Skip to main content
Log in

Eco-innovative design approach: Integrating quality and environmental aspects in prioritizing and solving engineering problems

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study proposes an eco-innovative design process taking into consideration quality and environmental aspects in prioritizing and solving technical engineering problems. This approach provides a synergy between the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), the nonquality matrix, the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ), morphological analysis and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). In the sequence of these tools, LCA assesses the environmental impacts generated by the system. Then, for a better consideration of environmental aspects, a new tool is developed, the non-quality matrix, which defines the problem to be solved first from an environmental point of view. The TRIZ method allows the generation of new concepts and contradiction resolution. Then, the morphological analysis offers the possibility of extending the search space of solutions in a design problem in a systematic way. Finally, the AHP identifies the promising solution(s) by providing a clear logic for the choice made. Their usefulness has been demonstrated through their application to a case study involving a centrifugal spreader with spinning discs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoffman W F. A tiered approach to design for environment. In: International Conference on Clean Electronics Products and Technology. Edimbourg, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fussler C, James P. Driving Eco-innovation: A Breakthrough Discipline for Innovation and Sustainability. London: Pitman Publishing, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  3. Graedel T E, Allenby B R. Design for Environment. London: Prentice Hall, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  4. Volvo. Corporate standards for materials. 2012, http://www.volvogroup.com/suppliers/global/en-gb/supplierapplication/standardsaccess/pages/standards.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bombardier. Prohibited and restricted substances for transportation. 2005, http://www2.bombardier.com/en/1_0/pdf/Prohibited_Restricted_Substances_en.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen J L, Liu C C. Green innovation design of products by TRIZ inventive principles and green evolution rules. In: International CIRP Design Seminar. Hong Kong, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen J L, Liu C C. An eco-innovative design approach incorporating the TRIZ method without contradiction analysis. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 2001, 1(4): 263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kobayashi H. Strategic evolution of eco-products: A product life cycle planning methodology. Research in Engineering Design, 2005, 16(1–2): 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kobayashi H. A systematic approach to eco-innovative product design based on life cycle planning. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2006, 20(2): 113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yen S B, Chen T. An eco-innovative tool by integrating FMEA and TRIZ methods. In: Fourth International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing. Tokyo: IEEE, 2005, 678–683

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fresner J, Jantschgi J, Birkel S, Bärnthaler J, Krenn C. The theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ) as option generation tool within cleaner production projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2010, 18(2): 128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang C J, Chen J L. Accelerating preliminary eco-innovation design for products that integrates case-based reasoning and TRIZ method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2011, 19(9–10): 998–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones E, Harisson D, McLaren J. Managing Creative Ecoinnovation. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 2001, 1(1): 27–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vezzoli C, Manzini E. Design for Environmental Sustainability. London: Springer, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  15. Terninko J, Zusman A, Zlotin B. Systematic Innovation: An Introduction to TRIZ. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  16. Portwood B, Reising L. Root cause analysis and quantitative methods-Yin and Yang? In: Proceedings of the 25th International System Safety Conference. Baltimore: System Safety Organization, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  17. Altshuller G S. Creativity as an Exact Science. New York: Gordon & Breach, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  18. Altshuller G S. And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. 2nd ed. Worcester: Technical Innovation Center, Inc., 1994

    Google Scholar 

  19. Salamatov Y. TRIZ: The Right Solution at the Right Time. Enschede: Insytec B V, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  20. Savransky S. Engineering of Creativity: Introduction to TRIZ Methodology of Inventive Problem Solving. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Maier M W, Rechtin E. The Art of Systems Architecting. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zwicky F. Discovery, Invention, Research—Through the Morphological Approach. Toronto: The Macmillan Company, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zwicky F, Wilson A G. New Methods of Thought and Procedure. Contributions to the Symposium on Methodologies. Berlin: Springer, 1967

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Pomerol J C, Barba-Romero S. Choix Multicritère Dans L’Entreprise. Paris: Hermes Science Publications, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  25. Saaty T L. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, 48(1): 9–26

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Saaty T L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmoud Chakroun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chakroun, M., Gogu, G., Pacaud, T. et al. Eco-innovative design approach: Integrating quality and environmental aspects in prioritizing and solving engineering problems. Front. Mech. Eng. 9, 203–217 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-014-0308-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-014-0308-8

Keywords

Navigation