Skip to main content
Log in

Option prioritization for unknown preference

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An option prioritization technique is developed to efficiently elicit the preferences, both unknown and crisp, of decision makers (DMs) in strategic conflicts. In the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution, each DM has one or more options, each of which may be selected or not. A state, or possible scenario, is formed when all DMs make an option selection. The software GMCR II contains an option prioritization procedure that makes it easy for a modeller to enter a DM’s crisp preference ordering over the states using prioritized statements describing the DM’s preferred option combinations. This procedure is extended by adding two new logical connectives that describe uncertainty of preference. For each DM, a range of possible scores for each feasible state can then be calculated, facilitating the determination of a preference ordering containing uncertainty by comparing and ranking scores. To demonstrate how this new methodology can be used to represent unknown preferences in a real-world decision problem, it is applied to a Canadian dispute over proposed water exports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Mutairi, M.S., Hipel, K.W. & Kamel, M.S. (2008). Fuzzy preferences in conflicts. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 17 (3): 257–276.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bashar, M.A., Kilgour, D.M. & Hipel, K.W. (2012). Fuzzy preferences in the graph model for conflict resolution. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20 (4): 760–770.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bashar, M.A., Kilgour, D.M. & Hipel, K.W. (2014). Fuzzy option prioritization for the graph model for conflict resolution. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 246: 34–48.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fang, L., Hipel, K.W. & Kilgour, D.M. (1993). Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fang, L., Hipel, K.W. & Wang, L. (2002). Gisborne water export conflict study. In: Schmitz GH (ed.), Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Water Resources Environment Research (ICWRER), 1: 432–436, Dresden, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M. & Peng, X. (2003a). A decision support system for interactive decision making- part I: model formulation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C. Applications and Reviews, 33 (1): 42–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M. & Peng, X. (2003b). A decision support system for interactive decision making- part II: Analysis and output interpretation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C. Applications and Reviews, 33 (1): 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fraser, N.M. & Hipel, K.W. (1984). Conflict Analysis: Models and Resolutions. North-Holland, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Fraser, N.M. & Hipel, K.W. (1988). Decision support systems for conflict analysis. In: Singh MG, Salassa D, and Hindi KS (eds.), Managerial Decision Support Systems, pp. 13–21, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hamouda, L., Kilgour, D.M. & Hipel, K.W. (2004). Strength of preferences in the graph model for conflict resolution. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13: 449–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M., Fang, L. & Peng, X. (1997). The decision support system GMCR in environmental conflict management. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 83 (2): 117–152.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hipel, K.W., Fang, L. & Wang, L. (2003). Bulk water export issues in Canada and the Lake Gisborne conflict. Paper presented at the 2nd International Symposium on Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM): Towards Sustainable Water Utilization in the 21st Century (ICWRS), Stellenbosch, South Africa, 22-24 January 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M. & Bashar, M.A. (2011). Fuzzy preferences in multiple participant decision making. Scientia Iranica, 18 (3): 627–638.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Howard, N. (1971). Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Howard, N. (1999). Confrontation Analysis: How to Win Operations Other Than War. CCRP publication series, D.C., Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Inohara, T., Hipel, K.W. & Walker, S. (2007). Conflict analysis approaches for investigating attitudes and misperceptions in the War of 1812. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 16 (2): 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Inohara, T. & Hipel, K.W. (2008). Interrelationships among noncooperative and coalition stability concepts. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 17: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ke, G.Y., Fu, B., De, M. & Hipel, K.W. (2012). A hierarchical multiple criteria model for eliciting relative preferences in conflict situations. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 21 (1): 56–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kilgour, D.M. & Eden, C. (2011). Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kilgour, D.M., Hipel, K.W. & Fang, L. (1987). The graph model for conflicts. Automatica, 23 (1): 41–55.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Kilgour, D.M., Hipel, K.W., Fang, L. & Peng, X. (2001). Coalition analysis in group decision support. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10 (2): 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li, K.W., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M. & Fang, L. (2004a). Preference uncertainty in the graph model for conflict resolution. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, Humans and Systems, 34 (4): 507–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li, K.W., Kilgour, D.M. & Hipel, K.W. (2004b). Status quo analysis of the Flathead River conflict. Water Resources Research, 40 (5).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li, K.W., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M. & Noakes, D. (2005). Integrating unknown preferences into status quo analysis with applications to an environmental conflict. Group Decision and Negotiation, 14 (6): 461–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ma, J., Hipel, K.W. & De, M. (2011). Devils lake emergency outlet diversion conflict. Journal of Environmental Management, 92 (3): 437–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Walker, S., Hipel, K.W. & Inohara, T. (2009). Strategic decision making for improved environmental security: coalitions and attitudes in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 18 (4): 461–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Walker, S., Hipel, K.W. & Inohara, T. (2012). Dominating attitudes in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 21 (3): 316–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu, H., Hipel, K.W. & Kilgour, D.M. (2009). Multiple levels of preference in interactive strategic decisions. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 157 (15): 3300–3313.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Yu, J., Zhao, M., Sun, D. & Dong, J. (2013). Research on the water pollution conflict between the upstream area and the downstream area in a river basin based on GMCR. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 44 (12): 1389–1398.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith W. Hipel.

Additional information

Jing Yu is a Ph.D. candidate of technological economics and management at Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. She received her Bachelor’s degree in international economics and trades from Hohai University in 2009. She has been taking successive postgraduate and doctoral programs of study for doctoral degree since September 2009 at Hohai University. From September 2013 to September 2014, she was a visiting scholar in the Systems Design Engineering Department at the University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Her current research interests are in the fields of game theory, conflict analysis, development and application of the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution (GMCR), water resources management, development and resolution of environmental conflicts, and environmental engineering and sustainable development.

Keith W. Hipel is a professor of systems design engineering at the University of Waterloo where he is Coordinator of the Conflict Analysis Group. He is the president of the Academy of Science within the Royal Society of Canada, Senior Fellow of the Centre for International Governance Innovation, Fellow of the Balsillie School of International Affairs and Past-Chair of the Board of Governors of Renison University College. Keith thoroughly enjoys mentoring students and is a recipient of the Distinguished Teacher Award, Faculty of Engineering Teaching Excellence Award, and the Award of Excellence in Graduate Supervision from the University of Waterloo, as well as the Outstanding Engineering Educator Award from IEEE Canada. His major research interests are the development of conflict resolution, multiple criteria decision analysis, time series analysis and other decision-making methodologies for addressing challenging interdisciplinary system of systems engineering problems lying at the confluence of society, technology and the environment, with applications in water resources management, hydrology, environmental engineering, energy, and sustainable development. Keith is Co-Chair of the Council of Canadian Academies (CCA) Expert Panel on “Energy Use and Climate Change: A Synthesis of the Latest Evidence”. He is the recipient of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Eminent Scientist Award, Joseph G. Wohl Outstanding Career Award from the IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC) Society, IEEE SMC Norbert Wiener Award, Docteur Honoris Causa (France), Doctor Honoris Causa (Hungary), Sir John William Dawson Medal (Royal Society of Canada), and Engineering Medal for Research and Development (Professional Engineers Ontario).

D. Marc Kilgour is a professor of mathematics at Wilfrid Laurier University and Adjunct Professor of Systems Design Engineering at University of Waterloo. His research lies at the intersection of mathematics, engineering, and social science, and his most significant contributions include insights into arms control, environmental management, negotiation, arbitration, voting systems, fair division, and coalition formation. Also, he pioneered the application of decision support systems for strategic conflicts. Dr. Kilgour has been privileged to supervise the PhD programs of 19 students, all of whom are going on to illustrious careers. His lifetime publications, including 6 books and nearly 400 articles in refereed journals, conference proceedings, and edited books, have earned him many international awards and distinctions. He is a member of the Board of Directors of the Laurier Centre for Military Strategic and Disarmament Studies, is active in 12 professional societies, and has many editorial responsibilities, including co-editing the Springer Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation. He was President of the Peace Science Society in 2012-13, and is now President of the INFORMS Section on Group Decision and Negotiation.

Min Zhao is a professor of Business School at Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. He received his Bachelor’s degree in mathematics from Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, in 1984. He has hosted and participated in over 70 projects, and published over 10 books and over 130 journal and conference papers. His major research interests are technological economics and management, and water conservancy economy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, J., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M. et al. Option prioritization for unknown preference. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 25, 39–61 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-015-5282-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-015-5282-0

Keywords

Navigation