Skip to main content
Log in

Some remarks on the engineering application of the fatigue crack growth approach under nonzero mean loads

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The well-known fatigue crack growth (FCG) curves are two-parameter dependents. The range of the stress intensity factor ΔK and the load ratio R are the parameters normally used for describing these curves. For engineering purposes, the mathematical representation of these curves should be integrated between the initial and final crack sizes in order to obtain the safety factors for stresses and life. First of all, it is necessary to reduce the dependence of the FCG curves to only one parameter. ΔK is almost always selected and, in these conditions, considered as the crack driving force. Using experimental data from literature, the present paper shows how to perform multiple regression analyses using the traditional Walker approach and the more recent unified approach. The correlations so obtained are graphically analyzed in three dimensions. Numerical examples of crack growth analysis for cracks growing under nominal stresses of constant amplitude in smooth and notched geometries are performed, assuming an identical material component as that of the available experimental data. The resulting curves of crack size versus number of cycles (a vs. N) are then compared. The two models give approximately the same (a vs. N) curves in both geometries. Differences between the behaviors of the (a vs. N) curves in smooth and notched geometries are highlighted, and the reasons for these particular behaviors are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Castro J T P, Landim R V, Leite J C C, et al. Prediction of notch sensitivity effects in fatigue and in environmentally assisted cracking. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2015, 38(2): 161–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Janssen M M, Zuidema J, Wanhill R J H. Fracture Mechanics. 2nd ed. Delft: VSSD, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lazzarin P, Tovo R. A notch intensity factor approach to the stress analysis of welds. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 1998, 21(9): 1089–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atzori B, Lazzarin G, Meneghetti G. Fatigue strength assessment of welded joints: From the integration of Paris’ law to a synthesis based on the notch stress intensity factors of the uncracked geometries. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2008, 75(3–4): 364–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Witek L. Crack propagation analysis of mechanically damaged compressor blades subjected to high cycle fatigue. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2011, 18(4): 1223–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Luke M, Varfolomeev I, Lutkepohl K, et al. Fatigue crack growth in railway axles: Assessment concept and validation tests. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2011, 78(5): 714–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Walker K. The effect of stress ratio during crack propagation and fatigue for 2024-T3 and 7075-T6 aluminum. In: Rosenfeld M, ed. Effects of Environment and Complex Load History on Fatigue Life, ASTM STP 462. 1970, 1–14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Sadananda K, Vasudevan A K. Short crack growth and internal stresses. International Journal of Fatigue, 1997, 19(93): 99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sadananda K, Vasudevan A K. Analysis of small crack growth behavior using unified approach. In: Ravichandran K S, Murakami Y, Ritchie R, eds. Small fatigue cracks: Mechanics, Mechanisms and Applications. Elsevier, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dinda S, Kujawski D. Correlation and prediction of fatigue crack growth for different R-ratios using K max and ΔK + parameters. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2004, 71(12): 1779–1790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sadananda K, Vasudevan A K. Fatigue crack growth mechanisms in steels. International Journal of Fatigue, 2003, 25(9–11): 899–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sadananda K, Vasudevan A K. Crack tip driving forces and crack growth representation under fatigue. International Journal of Fatigue, 2004, 26(1): 39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dowling N E. Mean stress effects in strain-life fatigue. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2009, 32(12): 1004–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller M S, Gallagher J P. An analysis of several fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) descriptions. In: Hudak S J, Bucci R J, eds. Fatigue Crack Growth Measurement and Data Analysis. ASTM, 1981, 205–251

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Lipson C, Narendra J S. Statistical Design and Analysis of Engineering Experiments. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  16. Castro J T P, Meggiolaro M A. Fadiga: Técnicas e Práticas de Dimensionamento Estrutural sob Cargas Reais de Serviço, Create-Space, 2009 (in Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tada H, Paris P C, Irwin G R. The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook. 3nd ed. New York: ASME Press, 2000

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Alberto Rodriguez Duran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duran, J.A.R., Boloy, R.M. & Leoni, R.R. Some remarks on the engineering application of the fatigue crack growth approach under nonzero mean loads. Front. Mech. Eng. 10, 255–262 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-015-0342-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-015-0342-1

Keywords

Navigation