Abstract
Although several previous studies in Inner Mongolia examined the effects of ecological conservation on the delivery of ecosystem services, they were often limited in scope (few ecosystem services were assessed) and often suffered from confounding by spatial variation. In this study, we examined the impact of conservation measures (changes in grassland utilization patterns) on the provision of selected ecosystem services in three types of grasslands (meadow steppe in Hulun Buir, typical steppe in Xilin Gol, and semi-desert steppe in Ordos) in Inner Mongolia. We examined five utilization patterns: no use (natural grasslands), light use, moderate use, intensive use, and recovery sites (degraded sites protected from further use). Through household surveys and vegetation and soil surveys, we measured the differences in ecosystem services among the different grassland utilization patterns. We also identified spatial factors that confounded the quantification of ecosystem services in different types of grasslands. We found that light use generally provided high levels of ecosystem services in meadow steppe and typical steppe, with the main differences in the supporting ecosystem services. Surprisingly, we found no consistently positive impacts of strict conservation activities across the sites, since the results varied spatially and with respect to differences in the land-use patterns. Our study suggests that appropriate grassland utilization patterns can enhance the supply of ecosystem services and reduce negative effects on both household livelihoods and the environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abson D J, Termansen M, 2011. Valuing ecosystem services in terms of ecological risks and returns. Conservation Biology, 25: 250–258.
Bakelaar R G, Odum E P, 1978. Community and population level responses to fertilization in an old-field ecosystem. Ecology, 59: 660–665.
Bao S D, 2000. Soil Chemical Analysis of Agriculture. Beijing: China Agriculture Press. (in Chinese)
Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J, 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12: 1394–1404.
Brown A J, 1993. A review of soil sampling for chemical analysis. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 33(8): 983–1006.
Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S et al., 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21: 17–29.
Cheng X L, An S Q, Li G Q et al., 2001. The correlation between the desertification of grassland and the change of vegetation biomass in Erduosi. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 37(2): 13–20. (in Chinese)
Castro A J, Martin-Lopez B, Lopez E et al., 2015. Do protected areas networks ensure the supply of ecosystem services? Spatial patterns of two nature reserve systems in semi-arid Spain. Applied Geography, 60: 1–9.
Crossman N D, Burkhard B, Nedkov S et al., 2013. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 4: 4–14.
Dai X G, Xu Y, Jia G et al., 2009. Climate change impact and adaptation in Inner Mongolia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 6: 342018.
Daily G, 1997. Nature’s Services. Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington D.C: Island Press.
de Groot R S, Wilson M A, Boumans R M J, 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41: 393–408.
Deng X Z, Li Z H, Gibson J, 2016. A review on trade-off analysis of ecosystem services for sustainable land-use management. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26(7): 953–968.
Du B Z, Zhen L, de Groot R et al., 2014. Changing patterns of basic household consumption in the Inner Mongolian grasslands: A case study of policy-oriented adoptive changes in the use of grasslands. The Rangeland Journal, 36(5): 505–517.
Eastwood A, Nijnik M, Brooker R et al., 2013. Nature Conservation and Ecosystem Service Delivery. Peterborough: JNCC Report No. 492.
Eigenbrod F, Armsworth P R, Anderson B J et al., 2010. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47: 377–385.
Evans C R W, Krzic M, Broersma K et al., 2012. Long-term grazing effects on grassland soil properties in southern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 92(4): 685–693.
Inner Mongolia Statistics Bureau (IMSB), 2013. Rural Statistics Yearbook of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region in 2010. Hohhot, China: Inner Mongolia Statistics Bureau. (in Chinese)
Inner Mongolia Statistics Yearbook (IMSY), 2015. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese).
Ji S J, Geng Y, Li D F et al., 2009. Plant coverage is more important than species richness in enhancing aboveground biomass in a premature grassland, northern China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 129: 491–496.
John R, Chen J Q, Lu N et al., 2008. Predicting plant diversity based on remote sensing products in the semi-arid region of Inner Mongolia. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(5): 2018–2032.
Kang L, Han X, Zhang Z et al., 2007. Grassland ecosystems in China: Review of current knowledge and research advancement. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 362(1482): 997–1008.
Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts T H et al., 2011. Natural Capital. Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kumar P, 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. London and Washington D.C: Earthscan Publications.
Liu J G, Dietz T, Carpenter S R et al., 2007. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317: 1513–1516.
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington D.C: Island Press.
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington D.C: Island Press.
Medina-Roldan E, Paz-Ferreiro J, Bardgett R D, 2012. Grazing exclusion affects soil and plant communities, but has no impact on soil carbon storage in an upland grassland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 149: 118–123.
NDRC, 2014. “Opinions on improving the policy of returning grazing to grassland” is the latest guidance to implementing the policy of “returning grazing to grassland”, which Joint release by the National Development and Reform Commission, National Ministry of Finance and National Ministry of Agriculture (in Chinese).
Pan Y, Xu Z, Wu J, 2013. Spatial differences of the supply of multiple ecosystem services and the environmental and land use factors affecting them. Ecosystem Services, 5: e4–e10.
Power A G, 2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: Tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365: 2959–2971.
Prober S M, Thiele K R, Rundel P W et al., 2012. Climate adaptation in intact landscapes: A framework for managing change and resilience applied to the world’s largest temperate woodland. Climatic Change, 110: 227–248.
Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson G D, Bennett E M, 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 107: 5242–5247.
Rook A J, Dumont B, Isselstein J et al., 2004. Matching type of livestock to desired biodiversity outcomes in pastures: A review. Biological Conservation, 119(2): 137–150.
Shan G L, Xu Z, Ning F, 2008. Influence of exclosure year on community structure and species diversity in a pical steppe. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 17(6): 1–8. (in Chinese)
Suškevics M, 2012. Legitimacy analysis of multi-level governance of biodiversity: Evidence from 11 case studies across the EU. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22: 217–237.
Swinton S M, Lupi F, Robertson G P et al., 2007. Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecological Economics, 64: 245–252.
Tabachnick B G, Fidell L S, 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th edn. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Xu Z, Cheng S, Zhen L et al., 2013. Impacts of dung combustion on the carbon cycle of alpine grassland of the north Tibetan Plateau. Environmental Management, 52: 441–449.
Xue Z C, Zhen L, 2018. Impact of rural land transfer on land use functions in western China’s Guyuan based on a multi-level stakeholder assessment framework. Sustainability, 10(5): 1376(1–21).
Yan Y, Hu Y, Yue L et al., 2012. Plant diversity change with different land use type and land use intensity: Take Zhengxiangbai Banner as case study. Resources Science, 34(6): 1032–1038. (in Chinese)
Yu F F, Price K P, Ellis J et al., 2003. Response of seasonal vegetation development to climatic variations in eastern central Asia. Remote Sensing of Environment, 87: 42–54.
Zhang Q Y, Wu X H, Zhao D S et al., 2013. Temporal-spatial changes in Inner Mongolian grassland degradation during past three decades. Agricultural Science & Technology, 14(4): 676–683.
Zhen L, Du B, 2017. Ecological footprint analysis based on changing food consumption in a poorly developed area of China. Sustainability, 9(8): 1323(1–18).
Zhen L, Ochirbat B, Lv Y et al., 2010. Comparing patterns of ecosystem service consumption and perceptions of range management between ethnic herders in Inner Mongolia and Mongolia. Environmental Research Letters, 5: e015001(1–11).
Zhou Z C, Gan Z T, Shangguan Z P et al., 2010. Effects of grazing on soil physical properties and soil erodibility in semiarid grassland of the northern Loess Plateau (China). Catena, 82(2): 87–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41671517; National Key Research and Development Program of China, No.2016YFC0503700
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Du, B., Zhen, L., Hu, Y. et al. Comparison of ecosystem services provided by grasslands with different utilization patterns in China’s Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. J. Geogr. Sci. 28, 1399–1414 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1552-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1552-3