Skip to main content
Log in

Nanocomposites composed of modified natural polymer and inorganic nanomaterial for safe, high-efficiency, multifunctional protection of paper-based relics

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Paper-based relics as important carriers of human history and civilization have been facing severe damage problems, and their protection is a major project for cultural heritage restoration. So far, safe, high-efficiency, and multifunctional protection materials are still urgent to be developed. Herein, through screening a series of alkaline nano-oxides and cleverly combining the advantages of modified natural polymer (quaternized chitosan) and inorganic nanomaterials (ZnO), we successfully prepared their functional nanocomposites with multiple properties and pioneered their smart application for multifunctional protection of paper relics. By spraying loads, this kind of nanocomposites can effectively and safely inhibit the acid degradation of paper relics and long-term maintain a natural or weak basic state even under harsh accelerated aging conditions. Meanwhile, the coating of nanocomposites does not change the chromatic aberration but partially improves the hydrophobicity. Moreover, the mechanical properties of paper relics are reinforced up to more than one time for all-around tensile strength, folding endurance, and tearing strength. It is worth noting that the usage of nanocomposites can avoid the discoloration or fading of pH-sensitive pigments/dyes and prevent the blue/red inks from ink-spreading. By integrating the anti-microorganism effects of the two components, the nanocomposites have exhibited a broad antimicrobial capacity for both fungi (e.g., Plectosphaerella cucumerina and Aspergillus unguis) and bacteria (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus). The acquired knowledge not only represents an advanced step for designing functionalized inorganic/polymer nanocomposite but also sheds light on the multi-functional integrated protection of paper-based relics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Sobucki W, Drewniewska-Idziak B. Survey of the preservation status of the 19th and 20th century collections at the National Library in Warsaw. Restaurator, 2003, 24: 189–201

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zyska B. Permanence of paper in Polish books of the period 1900–1994. Restaurator, 1996, 17: 179–186

    Google Scholar 

  3. Daniels V D. The chemistry of paper conservation. Chem Soc Rev, 1996, 25: 179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Muñoz-Viñas S. A dual-layer technique for the application of a fixative on water-sensitive media on paper. Restaurator, 2007, 28: 78–94

    Google Scholar 

  5. Havlínová B, Mináriková J, Švorcová L, et al. Influence of fixatives and deacidification on the stability of arylmethane dyes on paper during the course of accelerated aging. Restaurator, 2005, 26: 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zotti M, Ferroni A, Calvini P. Inhibition properties of simple fungistatic compounds on fungi isolated from foxing spots. Restaurator, 2007, 28: 201–217

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huang J, Liang G, Lu G, et al. Conservation of acidic papers using a dispersion of oleic acid-modified MgO nanoparticles in a non-polar solvent. J Cultural Heritage, 2018, 34: 61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jablonský M, Holúbková S, Kazíková J, et al. The treatment of acid newsprint paper: Evaluation of treatment by MgO or by a mixture of MgO and methyl methoxy magnesium carbonate. Wood Res-Slovakia, 2013, 58: 151–164

    Google Scholar 

  9. Giorgi R, Bozzi C, Dei L, et al. Nanoparticles of Mg(OH)2: Synthesis and application to paper conservation. Langmuir, 2005, 21: 8495–8501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Amornkitbamrung L, Mohan T, Hribernik S, et al. Polysaccharide stabilized nanoparticles for deacidification and strengthening of paper. RSC Adv, 2015, 5: 32950–32961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rodriguez-Navarro C, Ruiz-Agudo E, Ortega-Huertas M, et al. Nanostructure and irreversible colloidal behavior of Ca(OH)2: Implications in cultural heritage conservation. Langmuir, 2005, 21: 10948–10957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Area M C, Cheradame H. Paper aging and degradation: Recent findings and research methods. Bioresources, 2011, 6: 5307–5337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zervos S, Alexopoulou I. Paper conservation methods: A literature review. Cellulose, 2015, 22: 2859–2897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang H, Zhang C, Ye Z, et al. Alkali-exchanged Y zeolites as superior deacidifying protective materials for paper relics: Effects of accessibility and strength of basic sites. Microporous Mesoporous Mater, 2020, 293: 109786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang C, Huang Y, Zhang H, et al. Selectively functionalized zeolite NaY composite materials for high-efficiency multiple protection of paper relics. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2020, 59: 11196–11205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baty J, Maitland C, Minter W, et al. Deacidification for the conservation and preservation of paper-based works: A review. BioR-esources, 2010, 5: 1955–2023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li Y, Li Z, Shen G, et al. Paper conservation with an aqueous NaOH/urea cellulose solution. Cellulose, 2019, 26: 4589–4599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Völkel L, Ahn K, Hähner U, et al. Nano meets the sheet: Adhesive-free application of nanocellulosic suspensions in paper conservation. Herit Sci, 2017, 5: 23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang W, Jing Z, Shan Y, et al. Paper reinforced with regenerated cellulose: A sustainable and fascinating material with good mechanical performance, barrier properties and shape retention in water. J Mater Chem A, 2016, 4: 17483–17490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Isca C, D’Avorgna S, Graiff C, et al. Paper preservation with polyamidoamines: A preliminary study. Cellulose, 2016, 23: 1415–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li Q, Xi S, Zhang X. Conservation of paper relics by electrospun PVDF fiber membranes. J Cultural Heritage, 2014, 15: 359–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ni S, Wang C, Bian H, et al. Enhancing physical performance and hydrophobicity of paper-based cellulosic material via impregnation with starch and PEI-KH560. Cellulose, 2018, 25: 1365–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang M, He W, Wang S, et al. Carboxymethylated glucomannan as paper strengthening agent. Carbohydrate Polyms, 2015, 125: 334–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fatehi P, Kititerakun R, Ni Y, et al. Synergy of CMC and modified chitosan on strength properties of cellulosic fiber network. Carbohydrate Polyms, 2010, 80: 208–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jung J, Bae Y, Kwan Cho Y, et al. Structural insights into conformation of amphiphilic quaternary ammonium chitosans to control fungicidal and anti-biofilm functions. Carbohydrate Polyms, 2020, 228: 115391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Strnadová J, Ďurovič M. The cellulose ethers in paper conservation. Restaurator, 1994, 15: 220–241

    Google Scholar 

  27. Andreica B I, Cheng X, Marin L. Quaternary ammonium salts of chitosan. A critical overview on the synthesis and properties generated by quaternization. Eur Polym J, 2020, 139: 110016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Min T, Zhu Z, Sun X, et al. Highly efficient antifogging and antibacterial food packaging film fabricated by novel quaternary ammonium chitosan composite. Food Chem, 2020, 308: 125682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu Y, Li Y, Deng L, et al. Hydrophobic ethylcellulose/gelatin nanofibers containing zinc oxide nanoparticles for antimicrobial packaging. J Agric Food Chem, 2018, 66: 9498–9506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang J, Liu Y, Hu P, et al. Adsorption of phosphate from aqueous solution by Zr(IV)-crosslinked quaternized chitosan/bentonite composite. Environ Prog Sustain Energy, 2018, 37: 267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sundholm F, Tahvanainen M. Paper conservation using aqueous solutions of calcium hydroxide/methyl cellulose. 3. The influence on the degradation of papers. Restaurator, 2004, 25: 15–25

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ghule K, Ghule A V, Chen B J, et al. Preparation and characterization of ZnO nanoparticles coated paper and its antibacterial activity study. Green Chem, 2006, 8: 1034–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang L, Jiang Y, Ding Y, et al. Investigation into the antibacterial behaviour of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO nanofluids). J Nanopart Res, 2007, 9: 479–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cinteză L O, Tănase M A. Multifunctional ZnO nanoparticle: Based coatings for cultural heritage preventive conservation. In: Thin Films. IntechOpen, 2020. Chapter 6, 1–20

  35. David M E, Ion R M, Grigorescu R M, et al. Nanomaterials used in conservation and restoration of cultural heritage: An up-to-date overview. Materials, 2020, 13: 2064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. El-Feky O M, Hassan E A, Fadel S M, et al. Use of ZnO nanoparticles for protecting oil paintings on paper support against dirt, fungal attack, and UV aging. J Cultural Heritage, 2014, 15: 165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang D, Pan Q, Jia M, et al. Three birds with one stone: Preventive protection of paper materials by ZnO-PHMB and UV-531 composite systems. Langmuir, 2021, 37: 8445–8454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fistos T, Fierascu I, Fierascu R C. Recent developments in the application of inorganic nanomaterials and nanosystems for the protection of cultural heritage organic artifacts. Nanomaterials, 2022, 12: 207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Silva N, Pullar R C, Pintado M E, et al. Biotechnology for preventive conservation: Development of bionanomaterials for antimicrobial coating of outdoor sculptures. Studies Conservat, 2018, 63: 230–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ponce-Jiménez M D P, Toral F A L, Fornue E D. Antifungal protection and sizing of paper with chitosan saltsand cellulose ethers. Part 1, physical effects. J Am Inst Conservat, 2002, 41: 243–254

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ponce-Jiménez M D P, Toral F A L, Gutierrez-Pulido H. Antifungal protection and sizing of paper with chitosan saltsand cellulose ethers. Part 2, antifungal effects. J Am Inst Conservat, 2002, 41: 255–268

    Google Scholar 

  42. Shiah T C. Applying chitosan to increase the fungal resistance of paper-based cultural relics. Taiwan J Sci, 2009, 24: 285–294

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jia Z, Yang C, Zhao F, et al. One-step reinforcement and deacidification of paper documents: Application of lewis base—Chitosan nanoparticle coatings and analytical characterization. Coatings, 2020, 10: 1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Guo M, Diao P, Cai S. Hydrothermal growth of well-aligned ZnO nanorod arrays: Dependence of morphology and alignment ordering upon preparing conditions. J Solid State Chem, 2005, 178: 1864–1873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lu H Y, Chu S Y, Tan S S. The characteristics of low-temperature-synthesized ZnS and ZnO nanoparticles. J Cryst Growth, 2004, 269: 385–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Salehi R, Arami M, Mahmoodi N M, et al. Novel biocompatible composite (Chitosan-zinc oxide nanoparticle): Preparation, characterization and dye adsorption properties. Colloids Surfs B-Biointerfaces, 2010, 80: 86–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bhadra P, Mitra M K, Das G C, et al. Interaction of chitosan capped ZnO nanorods with Escherichia coli. Mater Sci Eng-C, 2011, 31: 929–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Moezzi A, McDonagh A M, Cortie M B. Zinc oxide particles: Synthesis, properties and applications. Chem Eng J, 2012, 185–186: 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ciolacu F, Nicu R, Balan T, et al. Chitosan derivatives as bio-based materials for paper heritage conservation. BioResources, 2017, 12: 735–747

    Google Scholar 

  50. Elsabee M Z, Morsi R E, Al-Sabagh A M. Surface active properties of chitosan and its derivatives. Colloids Surfs B-Biointerfaces, 2009, 74: 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Samain L, Gilbert B, Grandjean F, et al. Redox reactions in Prussian blue containing paint layers as a result of light exposure. J Anal At Spectrom, 2013, 28: 524–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Guha S N, Moorthy P N, Mittal J P. Redox reactions of neutral red. A pulse radiolysis study. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2, 1993, 3: 409–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Blázquez-Castro A, Stockert J C, Sanz-Rodríguez F, et al. Differential photodynamic response of cultured cells to methylene blue and toluidine blue: Role of dark redox processes. Photochem Photobiol Sci, 2009, 8: 371–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Raval N P, Priyadarshi G V, Mukherjee S, et al. Statistical physics modeling and evaluation of adsorption properties of chitosan-zinc oxide nanocomposites for the removal of an anionic dye. J Environ Chem Eng, 2022, 10: 108873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Rivero S, Garcaa M A, Pinotti A. Physical and chemical treatments on chitosan matrix to modify film properties and kinetics of biodegradation. J Mat Phy Chem, 2013, 1: 51–57

    Google Scholar 

  56. Carrapiço A, Martins M R, Caldeira A T, et al. Biosynthesis of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles using microbial cultures: Mechanisms, antimicrobial activity and applications to cultural heritage. Microorganisms, 2023, 11: 378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Castillo I F, Guillén E G, de la Fuente J M, et al. Preventing fungal growth on heritage paper with antifungal and cellulase inhibiting magnesium oxide nanoparticles. J Mater Chem B, 2019, 7: 6412–6419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Castillo I F, De Matteis L, Marquina C, et al. Protection of 18th century paper using antimicrobial nano-magnesium oxide. Int Biodeterior Biodegr, 2019, 141: 79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Shi L E, Li Z H, Zheng W, et al. Synthesis, antibacterial activity, antibacterial mechanism and food applications of ZnO nanoparticles: A review. Food Additives Contams-Part A, 2014, 31: 173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Al-Naamani L, Dobretsov S, Dutta J. Chitosan-zinc oxide nanoparticle composite coating for active food packaging applications. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol, 2016, 38: 231–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to HongBin Zhang.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 22175040), the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (Grant No. 21ZR1405100), and the Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Biobased Material and Green Papermaking, Qilu University of Technology, Shandong Academy of Sciences (Grant Nos. GZKF202109, GZKF202210).

Supporting Information

The supporting information is available online at https://tech.scichina.com and https://link.springer.com. The supporting materials are published as submitted, without typesetting or editing. The responsibility for scientific accuracy and content remains entirely with the authors.

Supporting Information

11431_2022_2391_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Nanocomposites composed of modified natural polymer and inorganic nanomaterial for safe, high-efficiency, multifunctional protection of paper-based relics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, H., Liu, P., Huang, Y. et al. Nanocomposites composed of modified natural polymer and inorganic nanomaterial for safe, high-efficiency, multifunctional protection of paper-based relics. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 66, 2225–2236 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2391-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2391-6

Keywords

Navigation