Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recent development in low-constraint fracture toughness testing for structural integrity assessment of pipelines

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fracture toughness measurement is an integral part of structural integrity assessment of pipelines. Traditionally, a single-edge-notched bend (SE(B)) specimen with a deep crack is recommended in many existing pipeline structural integrity assessment procedures. Such a test provides high constraint and therefore conservative fracture toughness results. However, for girth welds in service, defects are usually subjected to primarily tensile loading where the constraint is usually much lower than in the three-point bend case. Moreover, there is increasing use of strain-based design of pipelines that allows applied strains above yield. Low-constraint toughness tests represent more realistic loading conditions for girth weld defects, and the corresponding increased toughness can minimize unnecessary conservatism in assessments. In this review, we present recent developments in low-constraint fracture toughness testing, specifically using single-edge-notched tension specimens, SENT or SE(T). We focus our review on the test procedure development and automation, round-robin test results and some common concerns such as the effect of crack tip, crack size monitoring techniques, and testing at low temperatures. Examples are also given of the integration of fracture toughness data from SE(T) tests into structural integrity assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. OSAGE D A. API 579: Fitness for Service. Washington: American Petroleum Institute, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  2. CAN/CSA-Z662-15.Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems. CSA Group, 2015

  3. ASTM-E399-12e3. Standard Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane Strain Fracture Toughness K IC of Metallic Materials. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  4. ASTM E1820-13e1. Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  5. BS 7448–1. Fracture Mechanics Toughness Tests Part 1: Method for Determination of K IC, Critical CTOD and Critical J Values of Metallic Materials. London: British Standards Institution, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  6. BS 7448–2. Fracture Mechanics Toughness Tests Part 2: Method for Determination of K IC, Critical CTOD and Critical J Values of Welds in Metallic Materials. London: British Standards Institution, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  7. BS 7448–4. Fracture Mechanics Toughness Tests Part 4: Method for Determination of Fracture Resistance Curves and Initiation Values for Stable Crack Extension in Metallic Materials. London: British Standards Institution, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  8. ISO 12135. Metallic Materials Unified Method of Test for the Determination of Quasistatic Fracture Toughness. Vernier: International Organization of Standardization, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  9. O’Dowd N P, Shih C F. Family of crack-tip fields characterized by a triaxiality parameter—I. Structure of fields. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1991, 39(8): 989–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chiesa M, Nyhus B, Skallerud B, et al. Efficient fracture assessment of pipelines. A constraint corrected SENT specimen approach. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2001, 68(5): 527–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. DNV Recommended practice DNV-RP-F108. Fracture Control for Pipeline Installation Methods Introducing Cyclic Plastic Strain. Oslo: Det Norske Veritas, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shen G, Gianetto J A, Tyson WR. Measurement of J-R curves using single-specimen technique on clamped SE(T) specimens. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Osaka, 2009, ISOPE TPC-139

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shen G, Tyson W R. Crack size evaluation using unloading compliance in single-specimen single-edge-notched tension fracture toughness testing. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2009, 37(4): 347–357

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tang H, Macia M, Minaar K, et al. Development of the SENT test for strain-based design of welded pipelines. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Pipeline Conference (IPC2010). Calgary: ASME, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tyson W R, Shen G, Park D Y, et al. Low constraint toughness testing. Journal of Pipeline Engineering, 2013, 12(3): 157–163

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu X K. Review of fracture toughness test methods for ductile materials in low-constraint conditions. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2016, 139–140: 173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shen G, Bouchard R, Gianetto J A, et al. Fracture toughness evaluation of high-strength steel pipe. In: Proceedings of ASME PVP 2008 Conference. Chicago: ASME, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tyson W R, Shen G, Gianetto J A, et al. Development of a low-constraint SE(T) toughness test. Key Engineering Materials, 2012, 488–489: 126–129

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cravero S, Ruggieri C. Correlation of fracture behavior in high pressure pipelines with axial flaws using constraint designed test specimens—Part I: Plane strain analyses. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2005, 72(9): 1344–1360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cravero S, Bravo R E, Ernst H A. Constraint evaluation and effects on J-R curves for pipes under combined load conditions. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, 2008, ISOPE-I-08-435

    Google Scholar 

  21. Paredes M, Ruggieri C. Further results in J and CTOD estimation procedures for SE(T) fracture specimens—Part II: Weld centerline cracks. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2012, 89: 24–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheng W, Tang H, Gioielli P C, et al. Test methods for characterization of strain capacity: Comparison of R-curves from SENT/CWP/FS tests. In: Proceedings of 5th Pipeline Technology Conference. Ostend, 2009, 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kang J, Shen G, Liang J, et al. Evaluation of fracture toughness test methods for linepipe steels. In: ASTM STP 1571. Application of Automation Technology in Fatigue and Fracture Testing and Analysis. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2014, 101–115

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kang J, Shen G, Liang J, et al. Influence of constraint on J-resistance curves for an X100 pipe steel. Procedia Materials Science, 2014, 3: 239–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liang J. Development of test control software for measuring CTOD and J resistance curves using SENT specimens. 2017 (unpublished research)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moore P. The effect of notch sharpness on the fracture toughness determined from SENT specimens. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering OMAE2014. San Francisco: ASME, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  27. Drexler E, Wang Y Y, Sowards J W, et al. SE(T) testing of pipeline welds. In: Proceedings of 2010 8th International Pipeline Conference. Calgary: ASME, 2010, 149–158

    Google Scholar 

  28. Akselsen O M, Østby E, Nyhus B. Low temperature fracture toughness of X80 girth welds. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-second International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Rhodes: ISOPE, 2012, ISOPE-I-12-584

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moore P L, Crintea A M. Single edge notched tension (SENT) testing at low temperature. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Pipeline Conference (IPC2016). Calgary: ASME, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  30. Verstraete M A, Denys R M, Van Minnebruggen K, et al. Determination of CTOD resistance curves in side-grooved single-edge notched tensile specimens using full field deformation measurements. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2013, 110: 12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tyson WR, Gianetto J A. Low-constraint toughness testing: Results of a round robin on a draft SE(T) test procedure. In: Proceedings of the ASME Pressure Vessels & Piping Division Conference (PVP2013). Paris: ASME, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tiku S, Pussegoda N, Ghovanlou M, et al. Standardization of SENT (or SE(T)) fracture toughness measurement: Results of a round robin on a draft test procedure. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Pipeline Conference (IPC2016). Calgary: ASME, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pisarski H. Assessment of flaws in pipeline girth welds—A critical review. Welding in the World, 2013, 57(6): 933–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang Y Y, Liu M, Song Y, et al. Tensile strain models for strainbased design of pipelines. In: Proceedings of 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Rio de Janeiro: ASME, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang X, Kibey S, Tang H, et al. Strain-based design—Advances in prediction methods of tensile strain capacity. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 2011, 21(1): 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gordon J R, Keith G, Gordon N C. Defect and strain tolerance of girth welds in high strength pipelines. In: Proceedings of CBMMTMS International Seminar. Araxa: CBMM-TMS, 2011, 365–394

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the valuable discussions with staff of CanmetMATERIALS on a variety of aspects of SE(T) testing. This review was completed as part of the Welding and Strain Based Design project with funding provided by the Federal Program for Energy Research and Development (PERD) and Natural Resources Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CanmetMATERIALS, Hamilton, L8P 0A5, Canada

    Jidong Kang, James A. Gianetto & William R. Tyson

Authors
  1. Jidong Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James A. Gianetto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. William R. Tyson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jidong Kang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, J., Gianetto, J.A. & Tyson, W.R. Recent development in low-constraint fracture toughness testing for structural integrity assessment of pipelines. Front. Mech. Eng. 13, 546–553 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-018-0501-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-018-0501-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation