Skip to main content
Log in

A biomimetic bi-layered tissue engineering scaffolds for osteochondral defects repair

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Osteochondral defects are most commonly characterized by damages to both cartilage and underlying subchondral bone tissues, thus developing bi-layered scaffold that can concurrently regenerate these two specific lineages becomes challenge. In this study, the highly biomimetic bi-layered scaffolds were successfully prepared using human-like-collagen (HLC), hyaluronan (HA) and nano hydroxyapatite (HAP) particles, combined with “liquid phase synthesis” technology, freeze-drying and chemical cross-linking techniques, which was simulated the composition of natural extracellular matrix to repair osteochondral defects. This novel bilayer osteochondral graft had a seamlessly integrated layer structure, suitable pore size, high levels of porosity, and excellent mechanical properties. In vitro cell experiments of the bilayer scaffold indicated that the scaffold could promote the proliferation and adhesion of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. In vivo osteochondral defects and micro-CT experiment revealed that bilayer scaffolds showed complete closure of the defect. Histology confirmed collagen and glycosaminoglycans were deposited in the new matrix of hyaline cartilage and bone in the bilayer scaffold group. Therefore, the developed bionic bilayer scaffold enhanced the regeneration of hyaline cartilage through subchondral bone formation and lateral host-tissue integration. In conclusion, this bilayer scaffold based on HLC could be used as the desired strategy for osteochondral defects regeneration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin I, Miot S, Barbero A, et al. Osteochondral tissue engineering. J BioMech, 2007, 40: 750–765

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wu Y, Zhu S, Wu C, et al. A bi-lineage conducive scaffold for osteochondral defect regeneration. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 4473–4483

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yuan X L, Meng H Y, Wang Y C, et al. Bone-cartilage interface crosstalk in osteoarthritis: potential pathways and future therapeutic strategies. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2014, 22: 1077–1089

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang Y, Yu J, Ren K, et al. Thermosensitive hydrogels as scaffolds for cartilage tissue rngineering. Biomacromolecules, 2019, 20: 1478–1492

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huey D J, Hu J C, Athanasiou K A. Unlike bone, cartilage regeneration remains elusive. Science, 2012, 338: 917–921

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yan L P, Silva-Correia J, Oliveira M B, et al. Bilayered silk/silknanoCaP scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering: In vitro and in vivo assessment of biological performance. Acta Biomater, 2015, 12: 227–241

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kang H, Zeng Y, Varghese S. Functionally graded multilayer scaffolds for in vivo osteochondral tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, 2018, 78: 365–377

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xia D, Liu Y, Wang S, et al. In vitro and in vivo investigation on biodegradable Mg-Li-Ca alloys for bone implant application. Sci China Mater, 2019, 62: 256–272

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xu Q, Liang J, Xue H, et al. Novel injectable and self-setting composite materials for bone defect repair. Sci China Mater, 2020, 63: 876–887

    Google Scholar 

  10. Levingstone T J, Thompson E, Matsiko A, et al. Multi-layered collagen-based scaffolds for osteochondral defect repair in rabbits. Acta Biomater, 2016, 32: 149–160

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wakitani S, Goto T, Young R G, et al. Repair of large full-thickness articular cartilage defects with allograft articular chondrocytes embedded in a collagen gel. Tissue Eng, 1998, 4: 429–444

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lahm A, Kreuz P C, Oberst M, et al. Subchondral and trabecular bone remodeling in canine experimental osteoarthritis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2006, 126: 582–587

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mrosek E H, Lahm A, Erggelet C, et al. Subchondral bone trauma causes cartilage matrix degeneration: an immunohistochemical analysis in a canine model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2006, 14: 171–178

    Google Scholar 

  14. O’Shea T M, Miao X. Bilayered scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B-Rev, 2008, 14: 447–464

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oliveira J M, Rodrigues M T, Silva S S, et al. Novel hydroxyapatite/chitosan bilayered scaffold for osteochondral tissue-engineering applications: Scaffold design and its performance when seeded with goat bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials, 2006, 27: 6123–6137

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reyes R, Delgado A, Sánchez E, et al. Repair of an osteochondral defect by sustained delivery of BMP-2 or TGF²1 from a bilayered alginate-PLGA scaffold. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2012

  17. Guo X, Park H, Liu G, et al. In vitro generation of an osteochondral construct using injectable hydrogel composites encapsulating rabbit marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials, 2009, 30: 2741–2752

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kon E, Delcogliano M, Filardo G, et al. Novel nano-composite multilayered biomaterial for osteochondral regeneration. Am J Sports Med, 2011, 39: 1180–1190

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chen J, Chen H, Li P, et al. Simultaneous regeneration of articular cartilage and subchondral bone in vivo using MSCs induced by a spatially controlled gene delivery system in bilayered integrated scaffolds. Biomaterials, 2011, 32: 4793–4805

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moutos F T, Freed L E, Guilak F. A biomimetic three-dimensional woven composite scaffold for functional tissue engineering of cartilage. Nat Mater, 2007, 6: 162–167

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yang P J, Temenoff J S. Engineering Orthopedic Tissue Interfaces. Tissue Eng Part B-Rev, 2009, 15: 127–141

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gomes S, Leonor I B, Mano J F, et al. Natural and genetically engineered proteins for tissue engineering. Prog Polym Sci, 2012, 37: 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  23. Huang X, Jia J, Wang Z, et al. A novel chitosan-based sponge coated with self-assembled thrombin/tannic acid multilayer films as a hemostatic dressing. Chin J Polym Sci, 2015, 33: 284–290

    Google Scholar 

  24. Geng C, Hu X, Yang G, et al. Mechanically reinforced chitosan/cellulose nanocrystals composites with good transparency and biocompatibility. Chin J Polym Sci, 2015, 33: 61–69

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hu J, Cai X, Mo S, et al. Fabrication and characterization of chitosansilk fibroin/hydroxyapatite composites via in situ precipitation for bone tissue engineering. Chin J Polym Sci, 2015, 33: 1661–1671

    Google Scholar 

  26. Xu W K, Tang J Y, Yuan Z, et al. Accelerated cutaneous wound healing using an injectable teicoplanin-loaded PLGA-PEG-PLGA thermogel dressing. Chin J Polym Sci, 2019, 37: 548–559

    Google Scholar 

  27. Park S H, Song T, Bae T S, et al. Comparative analysis of collagens extracted from different animal sources for application of cartilage tissue engineering. Int J Precis Eng Manuf, 2012, 13: 2059–2066

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang L, Liu J, Zheng X, et al. Pullulan dialdehyde crosslinked gelatin hydrogels with high strength for biomedical applications. Carbohydrate Polyms, 2019, 216: 45–53

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ramshaw J A M. Biomedical applications of collagens. J Biomed Mater Res, 2016, 104: 665–675

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sionkowska A, Kozlowska J. Fish scales as a biocomposite of collagen and calcium salts. KEM, 2013, 587: 185–190

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fan D D, Luo Y, Mi Y, et al. Characteristics of fed-batch cultures of recombinant Escherichia coli containing human-like collagen cDNA at different specific growth rates. Biotechnol Lett, 2005, 27: 865–870

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang J, Ma X, Fan D, et al. Synthesis and characterization of hyaluronic acid/human-like collagen hydrogels. Mater Sci Eng-C, 2014, 43: 547–554

    Google Scholar 

  33. Li X, Xue W, Liu Y, et al. Novel multifunctional PB and PBH hydrogels as soft filler for tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B, 2015, 3: 4742–4755

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jiang X, Wang Y, Fan D, et al. A novel human-like collagen hemostatic sponge with uniform morphology, good biodegradability and biocompatibility. J Biomater Appl, 2017, 31: 1099–1107

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhu C, Fan D, Wang Y. Human-like collagen/hyaluronic acid 3D scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng-C, 2014, 34: 393–401

    Google Scholar 

  36. Van Vlierberghe S, Dubruel P, Schacht E. Biopolymer-based hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: A review. Biomacromolecules, 2011, 12: 1387–1408

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yang J, Zhang Y S, Yue K, et al. Cell-laden hydrogels for osteochondral and cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, 2017, 57: 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  38. Matsiko A, Levingstone T J, O’Brien F J, et al. Addition of hyaluronic acid improves cellular infiltration and promotes early-stage chondrogenesis in a collagen-based scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. J Mech Behav BioMed Mater, 2012, 11: 41–52

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yang Q, Peng J, Guo Q, et al. A cartilage ECM-derived 3-D porous acellular matrix scaffold for in vivo cartilage tissue engineering with PKH26-labeled chondrogenic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials, 2008, 29: 2378–2387

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zheng X F, Lu S B, Zhang W G, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells on a decellularized cartilage matrix for cartilage tissue engineering. Biotechnol Bioproc E, 2011, 16: 593–602

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zheng X, Yang F, Wang S, et al. Fabrication and cell affinity of biomimetic structured PLGA/articular cartilage ECM composite scaffold. J Mater Sci-Mater Med, 2011, 22: 693–704

    Google Scholar 

  42. Yang F, Qu X, Cui W, et al. Manufacturing and morphology structure of polylactide-type microtubules orientation-structured scaffolds. Biomaterials, 2006, 27: 4923–4933

    Google Scholar 

  43. Harley B A, Lynn A K, Wissner-Gross Z, et al. Design of a multiphase osteochondral scaffold III: Fabrication of layered scaffolds with continuous interfaces. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009, 9999A: NA

  44. McNamara S L, Rnjak-Kovacina J, Schmidt D F, et al. Silk as a biocohesive sacrificial binder in the fabrication of hydroxyapatite load bearing scaffolds. Biomaterials, 2014, 35: 6941–6953

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lu S, Lam J, Trachtenberg J E, et al. Dual growth factor delivery from bilayered, biodegradable hydrogel composites for spatially-guided osteochondral tissue repair. Biomaterials, 2014, 35: 8829–8839

    Google Scholar 

  46. Radhakrishnan J, Manigandan A, Chinnaswamy P, et al. Gradient nano-engineered in situ forming composite hydrogel for osteochondral regeneration. Biomaterials, 2018, 162: 82–98

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sophia Fox A J, Bedi A, Rodeo S A. The basic science of articular cartilage: Structure, composition, and function. Sports Health, 2009, 1: 461–468

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang Q, Lu H, Kawazoe N, et al. Pore size effect of collagen scaffolds on cartilage regeneration. Acta Biomater, 2014, 10: 2005–2013

    Google Scholar 

  49. Huang J, Xia X, Zou Q, et al. The long-term behaviors and differences in bone reconstruction of three polymer-based scaffolds with different degradability. J Mater Chem B, 2019, 7: 7690–7703

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ribeiro V P, Pina S, Costa J B, et al. Enzymatically cross-linked silk fibroin-based hierarchical scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11: 3781–3799

    Google Scholar 

  51. Drury J L, Mooney D J. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: Scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials, 2003, 24: 4337–4351

    Google Scholar 

  52. Madry H, van Dijk C N, Mueller-Gerbl M. The basic science of the subchondral bone. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010, 18: 419–433

    Google Scholar 

  53. Song X, Zhu C, Fan D, et al. A novel human-like collagen hydrogel scaffold with porous structure and sponge-like properties. Polymers, 2017, 9: 638

    Google Scholar 

  54. Naseri N, Poirier J M, Girandon L, et al. 3-Dimensional porous nanocomposite scaffolds based on cellulose nanofibers for cartilage tissue engineering: Tailoring of porosity and mechanical performance. RSC Adv, 2016, 6: 5999–6007

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wu X, Liu Y, Li X, et al. Preparation of aligned porous gelatin scaffolds by unidirectional freeze-drying method. Acta Biomater, 2010, 6: 1167–1177

    Google Scholar 

  56. Murphy C M, Schindeler A, Gleeson J P, et al. A collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold allows for binding and co-delivery of recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins and bisphosphonates. Acta Biomater, 2014, 10: 2250–2258

    Google Scholar 

  57. Gleeson J P, Plunkett N A, O’Brien F J. Addition of hydroxyapatite improves stiffness, interconnectivity and osteogenic potential of a highly porous collagen-based scaffold for bone tissue regeneration. eCM, 2010, 20: 218–230

    Google Scholar 

  58. Vines J B, Lim D J, Anderson J M, et al. Hydroxyapatite nanoparticle reinforced peptide amphiphile nanomatrix enhances the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by compositional ratios. Acta Biomater, 2012, 8: 4053–4063

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to XiaoXuan Ma or DaiDi Fan.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFA0905200), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21838009, 21878247, and 21676214) and the Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Degradable Biomedical Materials Program (Grant No. 17JS124).

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, K., Liu, Y., Duan, Z. et al. A biomimetic bi-layered tissue engineering scaffolds for osteochondral defects repair. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 64, 793–805 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1597-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1597-4

Keywords

Navigation