Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of consolidation parameters based on the excess pore water pressure measurement using a newly developed U-oedometer

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the U-oedometer, a novel modified oedometer cell equipped with tailor-made needle probes, is developed to easily and accurately measure the excess pore water pressure (\(\Delta u\)) during 1D consolidation tests and to determine the coefficient of consolidation (\(c_{\text{v}}\)). The 3D printing technique is applied to make simple yet robust modifications to the conventional oedometer cell for facilitating the installation of the needle probes. The tailor-made needle probes are designed in such a way that the volumetric compliance is lowered to avoid measurement bias. Subsequently, the \(\Delta u\)-based method is proposed to determine \(c_{\text{v}}\), with the target of avoiding the intervention of human judgement and therefore minimizing the degree of subjectivity. The experimental results demonstrate that the measured \(\Delta u\) matches the theoretical values of the Terzaghi 1D consolidation theory, showing that the estimated \(c_{\text{v}}\) is sufficiently reliable. In addition to the determination of \(c_{\text{v}}\), the U-oedometer allows additional measurements of other soil properties during consolidation, including the coefficient of permeability (\(k\)) and the coefficient of earth pressure at rest (\(K_{0}\)). It is observed that k decreases with the reduction in void volume, due to the increase in the effective vertical stress (\(\sigma_{\text{v}}^{'}\)). Further, the secondary compression seems to be a continuation of the primary consolidation, where the soil sample continues to deform at a relatively slower rate, associated with the slight decrease in \(k\). A constant value of \(K_{0}\) is observed at any value of \(\sigma_{\text{v}}^{'}\) in the loading path, while during secondary compression, \(K_{0}\) slightly increases with time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aldrich HP (1951) Analysis of foundation stresses and settlements at the Hayden Library Harl Preslar Aldrich. Dissertation, Massachusett Institute of Technology

  2. Al-Zoubi MS (2008) Coefficient of consolidation by the slope method. Geotech Test J 31:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Zoubi MS (2010) Consolidation analysis using the settlement rate-settlement (SRS) method. Appl Clay Sci 50:34–40

    Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Zoubi MS (2014) Consolidation analysis by the modified slope method. Geotech Test J 37:540–547

    Google Scholar 

  5. ASTM D2435 (2011) (2011) Standard test methods for one-dimensional consolidation properties of soils using incremental loading. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  6. BS 1377 (1960) British standard methods of test for Soils for civil engineering purpose. Part 6. Consolidation and permeability tests in hydraulic cells and with pore pressure measurement. British Standards Institution, London

  7. Burland JB, Roscoe KH (1969) Local strains and pore pressures in a normally consolidated clay layer during one-dimensional consolidation. Géotechnique 19:335–356

    Google Scholar 

  8. Casagrande A, Fadum RE (1940) Notes on soil testing for engineering purposes. Harvard University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cour FR (1971) Inflection point method for computing consolidation coefficient. J Soil Mech Found Div 97:827–831

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis EH, Raymond GP (1965) A non-linear theory of consolidation. Géotechnique 15:161–173

    Google Scholar 

  11. Engineering Toolbox (2003) Young’s modulus–tensile and yield strength for common materials. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/young-modulus-d_417.html. Accessed 18 July 2018

  12. Feng T-W, Lee Y-J (2001) Coefficient of consolidation from the linear segment of the t1/2 curve. Can Geotech J 38:901–909

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gao Y, Wang YH (2014) Experimental and DEM examinations of K0 in sand under different loading conditions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0001095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gao Y, Wang YH, Chow JK (2017) Application of Film-like sensors for K0 and pore water pressure measurement in clay during 1D consolidation. Geotech Test J 40:134–143

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gibson RE (1963) An analysis of system flexibility and its effect on time-lag in pore-water pressure measurements. Géotechnique 13:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gibson RE, England GL, Hussey MJL (1967) The theory of one-dimensional consolidation of saturated clays. Géotechnique 17:261–273

    Google Scholar 

  17. Griffiths FJ, Joshi RC (1991) Change in pore size distribution owning to secondary consolidation of clays. Can Geotech J 28:20–24

    Google Scholar 

  18. Helenelund KV (1972) Pore pressures during the consolidation of highly compressible soils. Rakenteiden Mekaniikka 5:159–174

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hvorslev MJ (1951) Time-lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations. Bulletin No. 36, Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army, Vicksburg, MS

  20. Kutter BL, Sathialingam N, Hermann LR (1990) Effects of arching on response time of miniature pore pressure transducer in clay. Geotech Test J 13:164–178

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lacerda WA (1976) Stress-relaxation and creep effects on soil deformation. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

  22. Lovisa J, Sivakugan N (2013) An in-depth comparison of cv values determined using common curve-fitting techniques. Geotech Test J 36:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  23. McKinley JD, Sivakumar V (2009) Coefficient of consolidation by plotting velocity against displacement. Géotechnique 59:553–557

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mesri G (2003) Primary compression and secondary compression. Soil behavior and soft ground construction, Geotech Special Publ 119:122–166

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mesri G, Godlewski MP (1977) Time and stress-compressibility interrelationship. J Geotech Eng Div 103:417–430

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mesri G, Hayat TM (1993) The coefficient of earth pressure at rest. Can Geotech J 30:647–666

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mesri G, Feng TW, Shahie M (1999) Coefficient of consolidation by inflection point method. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125:716–718

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behavior. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pandian NS, Sridharan A, Kumar KS (1992) A new method for the determination of coefficient of consolidation. Geotech Test J 15:74–79

    Google Scholar 

  30. Parkin AK (1978) Coefficient of consolidation by the velocity method. Géotechnique 28:472–474

    Google Scholar 

  31. Perloff WH, Nair K, Smith JG (1965) Effect of measuring system on pore water pressures in the consolidation test. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conferences on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Montreal, Canada, September 8th–15th, 1965. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada, pp 338–341

  32. Robinson RG (1997) Consolidation analysis by an inflection point method. Géotechnique 47:199–200

    Google Scholar 

  33. Robinson RG (1999) Consolidation analysis with pore water pressure measurements. Géotechnique 49:127–132

    Google Scholar 

  34. Robinson RG, Allam MM (1996) Determination of coefficient of consolidation from early stage of Log t plot. Geotech Test J 19:316–320

    Google Scholar 

  35. Robinson R, Soundara B (2008) Coefficient of consolidation from mid-plane pore pressure measurements. Int J Geotech Eng 2:419–425

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rowe PW, Barden L (1966) A new consolidation cell. Géotechnique 16:162–170

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sebai S, Belkacemi S (2016) Consolidation coefficient by combined probabilistic and least residuals methods. Geotech Test J 39:891–897

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shogaki T, Nochikawa Y (2004) Triaxial strength properties of natural deposits at K0 consolidation state using a precision triaxial apparatus with small size specimens. Soils Found 44:41–52

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sivaram B, Swamee PK (1977) A computational method for consolidation-coefficient. Soils Found 17:48–52

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sridharan A, Prakash K (1993) δ-t/δ method for the determination of coefficient of consolidation. Geotech Test J 16:131–134

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sridharan A, Prakash K (1998) Determination of coefficient of consolidation: a user friendly approach. Ground Eng 31:30–32

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sridharan A, Murthy NS, Prakash K (1987) Rectangular hyperbola method of consolidation analysis. Géotechnique 37:355–368

    Google Scholar 

  43. Taylor DW (1948) Fundamentals of soil mechanics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  44. Teerachaikulpanich N, Okumara S, Matsunaga K, Ohta H (2007) Estimation of coefficient of earth pressure at rest using modified oedometer test. Soils Found 47:349–360

    Google Scholar 

  45. Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tewatia SK (1998) Evaluation of true cv and instantaneous cv, and isolation of secondary consolidation. Geotech Test J 21:102–108

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tsuchida T, Kikuchi Y (1991) K0 consolidation of undisturbed clays by means of triaxial cell. Soils Foun 31:127–137

    Google Scholar 

  48. Vinod JS, Sridharan A (2015) Laboratory determination of coefficient of consolidation from pore water pressure measurement. Géotechnique Letters 5:294–298

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wang YH, Siu WK (2006) Structure characteristics and mechanical properties of kaolinite soils. I. Surface charges and structural characterizations. Can Geotech J 43:587–600

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wang YH, Xu D (2007) Dual porosity and secondary consolidation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133:793–801

    Google Scholar 

  51. Watabe Y, Tanaka M, Tanaka H, Tsuchida T (2003) K0-consolidation in a triaxial cell and evaluation of in situ K0 for marine clays with various characteristics. Soils Found 43:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  52. Whitman RV, Richardson AM, Healy KA (1961) Time-lags in pore pressure measurements. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Paris, July 17th–22th, 1961. Dunod, Malakoff Cedex, France, pp 407–411

  53. Zeng X, Grolewski B (2005) Measurement of Gmax and estimation of K0 of saturated clay using bender elements in an oedometer. Geotech Test J 28:264–274

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Professor John Schmertmann for providing valuable comments on the design of the needle probes of the U-oedometer. This research was supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (project no. T22-603/15-N) and the Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme (HKPFS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Hsing Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chow, J.K., Wang, YH., Lui, H.L. et al. Determination of consolidation parameters based on the excess pore water pressure measurement using a newly developed U-oedometer. Acta Geotech. 15, 2665–2680 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00914-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00914-y

Keywords

Navigation