Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive decision-level fusion strategy for the fault diagnosis of axial piston pumps using multiple channels of vibration signals

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An axial piston pump is a key component that plays the role of the “heart” in hydraulic systems. The pump failure will lead to an unexpected breakdown of the entire hydraulic system or even economic loss and catastrophic safety consequences. Several vibration-based machine learning methods have been developed to detect and diagnose faults of axial piston pumps. However, most of these intelligent diagnosis methods use single-sensor vibration data to monitor the pump health states. Additionally, the diagnostic accuracy is unacceptable in most situations due to the complex pump structure and limited sensor information. Therefore, this study proposes a multi-sensor fusion method to improve the fault diagnosis performance of axial piston pumps. The convolutional neural network receives three channels of vibration data and makes the final diagnosis through information fusion at the decision level. The proposed decision fusion method is evaluated on the classification task of leakage levels of an actual axial piston pump. The experimental results show that the proposed method improves the classification accuracy by adjusting the probability distribution of classification according to the learned weight matrix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wen L, Li X, Gao L, et al. A new convolutional neural network-based data-driven fault diagnosis method. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2018, 65: 5990–5998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lan Y, Hu J, Huang J, et al. Fault diagnosis on slipper abrasion of axial piston pump based on extreme learning machine. Measurement, 2018, 124: 378–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Manikandan S, Duraivelu K. Fault diagnosis of various rotating equipment using machine learning approaches—A review. Proc Institution Mech Engineers Part E-J Process Mech Eng, 2021, 235: 629–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Du J, Wang S, Zhang H. Layered clustering multi-fault diagnosis for hydraulic piston pump. Mech Syst Signal Processing, 2013, 36: 487–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xia S, Zhang J, Ye S, et al. A spare support vector machine based fault detection strategy on key lubricating interfaces of axial piston pumps. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 178177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tang H, Fu Z, Huang Y. A fault diagnosis method for loose slipper failure of piston pump in construction machinery under changing load. Appl Acoustics, 2021, 172: 107634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Y, Zhu Y, Wang Q, et al. Effective component extraction for hydraulic pump pressure signal based on fast empirical mode decomposition and relative entropy. AIP Adv, 2020, 10: 075103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang W, Li Z, Li J, et al. Study on a fault identification method of the hydraulic pump based on a combination of voiceprint characteristics and extreme learning machine. Processes, 2019, 7: 894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao Q, Tang H S, Xiang J W, et al. A multi-sensor fault detection strategy for axial piston pump using the Walsh transform method. Int J Distrib Sens Networks, 2018, 14: 1550147718772531

    Google Scholar 

  10. Muralidharan V, Sugumaran V. Feature extraction using wavelets and classification through decision tree algorithm for fault diagnosis of mono-block centrifugal pump. Measurement, 2013, 46: 353–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Muralidharan V, Sugumaran V. A comparative study of Naïve Bayes classifier and Bayes net classifier for fault diagnosis of monoblock centrifugal pump using wavelet analysis. Appl Soft Computing, 2012, 12: 2023–2029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang H R, Li K, Su W S, et al. An improved empirical wavelet transform method for rolling bearing fault diagnosis. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 2231–2240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lecun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature, 2015, 521: 436–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hinton G, Deng L, Yu D, et al. Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition: The shared views of four research groups. IEEE Signal Process Mag, 2012, 29: 82–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tang S, Yuan S, Zhu Y. Convolutional neural network in intelligent fault diagnosis toward rotatory machinery. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 86510–86519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Islam M M M, Kim J M. Automated bearing fault diagnosis scheme using 2D representation of wavelet packet transform and deep convolutional neural network. Comput Industry, 2019, 106: 142–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ince T, Kiranyaz S, Eren L, et al. Real-Time motor fault detection by 1-D convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2016, 63: 7067–7075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liang P, Deng C, Wu J, et al. Compound fault diagnosis of gearboxes via multi-label convolutional neural network and wavelet transform. Comput Industry, 2019, 113: 103132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yan J, Zhu H, Yang X, et al. Research on fault diagnosis of hydraulic pump using convolutional neural network. J Vibroeng, 2016, 18: 5141–5152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tang S, Yuan S, Zhu Y, et al. An integrated deep learning method towards fault diagnosis of hydraulic axial piston pump. Sensors, 2020, 20: 6576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang S, Xiang J. A minimum entropy deconvolution-enhanced convolutional neural networks for fault diagnosis of axial piston pumps. Soft Comput, 2020, 24: 2983–2997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun S W, Zhang S, Jiang W L, et al. Study on the health condition monitoring method of hydraulic pump based on convolutional neural network. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA). Phuket, 2020. 149–153

  23. Xu G, Liu M, Jiang Z, et al. Online fault diagnosis method based on transfer convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas, 2020, 69: 509–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar A, Gandhi C P, Zhou Y, et al. Improved deep convolution neural network (CNN) for the identification of defects in the centrifugal pump using acoustic images. Appl Acoustics, 2020, 167: 107399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lázaro J G M, Pinilla C B. A methodology for detection of wear in hydraulic axial piston pumps. Int J Interact Des Manuf, 2020, 14: 1103–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xia M, Li T, Xu L, et al. Fault diagnosis for rotating machinery using multiple sensors and convolutional neural networks. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2018, 23: 101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen Z, Li W. Multisensor feature fusion for bearing fault diagnosis using sparse autoencoder and deep belief network. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas, 2017, 66: 1693–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoang D T, Kang H J. A motor current signal-based bearing fault diagnosis using deep learning and information fusion. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas, 2020, 69: 3325–3333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu M K, Tran M Q, Weng P Y. Fusion of vibration and current signatures for the fault diagnosis of induction machines. Shock Vib, 2019, 2019: 7176482

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chen H, Hu N, Cheng Z, et al. A deep convolutional neural network based fusion method of two-direction vibration signal data for health state identification of planetary gearboxes. Measurement, 2019, 146: 268–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Azamfar M, Singh J, Bravo-Imaz I, et al. Multisensor data fusion for gearbox fault diagnosis using 2-D convolutional neural network and motor current signature analysis. Mech Syst Signal Processing, 2020, 144: 106861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Di Z Y, Shao H D, Xiang J W. Ensemble deep transfer learning driven by multisensor signals for the fault diagnosis of bevel-gear cross-operation conditions. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 481–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yu H, Li H, Li Y. Vibration signal fusion using improved empirical wavelet transform and variance contribution rate for weak fault detection of hydraulic pumps. ISA Trans, 2020, 107: 385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang H, Li S, Song L, et al. A novel convolutional neural network based fault recognition method via image fusion of multi-vibration-signals. Comput Industry, 2019, 105: 182–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yu H, Li H, Li Y, et al. A novel improved full vector spectrum algorithm and its application in multi-sensor data fusion for hydraulic pumps. Measurement, 2019, 133: 145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zeng F, Li Z, Zhou Z, et al. Fault classification decision fusion system based on combination weights and an improved voting method. Processes, 2019, 7: 783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen B, Varshney P K. A Bayesian sampling approach to decision fusion using hierarchical models. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2002, 50: 1809–1818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Li S, Liu G, Tang X, et al. An ensemble deep convolutional neural network model with improved D-S evidence fusion for bearing fault diagnosis. Sensors, 2017, 17: 1729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dahl G E, Sainath T N, Hinton G E. Improving deep neural networks for LVCSR using rectified linear units and dropout. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. Vancouver, 2013. 8609–8613

  40. Vani S, Madhusudhana Rao T V. An experimental approach towards the performance assessment of various optimizers on convolutional neural network. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI). Tirunelveli, 2019. 331–336

  41. Lecun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, et al. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc IEEE, 1998, 86: 2278–2324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Huang J, Yan Z, Quan L, et al. Characteristics of delivery pressure in the axial piston pump with combination of variable displacement and variable speed. Proc Institution Mech Engineers Part I-J Syst Control Eng, 2015, 229: 599–613

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JianFeng Tao.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2020YFB2007202), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52005323), the National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (Grant No. BX20200210), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2019M660086).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chao, Q., Gao, H., Tao, J. et al. Adaptive decision-level fusion strategy for the fault diagnosis of axial piston pumps using multiple channels of vibration signals. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 65, 470–480 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-021-1904-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-021-1904-7

Keywords

Navigation