Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Ultrasound and Calcium Chloride on the Ultrastructure and the Warner-Bratzler Shear Force Value of Beef Shank Muscle Fibers

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Food Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Meat tenderness is a major factor in consumer satisfaction. Tenderness may be quantified by changes in muscle sarcomere length, roughness (ultrastructure) and shear force. The ultrastructure and the Warner-Bratzler shear force value of beef shank muscle fibers were experimentally measured in controlled applications of ultrasound and calcium chloride. Uncooked beef samples were treated with ultrasound at 40 kHz at different intensities for 6 min, and then immersed in a range of calcium chloride solutions for 24 h. Warner–Bratzler shear analysis and atomic force microscopy (AFM) data collection were performed for each sample. AFM height derived data (the sarcomere length and roughness values) and the Warner–Bratzler shear force values indicate optimum ranges of ultrasound intensity and calcium chloride concentration for meat tenderization. While the effect of low intensity ultrasound alone was not significant, calcium chloride treatment increased the sarcomere length and decreased shear force values. Furthermore, the combination of ultrasound and calcium chloride increased the sarcomere length significantly and simultaneously reduced the Warner–Bratzler shear force tolerance of the sample. These data suggested that low intensity and frequency ultrasound alongside Calcium Chloride immersion can promote the transmembrane transport of calcium ions via the calpain system to improve meat tenderness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Koohmaraie, Meat Sci. 43(S1), 193–201 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. K.G. Grunert, Food Qual. Prefer. 8(3), 157–174 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S.D. Shackelford, T.L. Wheeler, M.K. Meade, J.O. Reagan, B.L. Byrnes, M. Koohmaraie, J. Anim. Sci. 79(10), 2605–2614 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Zor, R. Ortiz, E. Saatci, R. Bardsley, T. Parr, E. Csoregi, M. Nistor, Bioelectrochemistry 76(1–2), 93–99 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M.J. Colle, M.E. Doumit, Meat Sci. 131, 142–145 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A.D. Alarcon-Rojo, H. Janacua, J.C. Rodriguez, L. Paniwnyk, T.J. Mason, Meat Sci. 107, 86–93 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Turantas, G.B. Kilic, B. Kilic, Int. J. Food Microbiol. 198, 59–69 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K.S. Ojha, T.J. Mason, C.P. O'Donnell, J.P. Kerry, B.K. Tiwari, Ultrason. Sonochem. 34, 410–417 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. S.D. Jayasooriya, P.J. Torley, B.R. D'Arcy, B.R. Bhandari, Meat Sci. 75(4), 628–639 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. R.D. Warner, C.K. McDonnell, A.E.D. Bekhit, J. Claus, R. Vaskoska, A. Sikes, F.R. Dunshea, M. Ha, Meat Sci. 132, 72–89 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A.M. Herrero, L. de la Hoz, J.A. Ordonez, B. Herranz, M.D.R. de Avila, M.I. Cambero, Meat Sci. 80(3), 690–696 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Koohmaraie, G.H. Geesink, Meat Sci. 74(1), 34–43 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Li, J. Tan, P. Shatadal, Meat Sci. 57(4), 341–346 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Listrat, B. Lebret, I. Louveau, T. Astruc, M. Bonnet, L. Lefaucheur, B. Picard, J. Bugeon, TheScientificWorldJournal 2016, 3182746–3182746 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M.S. Rhee, T.L. Wheeler, S.D. Shackelford, M. Koohmaraie, J. Anim. Sci. 82(2), 534–550 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. C.P. Starkey, G.H. Geesink, R. van de Ven, D.L. Hopkins, Meat Sci. 126, 18–21 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. C.P. Starkey, G.H. Geesink, D. Collins, V.H. Oddy, D.L. Hopkins, Meat Sci. 113, 51–58 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. B. Tiribilli, D. Bani, F. Quercioli, A. Ghirelli, M. Vassalli, Ultramicroscopy 102(3), 227–232 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. D.M. Sango, D. Abela, A. McElhatton, V.P. Valdramidis, J. Appl. Microbiol. 116(5), 1067–1083 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. X. Pang, L. Lin, B. Tang, Sci. Rep. 7, 46042 (2017)

  21. E.L. Florin, V.T. Moy, H.E. Gaub, Science 264(5157), 415–417 (1994)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Zhu, T. Sabharwal, A. Kalyanasundaram, L. Guo, G. Wang, J. Biomech. 42(13), 2143–2150 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. F. Chemat, H. Zill e, M.K. Khan, Ultrason. Sonochem. 18(4), 813–835 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. G. Xiong, L. Zhang, W. Zhang, J. Wu, Czech J. Food Sci. 30(3), 195–205 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. T.S. Awad, H.A. Moharram, O.E. Shaltout, D. Asker, M.M. Youssef, Food Res. Int. 48(2), 410–427 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. F.W. Pohlman, M.E. Dikeman, J.F. Zayas, Meat Sci. 45(3), 329–337 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Z. Qian, R.D. Sagers, W.G. Pitt, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 25(1), 69–76 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. D.G. Riley, D.D. Johnson, C.C. Chase, et al., Meat Sci. 70(2), 347–356 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. C.P. Starkey, G.H. Geesink, D. Collins, O.V. Hutton, D.L. Hopkins, Meat Sci. 113, 51–58 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. J. Gao, Y. Wang, L. Liu, K. Li, S. Zhang, J. Zhu, Scanning 38(6), 545–553 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. M.A. da Silva Coutinho, P.M. Ramos, S. da Luz e Silva, L.S. Martello, A.S. Cravo Pereira, E.F. Delgado, Meat Sci. 134, 61–67 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Maki, E. Takano, T. Osawa, T. Ooi, T. Murachi, M. Hatanaka, J. Biol. Chem. 263(21), 10254–10261 (1988)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. R.A. Hanna, B.E. Garcia-Diaz, P.L. Davies, FEBS Lett. 581(16), 2894–2898 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. L. Uytterhaegen, E. Claeys, D. Demeyer, J. Anim. Sci. 72(5), 1209–1223 (1994)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. P. Ertbjerg, E. Puolanne, Meat Sci. 132, 139–152 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by Key Research and Development Plan of Shaanxi Province (2018NY-110, JZ), International S&T Cooperation Foundation of Northwest A&F University (2018, JZ), National Natural Science Foundation of China (11202170, JZ), National Beef and Yak Industrial Technology System (CARS-37, LZ), College Students’ Entrepreneurship Training Program of Shaanxi Province (S201710712095,YW), College Students’ Innovation Training Program of Northwest A&F University (1201710712108, WW). We would like to acknowledge Prof. Orgel at BioCAT of Argonne National Lab and Illinois Institute of Technology for his help on manuscript improvement and scientific discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Linsen Zan or Jie Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wan, Y., Wang, H., Wang, W. et al. Effect of Ultrasound and Calcium Chloride on the Ultrastructure and the Warner-Bratzler Shear Force Value of Beef Shank Muscle Fibers. Food Biophysics 13, 396–403 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11483-018-9545-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11483-018-9545-4

Keywords

Navigation