Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of matric suction on nonlinear time-dependent compression behavior of a granular fill material

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The site formation for the construction of a new airport in a mountainous region is typically performed by cutting and filling a hill section. The fill materials are subjected to seasonal changes and large variations in water content. The water content change renders the fill material to be characterized as unsaturated or saturated. This study aims to investigate the influence of matric suction on the time-dependent compression behavior of one local soil as a fill material for the construction of a new runway of an airport in Chongqing city, a mountainous region in China. A series of unsaturated drained triaxial tests were conducted on this coarse-grained soil to obtain the relationship between the effective stress parameter, χ, and the matric suction. Subsequently, multistaged compression tests were performed on this soil using a newly designed suction-controlled oedometer apparatus. The influence of suction on the time-dependent compression behavior of the fill material is emphasized. The results indicate that the matric suction can increase the compression stiffness, and that the unloading–reloading index varies nonlinearly with suction. A linear relationship between the time-dependent compression coefficient and normalized effective vertical loading is established. The linear relationship is subsequently used to predict the time-dependent compression coefficient to describe the time-dependent behavior of the fill under unsaturated conditions. Further, a nonlinear function based on the work of Yin (Géotechnique 49(5):699–707, 1999) is adopted to describe the development of time-dependent compression. The results indicate that the prediction obtained from the two newly proposed methods are promising, and can predict the nonlinear time-dependent compression behavior of this coarse-grained soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASTM D 2487-06 (2006) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  2. ASTM D 5298-16 (2016) Standard test method for measurement of soil potential (suction) using filter paper. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  3. Barden L (1965) Consolidation of compacted and unsaturated clays. Géotechnique 15(3):267–286

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bishop AW (1959) The principle of effective stress. Tek Ukebl 106(39):859–863

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bishop AW, Blight GE (1963) Some aspects of effective stress in saturated and partly saturated soils. Géotechnique 13(3):177–197

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borana L, Yin JH, Singh DN, Shukla SK (2015) A modified suction controlled direct shear device for testing unsaturated soil and steel plate interface. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 33(4):289–298

    Google Scholar 

  7. Borana L, Yin JH, Singh DN, Shukla SK (2016) Interface behavior from suction-controlled direct shear test on completely decomposed granitic soil and steel surfaces. Int J Geomech 16(6):D4016008

    Google Scholar 

  8. Borana L, Yin JH, Singh DN, Shukla SK (2017) Influence of matric suction and counterface roughness on shearing behavior of completely decomposed granitic soil and steel interface. Indian Geotech J 47(2):150–160

    Google Scholar 

  9. Borja RI (2004) Cam-Clay plasticity. Part V: a mathematical framework for three-phase deformation and strain localization analyses of partially saturated porous media. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:5301–5338

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. BS 1377 (1990) Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purpose. British Standards Institution, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Burland JB (1967) Deformation of soft clay. Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge

  12. Chen ZH, Fredlund DG, Julian KMG (1999) Overall volume change, water volume change, and yield associated with an unsaturated compacted loess. Can Geotech J 36(2):321–329

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chen WB, Yin JH, Feng WQ (2018) A new double-cell system for measuring volume change of a soil specimen under monotonic or cyclic loading. Acta Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0629-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen WB, Yin JH, Feng WQ, Borana L, Chen RP (2018) Accumulated permanent axial strain of a subgrade fill under cyclic high-speed railway loading. Int J Geomech 18(5):04018018

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen WB, Feng WQ, Yin JH, Borana L, Chen RP (2019) Characterization of permanent axial strain of granular materials subjected to cyclic loading based on shakedown theory. Constr Build Mater 198:751–761

    Google Scholar 

  16. Coop MR (1990) The mechanics of uncemented carbonate sands. Géotechnique 40(4):607–626

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cui K, Défossez P, Cui YJ, Richard G (2010) Quantifying the effect of matric suction on the compressive properties of two agricultural soil using an osmotic oedometer. Geoderma 156(3–4):337–345

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cui YJ, Delage P (1993) On the elasto-plastic behaviour of an unsaturated silt. ASCE Geotech Spec Publ 39:115–126

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fredlund DG, Morgenstern NR (1977) Stress state variables for unsaturated soils. J Geotech Eng Div 103(5):447–466

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fredlund DG, Xing A (1994) Equations for the soil-water characteristic curve. Can Geotech J 31(4):533–546

    Google Scholar 

  21. Futai MM, Almeida SS (2005) An experimental investigation of the mechanical behaviour of an unsaturated gneiss residual soil. Géotechnique 55(3):201–213

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gallipoli D, Gens A, Sharma R, Vaunat J (2003) An elasto-plastic model for unsaturated soil incorporating the effects of suction and degree of saturation on mechanical behavior. Géotechnique 53(1):123–135

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gan JKM, Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H (1988) Determination of the shear strength parameters of an unsaturated soil using the direct shear test. Can Geotech J 25(3):500–510

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hardin BO (1985) Crushing of soil particles. J Geotech Geoenviron ASCE 111(10):1177–1192

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ho DYF, Fredlund DG (1982) Strain rates for unsaturated soil shear strength testing. In: Proceedings of the seventh Southeast Asian geotechnical conference Hong Kong, vol 1, pp 787–803

  26. Hossain MA, Yin JH (2010) Behavior of a compacted completely decomposed granite soil from suction controlled direct shear tests. J Geotech Geoenviron 136(1):189–198

    Google Scholar 

  27. Imhoff S, Da Saliva AP, Fallow D (2004) Susceptibility to compaction, load support capacity and soil compressibility of Hapludox. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68(1):17–24

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jotisankasa A, Ridley A, Coop M (2007) Collapse behavior of compacted silty clay in suction-monitored oedometer apparatus. J Geotech Geoenviron 133(7):867–877

    Google Scholar 

  29. Khalili N, Khabbaz MH (1998) A unique relationship for χ for the determination of the shear strength of unsaturated soils. Géotechnique 48(5):681–687

    Google Scholar 

  30. Khalili N, Geiser F, Blight GE (2004) Effective stress in unsaturated soils: review with new evidence. Int J Geomech 4(2):115–126

    Google Scholar 

  31. Koliji A, Laloui L, Vulliet L (2009) Behaviour of unsaturated aggregated soil in oedometric condition. Soil Found 49(3):369–380

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lai XL, Wang SM, Ye WM, Cui YJ (2014) Experimental investigation on the creep behavior of an unsaturated clay. Can Geotech J 51(6):621–628

    Google Scholar 

  33. Le TM, Fatahi B, Khabbaz H (2012) Viscous behavior of soft clay and inducing factors. Geotech Geol Eng 30(5):1069–1083

    Google Scholar 

  34. Leroueil S, Kabbai M, Tavenas F, Bouchard R (1985) Stress–strain–strain rate relation for the of sensitive natural clays. Géotechnique 35(2):159–180

    Google Scholar 

  35. Leung CF, Lee FH, Yet NS (1997) The role of particle breakage in pile creep in sand. Can Geotech J 33(6):888–898

    Google Scholar 

  36. Liu K, Chen WB, Feng WQ, Yin JH (2018) Experimental study on the unsaturated behavior of a compacted soil. In: The 7th international conference on unsaturated soils (UNSAT2018), Hong Kong, China

  37. Marsal RJ (1967) Large scale testing of rockfill materials. J Soil Mech Found Div 93(2):27–43

    Google Scholar 

  38. Marsal RJ, Arellano LR, Guzmán MA, Adame H (1976) El Infiernillo. In behavior of dams built in Mexico. UNAM México: Instituto de Ingeniería, pp 239–312

  39. Mcdowell GR (2003) Micromechanics of creep of granular materials. Géotechnique 53(10):915–916

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mcdowell GR, Bolton MD (1998) On the micromechanics of crushable aggregates. Géotechnique 48(5):667–679

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mesri G, Paul MG (1977) Time-and stress-compressibility interrelationship. J Geotech Geoenviron 103(5):417–430

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mesri G, Feng TW, Benak JM (1990) Postdensification penetration resistance of clean sands. J Geotech Eng 116(7):1095–1115

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mesri G, Vardhanabhuti B (2009) Compression of granular materials. Can Geotech J 46(2):369–392

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mosaddeghi MR, Hemmat A, Hajabbasi MA, Vafaeian M, Alexandrou A (2006) Plate sinkage versus confined compression tests for in situ soil compressibility studies. Biosyst Eng 93(3):325–334

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mountassir GE, Sánchez M, Romero E (2014) An experimental study on the compaction and collapsible behavior of a flood defence embankment fill. Eng Geol 179:132–145

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mun W, McCartney JS (2015) Compression mechanisms of unsaturated clay under high stresses. Can Geotech J 52(12):2099–2112

    Google Scholar 

  47. Oldecop LA, Alonso EE (2001) A model for rockfill compressibility. Géotechnique 51(2):127–139

    Google Scholar 

  48. Oldecop LA, Alonso EE (2007) Theoretical investigation of the time-dependent behaviour of rockfill. Géotechnique 57(3):289–301

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pasha AY, Khoshghalb A, Khalili N (2015) Pitfalls in interpretation of gravimetric water content-based soil-water characteristic curve for deformable porous media. Int J Geomech 16(6):D4015004

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rampino C, Mancuso C, Vinale F (2000) Experimental behaviour and modelling of an unsaturated compacted soil. Can Geotech J 37(4):748–763

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sharma RS (1998) Mechanical behaviour of unsaturated highly expansive clays. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oxford, UK

  52. Sheng DC (2011) Review of fundamental principles in modelling unsaturated soil behaviour. Comput Geotech 38:757–776

    Google Scholar 

  53. Shi XS, Herle I (2014) Laboratory investigation of artificial lumpy materials. Eng Geol 183:303–314

    Google Scholar 

  54. Shi XS, Herle I (2016) Analysis of the compression behavior of artificial lumpy composite materials. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 40(10):1438–1453

    Google Scholar 

  55. Shi XS, Herle I (2017) Numerical simulation of lumpy soils using a hypoplastic model. Act Geotech 12(2):349–363

    Google Scholar 

  56. Shi XS, Herle I (2017) A model for natural lumpy composite soils and its verification. Int J Solids Struct 121:240–256

    Google Scholar 

  57. Shi XS, Herle I, Muir Wood D (2018) A consolidation model for lumpy composite soils in open-pit mining. Géotechnique 68(3):189–194

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sivakumar V (1993) A critical state framework for unsaturated soil. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sheffield, UK

  59. Sun D, Sun W, Yan W, Li J (2010) Hydro-mechanical behaviours of highly compacted sand-bentonite mixture. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 2(1):79–85

    Google Scholar 

  60. Vanapalli SK, Fredlund DG, Pufahl DE, Clifton AW (1996) Model for the prediction of shear strength with respect to soil suction. Can Geotech J 33(3):379–392

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wheeler SJ, Sivakumar V (1995) An elasto-plastic critical state framework for unsaturated soil. Géotechnique 45(1):35–53

    Google Scholar 

  62. Yao YP, Qi SJ, Che LW (2016) Computational method of post-construction settlement for high-fill embankments. J Hydroelectr Eng 35(3):1–10 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Yin JH (1999) Non-linear creep of soils in oedometer tests. Géotechnique 49(5):699–707

    Google Scholar 

  64. Yin JH (1999) Properties and behaviour of Hong Kong marine deposits with different clay contents. Can Geotech J 36(6):1085–1095

    Google Scholar 

  65. Yin JH, Graham J (1989) Viscous–elastic–plastic modelling of one-dimensional time-dependent behaviour of clays. Can Geotech J 26(2):199–209

    Google Scholar 

  66. Yin JH, Graham J (1994) Equivalent times and elastic visco-plastic modelling of time-dependent stress-strain behaviour of clays. Can Geotech J 31(1):42–52

    Google Scholar 

  67. Yin JH, Zhu JG, Graham J (2002) A new elastic viscoplastic model for time-dependent behaviour of normally and overconsolidated clays: theory and verification. Can Geotech J 39(1):157–173

    Google Scholar 

  68. Yin ZY, Chang CS, Karstunen M, Hicher PY (2010) An anisotropic elastic–viscoplastic model for soft clays. Int J Solids Struct 47(5):665–677

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhou WH, Xu X, Garg A (2016) Measurement of unsaturated shear strength parameters of silty sand and its correlation with unconfined compressive strength. Measurement 93:351–358

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial supports from Research Institute for Sustainable Urban Development of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (PolyU). The work in this paper is also supported by a National State Key Project “973” Grant (Grant No.: 2014CB047000) (Sub-project No. 2014CB047001) from Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China, a CRF Project (Grant No.: PolyU12/CRF/13E) from Research Grants Council (RGC) of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government of China. The authors are also sincerely grateful to the reviewers for their constructive review comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian-Hua Yin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, WB., Liu, K., Feng, WQ. et al. Influence of matric suction on nonlinear time-dependent compression behavior of a granular fill material. Acta Geotech. 15, 615–633 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-00761-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-00761-y

Keywords

Navigation