Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Resilience 2.0: Computer-aided Disaster Management

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many factors (larger population, more dependency on technology, more human-caused interference in the natural systems and equilibria, climate changes,⋯) contribute to the seemingly growing number and severity of disasters. Additional exaggeration is generated by public media. As a consequence Disaster Prevention and Disaster Management must be given increased attention. The ultimate goal of Disaster Management is resilience of the affected system and thus the adequate and acceptable survival of the affected population.

We discuss system behavior in the case of an assault or disturbance: from being fragile (loss of their functionality due to the assault) to being resilient (having the capacity... of bouncing back to dynamic stability after a disturbance), or even antifragile (being able to "learn" so as to improve disaster resilience).

Resilience 2.0 identifies a new paradigm: modern Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) are employed as a basis for enabling and improving resilience of a system. ICT provide the basis for sufficient preparation before an assault, for quick recognition of, and for effective, efficient reactions to disasters. Only the coordinated intra- and interphase deployment of ICT promises sufficient success and can bring resilience to currently as yet fragile systems. We discuss stressors (time and performance pressure, physical and psychological stress on personnel) and problems due to damaged ICT-platforms and communication infrastructure. The basic message is that computer-aided Disaster Management is able to offers a new level of reactivity: Resilience 2.0.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asimakopoulou, E. & Bessis, N. (2010). Advanced ICTs for disaster management and threat detection: collaborative and distributed frameworks. Information Sciences References, 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Aumayr, G. (2015). Health data processing-system theory based meaning and potential for future health. In Doucek, P., Chroust, G., and Oskrdal, V. (eds), IDIMT-2015, Information Technology and Society-Interaction and Interdependence, pages 423–430. Trauner Verlag Linz, Sept. 2015.

  3. Aumayr, G., Chroust, G., Haider, G., Randus, R. & Thür, A. (2015). Disaster-management: challenges for computer-supported process and project management. In Ison, R. (ed), Governing the Anthropocene: The greatest challenge for systems thinking in practice?-Program and Abstracts, pp. 107–109. ISSS, International Society for Systems Sciences, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Azuma, R. (2004). Overview of augmented reality. In SIGGRAPH’ 04: ACM SIGGRAPH 2004 Course Notes, pp.26, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Backfried, G., Göllner, J., Quirchmayr, G. et al. (2013). Integration of media sources for situation analysis in the different phases of disaster management. In EISIC 2013, IEEE, University of Upsalla, SWE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Bolin, R. & Standford, L. (1998). The Northridge Earthquake: Vulnerability and Disaster. Routledge, London 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Brose, D. (2015). Developing a framework for measuring community resilience: summary of a workshop. The National Academies Press 2015. Available via http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=20672.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bundesamt f. Bevölkerungsschutz und Katastrophenhilfe (2011). Psychosoziales Krisenmanagement in CBRN-Lagen / Psychosocial Crisis Management in CBRN Incidents. Bundesamt f. Bevölkerungsschutz und Katastrophenhilfe, Germany 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chroust, G. & Aumayr, G. (2015). Resilience 2.0: ICT for Resilience of Systems. In Doucek, P., Chroust, G. and Oskrdal, V. (eds), IDIMT-2015, Information Technology and Society-Interaction and Interdependence, pp. 13–22. Trauner Verlag Linz, Sept. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chroust, G., Ossimitz, G., Roth, M., Sturm, N. & Ziehesberger, P. (2015). First responders in regional disasters: a social responsibility. In Mulej, M. and Dyck, R. (eds), Social Responsibility-Range of Perspectives per topic and Countries, pp.23. Bentham Science Publishing Ltd., 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chroust, G., Schönhacker, S., Rainer, K., Roth, M. & Ziehesberger, P. (2009a). Dependable systems, emergency interventions, and organizational processes. In Doucek, P., Chroust, G., and Oskrdal, V. (eds), IDIMT 2009–System and Humans-A Complex Relationship, pp.279–287. Trauner Verlag Linz, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chroust, G., Schö nhacker, S., Rainer, K., Roth, M. & Ziehesberger, P. (2009b). Training and supporting first responders by mixed reality environments. In 53rd Annual Conference-The International Society for the Systems Sciences " Making Livable, Sustainable Systems Unremarkable", pp.18. The International Society for the Systems Sciences 2009 (CDROM), July 2009, paper no. 2009-1248-Chroust.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chroust, G., Sturm, N., Roth, M. & Ziehesberger, P. (2011). Regional disasters and systemic reactions. In Wilby, J. (ed), ISSS 2011 and ISKSS 2011: All Together Now: Working across Disciplines, pp.15 (paper no. 1631). (CDROM) Int. Systems Science Society, UK, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cruz, A. M. (2005). Natech disasters: a review of practices, lessons learned and future research needs. Technical report, available via ipcc-wg2.gov/njlite_download.php?id=6152 [Dec.2014].

    Google Scholar 

  15. Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse-How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. Penguin Books London, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dörner, D. (1996). Die Logik des Misslingens-Strategisches Denken in komplexen Situationen. sachbuch-9314, rororo Verlag, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Filippoupolitis, A., Hey, L., Loukas, G., Gelenbe, E. & Timotheou, S. (2008). Emergency response simulation using wireless sensor networks. In Ambi-Sys’ 08: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Ambient Media and Systems, pp.1-7, ICST, Brussels, Belgium. ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Francois, C. (2004). International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics. 2nd edition, 2 volumes, K. G. Saur, München 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Greengard, S. (2014). Weathering a new era of Big Data. Comm. ACM, 57 (9): 12–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grifantini, K. (2009). Can you trust crowd wisdom? Technology review (MIT), Sept. 16, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Haddow, K. & Haddow, G. (2008). Disaster Communications in a Changing Media World. Butterworth-Heinemann Homeland Security, kindle-book, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Holling, C. (1986). The resilience and stability of ecosystems. In Clark, W. and Munn, R. (eds), Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. Cambridge Univ. Press 1986.

  23. IFRC (ed.) (2007a). Contingency Planning Guide. Technical report, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  24. IFRC (ed.) (2007b). Disaster Response and Contingency Planning Guide. Technical report, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  25. INSARAG (ed.) (2012). INSARAG Guidelines and Methodology Technical Report. Technical report, International Search and Rescue Advisory Group, United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affaires, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  26. ISO (2011). ISO 22320:2011, Societal security–emergency management–requirements for incident response. Technical report, International Organization for Standardization, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kelton, D., Sadowski, R. P. & Sturrock, D. (2007). Simulation with ARENA. McGrawHill, Boston 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Khan, H., Vasilescu, L. & Khan, A. (2008). Disaster management cycle-a theoretical approach. Management and Marketing Journal, 6(1): 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kreps, G. et al. (1989). Social Structure and Disaster. University of Delaware Press, Newark, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lazarte, M. (2013). New ISO standard for emergency management. Available via http://www.iso.org/iso/home/news_index/ news_archive/news.htm?refid=Ref1496, [Feb. 2014].

    Google Scholar 

  31. Manahl, C. & Drechsler, F. (2015). Engaging end-users in the development of smartphone applications for emergency services. In Doucek, P., Chroust, G. & Oskrdal, V. (eds), IDIMT-2015, Information Technology and Society -Interaction and Interdependence, pp.39–44. Trauner Verlag Linz, Sept. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  32. McEntire, D. (2007). Disaster Response and Recovery: Strategies and Tactics for Resilience. Wiley, USA 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mrotzek, M. (2009). Catastrophe dynamics-a systemistic exploration of catastrophes towards a set of catastrophe archetypes using the system dynamics simulation method. PhD thesis, Faculty for Technical Sciences, Alpe-Adria University Klagenfurt, Feb. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mrotzek, M. & Ossimitz, G. (2008a). Catastrophe archetypes-using system dynamics to build an integrated systemic theory of catastrophes. In Chroust, G., Doucek, P. & Klas, J. (eds), IDIMT-2008-Managing the Unmanageable, 16th Interdisciplinary Information Management Talks, pp. 371–384. Verlag Trauner Linz, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mrotzek, M. & Ossimitz, G. (2008b). An integrative systemic theory of catastrophes-Studie für KIRAS nr. 813798 proj. SimRad.NBC. Technical report, Inst. f. Mathematik, Univ. Klagenfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Norris, F., Friedman, M. & Watson, P. (2002). 60.000 disaster victims speak: Part ii.: summary and implications of the disaster mental health research. Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 65: 240–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ossimitz, G. & Lapp, C. (2006). Katastrophen-systemisch betrachtet. Wissenschaft & Umwelt 2006–INTERDISZIPLINÄR, 10: 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pfahl, D. (2005). System dynamics simulation-a tool in support of software risk assessment and decision support. Tutorial at IASTED SE2005, Innsbruck, Austria, February 17, 2005, Handout.

    Google Scholar 

  39. PublicSafety.NET (2015). For further development of broadband services in disaster relief-whitepaper. Available via http://www.johanniter.at/forschung/D81whitepaper.pdf [January 2016].

    Google Scholar 

  40. Quarantelli, E. (1985). The need for clarification in definition and conceptualization in research. In Sowder, B. (ed), Disasters and Mental Health-Selected Contemporary Perspectives, pp. 41–73.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Roth, M. et al. (2012). SIMRAD.COMP: Simulations-und Informationssystem zum Administrieren von Hilfseinheiten bei Katastrophen-Erforschung von Systemkomponenten zur Überprüfung der Einsatztauglichkeit der SIMRAD Technologie, Endbericht Projekt KIRAS 818784. Technical report, Österr. Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft mbH (FFG) 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  42. SimRad.NBC (2009). The SimRad.NBC-simulation-and information system to manage rescue units at disasters–with focus on NBC threats. Available via http://www.simrad.at [May 2009].

    Google Scholar 

  43. Skrbek, J. & Kviz, J. (2010). Critical areas of early warning system. In Doucek, P., Chroust, G. & Oskrdal, V. (eds), IDIMT 2010 Information Technology-Human Values, Innovation and Economy, Sept 2010, pp. 193–200. Trauner Verlag Linz, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Svata, V. (2012). ICT Methodogical support of disaster management. In Doucek, P., Chroust, G. & Oskrdal, V. (eds), IDIMT 2012-ICT Support for Complex Systems, Sept 2012. Trauner Verlag Linz.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Taleb, N. (2012). Antifragile: How to Live in a World We Don’t Understand. Penguin UK2012.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tierney, K., Lindell, M. & Perry, R. (2001). Facing the Unexpected-Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States. Josef Henry Press, Washington DC, SA 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wikipedia-english (2013). Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Available via http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The foundations of this work was funded by projects supported by security program "Sicherheitsforschungs - Förderprogramm KIRAS" of the Austrian Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology (BMVIT).

The authors also want to thank the reviewers for their help and support in improving the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerhard Chroust.

Additional information

Gerhard Chroust is an Austrian systems scientist and Professor Emeritus for systems engineering and automation at the Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Austria. He is the Secretary General of the International Federation for Systems Research (IFSR) and a Board Member of the Austrian Computer Society (OCG). He is an Honorary Member of the Austrian Society for Informatics (ÖGI) and of the Bertalanffy Center for Study of Systems Sciences (BCSSS). Chroust is an authority on formal definition of programming languages, system development processes, software quality standards, process assessment, and on cultural differences in system development. His current key research is in human aspects, cultural differences and systemic aspects of system development and disaster management, and representation and enactment of software processes. In 1964 he received a Master of Science (electrical engineering) from the Technical University, 1965 a Master of Science (computer science) from the University of Pennsylvania. In 1975 he was awarded a PhD (computer science) from the Technical University Vienna and in 1980 a Habilitation (Computer Science) from the Johannes Kepler University Linz. From 1966 to 1991 Chroust worked at the IBM Laboratory Vienna. From 1992 until 2007 he was tenured Professor for ‘Systems Engineering and Automation’ at the Kepler University of Linz. He has published 10 authored books, edited/co-edited approx. 60 proceedings, written approx. 220 scientific publications and approx. 300 other publications. Chroust is bearer of the Silver Medal of Honor of Upper Austria. Website: http://www.gerhard-chroust.at.

Georg Aumayr is an Austrian health promotion and communication scientist. He received his Master in Communication Science at the University of Vienna in 2007. Aumayr is head of the research and innovation center of Johanniter in Vienna, Austria and the research officer of Johanniter International in Brussels, Belgium. During large scale events like the EURO2008 he worked as EMT and was active ambulance staff and first aid instructor for several years. Aumayr worked also for the pharma industry in marketing and ICT as well as for the University of Vienna as assistant. He was from 2010-2012 member of advisory groups for Ambient Assisted Living and Emergency Care in Austria as well as Evaluator for European Research Programs. Since 2010 he is constantly engaged in European research projects and national research projects in the area of health promotion and ambient assisted living as well as in disaster relief from situation awareness systems to personal protective equipment. His current key research is the promotion of health under extreme or constantly changing situations like in disasters or at the process of ageing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chroust, G., Aumayr, G. Resilience 2.0: Computer-aided Disaster Management. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 26, 321–335 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-017-5335-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-017-5335-7

Keywords

Navigation