Skip to main content
Log in

A 3D elastic-plastic-viscous constitutive model for soils considering the stress path dependency

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to consider the stress path dependency of soils, this paper decomposes any arbitrary stress path into several infinitesimal stress paths. Then the infinitesimal stress path is further transformed into the superposition of two parts, i.e., a constant stress ratio part and a constant mean stress part, which are sufficiently close to the real stress path. The plastic strain increments under the transformed paths are determined separately, and then the plastic strain under any path is obtained. Based on the instantaneous loading line of normally consolidated soil, a reference state line is proposed to determine the overconsolidation ratio and creep time of soil. The overconsolidation ratio is introduced into the viscous flow rule to obtain the viscous strain increment. The stress-strain-time relationship for triaxial compression condition is extended to 3D stress condition by the transformed stress method. The proposed model adopts only seven material parameters and each of them has a clear physical meaning. Comparisons with test results demonstrate that the model can not only reasonably predict the plastic strain under typical stress paths of excavation, but adequately capture the time-dependent behaviours of soils, including creep, stress relaxation and strain rate effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liingaard M, Augustesen A, Lade P V. Characterization of models for time-dependent behavior of soils. Int J GeoMech, 2004, 4: 157–177

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yao Y P, Kong L M, Zhou A N, et al. Time-dependent unified hardening model: Three-dimensional elastoviscoplastic constitutive model for clays. J Eng Mech, 2015, 141: 04014162

    Google Scholar 

  3. Qiao Y, Ferrari A, Laloui L, et al. Nonstationary flow surface theory for modeling the viscoplastic behaviors of soils. Comput Geotech, 2016, 76: 105–119

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Z, Wong R C K. Strain-dependent and stress-dependent creep model for a till subject to triaxial compression. Int J Geomech, 2016, 16: 04015084

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feng W Q, Lalit B, Yin Z Y, et al. Long-term non-linear creep and swelling behavior of Hong Kong marine deposits in oedometer condition. Comput Geotech, 2017, 84: 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yuan Y, Whittle A J. A novel elasto-viscoplastic formulation for compression behaviour of clays. Géotechnique, 2018, 68: 1044–1055

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou H W, Wang C P, Han B B, et al. A creep constitutive model for salt rock based on fractional derivatives. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 2011, 48: 116–121

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ma B, Muhunthan B, Xie X. Stress history effects on 1-D consolidation of soft soils: A rheological model. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech, 2013, 37: 2671–2689

    Google Scholar 

  9. Madaschi A, Gajo A. A one-dimensional viscoelastic and viscoplastic constitutive approach to modeling the delayed behavior of clay and organic soils. Acta Geotech, 2017, 12: 827–847

    Google Scholar 

  10. Di Prisco C, Imposimato S, Vardoulakis I. Mechanical modelling of drained creep triaxial tests on loose sand. Géotechnique, 2000, 50: 73–82

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tong X, Tuan C Y. Viscoplastic cap model for soils under high strain rate loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2007, 133: 206–214

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yin Z Y, Chang C S, Karstunen M, et al. An anisotropic elasticviscoplastic model for soft clays. Int J Solids Struct, 2010, 47: 665–677

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Yin Z Y, Karstunen M, Hicher P Y. Evaluation of the influence of elasto-viscoplastic scaling functions on modelling time-dependent behaviour of natural clays. Soils Found, 2010, 50: 203–214

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yin Z Y, Karstunen M, Chang C S, et al. Modeling time-dependent behavior of soft sensitive clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2011, 137: 1103–1113

    Google Scholar 

  15. Desai C S, Sane S, Jenson J. Constitutive modeling including creep- and rate-dependent behavior and testing of glacial tills for prediction of motion of glaciers. Int J Geomech, 2011, 11: 465–476

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maranha J R, Pereira C, Vieira A. A viscoplastic subloading soil model for rate-dependent cyclic anisotropic structured behaviour. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech, 2016, 40: 1531–1555

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang S, Wu W, Yin Z Y, et al. Modelling the time-dependent behaviour of granular material with hypoplasticity. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech, 2018, 42: 1331–1345

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhu J G. Experimental study and elastic visco-plastic modelling of the time dependent behavior of Hong Kong marine deposits. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cuvilliez S, Djouadi I, Raude S, et al. An elastoviscoplastic constitutive model for geomaterials: Application to hydromechanical modelling of claystone response to drift excavation. Comput Geotech, 2017, 85: 321–340

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang J, Ling H I, Kaliakin V N, et al. Evaluation of an anisotropic elastoplastic-viscoplastic bounding surface model for clays. Acta Geotech, 2017, 12: 335–348

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leoni M, Karstunen M, Vermeer P A. Anisotropic creep model for soft soils. Géotechnique, 2008, 58: 215–226

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rezania M, Taiebat M, Poletti E. A viscoplastic SANICLAY model for natural soft soils. Comput Geotech, 2016, 73: 128–141

    Google Scholar 

  23. Islam M N, Gnanendran C T. Elastic-viscoplastic model for clays: Development, validation, and application. J Eng Mech, 2017, 143: 04017121

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bodas Freitas T M, Potts D M, Zdravkovic L. A time dependent constitutive model for soils with isotach viscosity. Comput Geotech, 2011, 38: 809–820

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kong Y, Xu M, Song E. An elastic-viscoplastic double-yield-surface model for coarse-grained soils considering particle breakage. Comput Geotech, 2017, 85: 59–70

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schanz T, Vermeer P A, Bonnier P G. The hardening soil model: Formulation and verification. In: Proceedings of International Symptom Beyond 2000 in Computational Geotechnics-10 Years of Plaxis International. Rotterdam, 1999. 1–16

  27. Debernardi D, Barla G. New viscoplastic model for design analysis of tunnels in squeezing conditions. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2009, 42: 259–288

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sekiguchi H. Theory of undrained creep rupture of normally consolidated clay based on elasto-viscoplasticity. Soils Found, 1984, 24: 129–147

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cassiani G, Brovelli A, Hueckel T. A strain-rate-dependent modified Cam-Clay model for the simulation of soil/rock compaction. Geo-Mech Energy Environ, 2017, 11: 42–51

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yin Z Y, Hicher P Y. Identifying parameters controlling soil delayed behaviour from laboratory and in situ pressuremeter testing. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech, 2008, 32: 1515–1535

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Qu G, Hinchberger S D, Lo K Y. Evaluation of the viscous behaviour of clay using generalised overstress viscoplastic theory. Géotechnique, 2010, 60: 777–789

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yin J H, Zhu J G, Graham J. A new elastic viscoplastic model for time-dependent behaviour of normally and overconsolidated clays: Theory and verification. Can Geotech J, 2002, 39: 157–173

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kelln C, Sharma J, Hughes D, et al. An improved elastic-viscoplastic soil model. Can Geotech J, 2008, 45: 1356–1376

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nakai T. An isotropic hardening elastoplastic model for sand considering the stress path dependency in three-dimensional stresses.. Soils Found, 1989, 29: 119–137

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yao Y P, Sun D A, Matsuoka H. A unified constitutive model for both clay and sand with hardening parameter independent on stress path. Comput Geotech, 2008, 35: 210–222

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lu D C. A constitutive model for soils considering complex stress paths based on the generalized nonlinear strength theory (in Chinese). Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Beijing: Beihang University, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  37. Xiao Y, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. Bounding surface plasticity model incorporating the state pressure index for rockfill materials. J Eng Mech, 2004, 140: 04014087

    Google Scholar 

  38. Xiao Y, Liu H. Elastoplastic constitutive model for rockfill materials considering particle breakage. Int J Geomech, 2017, 17: 04016041

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yao Y, Lu D, Zhou A, et al. Generalized non-linear strength theory and transformed stress space. Sci China Ser E-Tech Sci, 2004, 47: 691–709

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Šuklje L. The analysis of the consolidation process by the isotaches method. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. London, 1957. 200–206

  41. Leroueil S. Šuklje memorial lecture: The isotache approach. Where are we 50 years after its development by Professor Šuklje? In: Proceedings of the 13th Danube-European Conference on Geotechnical Engineering. Ljubljana, 2006. 55–88

  42. Bjerrum L. Engineering geology of Norwegian normally-consolidated marine clays as related to settlements of buildings. Géotechnique, 1967, 17: 83–118

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tatsuoka F, Di Benedetto H, Enomoto T, et al. Various viscosity types of geomaterials in shear and their mathematical expression. Soils Found, 2008, 48: 41–60

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yin Z Y, Jin Y F, Shen J S, et al. Optimization techniques for identifying soil parameters in geotechnical engineering: Comparative study and enhancement. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech, 2018, 42: 70–94

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jin Y F, Yin Z Y, Zhou W H, et al. A single-objective EPR based model for creep index of soft clays considering L2 regularization. Eng Geol, 2019, 248: 242–255

    Google Scholar 

  46. Nakai T, Hinokio M. A simple elastoplastic model for normally and over consolidated soils with unified material parameters. Soils Found, 2004, 44: 53–70

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nakai T, Matsuoka H. A generalized elastoplastic constitutive model for clay in three-dimensional stresses. Soils Found, 1986, 26: 81–98

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kiyota T, Tatsuoka F. Viscous property of loose sand in triaxial compression, extension and cyclic loading. Soils Found, 2006, 46: 665–684

    Google Scholar 

  49. Yin Z Y, Yin J H, Huang H W. Rate-dependent and long-term yield stress and strength of soft Wenzhou marine clay: Experiments and modeling. Mar Georesources Geotech, 2015, 33: 79–91

    Google Scholar 

  50. Lacerda W A. Stress-relaxation and creep effects on soil deformation. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Berkeley: University of California, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lu D C, Miao J B, Du X L, et al. A new method of developing elastic-plastic-viscous constitutive model for clays. Sci China Tech Sci, 2019, 62: doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-018-9469-9

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to XiuLi Du.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U1839201, 51778026, 51421005 & 51538001).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, D., Miao, J., Du, X. et al. A 3D elastic-plastic-viscous constitutive model for soils considering the stress path dependency. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 63, 791–808 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-9536-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-9536-y

Keywords

Navigation