Abstract
Humeral motion can be challenging to measure and analyze. Typically, Euler/Cardan sequences are used for humeral angle decomposition, but choice of rotation sequence has substantial effects on outcomes. A new method called True axial rotation calculation may be more precise. The objective of this study is to compare humeral axial rotation measured from two systems (optical motion capture and inertial measurement units (IMUs)) and calculated with two methods (Euler angles and True axial). Motion of torso and dominant humerus of thirty participants free from any upper limb impairments was tracked using both systems. Each participant performed a functional tasks protocol. Humeral axial rotation was calculated with Euler decomposition and the True axial method. Waveforms were compared with two-way ANOVA statistical parametric mapping. A consistent pattern emerged: axial rotation was not different between motion capture systems when using the True axial method (p > .05), but motion capture systems showed relatively large magnitude differences (~ 20–30°) when using Euler angle calculation. Between-calculation method differences were large for both motion capture systems. Findings suggest that the True axial rotation method may result in more consistent findings that will allow for precise measurements and comparison between motion capture systems.
Graphical Abstract
Two methods for calculating humeral axial rotation measured from optical motion capture and inertial measurement units were compared.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Valevicius AM, Jun PY, Hebert JS, Vette AH (2018) Use of optical motion capture for the analysis of normative upper body kinematics during functional upper limb tasks: A systematic review. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 40:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JELEKIN.2018.02.011
Bonnefoy-Mazure A, Slawinski J, Riquet A, Lévèque JM, Miller C, Chèze L (2010) Rotation sequence is an important factor in shoulder kinematics. Application to the elite players’ flat serves. J Biomech 43(10):2022–2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2010.03.028
Phadke V, Braman JP, LaPrade RF, Ludewig PM (2011) Comparison of glenohumeral motion using different rotation sequences. J Biomech 44(4):700–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.042
AJ Schnorenberg, BA Slavens (2021) Effect of Rotation Sequence on Thoracohumeral Joint Kinematics during Various Shoulder Postures. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS 4912–4915. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9629667.
Senk M, Cheze L (2006) Rotation sequence as an important factor in shoulder kinematics. Clin Biomech 21:3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.09.007
Wu G et al (2005) ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion - Part II: Shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech 38(5):981–992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042
Doorenbosch CAM, Harlaar J, Dirkjan HEJ, Veeger (2003) The globe system: An unambiguous description of shoulder positions in daily life movements. J Rehabil Res Dev 40(2):147–156. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2003.03.0149
Lang AE, Dickerson CR (2017) Normative kinematics of reaching and dexterity tasks: moving towards a quantitative baseline for Functional Capacity Evaluations (FCEs). Int Biomech 4(2):37–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2017.1326843
Lang AE, Dickerson CR (2017) Task intensity influences upper limb and torso kinematics during two common overhead Functional Capacity Evaluation tasks. Work 58(2):121–134
van Andel CJ, Wolterbeek N, Doorenbosch CAM, Veeger DHEJ, Harlaar J (2008) Complete 3D kinematics of upper extremity functional tasks. Gait Posture 27(1):120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.03.002
Kontaxis A, Cutti AG, Johnson GR, Veeger HEJ (2009) A framework for the definition of standardized protocols for measuring upper-extremity kinematics. Clin Biomech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.12.009
Friesen KB, Ostryzniuk A, Lang AE (2023) Comparison of scapular kinematics from optical motion capture and inertial measurement units during a work-related and functional task protocol. Med Biol Eng Comput 61:1521–1531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-023-02794-2
Aliaj K, Foreman KB, Chalmers PN, Henninger HB (2021) Beyond Euler/Cardan analysis: True glenohumeral axial rotation during arm elevation and rotation. Gait Posture 88:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GAITPOST.2021.05.004
Seitz AL, Mcclure PW, Finucane S, Boardman ND, Michener LA (2011) Mechanisms of rotator cuff tendinopathy : Intrinsic, extrinsic, or both? Clin Biomech 26:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.08.001
Ogston JB, Ludewig PM (2007) Differences in 3-Dimensional shoulder kinematics between persons with multidirectional instability and asymptomatic controls. Am J Sports Med 35(8):1361–1370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546507300820
Van Der Molen HF, Foresti C, Daams JG, Frings-Dresen MHW, Kuijer PPFM (2017) Work-related risk factors for specific shoulder disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med 74(10):745–755. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2017-104339
Aizawa J et al (2010) Three-dimensional motion of the upper extremity joints during various activities of daily living. J Biomech 43(15):2915–2922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.07.006
Kasten P, Rettig O, Loew M, Wolf S, Raiss P (2009) Three-dimensional motion analysis of compensatory movements in patients with radioulnar synostosis performing activities of daily living. J Orthop Sci 14:307–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1332-0
HEJ Veeger, DJ Magermans, J Nagels, EKJ Chadwick, FCT Van Der Helm (2006) A kinematical analysis of the shoulder after arthroplasty during a hair combing task. Clin Biomech 21(SUPPL 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLINBIOMECH.2005.09.012
Defroda SF, Goyal D, Patel N, Gupta N, Mulcahey MK (2018) Shoulder instability in the overhead athlete. Curr Sports Med Rep 17(9):308–314. https://doi.org/10.1249/JSR.0000000000000517
Kibler WB (1995) Biomechanical analysis of the shoulder during tennis activities. Clin Sports Med 14(1):79–85
Wilk KE et al (2015) Deficits in Glenohumeral Passive Range of Motion Increase Risk of Shoulder Injury in Professional Baseball Pitchers A Prospective Study. Am J Sports Med 43(10):2379–2385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515594380
Cutti A, Giovanni A, Rocchi L, Davilli A, Sacchetti R (2008) Ambulatory measurement of shoulder and elbow kinematics through inertial and magnetic sensors. Med Biol Eng Comput 46:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-007-0296-5
Winter DA (2009) Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, New Jersey
Pataky TC (2010) Generalized n-dimensional biomechanical field analysis using statistical parametric mapping. J Biomech 43:1976–1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.008
Kobayashi K et al (2022) Application of statistical parametric mapping for comparison of scapular kinematics and EMG. J Biomech 145:111357. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2022.111357
Höglund G, Grip H, Öhberg F (2021) The importance of inertial measurement unit placement in assessing upper limb motion. Med Eng Phys 92:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2021.03.010
Cutti AG, Paolini G, Troncossi M, Cappello A, Davalli A (2005) Soft tissue artefact assessment in humeral axial rotation. Gait Posture 21(3):341–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GAITPOST.2004.04.001
Fethke NB, Schall MC, Chen H, Branch CA, Merlino LA (2020) Biomechanical factors during common agricultural activities: Results of on-farm exposure assessments using direct measurement methods. J Occup Environ Hyg 17(2–3):85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2020.1717502
Lang AE, Card A, Barden J, Kim SY (2022) The effect of breast reconstruction on kinematics and performance during a range of upper limb functional tasks. Plast Reconstr Surg 150(4):e747–e756
Lang AE, Maciukiewicz JM, Vidt ME, Grenier SG, Dickerson CR (2018) Workstation configuration and container type influence upper limb posture in grocery bagging. Appl Ergon 73:206–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.07.012
Bruttel H, Spranz DM, Bülhoff M, Aljohani N, Wolf SI, Maier MW (2019) Comparison of glenohumeral and humerothoracical range of motion in healthy controls, osteoarthritic patients and patients after total shoulder arthroplasty performing different activities of daily living. Gait Posture 71:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.04.001
Oosterwijk AM, Nieuwenhuis MK, Van Der Schans CP, Mouton LJ (2018) Shoulder and elbow range of motion for the performance of activities of daily living: A systematic review Shoulder and elbow range of motion for the performance of activities of daily living: A systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract 34(7):505–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2017.1422206
Yildiz TI et al (2020) The repeatability of 3-dimensional scapular kinematic analysis during bilateral upper extremity movements. J Bodyw Mov Ther 24:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.06.038
Menegoni F, Vismara L, Capodaglio P, Crivellini M, Galli M (2008) Kinematics of trunk movements: protocol design and application in obese females. J Appl Biomater Biomech 6(3):178–185
MN Haik, Francisco Alburquerque-Sendín, PR Camargo (2014) Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of 3-Dimensional Scapular Orientation in Individuals With and Without Shoulder Impingement. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 44(5) 341–349. Downloaded from www.jospt.org. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2014.4705
J Clément, JA De Guise, A Fuentes, N Hagemeister (2018) Comparison of soft tissue artifact and its effects on knee kinematics between non-obese and obese subjects performing a squatting activity recorded using an exoskeleton. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.01.009
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All study procedures were approved by the institutional ethics review board.
Informed consent
Participants provided informed consent.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lang, A.E., Friesen, K.B. Defining humeral axial rotation with optical motion capture and inertial measurement units during functional task assessment. Med Biol Eng Comput 61, 2963–2970 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-023-02894-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-023-02894-z