Abstract
Social survey data on those aged 80 years or older is sparse. Based on a representative sample, this paper validates a multidimensional model proposed for understanding of quality of life (QoL) in very old age. Towards this goal, this paper estimated levels and heterogeneity of personal and environmental resources, well-being, autonomy, and perceived appreciation by society in the population of the very old in Germany. Next, the contribution of personal and environmental resources to QoL outcomes and overlap between these outcomes was estimated using a multivariate approach. Results were based on a representative survey on QoL of the very old in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany’s most populous state. The survey included comprehensive information on socio-demographics, health, social and personal QoL resources including objective testing of cognitive function. The sample comprised 1,863 individuals (mean age 86.5 years, range 80–102 years), including 211 individuals residing in non-private dwellings. Interviews with proxy informants were conducted for 176 individuals that were willing to participate but could not conduct the interview themselves due to limited ability to communicate (PLC). Pronounced differences were found for PLC with respect to environmental and personal resources and QoL outcomes. Pronounced differences were also found both with respect to lower observed levels of QoL outcomes (e.g., autonomy) and predictors of QoL outcomes (e.g., effect of negative “external” appreciation on subjective well-being). Contrary to the deficit-oriented model of old age, a high degree of autonomy was observed. However, substantial and consequential negative “external” appreciation of very old age was also apparent.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Different conceptualizations and assessments of quality of life (QoL) have been brought forward in the last decades, most prominently by the World Health Organization (WHO) (1997) that defines QoL as “individuals’ perceptions of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards, and concerns. It is a broad ranging concept incorporating in a complex way the persons’ physical health, psychological state, level of independence, social relationships, personal beliefs, and their relationships to salient features of the environment” (WHO, 1997, p. 11). This definition highlights important features of QoL, mainly that it is inherently multidimensional and that living conditions are to be evaluated against the backdrop of individual and societal values and expectations. In this broad understanding of QoL, it is not a single feature (e.g., life satisfaction) that can account for the multiple facets of QoL. Empirical assessments of QoL need to depict these different facets individually and consider simultaneously the relationship between them.
This is even more important in the context of old age which is characterized by the paradoxical empirical observations of high subjective well-being and good subjective health despite highly prevalent multimorbidity or cognitive and functional limitations (Schilling, 2006; Wettstein et al., 2016). Studies on QoL in the very old have shown strong psychological resilience to adverse trajectories in health, function, and participation (Jopp et al., 2008; Jyväkorpi et al., 2018) implicated by biological (Mitnitski et al., 2001), psychological (Schaie, 1983) and social (Bennett & Ahammer, 1977; Cumming & Henry, 1961) perspectives informing a deficit-model of ageing. Moreover, QoL in the oldest old has been described as geared towards specific ways to negotiate demands for autonomy, identity, and well-being in light of limited health and functioning (Botes et al., 2019; Cho et al., 2011; Kruse, 2021), some of which are more highly appreciated in society than others (e.g., informal caregiving, generativity, technology use).
Conceptual Model of Quality of Life
Within the scope of the large-scale representative survey NRW80+, the Challenges and Potentials model of QoL in very old age (CHAPO, Fig. 1) was developed as an interdisciplinary framework and a grid of operationalization (Wagner et al., 2018). CHAPO explicitly considers different dimensions of QoL and suggests operationalizations with a specific focus on old age within each of these dimensions. The dimensions are developed based on Veenhoven’s (2000) “Four Qualities of Life Model”. His differentiation between QoL ‘chances’ and ‘results’ and between ‘inner’ and ‘outer’ qualities leads to the four dimensions of QoL, namely, livability of the environment (CHAPO: livable environment), life-ability of the individual (CHAPO: life-ability of the person), external utility of life (CHAPO: appreciation by others), inner appreciation of life (CHAPO: appreciation of own life). The CHAPO model extends Veenhoven’s (2000) model by (1) explicitly considering values held by the person and the environment and (2) proposing ‘successful life conduct’ as a third QoL result characterized by person-environment fit and congruency of values of the individual and their environment. CHAPO achieves specificity with respect to very old age by the selection of QoL markers within conceptual domains that allow for testing competing mechanisms proposed by major ageing theories about how QoL is generated or retained in very old age (Erikson, 1998; Heckhausen et al., 2013; Wahl et al., 2012).
Life Results
In line with the distinction between inner valuation and external worth (utility) of an individual’s life as two kinds of life results (Veenhoven, 2000), we consider an individual’s life to be evaluated not only by themselves, but also by their social environment. As manifestations of such external evaluations, the environment’s explicit attitudes on and behaviors towards older individuals give them an impression of their appreciation by others (Neise et al., 2019). In a performance-oriented society holding generalized prejudice against old age, very old individuals are expected to be confronted with particularly negative evaluations such as constituting an unproductive burden to society (Fürstenberg, 2013). Although evidence for adverse effects of age stereotype on developmental outcomes (including health, well-being and even mortality) have been reported before (Dionigi, 2015; Levy et al., 2002; Levy, 2009), knowledge about the individual factors contributing to such adverse perceptions of external appraisal and potential protective effects remain limited.
As an indicator of subjective appreciation of own life, positive affect in very old individuals has been studied extensively. Maximizing positive affect and minimizing suffering are overarching motives of hedonic concepts of QoL. In contrast to rational evaluative judgements such as life satisfaction, however, affective well-being may also result from less conscious processing of goal approach and may signal need satisfaction and successful adaptation to ageing, for example in the competence press model by Nahemow and Lawton (1973) and late-life development (Erikson, 1998). In light of diminishing options for agency and control over one’s life and increasing likelihood of chronic disease and unrecoverable loss at the end of life, Tesch-Römer and Wahl (2017) focus on subjective well-being (SWB) as a marker of successful ageing in very old age. Similarly, in their discussion of an ecological theory of ageing, Wahl et al. (2012) propose autonomy, identity and well-being as developmental outcomes, highlighting the role of adaptive and supportive environments and processes of belonging to achieve these late-life outcomes.
In addition, CHAPO explicitly refers to the concept of successful life conduct as a behavioral QoL result. Acknowledging both social-normative and personal goals, we suggest that successful life conduct is characterized by a specific quality of the person-environment constellation (e.g., fit) or congruence between actual behavior and multi-dimensional stipulations held by individuals and society about the good life in very old age (e.g., autonomy, generativity, ego integrity). In this study, we consider perceived autonomy over one’s life as an indicator of successful life conduct. According to WHO (2002), “autonomy is the perceived ability to control, cope with and make personal decisions about how one lives on a day-to-day basis, according to one`s own rules and preferences” (WHO, 2002, p. 13). In ageing policy, autonomy of the individual is a key characteristic of responsible citizenship (WHO, 2002). As self-regulation implies autonomy of the individual, it is a widespread presumption and implicit outcome in ageing theories (Baltes & Baltes, 1990; Carstensen, 1991; Heckhausen, 1997).
Research into the mutual relationship between different aspects of QoL results in very old age is limited. Reliable data on many facets of QoL in the general population of the very old, including those in institutional settings, remains sparse. Especially data that allows for a combined analysis of how individual and environmental chances impact on different QoL results is rare. Wettstein et al. (2015) for example have shown substantial overlap (i.e., within-person correlation across time) between indicators of positive activation (positive affect, depressive symptoms, mastery) but a rather independent pattern of change in perceived autonomy in a substantial sample of very old community-dwelling individuals.
Conducting a representative study of very old people also means giving people who, because of their health, can no longer be interviewed themselves, a chance to participate. In dementia and stroke research, proxies are seen as valuable sources of information (Burks et al., 2021; Leontjevas et al., 2012; Sneeuw et al., 1997). With respect of the QoL results considered here, proxy interviews are more common in well-being research (Martyr et al., 2018), but rarely employed to assess personal values or autonomy. There is critical debate with respect to the validity and potential measurement error in proxy assessment (Vuorisalmi et al., 2012). In a total-survey-error framework, however, such measurement errors need to be weighed against representation errors resulting from systematic non-response of particularly vulnerable individuals. For the current study, first analyses show that including vulnerable people via proxy interviews comes with substantive benefits regarding the representativity of the sample but only minor measurement bias in core QoL indicators such as positive affect (Kaspar et al., 2023).
Life Chances
Livable environment refers to social norms or values and the opportunities to achieve own goals (Wagner et al., 2018). Of the plethora of aspects of the natural, cultural, social, built or material human environment, the following environmental aspects of life chances were exemplarily included in this paper: social contact, financial resources, internet usage, and societal values. Research on social contact shows that larger social networks go along with higher social support (Cornwell & Schafer, 2016) and are positively associated with SWB as well as mental or physical health in older adults (Hawton et al., 2011; Huxhold et al., 2013; Smith & Victor, 2019). A meta-analysis showed that the quality of social contact correlates more strongly with SWB than the quantity (Pinquart & Sörensen, 2000). The frequency of contacts was, however, found to be associated with QoL (Netuveli et al., 2006) in older adults. Available financial resources characterize the socioeconomic position of an individual within society. Research has identified an indirect effect of financial resources on QoL via health inequalities as well as direct effects on different QoL results (Pratschke et al., 2017). For older people (65+) with reduced self-care capacity, poor financial resources are associated with lower life satisfaction (Borg et al., 2006). A literature review shows significant correlations of income with SWB operationalized as either life satisfaction, self-esteem, or happiness (Pinquart & Sörensen, 2000). Results of the Survey of Health and Retirement in Europe show that there are significant associations between income and QoL in the age group 65+ (Knesebeck et al., 2007). Information and communication technologies (ICT) have become indispensable in most areas of life and represent a major means of societal participation. Internet usage allows for knowledge acquisition, entertainment, or social interaction, and has the potential to preserve independency and autonomy (Czaja & Lee, 2007). Previous research indicated that internet use in old age increases self-efficacy (Erickson & Johnson, 2011), perceived control, social support, and life satisfaction, while reducing depressive symptoms and loneliness (Heo et al., 2015; Shapira et al., 2007; Szabo et al., 2019). According to the SIM study (Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest, 2022), 86% of the very old who use the internet do so at least once a week. Societal values co-determine opportunities of expression, pursuit, and attainment of individual goals (Bobowik et al., 2011; Sagiv et al., 2004). Due to societal and technological change, people in old age are regarded particularly likely to experience discrepancies between societal and their own values (Brandtstädter & Wentura, 1994), leading to feelings of alienation, disorientation, or exclusion (Sagiv et al., 2004). Such experiences – referred to here as anomie – provoke loneliness (Kaspar, 2004), decreased life satisfaction (Brandtstädter & Wentura, 1994), and suicidal tendencies (Schaller, 2008).
Life-ability of the person refers to resources within the individual, such as values, skills, or experience and knowledge (Wagner et al., 2018). Functional, cognitive, and mental health (i.e., independence in activities of daily living, cognitive impairment, and depressive symptoms) as well as personal values were considered in this study. Functional health has been identified as an indicator of individual (health) resources and as a key predictor of QoL results in old age. Henchoz et al. (2019) reported an association between an improvement in activities of daily living (ADL) and an increase of QoL. Schilling et al. (2013) found a strong linear effect of ADL deterioration on decline in overall life satisfaction among community-dwelling very old adults. This was also observed among institutionalized individuals (Liu et al., 2020). Furthermore, the ability to perform ADL was positively associated with perceived autonomy in both community-dwelling (Sánchez-García et al., 2019) and institutionalized older adults (Liu et al., 2020). In old age, dementia and depression belong to the most prevalent psychiatric diseases (Lilford and Hughes 2020) and they were identified as the main cause of reduction in disability-adjusted life years (Wittchen et al., 2011). The prevalence of major depression and subclinical depressive symptoms continues to increase across older age groups (Charlson et al., 2019). Symptoms of depression such as negative mood and reduced interest for enjoyment (WHO, 1992) directly affect subjective well-being. As a trans-situational reference system, personal values serve as benchmarks for cognitive judgements of satisfaction or more implicit experiences of coherence or achievement. Different values might be adaptive in different stages of life. For instance, a prioritization of values focusing on loss prevention instead of growth is expected to help manage a shift towards a less positive balance between gains and losses in later life (Ebner et al., 2006). An age-related decrease of self-centeredness and an increase of values focusing on the welfare of others can be expected based on Erikson’s stage theory of human development (1998) and the model of gero-transcendence (Tornstam, 1997). This view is supported by previous studies on age differences in values (Robinson, 2013; Tulviste et al., 2017).
Research Aims
Germany as an affluent society can build on a strong tradition of high-quality population-based monitoring of living conditions of older adults since at least 1996 (Tesch-Römer, 2023). However, substantive additional investment to better capture the hard-to-survey very old population is necessary to validly identify determinants of late-life QoL and inform policymaking (Kaspar et al., 2023). Thus, the aim of this paper is twofold. First, to offer a comprehensive and reliable account on the status quo of QoL chances and results in Germany’s very old population and subpopulations characterized by retained or limited abilities to communicate. Second, to test the validity of the CHAPO model by relating selected QoL chances for older adults to QoL results including successful life conduct.
Research Design and Methods
Participants and Procedures
Data are from a representative survey NRW80 + conducted in Germany’s most populated state North-Rhine Westphalia. The random community sample of persons aged 80 and over was selected in a multi-stage sampling procedure assuring adequate coverage of very old persons living both in private households and institutional settings. Details about the study and sample design have been reported by Hansen et al. (2021). A total of 1,863 computer-assisted personal interviews were conducted at participants’ homes by trained interviewers to assess QoL chances and subjective QoL results. Study nonresponse was found to be unrelated to respondent characteristics such as age, gender and living privately or in long-term care facilities (Kaspar et al., 2023). Mean age of the realized sample at time of interview was 87.0 ± 4.5 years (age range 80.1 to 102.9 years). A total of 211 interviews (11.3%) were conducted in nursing homes. The sample includes 176 interviews with proxy informants conducted if target persons were willing to be included in the study but were not able to conduct the 90 min interview themselves due to health impairments. The target person was present in 45 of these interviews (25.6%). Proxy informants had a relationship of mutual trust with the target person and offered their best account of the target person’s perspective. They included 42 (23.9%) spouses, 85 (48.3%) children, 9 (5.1%) professional caregivers, 9 (5.1%) children in law and 31 (17.6%) persons with other types of relationship. Age of proxy informants ranged from 19 to 99 years (mean age: 66.2 ± 14.9 years) and the majority were female (124, 70.4%).
Outcome Measures
Burdensomeness was used as an indicator of appreciation by others with the question “Do you have the feeling that society treats you like a burden (e.g., due to physical impairments)?” and a 4-point response scale from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).
The positive affect subscale of the short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (Kercher, 1992) was used as an indicator of appreciation of own life. Frequency of positive affective states (e.g., “enthusiastic”, “excited”) across the past 12 months was reported on a five-point response scale from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). Favorable psychometric properties of this very brief instrument were reported for age-diverse and old-old samples (Hilleras et al., 1998; Kercher, 1992; Mackinnon et al., 1999). Scale consistency in our sample was satisfying (MacDonald’s ω = 0.88).
Autonomy was used as an indicator of successful life conduct. Perceived autonomy was assessed by responses to the question “Do you lead your life according to your own preferences?” on a 4-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).
Predictors
Regarding social contact, respondents were asked how much time they spend with other people such as friends or family. Response options were 1 (never) to 5 (very often).
Net equivalence income was computed based on monthly all-source net income in private households. For respondents residing in long-term care (LTC), actual costs for accommodation and care per month were considered as a lower threshold estimate of financial resources.
Internet use across the last 12 months (yes, no) was considered as a lower bound estimate of digital resources available to the individual. Internet use comprised both the use of computer devices (e.g., laptop, desktop) and digital devices such as smartphones, tablets or wearables running web-based applications.
To measure respondents’ reflection of societal values, two items (capturing difficulties with modern societal lifestyle, and perceived discrepancy between societal and personal values) from the Future Time Perspective Scale by Brandtstädter et al. (1997) and one item (capturing feelings of disorientation) from the anomia scale suggested by Gümüs et al. (2014) were used. Response options range from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Scale consistency was found to be moderate in the current sample (MacDonald’s ω = 0.69) and comparable to Cronbach’s alpha of 0.72 reported for the five-item obsolescence subscale by Brandtstädter et al. (1997).
Independence in ADL (Fillenbaum, 1988; Lawton & Brody, 1969) was used as an index of functional health. Items included seven basic ADL (e.g., eating, dressing, walking) and six instrumental ADL (IADL, e.g., preparing meals, handling finances) with response options 0 (not possible without help), 1 (some help needed), or 2 (no help needed). Four domain-heterogeneous parcels of ADL and IADL items were used as observed indicators of the second-order construct of functional health (Cole et al., 2016).
The DemTect has been developed as a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early stages of dementia (Kalbe et al., 2004). It comprises subtests targeting immediate/delayed word recall, digit span, number transcoding and verbal fluency. Favorable diagnostic properties in identifying MCI have been reported (Kalbe et al., 2013) and age-specific scoring instructions for persons 80 years or older have been reported by Kessler et al. (2014). In proxy interviews, cognitive status was reported with the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) (Reisberg et al., 1982) in seven stages from 1 (no cognitive impairment) to 7 (most severe). Reisberg et al. (2011) aligned GDS stage 3 to correspond to a clinical presentation of MCI.
Depressive symptoms across the past two weeks were assessed with the short form of the Depression in Old Age Scale (DIA-S4; Heidenblut & Zank, 2014, 2020). The four items ask for the occurrence of lack of motivation, feelings of sadness, worrying, or inability to enjoy life. The DIA-S4 was shown to distinguish groups of depressed and non-depressed geriatric inpatients (Heidenblut & Zank, 2014). In this non-clinical sample, we use a continuous latent variable estimated from reported symptoms as an indicator of depressive state.
Personal values were assessed with the ten-item version of the Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ) (Datler et al., 2013; infas, 2006; Schwartz, 2003; Verkasalo et al., 2009). In line with previous research on the dimensionality of the PVQ (Verkasalo et al., 2009), responses in the current sample could best be represented by a three-factor model comprising „self-transcendence“ (with the markers universalism, benevolence, self-direction, and tradition), „self-enhancement“ (containing conformity, security and stimulation), and „conservation vs. openness to change“ (containing power, achievement, hedonism and stimulation) (Reissmann et al., 2021). Only a single factor (termed “generic value orientation” here) could be extracted from proxy reports of the value-system of target persons.
Plan of Analysis
In a first step, we describe levels and heterogeneity of person and environment chances as well as the prevalence of QoL results in very old age. All analyses include available proxy information in case the targeted individual was unable to respond (i.e., persons with limited ability to communicate, PLC) to avoid under-representation of this most vulnerable part of the population. However, because perspectives of persons able to communicate themselves (PC) and proxies of PLC may diverge based on item content (e.g., factual versus subjective), analyses were conducted in parallel for both subgroups. For multi-item scales, measurement invariance (MI) was tested using a structural equation model multi-group approach and equality constraints of factor loadings and item intercepts. If at least partial MI was established, information for the whole population with combined PC and PLC data was additionally reported and the expected bias when omitting PLC from the analysis was discussed.
In a second step, we use multiple linear regression to estimate the relative contribution of personal and environmental chances to predict differences in metric QoL results. Generalized logistic regressions were estimated for ordinal outcome measures (i.e., autonomy, perceived burdensomeness). In addition, we use correlation analysis to estimate the empirical overlap between these QoL results in very old age.
All analyses used weights to correct for the disproportional sampling design and survey nonresponse (Valliant et al., 2013). Standard errors of parameter estimates were corrected for the clustering due to the two-stage sampling procedure. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and Mplus 8.4 (Muthén & Muthén 1998–2017) software.
Results
Descriptive Results
Estimated population means and prevalence for QoL chances and results are given in Table 1 for the PC and PLC subgroups separately.
Most older adults did not report feelings of being treated like a burden by society. However, one in eight adults aged 80 years or older reported such experiences quite a bit or very much. The share of older adults reporting such potentially ageist sentiments in PLC was approximately double the size of that in PC (i.e., 24.9% versus 12.9%).
With respect to positive affect, MI testing suggested that latent scores from proxy reports could be validly combined with those from self-reports to estimate levels of positive appraisal of own life in the very old population (Supplementary Table S1). Participants capable of self-report showed an overall mean of 3.3 on the five-point scale, corresponding to the “sometimes” and “often” categories. Average positive affect in PLC was significantly lower (2.6).
On the four-point autonomy scale, more than nine out of ten PC reported high levels of perceived autonomy (very much or quite a bit). In contrast, the majority of PLC was characterized as not living their lives according to their own preferences by proxy informants.
Frequency of social contact was high and similar for PLC (3.4) and PC (3.6). Average financial resources were lower for PC than for PLC (1,944€ vs. 2,581€, respectively). As Fig. 2 illustrates, monthly costs of receiving full inpatient care were higher than the net equivalence income reported for community-dwelling people or people in other care settings (e.g., assisted living). In PC, more than one in five participants have been actively using the internet in the past 12 months. In contrast, this rate was considerably lower (1.6%) in PLC. Participants reported average scores of 2.5 (PC) and 2.4 (PLC) with regards to anomic feelings, representing values in the middle area of the scale. MI of the latent variable “anomie” has been established across PC and PLC groups (Supplementary Table S2), allowing for direct group comparison. Average anomie scores in both groups were not statistically different from one another.
Functional health was high in PC (1.6 on the 0–2-point scale) but well beyond scale midpoint in PLC (0.5). With respect to cognitive status, the overall prevalence of beginning dementia was 9.8% in PC. In contrast, 73.5% of PLC showed symptoms of at least beginning dementia. The overall prevalence of MCI in PC was 16.4%. In PLC, the overall prevalence of MCI was 7.4%. Latent estimates of depressive symptoms were higher in PLC (1.6) than in PC (0.3). Tests for MI indicated that information from PC and PLC groups could validly be compared and combined to estimate levels of depressive symptoms in the very old population (Supplementary Table S3). With respect to the system of values held by older adults, no factor score means are presented in Table 1 because these have been fixed at zero in the exploratory structural equations model. However, details of modelling value factors based on the Schwartz scale and value priorities in this sample have been described elsewhere (Reissmann et al., 2021).
Validity of the CHAPO Model
Associations between different facets of QoL results in very old age (Table 2) were found to be of medium to large effect size according to the classification suggested by Brydges (2019) for gerontological research (r = .2 and 0.3, respectively). The strongest link was observed between positive affect and perceived autonomy (PC: r = .41, PLC: r = .47). Older individuals who felt being treated as a burden to society, however, showed lower levels of autonomy and vice versa. While this moderate effect was apparent irrespective of study group, a negative association of feelings of burdensomeness with positive affect was only found in PC (r = − .18).
Approximately 32% of variance in self-reported burdensomeness could be explained by QoL chances, whereas individual background characteristics of PC such as gender or age had no predictive value (Table 3). The risk of negative appraisals by others was significantly reduced with higher functional health and more self-transcending values. In contrast, higher feelings of anomie strongly increased the risk of experiencing negative appraisal by others. Interestingly, higher financial resources were slightly but significantly related to higher risk of being treated like a burden. In PLC, the set of predictors was limited in its potential to systematically explain differences in feelings of being treated like a burden to society, as none of the estimated Odds Ratios indicated statistical significance.
Model determination for positive affect was above 0.46 in both study groups, indicating a strong contingency of subjective positive experiences upon individual and environmental life chances. Self-enhancement values were strong positive predictors of SWB, while higher self-transcendence values were weakly and negatively associated with positive affect. Depressive symptoms were also weakly and negatively related to positive affect. Social contact as an environmental resource showed a positive and moderate effect on well-being. A small but significant contribution to well-being in very old age was also found for internet use. In the PLC subgroup, a similar pattern emerged. Global value orientation was strongly related to positive affect. Depressive symptoms exhibited a stronger effect on well-being in PLC. Moreover, functional health, cognitive impairment and societal values (i.e., anomie) played a more critical role in explaining variance in positive affect in this more vulnerable subpopulation.
The set of predictors was able to explain 33% of variance in autonomy in PC and 37% in the more vulnerable (and less autonomous) subgroup of PLC. In the latter, autonomy appeared to be solely and strongly dependent on functional health. The pattern of predictive relationships was more differentiated in the PC subpopulation. Here, in addition to strong effects for functional health and moderate effects for depressive symptoms, self-enhancement values and internet use moderately contributed to higher perceived autonomy. More financial resources (or financial turnaround in persons living in nursing homes) were associated with less perceived autonomy.
In summary, the set of QoL chances considered here were able to explain up to nearly half of the variance observed in QoL results in very old adults. However, personal and environmental life chances contributed differently to distinct aspects of QoL results. Moreover, QoL results in the subpopulation of PLC appeared to be influenced by specific (additional) determinants.
Discussion
This paper gives a comprehensive and multidimensional account of QoL in the population aged 80 years or older. By including persons in long-term care facilities and persons with limited ability to communicate in this population-based assessment, the results decisively expand the state of research.
The core findings showed that – in line with the CHAPO-Model – a multidimensional discussion of QoL in very old age needs to also consider QoL results beyond appreciation of own life and include both appreciation by others and successful life conduct as interrelated, yet distinct QoL facets.
Findings support the conclusion that reservation to address what Veenhoven (2000) named the “utility quadrant” of QoL especially in more vulnerable populations or those no longer participating in the workforce might have restrained aging societies to better prepare for demographic change by failure to communicate realistic and transparent expectations regarding the role of the oldest-old in society and not offering post-retirement opportunities to retain or acquire such capabilities. Substantial overlap between external appraisal, retained autonomy and subjective well-being indicates that successful life conduct in very old age is defined in part by the co-existence of values and priorities imposed by others and the motives and value systems of the individual. Moreover, the finding that proxy informants would report values of very old target persons that were less differentiated than that obtained from self-reports and unrelated to our indicator of successful life conduct indicates a need to define multiple roles for the oldest-old, and to do so in a timely manner and with substantively limited functional capabilities in mind (Tesch-Römer & Wahl, 2017).
The descriptive results on the three outcome measures of life results showed that respondents did not fully negate feelings of being treated as a burden to society. This is all the more concerning against the background that lacking appreciation was also associated with lower well-being and less perceived autonomy in this study. An “acceptance problem” of very old age becomes evident even if maybe not as pronounced as described by Fürstenberg (2013). According to van Dyk (2009), the programmatic “discovery” of potentials of old age in response to lopsided deficit models of ageing has led to societal pressure on individuals to preserve and use those potentials for the benefits of society, while those who do not live up to such normative expectations are subject to devaluation and marginalization. Results on the prevalence of autonomy and positive affect run contrary to the deficit-oriented model of ageing. Participants reported frequent positive affect as a marker of appreciation of own life. In PLC, positive affect was less frequent. A high degree of autonomy was observed in PC, signaling successful life-conduct in very old age. In all three examined life results, PLC scored lower than PC, underscoring dampened prospects for retaining QoL in very old age with disability even with the broader conceptual perspective suggested by the CHAPO model (Bröckerhoff et al., 2020).
Findings from multiple regression modelling underscore that better life chances were systematically associated with better late-life QoL results. Hence, the CHAPO model proves useful to identify potential avenues for late-life QoL intervention. Interestingly, chronological age no longer predicted QoL results when the proposed QoL chances were simultaneously considered, suggesting that the conceptual framework adequately covers the heterogeneity of determinants of late-life QoL across a phase of the life course that may span several decades (He et al., 2016). However, unique contributions were observed for different indicators with respect to different life results and between PCs and PLCs.
In line with existing evidence (Netuveli et al., 2006; Pinquart & Sörensen, 2000), frequency of social contact was a significant predictor of positive affect. However, social support or type of relationship may be more relevant than the frequency of contact for autonomy or perceived burdensomeness (Cimarolli et al., 2006; Warner et al., 2011).
Financial resources were found to signal a risk factor for autonomy in PC, but also for burdensomeness in PLC. These findings might appear contradictory to existing evidence, but they can be traced back to the higher financial turnover in individuals residing in LTC compared to individuals in private households in this study.
With respect to digital resources, findings that only 21% of those 80 years or older are online shows a wide digital gap between generations (Initiative D21, 2020). While the growth of the online population is expected to continue (e.g., today’s ageing generation being more experienced in the use of technology; Erickson & Johnson, 2011; van Eimeren & Frees, 2014), the gap in very old age is expected to persist, as age-related losses in (e.g., sensory, cognitive) abilities impede use of (new) technology (Seifert & Schelling, 2015). The small share of onliners (1.6%) in PLC is in line with previous findings that good physical health and cognitive functioning are predictors of internet use (Erickson & Johnson, 2011). Internet use contributed to the prediction of positive affect and autonomy in this sample. In addition, recent findings of Rennoch et al. (2023) suggest substantive effects of internet use on well-being also in the oldest old. However, Huang (2010) reported small but negative associations between internet use and well-being in her meta-analysis. Detailed examination of sources for this contradictory evidence is beyond the scope of this paper and readers are referred to a more thorough discussion of antecedents and consequences of ICT use in this sample (Schlomann et al., 2020a, b).
This study drew on the concept of anomie as an important marker of life chances. Our results indicate that anomic feelings may not be considerably higher in very old age than in a younger sample (mean age 73; Schmidt, 2017) and suggest that the subjective relationship with society may remain stable after a shift of personal priorities that occurs already before the age of 80. Anomie was a significant predictor of burdensomeness and positive affect. Hence, our findings do not support Schmidt’s (2017) claim that anomie as perceived distance from the outside world may itself be adaptive in the sense of disengagement theory (Cumming & Henry, 1961). Structural gaps in the recognition of priorities of today’s very old population or lack of opportunity for societal engagement do not create a “privileged” space for coping with developmental tasks in late life.
Differences in the predictive power of functional health across study groups were observed. Functional health predicted positive affect only in PLC, for which adaptation of well-being despite health impairments assumed by theories of psychological coping and self-regulation (Schilling et al., 2013) might no longer be possible. However, functional health was unrelated to feelings of burdensomeness in this subgroup. We speculate that with pronounced functional impairment and elevated levels of perceived burdensomeness, negative external appraisal may be more strongly related to specific support or care constellations (e.g., no caregiving relative) than to functional status itself. Not surprisingly, functional health was the strongest predictor of autonomy in all participants. Similar effects have been reported for community-dwelling (Henchoz et al., 2019; Sánchez-García et al., 2019) and institutionalized individuals (Liu et al., 2020). Hence, our findings are in line with expectations from self-determination theory (Hertz, 1996) that low ADL impairment results in high perceived ability to act autonomously in meeting needs and goals.
Although PLC showed lower levels of cognitive functioning than PC, relationships with respect to age and gender were comparable. Because PLC are often excluded from surveys, comparison of prevalence for MCI and dementia estimated in PLC in this study with existing studies is limited. Previous research has shown that cognition has a greater impact on QoL outcomes in proxy ratings than in self-ratings (Römhild et al., 2018). Our results for the prediction of positive affect are in line with these well-established results. While research emphasizes the importance of involving people with dementia in (supported) decision-making (Wied et al., 2019), we found no indication of an adverse effect of impaired cognition on perceived autonomy in our sample.
Depressive symptoms predicted positive affect and autonomy in both study groups. However, effect sizes were small in PC and moderate to large in PLC. Contrary to our expectation, depressive symptoms were not found to be related to the feeling of burdensomeness.
In respondents able to give detailed report on their personal values, a differentiated pattern of relationships with QoL results was observed. The finding that self-transcendence was negatively related to positive affect was unexpected, as palliative care patients with such “macro worries” have been found to show higher well-being (concerned with self-enhancement values; Fegg et al., 2005). In line with our finding of a positive predictive value of self-enhancement, we speculate that well-being for most individuals in their eighties and nineties is still contingent upon agency and priorities for engagement and self-enhancement. In contrast, self-transcendence values may signal concern for others (e.g., in caregiving relationships) that represent risks to one’s own well-being. This interpretation is also in line with our additional finding that self-transcendence values are protective against negative external appraisal. Although a shift of priorities towards conservation with ageing has been discussed as an adaptive process (Borg et al., 2017) and has been found to be positively related to QoL results (Fegg et al., 2005; Fung et al., 2016; Robinson, 2013), we found no evidence of associations with the range of QoL results considered here. In the PLC subgroup, the single generic value orientation factor was positively related to positive affect, highlighting the importance of explicating one’s priorities for successful life conduct with more pronounced health impairment.
In sum, the comprehensive CHAPO approach appears helpful to overcome deficit-oriented age stereotypes and acknowledge the full complexity of QoL in old age. This includes, of course, acknowledging the increasingly limited personal and environmental resources (e.g., functional health, social embeddedness) for successful life conduct in very old age. However, it also highlights constellations characterized by ongoing autonomy, diverse personal priorities, and resilience to adversity, be it personal (e.g., function, cognition) or structural (e.g., anomie, negative external appraisal).
Limitations and Future Directions
First, smaller sample size effectively limited the potential to statistically substantiate small effects in PLC. We still consider including them in a population-based sample an important improvement as compared to excluding them completely. Explained total variance was higher in PLC, suggesting vulnerable individuals to profit more from QoL monitoring using the CHAPO framework (Wagner et al., 2018). Second, whereas burdensomeness was negatively associated with positive affect in PC, no such effect was observed in the subpopulation of very old individuals represented in the survey by interviews with family members or close affiliates. We cautiously consider this a hint towards a protective effect of an engaged social network that buffers and compensates for negative external appraisal. However, this interpretation needs further substantiation as information bias (e.g., social desirability) in proxy interviews might have impacted the results. Third, actual costs for respondents residing in LTC facilities were used in this study as a useful marker for financial asset in the institutionalized population; nevertheless, correspondence with net household income in private settings is limited. Finally, although data represents adults 80 + in Germany’s most populous Federal state, generalizability to other regions or less affluent societies with other demographic trajectories may be limited.
We conclude that findings from this cross-sectional population study lend ample support to the validity of using CHAPO as a framework to monitor QoL in the oldest-old. Nevertheless, further insights from longitudinal studies are clearly needed to fully develop its potential to inform policy aimed at improving prospects of successful life conduct in very old age.
References
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34).
Bennett, K. C., & Ahammer, I. M. (1977). Toward a Social Deficit Model of Ageing. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 12(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.1977.tb00583.x.
Bobowik, M., Basabe, N., Páez, D., Jiménez, A., & Bilbao, M. Á. (2011). Personal values and well-being among europeans, Spanish natives and immigrants to Spain: Does the culture matter? Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(3), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9202-1.
Borg, C., Hallberg, I. R., & Blomqvist, K. (2006). Life satisfaction among older people (65+) with reduced self-care capacity: The relationship to social, health and financial aspects. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15(5), 607–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01375.x.
Borg, I., Hertel, G., & Hermann, D. (2017). Age and personal values: Similar value circles with shifting priorities. Psychology and Aging, 32(7), 636–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000196.
Botes, R., Vermeulen, K. M., Gerber, A. M., Ranchor, A. V., & Buskens, E. (2019). Health-related quality of life and well-being health state values among Dutch oldest old. Patient Preference and Adherence, 13, 721–728. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S193171.
Brandtstädter, J., & Wentura, D. (1994). Veränderungen Der Zeit- Und Zukunftsperspektive Im Übergang Zum höheren Erwachsenenalter: Entwicklungspsychologische und differentielle aspekte. Zeitschrift Für Entwicklungspsychologie Und Pädagogische Psychologie, 26(1), 2–21.
Brandtstädter, J., Wentura, D., & Schmitz, U. (1997). Veränderungen Der Zeit- Und Zukunftsperspektive Im Übergang Zum höheren Alter: Quer- Und längsschnittliche Befunde. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 205(4), 377–395.
Bröckerhoff, P., Evers-Wölk, M., Sonk, M., Pein, K., Krings, B. J., Weinberger, N., & Woopen, C. (2020). Primat Der Lebensqualität in Alternden Gesellschaften. [Primacy of Quality of Life in Aging Societies] Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 117(50), A2464–A2468.
Brydges, C. R. (2019). Effect size guidelines, sample size calculations, and statistical power in gerontology. Innovation in Aging, 3(4), igz036. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz036.
Burks, H. B., Des Bordes, J. K. A., Chadha, R., Holmes, H. M., & Rianon, N. J. (2021). Quality of life assessment in older adults with dementia: A systematic review. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 50(2), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1159/000515317.
Carstensen, L. L. (1991). Socioemotional selectivity theory: Social activity in life-span context. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 11, 195–217.
Charlson, F., van Ommeren, M., Flaxman, A., Cornett, J., Whiteford, H., & Saxena, S. (2019). New WHOprevalence estimates of mental disorders in conflict settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet, 394(10194), 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30934-1
Cho, J., Martin, P., Margrett, J., Macdonald, M., & Poon, L. W. (2011). The Relationship between physical health and psychological well-being among oldest-old adults. Journal of Aging Research, 2011, 605041. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/605041.
Cimarolli, V. R., Reinhardt, J. P., & Horowitz, A. (2006). Perceived overprotection: Support gone bad? The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/61.1.s18.
Cole, D. A., Perkins, C. E., & Zelkowitz, R. L. (2016). Impact of homogeneous and heterogeneous parceling strategies when latent variables represent multidimensional constructs. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000047.
Cornwell, B., & Schafer, M. H. (2016). Social networks in later life. In L.K. George & K.F. Ferraro (Eds.) Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences (pp. 181–201). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-417235-7.00009-3.
Cumming, E., & Henry, W. E. (1961). Growing old. The process of disengagement. Basic Books.
Czaja, S. J., & Lee, C. C. (2007). The impact of aging on access to technology. Universal Access in the Information Society, 5(4), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-006-0060-x.
Datler, G., Jagodzinski, W., & Schmidt, P. (2013). Two theories on the test bench: Internal and external validity of the theories of Ronald Inglehart and Shalom Schwartz. Social Science Research, 42(3), 906–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.12.009.
Dionigi, R. A. (2015). Stereotypes of aging: Their effects on the health of older adults. Journal of Geriatrics, 2015(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/954027.
Ebner, N. C., Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2006). Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: From striving for gains to maintenance and prevention of losses. Psychology and Aging, 21(4), 664–678. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.4.664.
Erickson, J., & Johnson, G. M. (2011). Internet use and psychological wellness during late adulthood. Canadian Journal on Aging, 30(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980811000109.
Erikson, E. H. (1998). Life cycle completed: A review. W.W.Norton.
Fegg, M. J., Wasner, M., Neudert, C., & Borasio, G. D. (2005). Personal values and individual quality of life in palliative care patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 30(2), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.02.012.
Fillenbaum, G. G. (1988). Multidimensional functional assessment of older adults: The Duke Older americans resources and services procedures. Duke University Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development.
Fung, H. H., Ho, Y. W., Zhang, R., Zhang, X., Noels, K. A., & Tam, K. P. (2016). Age differences in personal values: Universal or cultural specific? Psychology and Aging, 31(3), 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000082.
Fürstenberg, F. (2013). Very old age as a problem of acceptance: A position paper. Zeitschrift Für Gerontologie Und Geriatrie, 46(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-012-0460-x.
Gümüs, A., Gömleksiz, M., Glöckner-Rist, A., & Balke, D. (2014). Anomie: Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher items und Skalen. ZIS - GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.6102/zis145.
Hansen, S., Kaspar, R., Wagner, M., Woopen, C., & Zank, S. (2021). The NRW80 + study: Conceptual background and study groups. Zeitschrift Für Gerontologie Und Geriatrie, 54(2), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-021-01970-z.
Hawton, A., Green, C., Dickens, A. P., Richards, S. H., Taylor, R. S., Edwards, R., Greaves, C. J., & Campbell, J. L. (2011). The impact of social isolation on the health status and health-related quality of life of older people. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment Care & Rehabilitation, 20(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9717-2.
He, W., Goodkind, D., Kowal, P., & U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). An Aging World: 2015. U.S. Government Publishing Office. International Population Reports, P95/16 – 1.
Heckhausen, J. (1997). Developmental regulation across adulthood: Primary and secondary control of age-related challenges. Developmental Psychology, 33, 176–187.
Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2013). A lines-of-defense model for managing health threats: A review. Gerontology, 59(5), 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1159/000351269.
Heidenblut, S., & Zank, S. (2014). Screening for depression with the Depression in Old Age Scale (DIA-S) and the geriatric Depression Scale (GDS15). GeroPsych, 27(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000101.
Heidenblut, S., & Zank, S. (2020). Screening for depression in old age with very short instruments: The DIA-S4 compared to the GDS5 and GDS4. Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine, 6, 2333721420981328. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333721420981328.
Henchoz, Y., Abolhassani, N., Büla, C., Guessous, I., Goy, R., & Santos-Eggimann, B. (2019). Change in quality of life among community-dwelling older adults: Population-based longitudinal study. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment Care & Rehabilitation, 28(5), 1305–1314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02108-w.
Heo, J., Chun, S., Lee, S., Lee, K. H., & Kim, J. (2015). Internet use and well-being in older adults. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 18(5), 268–272. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0549.
Hertz, J. E. (1996). Conceptualization of perceived enactment of autonomy in the elderly. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 17(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612849609049919.
Hilleras, P. K., Jorm, A. F., Herlitz, A., & Winblad, B. (1998). Negative and positive affect among the very old. Research on Aging, 20(5), 593–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027598205003.
Huang, C. (2010). Internet use and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 13(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0217.
Huxhold, O., Fiori, K. L., & Windsor, T. D. (2013). The dynamic interplay of social network characteristics, subjective well-being, and health: The costs and benefits of socio-emotional selectivity. Psychology and Aging, 28(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030170.
infas. (2006). Weltwertestudie: Fragebogen Version A. infas.
Initiative, D. (2020). D21-Digital-Index 2019/ 2020: Wie digital ist Deutschland? Jährliches Lagebild zur Digitalen Gesellschaft (1. Auflage). D21-Digital-Index. Initiative D21.
Jopp, D., Rott, C., & Oswald, F. (2008). Valuation of life in old and very old age: The role of sociodemographic, social, and health resources for positive adoption. The Gerontologist, 48(5), 646–658. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/48.5.646.
Jyväkorpi, S. K., Urtamo, A., Pitkälä, K. H., & Strandberg, T. E. (2018). Nutrition, daily walking and resilience are associated with physical function in the oldest old men. The Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging, 22(10), 1176–1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-018-1136-z.
Kalbe, E., Kessler, J., Calabrese, P., Smith, R., Passmore, A. P., Brand, M., & Bullock, R. (2004). Demtect: A new, sensitive cognitive screening test to support the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and early dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19(2), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.1042.
Kalbe, E., Calabrese, P., Fengler, S., & Kessler, J. (2013). Demtect, PANDA, EASY, and MUSIC: Cognitive screening tools with age correction and weighting of subtests according to their sensitivity and specificity. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease: JAD, 34(4), 813–834. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-122128.
Kaspar, R. (2004). Technology and loneliness in old age. Gerontechnology, 3(1), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2004.03.01.007.00.
Kaspar, R., Brijoux, T., Albrecht, A., Zimmermann, J., Wenner, J., Fey, J., Reissmann, M., Wagner, M., & Zank, S. (2023). Challenges and Benefits of Including the Institutionalized, Cognitively Impaired and Unable to Respond in a Representative Survey of the Very Old. Survey Research Methods, 17(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2023.v17i2.8008.
Kercher, K. (1992). Assessing subjective well-being in the old-old: The PANAS as a measure of orthogonal dimensions of positive and negative affect. Research on Aging, 14(2), 131–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027592142001.
Kessler, J., Fengler, S., Kaesberg, S., Müller, K., Calabrese, P., Ellwein, T., & Kalbe, E. (2014). DemTect 40- and DemTect 80+: New scoring routines for these age groups. Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie, 82(11), 640–645. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1385278
Knesebeck, O., von dem, Wahrendorf, M., Hyde, M., & Siegrist, J. (2007). Socio-economic position and quality of life among older people in 10 European countries: Results of the SHARE study. Ageing and Society, 27(2), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X06005484.
Kruse, A. (2021). Vom Leben Und Sterben Im Alter: Wie Wir das Lebensende gestalten können. W. Kohlhammer.
Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist (9), 179–186.
Leontjevas, R., Gerritsen, D. L., Vernooij-Dassen, M. J. F. J., Smalbrugge, M., & Koopmans, R. T. C. M. (2012). Comparative validation of proxy-based Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale and Cornell scale for depression in dementia in nursing home residents with dementia. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20(11), 985–993. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e318233152b.
Levy, B. R. (2009). Stereotype embodiment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(6), 332–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01662.x.
Levy, B. R., Slade, M. D., Kunkel, S. R., & Kasl, S. V. (2002). Longevity increased by positive self-perceptions of aging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.2.261.
Lilford, P. & Hughes, J. C. (2020). Epidemiology and mental illness in old age. BJPsych Advances, 26(2), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2019.56
Liu, L. H., Kao, C. C., & Ying, J. C. (2020). Functional capacity and life satisfaction in older adult residents living in long-term care facilities: The mediator of autonomy. The Journal of Nursing Research: JNR, 28(4), e102. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNR.0000000000000362.
Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A., & Rodgers, B. (1999). A short form of the positive and negative affect schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(3), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00251-7.
Martyr, A., Nelis, S. M., Quinn, C., Wu, Y. T., Lamont, R. A., Henderson, C., Clarke, R., Hindle, J. V., Thom, J. M., Jones, I. R., Morris, R. G., Rusted, J. M., Victor, C. R., & Clare, L. (2018). Living well with dementia: A systematic review and correlational meta-analysis of factors associated with quality of life, well-being and life satisfaction in people with dementia. Psychological Medicine, 48(13), 2130–2139. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718000405.
Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest (Ed.) (2022). SIM-Studie 2021: Senior*innen, Information, Medien. Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang von Personen ab 60 Jahren in Deutschland Stuttgart. https://www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/files/Studien/SIM/2021/Web_SIM-Studie2021_final_barrierefrei.pdf.
Mitnitski, A. B., Mogilner, A. J., & Rockwood, K. (2001). Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. The Scientific World Journal, 1, 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.58.
Nahemow, L., & Lawton, M. P. (1973). Toward an ecological theory of adaptation and aging. Environmental Design Research, 1(24), 24–32.
Neise, M., Janhsen, A., Geithner, L., Schmitz, W., & Kaspar, R. (2019). Lebensqualitäten in Der Hochaltrigkeit. In K. Hank, F. Schulz-Nieswandt, M. Wagner, & S. Zank (Eds.), Alternsforschung: Handbuch für Wissenschaft Und Praxis (1st ed., pp. 583–607). Nomos.
Netuveli, G., Wiggins, R. D., Hildon, Z., Montgomery, S. M., & Blane, D. (2006). Quality of life at older ages: Evidence from the English longitudinal study of aging (wave 1). Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(4), 357–363. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.040071.
Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15, 187–224.
Pratschke, J., Haase, T., & McKeown, K. (2017). Direct and indirect influences of socio-economic position on the wellbeing of older adults: A structural equation model using data from the first wave of the Irish longitudinal study on Ageing. Ageing and Society, 37(9), 1770–1797. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X1600060X.
Reisberg, B., Ferris, S. H., de Leon, M. J., & Crook, T. (1982). The global deterioration scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 139(9), 1136–1139. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.139.9.1136.
Reisberg, B., Jamil, I. A., Khan, S., Monteiro, I., Torossian, C., Ferris, S., Sabbagh, M., Gauthier, S., Auer, S., Shulman, M. B., Kluger, A., Franssen, E., & Wegiel, J. (2011). Staging dementia. In A. Kumar, C. L. E. Katona, & M. T. Abou-Saleh (Eds.), Principles and practice of geriatric psychiatry (3rd ed., pp. 162–169). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470669600.ch31.
Reissmann, M., Storms, A., & Woopen, C. (2021). Individual values and spirituality and their meaning for affective well-being and engagement with life in very old age. Zeitschrift Für Gerontologie Und Geriatrie, 54(2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-021-01974-9.
Rennoch, G., Schlomann, A., & Zank, S. (2023). The Relationship between Internet Use for Social purposes, loneliness, and depressive symptoms among the Oldest Old. Research on Aging, 1640275221150017. https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275221150017.
Robinson, O. C. (2013). Values and adult age: Findings from two cohorts of the European Social Survey. European Journal of Ageing, 10(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-012-0247-3.
Römhild, J., Fleischer, S., Meyer, G., Stephan, A., Zwakhalen, S., Leino-Kilpi, H., Zabalegui, A., Saks, K., Soto-Martin, M., Sutcliffe, C., Hallberg, R., I., & Berg, A. (2018). Inter-rater agreement of the quality of Life-Alzheimer’s Disease (QoL-AD) self-rating and proxy rating scale: Secondary analysis of RightTimePlaceCare data. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 16(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0959-y.
Sagiv, L., Roccas, S., & Hazan, O. (2004). Value pathways to well-being: Healthy values, valued goal attainment, and environmental congruence. In P. A. Linley, & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 68–85). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939338.ch5.
Sánchez-García, S., García-Peña, C., Ramírez-García, E., Moreno-Tamayo, K., & Cantú-Quintanilla, G. R. (2019). Decreased autonomy in community-dwelling older adults. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 14, 2041–2053. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S225479.
Schaie, K. W. (1983). Longitudinal studies of adult psychological development. Guilford Press.
Schaller, S. (2008). Transactional model of suicidal behavior in the elderly. Zeitschrift Für Gerontologie Und Geriatrie, 41(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-008-0518-y.
Schilling, O. K. (2006). Development of life satisfaction in old age: Another view on the paradox. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 241–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-5297-2.
Schilling, O. K., Wahl, H. W., & Oswald, F. (2013). Change in life satisfaction under chronic physical multi-morbidity in advanced old age: Potential and limits of adaptation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9313-3.
Schlomann, A., Seifert, A., Zank, S., & Rietz, C. (2020a). Assistive technology and mobile ICT usage among oldest-old cohorts: Comparison of the oldest-old in private homes and in long-term care facilities. Research on Aging, 42(5–6), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027520911286.
Schlomann, A., Seifert, A., Zank, S., Woopen, C., & Rietz, C. (2020b). Use of information and communication technology (ICT) devices among the oldest-old: Loneliness, anomie, and autonomy. Innovation in Aging, 4(2), igz050. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz050.
Schmidt, L. (2017). Technikhandhabung Im höheren Alter: Zur Rolle Von Kognitiver Leistungsfähigkeit, Technikeinstellung Und Technikerfahrung. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. http://gbv.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=4741454.
Schwartz, S. H. (2003). A proposal for Measuring Value orientations across Nations. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Seifert, A., & Schelling, H. R. (2015). Digitale Senioren: Nutzung Von informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien (IKT) durch Menschen ab 65 Jahren in Der Schweiz Im Jahr 2015. Pro Senectute Schweiz. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4183.5600.
Shapira, N., Barak, A., & Gal, I. (2007). Promoting older adults’ well-being through internet training and use. Aging & Mental Health, 11(5), 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860601086546.
Smith, K. J., & Victor, C. R. (2019). Typologies of loneliness, living alone and social isolation, and their associations with physical and mental health. Ageing and Society, 39(8), 1709–1730. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18000132.
Sneeuw, K. C., Aaronson, N. K., de Haan, R. J., & Limburg, M. (1997). Assessing quality of life after stroke: The value and limitations of proxy ratings. Stroke, 28(8), 1541–1549. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.28.8.
Szabo, A., Allen, J., Stephens, C., & Alpass, F. (2019). Longitudinal analysis of the relationship between purposes of internet use and well-being among older adults. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny036.
Tesch-Römer, C. (2023). Altersfragen der Zukunft / Future Societal Challenges of Old Age [DZA Aktuell 02/2023]. Berlin: Deutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen.
Tesch-Römer, C., & Wahl, H. W. (2017). Toward a more comprehensive concept of successful aging: Disability and care needs. The Journals of Gerontology Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72(2), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw162.
Tornstam, L. (1997). Gerotranscendence: The contemplative dimension of aging. Journal of Aging Studies, 11(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-4065(97)90018-9.
Tulviste, T., Kall, K., & Rämmer, A. (2017). Value priorities of younger and older adults in seven European countries. Social Indicators Research, 133(3), 931–942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1392-4.
Valliant, R., Dever, J. A., & Kreuter, F. (2013). Practical tools for designing and weighting survey samples Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6449-5.
van Dyk, S. (2009). Das Alter: Adressiert, aktiviert, diskriminiert. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 19(4), 601–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-009-0114-z.
van Eimeren, B., & Frees, B. (2014). 79% der Deutschen online – Zuwachs bei mobiler Internetnutzung und Bewegtbild: Ergebnisse der ARD/ZDF-Onlinestudie 2014. Media Perspektiven (7–8), 378–396. https://www.ard-werbung.de/fileadmin/user_upload/media-perspektiven/pdf/2014/0708-2014_Eimeren_Frees_.pdf.
Veenhoven, R. (2000). The Four qualities of Life: Ordering concepts and measures of the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010072010360.
Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J. E., Lipsanen, J., & Helkama, K. (2009). European norms and equations for a two dimensional presentation of values as measured with Schwartz’s 21-item portrait values questionnaire. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(5), 780–792. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.580.
Vuorisalmi, M., Sarkeala, T., Hervonen, A., & Jylhä, M. (2012). Among nonagenarians, congruence between self-rated and proxy-rated health was low but both predicted mortality. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65(5), 553–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.001.
Wagner, M., Rietz, C., Kaspar, R., Janhsen, A., Geithner, L., Neise, M., Kinne-Wall, C., Woopen, C., & Zank, S. (2018). Quality of life of the very old: Survey on quality of life and subjective well-being of the very old in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW80+). Zeitschrift Für Gerontologie Und Geriatrie, 51(2), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-017-1217-3.
Wahl, H. W., Iwarsson, S., & Oswald, F. (2012). Aging well and the environment: Toward an integrative model and research agenda for the future. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr154.
Warner, L. M., Ziegelmann, J. P., Schüz, B., Wurm, S., Tesch-Römer, C., & Schwarzer, R. (2011). Maintaining autonomy despite multimorbidity: Self-efficacy and the two faces of social support. European Journal of Ageing, 8(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-011-0176-6.
Wettstein, M., Schilling, O. K., Reidick, O., & Wahl, H. W. (2015). Four-year stability, change, and multidirectionality of well-being in very-old age. Psychology and Aging, 30(3), 500–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000037.
Wettstein, M., Schilling, O. K., & Wahl, H. W. (2016). Still feeling healthy after all these years: The paradox of subjective stability versus objective decline in very old adults’ health and functioning across five years. Psychology and Aging, 31(8), 815–830. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000137.
WHO. (1997). WHOQOL Measuring Quality of Life. World Health Organisation.
WHO. (2002). Active ageing: A Policy Framework. World Health Organisation.
WHO (1992). The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. https://icd.who.int/en.
Wied, T. S., Knebel, M., Tesky, V. A., & Haberstroh, J. (2019). The human right to make one’s own choices – implications for supported decision-making in persons with dementia: A systematic review. European Psychologist (24), (2), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000372.
Wittchen, H. U., Jacobi, F., Rehm, J., Gustavsson, A., Svensson, M., Jönsson, B., Olesen, J., et al. (2011). The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 21(9), 655–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.07.018
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant of the Ministry of Culture and Science of the German State of North Rhine-Westphalia (323-8.03-125240). The funding agency played no role in the design, execution, analysis and interpretation of data, or writing of the study. The project is part of the Key Research Area “Aging and Demographic Change” at the Cologne Center for Ethics, Rights, Economics, and Social Sciences of Health (ceres) at the University of Cologne. Members of the project board are Michael Wagner and Susanne Zank. RK drafted the study, conducted the analyses and wrote the original manuscript. JW, JZ, LG, MR, RK and TB contributed parts of the manuscript, revised and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. We thank Sylvia Hansen, Anna Storms, Michael Neise, Christian Rietz, Wiebke Schmitz and Christiane Woopen for their involvement in planning and conducting the NRW80 + study. We are indebted to Nicole Schäfer for her help in preparing this manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was advised by the ethical board of the medical faculty at University of Cologne (17–169). The observational study NRW80 + was preregistered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00011924).
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kaspar, R., Albrecht, A., Brijoux, T. et al. Successful Life Conduct in Very Old Age: Theoretical Implications and Empirical Support from a Population-Based Study. Applied Research Quality Life (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-024-10301-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-024-10301-4