Abstract
User comfort during simulated driving is of key importance, since reduced comfort can confound the experiment and increase dropout rates. A common comfort-affecting factor is simulator-related transient adverse health effect (SHE). In this study, we propose and evaluate methods to adapt a virtual driving scene to reduce SHEs. In contrast to the manufacturer-provided high-sensory conflict scene (high-SCS), we developed a low-sensory conflict scene (low-SCS). Twenty young, healthy participants drove in both the high-SCS and the low-SCS scene for 10 min on two different days (same time of day, randomized order). Before and after driving, participants rated SHEs by completing the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ). During driving, several physiological parameters were recorded. After driving in the high-SCS, the SSQ score increased in average by 129.4 (122.9 %, p = 0.002) compared to an increase of 5.0 (3.4 %, p = 0.878) after driving in the low-SCS. In the low-SCS, skin conductance decreased by 13.8 % (p < 0.01) and saccade amplitudes increased by 16.1 % (p < 0.01). Results show that the investigated methods reduce SHEs in a younger population, and the low-SCS is well accepted by the users. We expect that these measures will improve user comfort.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen RW, Park G, Cook M, Rosenthal TJ, Fiorentino D, Viirre E (2003) Novice driver training results and experience with a PC based simulator. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design
Bertin R, Collet C, Espié S, Graf W (2005) Objective measurement of simulator sickness and the role of visual-vestibular conflict situations. In: Driving simulation conference North America
Bertin R, Guillot A, Collet C, Vienne F, Espié S, Graf W (2004) Objective measurement of simulator sickness and the role of visual-vestibular conflict situations: a study with vestibular-loss (a-reflexive) subjects. In: Proceedings of Neuroscience meeting, San Diego
Boff KR, Lincoln JE (1988) Engineering data compendium: human perception and performance, vol 3. Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Ohio
Brooks JO, Goodenough RR, Crisler MC, Klein ND, Alley RL, Koon BL, Logan WC Jr, Ogle JH, Tyrrell RA, Wills RF (2010) Simulator sickness during driving simulation studies. Accid Anal Prev 42(3):788–796
Brown LB, Ott BR (2004) Driving and dementia: a review of the literature. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 17(4):232–240
Campbell FW, Wurtz RH (1978) Saccadic omission: why we do not see a grey-out during a saccadic eye movement. Vis Res 18(10):1297–1303
Classen S, Bewernitz M, Shechtman O (2011) Driving simulator sickness: an evidence-based review of the literature. Am J Occup Ther 65(2):179–188
Cobb SVG, Nichols S, Ramsey A, Wilson JR (1999) Virtual reality-induced symptoms and effects (VRISE). Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 8(2):169–186
Cowings PS, Suter S, Toscano WB, Kamiya J, Naifeh K (1986) General autonomic components of motion sickness. Psychophysiology 23(5):542–551
Yong GI (2012) Effects of age and gender differences on automobile instrument cluster design. Advances in affective and pleasurable design. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 22–212
Duh HB-L, Parker DE, Furness TA (2001) An independent visual background reduced balance disturbance envoked by visual scene motion: implication for alleviating simulator sickness. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Seattle, Washington, USA. ACM, pp 85–89
Duh HBL, Abi-Rached H, Parker DE, Furness TA (2001) Effects on balance disturbance of manipulating depth of an independent visual background in a stereographic display. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting
Duh HBL, Parker DE, Furness TA (2004) An independent visual background reduced simulator sickness in a driving simulator. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 13(5):578–588
Fisher D, Pollatsek A, Pradhan A (2006) Can novice drivers be trained to scan for information that will reduce their likelihood of a crash? Inj Prev 12(Suppl 1):i25–i29
Fisher DL (2011) Handbook of driving simulation for engineering, medicine, and psychology. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Gianaros PJ, Muth ER, Mordkoff JT, Levine ME, Stern RM (2001) A questionnaire for the assessment of the multiple dimensions of motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 72(2):115
Gibson JJ (1986) The ecological approach to visual perception. Routledge, London
Hettinger LJ, Berbaum KS, Kennedy RS, Dunlap WP, Nolan MD (1990) Vection and simulator sickness. Mil Psychol 2(3):171–181
Hill K, Howarth P (2000) Habituation to the side effects of immersion in a virtual environment. Displays 21(1):25–30
Horn BKP, Schunck BG (1981) Determining optical flow. Artif Intell 17(1):185–203
Howarth P, Costello P (1997) The occurrence of virtual simulation sickness symptoms when an HMD was used as a personal viewing system. Displays 18(2):107–116
Hu S, Grant WF, Stern RM, Koch KL (1991) Motion sickness severity and physiological correlates during repeated exposures to a rotating optokinetic drum. Aviat Space Environ Med 62(4):308–314
Johnson DM (2005) Introduction to and review of simulator sickness research. US Army Research Institute for the Behavior Sciences, Arlington
Kartiko I, Kavakli M, Ken C (2009) The impacts of animated-virtual actors’ visual complexity and simulator sickness in virtual reality applications. In: Sixth international conference on computer graphics, imaging and visualization
Kellogg RS, Kennedy RS, Graybiel A (1964) Motion sickness symptomatology of labyrinthine defective and normal subjects during zero gravity maneuvers. Aerosp Med 36:315–318
Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG (1993) Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviat Psychol 3(3):203–220
Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Grizzard MC, Stanney KM, Kingdon K, Lanham S (2001) Use of a motion history questionnaire to predict simulator sickness. In: Driving simulation conference
Kim YY, Kim HJ, Kim EN, Ko HD, Kim HT (2005) Characteristic changes in the physiological components of cybersickness. Psychophysiology 42(5):616–625
Kolasinski EM (1995) Simulator sickness in virtual environments. Technical report of the U.S. Army Research Institute 1027
Lee HC, Cameron D, Lee AH (2003) Assessing the driving performance of older adult drivers: on-road versus simulated driving. Accid Anal Prev 35(5):797–803
Lee HC, Lee AH, Cameron D, Li-Tsang C (2003) Using a driving simulator to identify older drivers at inflated risk of motor vehicle crashes. J Saf Res 34(4):453–459
Lerman Y, Sadovsky G, Goldberg E, Kedem R, Peritz E, Pines A (1993) Correlates of military tank simulator sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 64(7):619–622
Lin JJW, Abi-Rached H, Kim DH, Parker DE, Furness TA (2002) A “natural” independent visual background reduced simulator sickness. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting
Lukas A, Nikolaus T (2009) Driving ability and dementia. Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie: Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie 42(3):205
Min BC, Chung SC, Min YK, Sakamoto K (2004) Psychophysiological evaluation of simulator sickness evoked by a graphic simulator. Appl Ergon 35(6):549–556
Mourant RR, Rengarajan P, Cox D, Lin Y, Jaeger BK (2007) The effect of driving environments on simulator sickness. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting
Mourant RR, Thattacherry TR (2000) Simulator sickness in a virtual environments driving simulator. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting
Prothero JD, Draper MH, Furness TA, Parker DE, Wells MJ (1999) The use of an independent visual background to reduce simulator side-effects. Aviat Space Environ Med 70(3):277–283
Prothero JD, Draper MH, Furness TA, Parker DE, Wells MJ (1997) Do visual background manipulations reduce simulator sickness. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on motion sickness: medical and human factors
Reason JT, Brand JJ (1975) Motion sickness. Academic Press, Oxford, 310 pp
Regan C (1995) An investigation into nausea and other side-effects of head-coupled immersive virtual reality. Virtual Real 1(1):17–31
Schultheis MT, Rizzo AA (2001) The application of virtual reality technology in rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol 46(3):296
Stanney KM, Mourant RR, Kennedy RS (1998) Human factors issues in virtual environments: a review of the literature. Presence 7(4):327–351
Ungs TJ (1989) Simulator induced syndrome: evidence for long-term after effects. Aviat Space Environ Med 60:252–255
Watson TL, Krekelberg B (2009) The relationship between saccadic suppression and perceptual stability. Curr Biol 19(12):1040–1043
Yin Z, Mourant RR (2009). The perception of optical flow in driving simulators. In: Proceedings of the 5th international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training, and vehicle design
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jäger, M., Gruber, N., Müri, R. et al. Manipulations to reduce simulator-related transient adverse health effects during simulated driving. Med Biol Eng Comput 52, 601–610 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-014-1162-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-014-1162-x