Abstract
In this study, the U-oedometer, a novel modified oedometer cell equipped with tailor-made needle probes, is developed to easily and accurately measure the excess pore water pressure (\(\Delta u\)) during 1D consolidation tests and to determine the coefficient of consolidation (\(c_{\text{v}}\)). The 3D printing technique is applied to make simple yet robust modifications to the conventional oedometer cell for facilitating the installation of the needle probes. The tailor-made needle probes are designed in such a way that the volumetric compliance is lowered to avoid measurement bias. Subsequently, the \(\Delta u\)-based method is proposed to determine \(c_{\text{v}}\), with the target of avoiding the intervention of human judgement and therefore minimizing the degree of subjectivity. The experimental results demonstrate that the measured \(\Delta u\) matches the theoretical values of the Terzaghi 1D consolidation theory, showing that the estimated \(c_{\text{v}}\) is sufficiently reliable. In addition to the determination of \(c_{\text{v}}\), the U-oedometer allows additional measurements of other soil properties during consolidation, including the coefficient of permeability (\(k\)) and the coefficient of earth pressure at rest (\(K_{0}\)). It is observed that k decreases with the reduction in void volume, due to the increase in the effective vertical stress (\(\sigma_{\text{v}}^{'}\)). Further, the secondary compression seems to be a continuation of the primary consolidation, where the soil sample continues to deform at a relatively slower rate, associated with the slight decrease in \(k\). A constant value of \(K_{0}\) is observed at any value of \(\sigma_{\text{v}}^{'}\) in the loading path, while during secondary compression, \(K_{0}\) slightly increases with time.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldrich HP (1951) Analysis of foundation stresses and settlements at the Hayden Library Harl Preslar Aldrich. Dissertation, Massachusett Institute of Technology
Al-Zoubi MS (2008) Coefficient of consolidation by the slope method. Geotech Test J 31:1–5
Al-Zoubi MS (2010) Consolidation analysis using the settlement rate-settlement (SRS) method. Appl Clay Sci 50:34–40
Al-Zoubi MS (2014) Consolidation analysis by the modified slope method. Geotech Test J 37:540–547
ASTM D2435 (2011) (2011) Standard test methods for one-dimensional consolidation properties of soils using incremental loading. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
BS 1377 (1960) British standard methods of test for Soils for civil engineering purpose. Part 6. Consolidation and permeability tests in hydraulic cells and with pore pressure measurement. British Standards Institution, London
Burland JB, Roscoe KH (1969) Local strains and pore pressures in a normally consolidated clay layer during one-dimensional consolidation. Géotechnique 19:335–356
Casagrande A, Fadum RE (1940) Notes on soil testing for engineering purposes. Harvard University, Cambridge
Cour FR (1971) Inflection point method for computing consolidation coefficient. J Soil Mech Found Div 97:827–831
Davis EH, Raymond GP (1965) A non-linear theory of consolidation. Géotechnique 15:161–173
Engineering Toolbox (2003) Young’s modulus–tensile and yield strength for common materials. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/young-modulus-d_417.html. Accessed 18 July 2018
Feng T-W, Lee Y-J (2001) Coefficient of consolidation from the linear segment of the t1/2 curve. Can Geotech J 38:901–909
Gao Y, Wang YH (2014) Experimental and DEM examinations of K0 in sand under different loading conditions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0001095
Gao Y, Wang YH, Chow JK (2017) Application of Film-like sensors for K0 and pore water pressure measurement in clay during 1D consolidation. Geotech Test J 40:134–143
Gibson RE (1963) An analysis of system flexibility and its effect on time-lag in pore-water pressure measurements. Géotechnique 13:1–11
Gibson RE, England GL, Hussey MJL (1967) The theory of one-dimensional consolidation of saturated clays. Géotechnique 17:261–273
Griffiths FJ, Joshi RC (1991) Change in pore size distribution owning to secondary consolidation of clays. Can Geotech J 28:20–24
Helenelund KV (1972) Pore pressures during the consolidation of highly compressible soils. Rakenteiden Mekaniikka 5:159–174
Hvorslev MJ (1951) Time-lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations. Bulletin No. 36, Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army, Vicksburg, MS
Kutter BL, Sathialingam N, Hermann LR (1990) Effects of arching on response time of miniature pore pressure transducer in clay. Geotech Test J 13:164–178
Lacerda WA (1976) Stress-relaxation and creep effects on soil deformation. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Lovisa J, Sivakugan N (2013) An in-depth comparison of cv values determined using common curve-fitting techniques. Geotech Test J 36:1–10
McKinley JD, Sivakumar V (2009) Coefficient of consolidation by plotting velocity against displacement. Géotechnique 59:553–557
Mesri G (2003) Primary compression and secondary compression. Soil behavior and soft ground construction, Geotech Special Publ 119:122–166
Mesri G, Godlewski MP (1977) Time and stress-compressibility interrelationship. J Geotech Eng Div 103:417–430
Mesri G, Hayat TM (1993) The coefficient of earth pressure at rest. Can Geotech J 30:647–666
Mesri G, Feng TW, Shahie M (1999) Coefficient of consolidation by inflection point method. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125:716–718
Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behavior. Wiley, Hoboken
Pandian NS, Sridharan A, Kumar KS (1992) A new method for the determination of coefficient of consolidation. Geotech Test J 15:74–79
Parkin AK (1978) Coefficient of consolidation by the velocity method. Géotechnique 28:472–474
Perloff WH, Nair K, Smith JG (1965) Effect of measuring system on pore water pressures in the consolidation test. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conferences on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Montreal, Canada, September 8th–15th, 1965. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada, pp 338–341
Robinson RG (1997) Consolidation analysis by an inflection point method. Géotechnique 47:199–200
Robinson RG (1999) Consolidation analysis with pore water pressure measurements. Géotechnique 49:127–132
Robinson RG, Allam MM (1996) Determination of coefficient of consolidation from early stage of Log t plot. Geotech Test J 19:316–320
Robinson R, Soundara B (2008) Coefficient of consolidation from mid-plane pore pressure measurements. Int J Geotech Eng 2:419–425
Rowe PW, Barden L (1966) A new consolidation cell. Géotechnique 16:162–170
Sebai S, Belkacemi S (2016) Consolidation coefficient by combined probabilistic and least residuals methods. Geotech Test J 39:891–897
Shogaki T, Nochikawa Y (2004) Triaxial strength properties of natural deposits at K0 consolidation state using a precision triaxial apparatus with small size specimens. Soils Found 44:41–52
Sivaram B, Swamee PK (1977) A computational method for consolidation-coefficient. Soils Found 17:48–52
Sridharan A, Prakash K (1993) δ-t/δ method for the determination of coefficient of consolidation. Geotech Test J 16:131–134
Sridharan A, Prakash K (1998) Determination of coefficient of consolidation: a user friendly approach. Ground Eng 31:30–32
Sridharan A, Murthy NS, Prakash K (1987) Rectangular hyperbola method of consolidation analysis. Géotechnique 37:355–368
Taylor DW (1948) Fundamentals of soil mechanics. Wiley, New York
Teerachaikulpanich N, Okumara S, Matsunaga K, Ohta H (2007) Estimation of coefficient of earth pressure at rest using modified oedometer test. Soils Found 47:349–360
Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. Wiley, New York
Tewatia SK (1998) Evaluation of true cv and instantaneous cv, and isolation of secondary consolidation. Geotech Test J 21:102–108
Tsuchida T, Kikuchi Y (1991) K0 consolidation of undisturbed clays by means of triaxial cell. Soils Foun 31:127–137
Vinod JS, Sridharan A (2015) Laboratory determination of coefficient of consolidation from pore water pressure measurement. Géotechnique Letters 5:294–298
Wang YH, Siu WK (2006) Structure characteristics and mechanical properties of kaolinite soils. I. Surface charges and structural characterizations. Can Geotech J 43:587–600
Wang YH, Xu D (2007) Dual porosity and secondary consolidation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133:793–801
Watabe Y, Tanaka M, Tanaka H, Tsuchida T (2003) K0-consolidation in a triaxial cell and evaluation of in situ K0 for marine clays with various characteristics. Soils Found 43:1–20
Whitman RV, Richardson AM, Healy KA (1961) Time-lags in pore pressure measurements. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Paris, July 17th–22th, 1961. Dunod, Malakoff Cedex, France, pp 407–411
Zeng X, Grolewski B (2005) Measurement of Gmax and estimation of K0 of saturated clay using bender elements in an oedometer. Geotech Test J 28:264–274
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Professor John Schmertmann for providing valuable comments on the design of the needle probes of the U-oedometer. This research was supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (project no. T22-603/15-N) and the Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme (HKPFS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chow, J.K., Wang, YH., Lui, H.L. et al. Determination of consolidation parameters based on the excess pore water pressure measurement using a newly developed U-oedometer. Acta Geotech. 15, 2665–2680 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00914-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00914-y