Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial and temporal coordinated development research on ecosystem services and human well-being in the typical pastoral area of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the interplay between ecosystem services and human well-being in Seni district, which is a pastoral region of Nagqu city on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, is investigated. Employing the improved InVEST model, CASA model, coupling coordination model, and hierarchical clustering method, we analyze the spatiotemporal patterns of ecosystem services, the levels of resident well-being levels, and the interrelationships between these factors over the period from 2000 to 2018. Our findings reveal significant changes in six ecosystem services, with water production decreasing by 7.1% and carbon sequestration and soil conservation services increasing by approximately 6.3% and 14.6%, respectively. Both the habitat quality and landscape recreation services remained stable. Spatially, the towns in the eastern and southern areas exhibited higher water production and soil conservation services, while those in the central area exhibited greater carbon sequestration services. The coupling and coordination relationship between ecosystem services and human well-being improved significantly over the study period, evolving from low-level coupling to coordinated coupling. Hierarchical clustering was used to classify the 12 town-level units into five categories. Low subjective well-being townships had lower livestock breeding services, while high subjective well-being townships had higher supply, regulation, and support ecosystem services. Good transportation conditions were associated with higher subjective well-being in townships with low supply services. We recommend addressing the identified transportation disparities and enhancing key regulatory and livestock breeding services to promote regional sustainability and improve the quality of life for Seni district residents, thus catering to the diverse needs of both herdsmen and citizens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abunge C, Coulthard S, Daw T M, 2013. Connecting marine ecosystem services to human well-being: Insights from participatory well-being assessment in Kenya. Ambio, 42(8): 1010–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams H, Adger W N, Ahmad S et al., 2020. Multi-dimensional well-being associated with economic dependence on ecosystem services in deltaic social-ecological systems of Bangladesh. Regional Environmental Change, 20(3): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai Y, Ouyang Z Y, Zheng H et al., 2012. Modeling soil conservation, water conservation and their tradeoffs: A case study in Beijing. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 24(3): 419–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai Y, Wong C P, Jiang B et al., 2018. Developing China’s Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning. Nature Communications, 9(1): 3034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein A S, 2014. Biological diversity and public health. Annual review of public health, 35(1): 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo G, 2015. The human sustainable development index: The 2014 update. Ecological Indicators, (50): 258–259.

  • Breslow S J, Sojka B, Barnea R et al., 2016. Conceptualizing and operationalizing human wellbeing for ecosystem assessment and management. Environmental Science & Policy, 66(1): 250–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadell J, Jackson R B, Ehleringer J B et al., 1996. Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia, 108(4): 583–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celentano D, Sills E, Sales M et al., 2012. Welfare outcomes and the advance of the deforestation frontier in the Brazilian Amazon. World Development, 40(4): 850–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Che L, Zhou L, Xu J, 2021. Integrating the ecosystem service in sustainable plateau spatial planning: A case study of the Yarlung Zangbo River Basin. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 31(2): 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Ju P J, Zhu Q A et al., 2022a. Carbon and nitrogen cycling on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3(10): 701–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Xie G, Pei S et al., 2012. Ecosystem’s soil conservation function and its spatial distribution in Lancang River Basin, Southwest China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 23(8): 2249–2256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Zeng J, Zhong M et al., 2021. Coupling analysis of ecosystem services value and economic development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: A case study in Hunan province, China. Remote Sensing, 13(8): 1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Li Z, Li P et al., 2022b. Impacts and projections of land use and demographic changes on ecosystem services: A case study in the Guanzhong region, China. Sustainability, 14(5): 3003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciftcioglu G C, 2017. Assessment of the relationship between ecosystem services and human wellbeing in the social-ecological landscapes of Lefke Region in North Cyprus. Landscape Ecology, 32(4): 897–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark D A, 2014. Defining and measuring human well-being. Global Environmental Change, 1: 833–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, D’arge R, De Groot R et al., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630): 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai Y, Shangguan W, 2019. Dataset of soil properties for land surface modeling over China. In: A Big Earth Data Platform for Three Poles.

  • Dong X B, Ren J H, Zhang P et al., 2021. Entwining ecosystem services, land use change and human well-being by nitrogen flows. Journal of Cleaner Production, 308: 127442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue R J, Roderick M L, Mcvicar T R, 2012. Roots, storms and soil pores: Incorporating key ecohydrological processes into Budyko’s hydrological model. Journal of Hydrology, 436: 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang G, Xiang B, Zhao W et al., 2015. Study on soil erosion in LaSa River Basin based on GIS and RUSLE. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 29(3): 6–12. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Filoso S, Bezerra M O, Weiss K C et al., 2017. Impacts of forest restoration on water yield: A systematic review. PloS One, 12(8): e0183210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu B, 2020. Promoting geography for sustainability. Geography and Sustainability, 1(1): 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandarillas V, Jiang Y, Irvine K, 2016. Assessing the services of high mountain wetlands in tropical Andes: A case study of Caripe wetlands at Bolivian Altiplano. Ecosystem Services, 19: 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Rodrigues J, Villasante S, Sousa Pinto I, 2022. Non-material nature’s contributions to people from a marine protected area support multiple dimensions of human well-being. Sustainability Science, 17(3): 793–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haahtela T, Holgate S, Pawankar R et al., 2013. The biodiversity hypothesis and allergic disease: World allergy organization position statement. World Allergy Organization Journal, 6(1): 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermy M, Van Der Veken S, Van Calster H et al., 2008. Forest ecosystem assessment, changes in biodiversity and climate change in a densely populated region (Flanders, Belgium). Plant Biosystems: An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology, 142(3): 623–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hua X B, Yan J Z, Liu X, 2013. Settled herdsmen’s adaptation strategies to pasture degradation: Case study of Naqu county in Tibet Plateau. Mountain Research, 31(2): 140–149. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Q, Yin D, He C et al., 2020. Linking ecosystem services and subjective well-being in rapidly urbanizing watersheds: Insights from a multilevel linear model. Ecosystem Services, 43: 101106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang W, Wu T, Fu B, 2021. The value of ecosystem services in China: A systematic review for twenty years. Ecosystem Services, 52: 101365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jing H C, Liu Y H, He P et al., 2022. Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services and its influencing factors in typical areas of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: A case study of Nagqu city. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42(7): 2657–2673. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang T, Yang S, Bu J et al., 2020. Quantitative assessment for the dynamics of the main ecosystem services and their interactions in the northwestern arid area, China. Sustainability, 12(3): 803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King M F, Renó V F, Novo E M, 2014. The concept, dimensions and methods of assessment of human well-being within a socioecological context: A literature review. Social Indicators Research, 116(3): 681–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosanic A, Petzold J, 2020. A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services and human wellbeing. Ecosystem Services, 45: 101168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Li Y M, Zhou X W et al., 2022a. Modeling and analyzing supply-demand relationships of water resources in Xinjiang from a perspective of ecosystem services. Journal of Arid Land, 14(2): 115–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W L, Dong S C, Lin H Y et al., 2022b. Influence of rural social capital and production mode on the subjective well-being of farmers and herdsmen: Empirical discovery on farmers and herdsmen in Inner Mongolia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2): 695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Yu X, Wu K et al., 2021. Land-use zoning management to protecting the regional key ecosystem services: A case study in the city belt along the Chaobai River, China. Science of the Total Environment, 762: 143167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang Y, Song W, 2022. Integrating potential ecosystem services losses into ecological risk assessment of land use changes: A case study on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Journal of Environmental Management, 318: 115607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D, Chen H, Zhang H et al., 2022a. The impact of ecosystem services on human well-being and its group differences in the loess hilly and gully region. Geographical Research, 41(5): 1298–1310. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Huang L, Yan L, 2018. Influence of ecosystem services on human well-being: A case study of Tonglu county, Zhejiang province, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(5): 1687–1697. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Wei H, Dong X et al., 2022b. Integrating land use, ecosystem service, and human well-being: A systematic review. Sustainability, 14(11): 6926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu M X, Gao Y, Wei H J et al., 2022c. Profoundly entwined ecosystem services, land-use change and human well-being into sustainability management in Yushu, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32(9): 1745–1765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Wang S, Fang C, 2023. Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing mechanism of ecosystem service value in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 33(6): 1226–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logsdon R A, Chaubey I, 2013. A quantitative approach to evaluating ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling, 257: 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo M, Yu E, Zhou Y et al., 2019. Distribution and technical strategies of ecological protection and restoration projects for mountains-rivers-forests-farmlands-lakes-grasslands. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(23): 8692–8701. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y Y, Yang D W, O’connor P et al., 2022. Dynamic characteristics and synergistic effects of ecosystem services under climate change scenarios on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Scientific Reports, 12(1): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, Wang X, Zhou J et al., 2023. Exploring the response of ecosystem services to landscape change: A case study from eastern Qinghai province. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 33(9): 1897–1920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Qin Y, Zhang H et al., 2021. Improving well-being of farmers using ecological awareness around protected areas: Evidence from Qinling region, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18): 9792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques S M, Campos F S, David J et al., 2021. Modelling sediment retention services and soil erosion changes in Portugal: A spatio-temporal approach. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(4): 262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauser W, Klepper G, Rice M et al., 2013. Transdisciplinary global change research: The co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(3/4): 420–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcgregor J A, Camfield L, Woodcock A, 2009. Needs, wants and goals: Wellbeing, quality of life and public policy. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4(2): 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Outeiro L, Villasante S, 2013. Linking salmon aquaculture synergies and trade-offs on ecosystem services to human wellbeing constituents. Ambio, 42(8): 1022–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierret A, Maeght J-L, Clément C et al., 2016. Understanding deep roots and their functions in ecosystems: An advocacy for more unconventional research. Annals of Botany, 118(4): 621–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter C S, Randerson J T, Field C B et al., 1993. Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 7(4): 811–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qadir U, 2015. Human Development Report 2015: Work for human development. Pakistan Development Review, 54(3): 277–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi W, Liu S H, Zhou L, 2020. Regional differentiation of population in Tibetan Plateau: Insight from the “Hu Line”. Acta Geographica Sinica, 75(2): 255–267. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi X K, Li Q, Yue Y M et al., 2021. Rural-urban migration and conservation drive the ecosystem services improvement in China karst: A case study of Huanjiang county, Guangxi. Remote Sensing, 13(4): 566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu J Q, Yu D Y, Huang T, 2022. Influential paths of ecosystem services on human well-being in the context of the sustainable development goals. Science of The Total Environment, 852: 158443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raji S A, Odunuga S, Fasona M, 2021. Quantifying ecosystem service interactions to support environmental restoration in a tropical semi-arid basin. Acta Geophysica, 69(5): 1813–1841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rall E, Hansen R, Pauleit S, 2019. The added value of public participation GIS (PPGIS) for urban green infrastructure planning. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 40(SI): 264–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid W V, Mooney H A, Cropper A et al., 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being-Synthesis: A Report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press, 137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rong Y J, Yan Y, Wang C X et al., 2020. Construction and optimization of ecological network in Xiong’an New Area based on the supply and demand of ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(20): 7197–7206. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Salti N, Chaaban J, Irani A et al., 2021. A multi-dimensional measure of well-being among youth: The case of Palestinian refugee youth in Lebanon. Social Indicators Research, 154(1): 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandhu H, Sandhu S, 2014. Linking ecosystem services with the constituents of human well-being for poverty alleviation in eastern Himalayas. Ecological Economics, 107: 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp R, Douglass J, Wolny S et al., 2020. InVEST 3.9.0. User’s Guide: The Natural Capital Project. Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund.

  • Shen M G, Wang S P, Jiang N et al., 2022. Plant phenology changes and drivers on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3(10): 633–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shui Y, Lu H, Wang H et al., 2018. Assessment of habitat quality on the basis of land cover and NDVI changes in Lhasa River Basin. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(24): 8946–8954. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Song Y N, Wang M, Sun X F et al., 2021. Quantitative assessment of the habitat quality dynamics in Yellow River Basin, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193(9): 614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Berkel D B, Verburg P H, 2014. Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecological Indicators, 37: 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van De Kerk G, 2014. Sustainable society index, tool for measuring well-being. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 10: 978–994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van De Kerk G, Manuel A R, 2008. A comprehensive index for a sustainable society: The SSI-the Sustainable Society Index. Ecological Economics, 66(2/3): 228–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voukelatou V, Gabrielli L, Miliou I et al., 2021. Measuring objective and subjective well-being: Dimensions and data sources. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 11(4): 279–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B J, Tang H P, Xu Y, 2017. Integrating ecosystem services and human well-being into management practices: Insights from a mountain-basin area, China. Ecosystem Services, 27: 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B J, Zhang Q, Cui F Q, 2021a. Scientific research on ecosystem services and human well-being: A bibliometric analysis. Ecological Indicators, 125: 107449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Wang X, Wang Y et al., 2023. Spatio-temporal analysis of human wellbeing and its coupling relationship with ecosystem services in Shandong province, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 33(2): 392–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang F, Zheng S Y, Yang H R et al., 2022a. Regionalization and classification of water eco-environment in Zhejiang province based on ecosystem service. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42(2): 539–548. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Liu L B, Yin L et al., 2021b. Exploring the complex relationships and drivers of ecosystem services across different geomorphological types in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China (2000-2018). Ecological Indicators, 121: 107116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang R H, Peng Q, Zhang W D et al., 2022b. Ecohydrological service characteristics of qilian mountain ecosystem in the next 30 years based on scenario simulation. Sustainability, 14(3): 1819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei D, Qi Y H, Ma Y M et al., 2021. Plant uptake of CO2 outpaces losses from permafrost and plant respiration on the Tibetan Plateau. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(33): e2015283118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei H J, Fan W G, Ding Z Y et al., 2017. Ecosystem services and ecological restoration in the Northern Shaanxi Loess Plateau, China, in relation to climate fluctuation and investments in natural capital. Sustainability, 9(2): 199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei H J, Liu H M, Xu Z H et al., 2018. Linking ecosystem services supply, social demand and human well-being in a typical mountain-oasis-desert area, Xinjiang, China. Ecosystem Services, 31: 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams J, Renard K, Dyke P, 1983. EPIC: A new method for assessing erosion’s effect on soil productivity. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 38(5): 381–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier W H, Smith D D, 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: A guide to conservation planning. Environmental Science, 537: 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood S L, Declerck F, 2015. Ecosystems and human well-being in the Sustainable Development Goals. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 13(3): 123–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood S L, Jones S K, Johnson J A et al., 2018. Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals. Ecosystem Services, 29: 70–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu C Y, Chen K L, You X N et al., 2022. Improved CASA model based on satellite remote sensing data: Simulating net primary productivity of Qinghai Lake Basin alpine grassland. Geoscientific Model Development, 15(17): 6919–6933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Gao X, 2013. A gridded daily observation dataset over China region and comparison with the other datasets. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 56(4): 1102–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, He C, Xu W, 2013. Emergy footprint evaluation of hydropower projects. Science China Technological Sciences, 56(9): 2336–2342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J G, 2013. Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 28(6): 999–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z H, Wei H J, Fan W G et al., 2019. Relationships between ecosystem services and human well-being changes based on carbon flow: A case study of the Manas River Basin, Xinjiang, China. Ecosystem Services, 37: 100934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan Y, Zhao C L, Quan Y et al., 2017. Interrelations of ecosystem services and rural population wellbeing in an ecologically-fragile area in North China. Sustainability, 9(5): 709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang D, Liu W, Tang L Y et al., 2019. Estimation of water provision service for monsoon catchments of South China: Applicability of the InVEST model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 182: 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Cao K, 2022. Spatial matching and correlation between recreation service supply and demand in the Ili River Valley, China. Applied Geography, 148: 102805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Zhen L, Li F et al., 2010. Impacts of ecosystem services change on human well-being in the Loess Plateau. Resources Science, 32(5): 849–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang W, Mckinnon M C, Turner W R, 2015. Quantifying human well-being for sustainability research and policy. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 1(4): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Qiu X, Xu Y et al., 2021a. Spatial heterogeneity and dynamic features of the ecosystem services influence on human wellbeing in the West Sichuan Mountain Areas. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(19): 7555–7567. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y H, Weng B S, Yan D H et al., 2021b. Tracing potential water sources of the Nagqu River using stable isotopes. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 34: 100807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin G D, Wang X, Zhang X et al., 2020. InVEST model-based estimation of water yield in North China and its sensitivities to climate variables. Water, 12(6): 1692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan J, Zhang F, Chu X et al., 2019. Ecosystem services assessment based on emergy accounting in Chongming Island, eastern China. Ecological Indicators, 105: 464–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan N, Liu W H, Ye T et al., 2023. High-resolution livestock seasonal distribution data on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in 2020. Scientific Data, 10(1): 142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Zeng C, Zhang Q G et al., 2022a. Securing water quality of the Asian Water Tower. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3(10): 611–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H J, Pang Q, Long H et al., 2019a. Local residents’ perceptions for ecosystem services: A case study of Fenghe River Watershed. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19): 3602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L Q, Peng J, Liu Y X et al., 2017. Coupling ecosystem services supply and human ecological demand to identify landscape ecological security pattern: A case study in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Urban Ecosystems, 20(3): 701–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Estoque R C, Xie H et al., 2019b. Bibliometric analysis of highly cited articles on ecosystem services. PloS One, 14(2): e0210707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, He S, Yang Y, 2021. Evaluation of wetland ecosystem services value of the Yellow River Delta. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193(6): 353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Zhou J, Li G et al., 2020. Spatial pattern reconstruction of regional habitat quality based on the simulation of land use changes from 1975 to 2010. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30(4): 601–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X Y, Li S S, Yu H, 2022b. Analysis on the ecosystem service protection effect of national nature reserve in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau from weight perspective. Ecological Indicators, 142: 109225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X-H, Zhang R, Wu J et al., 2016. An emergy evaluation of the sustainability of Chinese crop production system during 2000–2010. Ecological Indicators, 60: 622–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y N, Chen D, Fan J, 2020. Sustainable development problems and countermeasures: A case study of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Geography and Sustainability, 1(4): 275–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng H, Robinson B E, Liang Y C et al., 2013. Benefits, costs, and livelihood implications of a regional payment for ecosystem service program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(41): 16681–16686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong S Z, Geng Y, Huang B B et al., 2020. Quantitative assessment of eco-compensation standard from the perspective of ecosystem services: A case study of Erhai in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263: 121530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou G Y, Wei X H, Chen X Z et al., 2015. Global pattern for the effect of climate and land cover on water yield. Nature Communications, 6(1): 5918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Gong J, Li J, 2020. Spatiotemporal change of habitat quality in ecologically sensitive areas of eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: A case study of the Hehuang Valley, Qinghai province. Resources Science, 42(5): 991–1003. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu W, Pan Y, He H et al., 2006. Simulation of maximum light use efficiency for some typical vegetation types in China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 51(4): 457–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu W Q, Chen Y H, Xu D et al., 2005. Advances in terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP) estimation models. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 24(3): 296–300. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China

    Siyu Ren, Xuexue Qian & Yinghui Liu

  2. Shenzhen Nanshan Foreign Language School, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518063, China

    Haichao Jing

Authors
  1. Siyu Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haichao Jing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xuexue Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yinghui Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yinghui Liu.

Additional information

Foundation: The Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP), No.2019QZKK0608

Author: Ren Siyu (2000–), Master, specialized in natural resources.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ren, S., Jing, H., Qian, X. et al. Spatial and temporal coordinated development research on ecosystem services and human well-being in the typical pastoral area of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. J. Geogr. Sci. 34, 252–288 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-024-2204-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-024-2204-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation