Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling of dynamic contact length in rail grinding process

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rails endure frequent dynamic loads from the passing trains for supporting trains and guiding wheels. The accumulated stress concentrations will cause the plastic deformation of rail towards generating corrugations, contact fatigue cracks and also other defects, resulting in more dangerous status even the derailment risks. So the rail grinding technology has been invented with rotating grinding stones pressed on the rail with defects removal. Such rail grinding works are directed by experiences rather than scientifically guidance, lacking of flexible and scientific operating methods. With grinding control unit holding the grinding stones, the rail grinding process has the characteristics not only the surface grinding but also the running railway vehicles. First of all, it’s important to analyze the contact length between the grinding stone and the rail, because the contact length is a critical parameter to measure the grinding capabilities of stones. Moreover, it’s needed to build up models of railway vehicle unit bonded with the grinding stone to represent the rail grinding car. Therefore the theoretical model for contact length is developed based on the geometrical analysis. And the calculating models are improved considering the grinding car’s dynamic behaviors during the grinding process. Eventually, results are obtained based on the models by taking both the operation parameters and the structure parameters into the calculation, which are suitable for revealing the process of rail grinding by combining the grinding mechanism and the railway vehicle systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grassie S L. Rail corrugation: advances in measurement, understanding and treatment. Wear Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems. 2005, 258(7–8): 1224–1234

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schoech W. Rolling contact fatigue mitigation by grinding. In: Proceedings of the Rail Tech Europe Conference, Utrecht, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kanematsu Y, Satoh Y. Influence of Type of Grinding Stone on Rail Grinding Efficiency. Quarterly Report of RTRI. 2011, 52(2): 97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zarembski A M, Palese J. Does rail grinding reduce rail defects? Rail Track & Structures, 2011, 2: 32–35

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schoech W, Heyder R, Grohmann D. Contact geometry and surface fatigue guidelines for appropriate rail maintenance. In: 7th International Conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems. Brisbane, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zarembski M, Patel P. Estimating maintenance costs for mixed higher speed passenger and freight rail corridors. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Joint Rail Conference. Urbana, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng C C, Kuo F C, Wang C P, Cheng W N. Vibration analysis of rail grinding using a twin-wheel grinder. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2011, 330(7): 1382–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hempe T, Siefer T. Rail grinding as an integral part of technically and economically efficient track maintenance. Rail Engineering International, 2007, 36(3): 6–12

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schoech W. Managing rail life to match performance and cut costs. Railway Gazette International, 2010, 8: 45–48

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schoech W. Development of rail grinding strategies in Europe. In: Conference on Railway Engineering. Rail Achieving Growth: Conference Proceeding. Melbourne, 2006, 95–100

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marcel T. High speed grinding preventative rail care. In: 7th World Congress on High Speed Rail. Beijing, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scroba P, Roney M. Rail grinding best practices. In: Proceedings of AREMA Annual Conference. Chicago, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hyde P, Fletcher D. Planning rail grinding using crack growth predictions. Journal of Mechanical Systems for Transportation and Logistics, 2010, 3(1): 216–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rowe WB. Principles of Modern Grinding Technology. Burlington: Science Publishers, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grassie S L, Gregory R W, Harrison D, Johnson K L. The dynamic response of railway track to high frequency vertical exitation. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 1982, 24(2): 77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grassie S L, Cox S J. The dynamic response of railway track with flexible sleepers to high frequency vertical excitation. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Transport Engineering, 1984, 117–124

    Google Scholar 

  17. Calogero F, Leyvraz F. On a new technique to manufacturing isochronous Hamiltonian systems: classical and quantal treatments. Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics, 2007, 14(4): 612–636

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianyong Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhi, S., Li, J. & Zarembski, A.M. Modelling of dynamic contact length in rail grinding process. Front. Mech. Eng. 9, 242–248 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-014-0305-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-014-0305-y

Keywords

Navigation