California Endowment, Grant No. 20112093.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason Corburn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corburn, J., Curl, S., Arredondo, G. et al. Health in All Urban Policy: City Services through the Prism of Health. J Urban Health 91, 623–636 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-014-9886-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-014-9886-3

Keywords

Navigation