Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship of minimum winter temperature and temperature seasonality to the northern range limit and species richness of trees in North America

  • Special Issue: Climate Change and Its Regional Response
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biologists have considered both winter coldness and temperature seasonality as major determinants of the northern limits of plants and animals in the Northern Hemisphere, which in turn drive the well-known latitudinal diversity gradient. However, few studies have tested which of the two climate variables is the primary determinant. In this study, we assess whether winter coldness or temperature seasonality is more strongly associated with the northern latitudinal limits of tree species and with tree species richness in North America. Tree species were recorded in each of 1198 quadrats of 110 km × 110 km in North America. We used correlation and regression analyses to assess the relationship of the latitude of the northern boundary of each species, and of species richness per quadrat, with winter coldness and temperature seasonality. Species richness was analyzed within 38 longitudinal, i.e., north-south, bands (each being >1100 km long and 110 km wide). The latitudes of the northern range limits of tree species were three times better correlated with minimum temperatures at those latitudes than with temperature seasonality. On average, minimum temperature and temperature seasonality together explained 81.5% of the variation in the northern range limits of the tree species examined, and minimum temperature uniquely explained six-fold (33.7% versus 5.8%) more of this variation than did temperature seasonality. Correlations of tree species richness with minimum temperatures were stronger than correlations with temperature seasonality for most of the longitudinal bands analyzed. Compared to temperature seasonality, winter coldness is more strongly associated with species distributions at high latitudes, and is likely a more important driver of the latitudinal diversity gradient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archibald S B, Bossert W H, Greenwood D R et al., 2010. Seasonality, the latitudinal gradient of diversity, and Eocene insects. Paleobiology, 36: 374–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battisti A, Stastny M, Netherer S et al., 2005. Expansion of geographic range in the pine processionary moth caused by increased winter temperatures. Ecological Applications, 15: 2084–2096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrensmeyer, A K, Damuth J D, DiMichele W A et al., 1992. Terrestrial Ecosystems Through Time: Evolutionary Paleoecology of Terrestrial Plants and Animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bivand R, Piras G, 2015. Comparing implementations of estimation methods for spatial econometrics. Journal of Statistical Software, 63: 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bivand R S, Hauke J, Kossowski T, 2013. Computing the Jacobian in Gaussian spatial autoregressive models: An illustrated comparison of available methods. Geographical Analysis, 45: 150–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J H, Lomolino M V, 1998. Biogeography. 2nd ed. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger M, 1998. Physiological mechanisms limiting the northern boundary of the winter range of the northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) [D]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Chen S, Shen M et al., 2018. Minimum temperature and precipitation determine fish richness pattern in China’s nature reserves. Biogeosciences Discussions, doi.https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2017-389.

  • Chen W-Y, Su T, 2020. Asian monsoon shaped the pattern of woody dicotyledon richness in humid regions of China. Plant Diversity, 42: 148–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delcourt P A, Delcourt H R, 1993. Paleoclimates, paleovegetation, and paleoflora during the Late Quaternary. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee ed. Flora of North America North of Mexico, Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press, 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue M J, 2008. A phylogenetic perspective on the distribution of plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105(Suppl 1): 11549–11555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell B, Mitter C, Futuyma D J, 1992. Diversification at the insect-plant interface. BioScience, 42: 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser R H, Currie D J, 1996. The species richness-energy hypothesis in a system where historical factors are thought to prevail: Coral reefs. The American Naturalist, 148: 138–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz S A, Rahbek C, 2012. Global patterns of amphibian phylogenetic diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 39: 1373–1382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma D J, 1998. Evolutionary Biology. 3rd edn. Sunderland: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham A, 1999. Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic History of North American Vegetation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins B A, Rodríguez M Á, Weller S G, 2011. Global angiosperm family richness revisited: Linking ecology and evolution to climate. Journal of Biogeography, 38: 1253–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins B A, Rueda M, Rangel T F et al., 2014. Community phylogenetics at the biogeographical scale: Cold tolerance, niche conservatism and the structure of North American forests. Journal of Biogeography, 41: 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H, 2004. On the generality of the latitudinal gradient. The American Naturalist, 163: 192–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huggett R J, 2004. Fundamentals of Biogeography. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huntley B, Bartlein P J, Prentice I C, 1989. Climatic control of the distribution and abundance of beech (Fagus L.) in Europe and North America. Journal of Biogeography, 16: 551–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen J, 1944. Viscum, Hedera and Ilex as climatic indicators. Geologiska Föreningens Stockholm Förhandlingar, 66: 463–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Körner C, 2021. The cold range limit of trees. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 36: 979–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larcher W, 2003. Physiological Plant Ecology: Ecophysiology and Stress Physiology of Functional Groups. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latham R E, Ricklefs R E, 1993a. Continental comparisons of temperate-zone tree species diversity. In: Ricklefs R E, Schluter D eds. Species Diversity in Ecological Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 294–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham R E, Ricklefs R E, 1993b. Global patterns of tree species richness in moist forests: Energy-diversity theory does not account for variation in species richness. Oikos 67: 325–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L, 2012. Numerical Ecology. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little E L, 1971–78. Atlas of United States Trees. Vols. 1, 3, 4, and 5. U.S. Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication, Washington, DC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • New M, Hulme M, Jones P, 1999. Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part I: Development of a 1961–90 mean monthly terrestrial climatology. Journal of Climate, 12: 829–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian H, Deng T, Jin Y et al., 2019. Phylogenetic dispersion and diversity in regional assemblages of seed plants in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116: 23192–23201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian H, Wang X, Wang S et al., 2007. Environmental determinants of amphibian and reptile species richness in China. Ecography, 30: 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian H, Zhang J, Hawkins B A, 2018. Mean family age of angiosperm tree communities and its climatic correlates along elevational and latitudinal gradients in eastern North America. Journal of Biogeography, 45: 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian H, Zhang J, Sandel B et al., 2020. Phylogenetic structure of angiosperm trees in local forest communities along latitudinal and elevational gradients in eastern North America. Ecography, 43: 419–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian H, Zhang Y, Zhang J et al., 2013. Latitudinal gradients in phylogenetic relatedness of angiosperm trees in North America. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 22: 1183–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs R E, 2004. A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 7: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs R E, 2006. Evolutionary diversification and the origin of the diversity/environment relationship. Ecology, 87: S3–S13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs R E, Schluter D, 1993. Species diversity: Regional and historical influences. In: Ricklefs R E, Schluter D eds. Species Diversity in Ecological Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 350–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root T L, 1988. Energy constraints on avian distributions and abundances. Ecology, 69: 330–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig M L, 1995. Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury E J, 1926. The geographical distribution of plants in relation to climatic factors. Geographical Journal, 57: 312–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens G C, 1989. The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: How so many species coexist in the tropics. The American Naturalist, 133: 240–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J-H, Cai Y-F, Zhang L et al., 2018. Species richness of the family Ericaceae along an elevational gradient in Yunnan, China. Forests, 9: 511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Fang J, Tang Z et al., 2011. Patterns, determinants and models of woody plant diversity in China. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278: 2122–2132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens J J, Donoghue M J, 2004. Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19: 639–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens J J, Graham C H, Moen D S et al., 2006. Evolutionary and ecological causes of the latitudinal diversity gradient in hylid frogs: Treefrog trees unearth the roots of high tropical diversity. The American Naturalist, 168: 579–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson L, Hill M, Welna J P et al., 1992. SYSTAT for Windows: Statistics. Evanston: SYSTAT Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson K, 1975. Birds and climatic change. Bird Study, 22: 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanne A E, Tank D C, Cornwell W K et al., 2014. Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature, 506: 89–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Hay W W, Wang C et al., 2019. The evolution of latitudinal temperature gradients from the latest Cretaceous through the present. Earth-Science Reviews, 189: 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to reviewers for their constructive comments. This study was partially supported by a grant from the National Key Research and Development Program (2019YFA 0607302) to Yangjian Zhang.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Qian.

Additional information

Foundation

National Key Research and Development Program, No.2019YFA0607302

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qian, H., Zhang, Y., Ricklefs, R.E. et al. Relationship of minimum winter temperature and temperature seasonality to the northern range limit and species richness of trees in North America. J. Geogr. Sci. 32, 280–290 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-022-1947-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-022-1947-z

Keywords

Navigation