Skip to main content
Log in

Capital liquidity and residents’ consumption decision: An asymmetry analysis of economic prosperity

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Economics in China

Abstract

Among the current literatures that discuss the influence exerted on residents’ consumption behavior by capital liquidity, some often independently decide the demarcation point of the liquidity restriction that affects residents’ consumption behavior, without taking into account when the economy is flourishing whether residents will be influenced by the restriction of the liquidity that their consumption behaviors can not be fully carried out. We introduce a threshold model which varies according to the actual GDP and other financial indicators (money supply, average stock index and balance of bank loans) to discuss residents’ consumption behavior in China under different economic states. The empirical results show that when the economy flourishes or resuscitates, residents’ income of the same period have not notable influence on their consumption, which suggests that residents’ consumption behavior does not considerably change according to the fluctuation of the current income, but conforms with the constant income-life cycle hypothesis. Moreover, two estimated values 0.7504 and 0.8597, as economic boom measures, all fall in the boom stable stage—basically consists with the early-warning index of the macro-economy boom issued by National Bureau of Statistics of China. It shows that the macro-economic boom is not notablely influenced by capital liquidity, so is residents’ consumption behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiyagari S R (1944). Uninsured idiosyncratic risk and aggregate saving. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, (8): 659–684

  • Bolten S E, Weigand R A (1998). The generation of stock market cycles. Economic Review, 33(1): 77–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J Y, Mankiw N G (1989). Consumption, income, and interest rate: Reinterpreting the time series evidence. In: NBER Macroeconomics Annual, O J Blanchard and S Fischer (eds). Cambridge: The MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J Y, Mankiw N G (1990). Permanent income, current income, and consumption. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 8(3): 265–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton A (1991). Saving and liquidity constraints. Econometrica, 59(5): 1221–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavin M (1985). Excess sensitivity of consumption to current income: Liquidity constraints of myopia. Canadian Journal of Economy, 18(1): 117–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmam B M, Kutter K N (1994). Indicator properties of the paper-bill spread: Lessons from recent experience. NBER Working Paper, No. 4969

  • Hall R (1978). Stochastic implication of the life cycle-permanent income hypothesis: Theory and evidence. Journal of Political Economy, 86: 971–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi F (1989). Tests for liquidity constrains: A critical survey and some new observations. In: Advances in Econometrics, T. Bewley (ed). Fifth World Congress, 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Jappelli T, Pagano M (1989). Consumption and capital market imperfections: An international comparison. American Economic Review, 79(5): 1088–1105

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12: 231–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashyap A K, Stein J C, Wilcox D W (1993). Monetary, policy and credit constraints: Evidence from the composition of external finance. American Economic Review, 83(1): 78–98

    Google Scholar 

  • King R G, Watson M W (1996). Money, prices, interest rates and the business cycle. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78: 35–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas D J (1994). Asset pricing with undiversifiable income risk and short sales constraints deepening the equity premium puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 34: 325–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon J G (1991). Critical values for cointegration tests, In: long-run economic relationships: Readings in cointegration, Engle R F, Granger C W J (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 267–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Runkle D (1991). Liquidity constraints and the permanent-income hypothesis: Evidence from panel data. Journal of Monetary Economics, 27(1): 73–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shefrin H M, Thaler R H (1988). The behavioral life-cycle hypothesis. Economic Inquiry, 26(4): 609–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telmer C I (1993). Asset pricing and incomplete markets. Journal of Finance, 48: 1803–1832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarnowitz V (1999). Theory and history behind business cycles: Are the 1990s the onset of a golden age? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(2): 69–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeldes S P (1989). Consumption and liquidity constrains: An empirical investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 97: 305–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H H (1997). Endogenous borrowing constraints with incomplete markets. Journal of Finance, 52(5): 2178–2209

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuanhua Xu.

Additional information

Translated and revised from Zhongguo Shehui Kexue 中国社会科学 (Social Sciences in China), 2009, (4): 43–53

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, X., Pan, B. Capital liquidity and residents’ consumption decision: An asymmetry analysis of economic prosperity. Front. Econ. China 5, 622–639 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11459-010-0116-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11459-010-0116-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation